Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Evaluación por competencias a través de un med basado en juegos serios en la práctica de la asignatura de control automatizado y robótica en la Universidad Militar Nueva Granada

dc.contributor.advisorRozo García, Hugo Alexander
dc.contributor.authorVega Angulo, Hugo Esteban
dc.date.accessioned2019-01-17T15:11:35Z
dc.date.available2019-01-17T15:11:35Z
dc.date.issued2018-11-01
dc.identifier.citationAlabbadi, M M. (2010). MobiQiyas: A Mobile Learning Standardized Test Preparation for Saudi Arabian Students. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies 4(4): 4–11. doi:10.3991/ijim.v4i4.1446
dc.identifier.citationAmasha, M., & Alkhalaf, S. (2015). The Effect of using Facebook Markup Language (FBML) for Designing an ELearning Model in Higher Education. International Journal of Research in Computer Science, 4(5), 1-9.
dc.identifier.citationArredondo, S C. (2002). Compromisos de La Evaluación Educativa. Pearson Educación. https://books.google.com.co/books?id=isGs4XJzgroC.
dc.identifier.citationBarry, Shane. (2012). “A Video Recording and Viewing Protocol for Student Group Presentations : Assisting SelfAssessment through a Wiki Environment.” Computers & Education 59(3): 855–60.
dc.identifier.citationBelland, B.R, Walker, A.E, Olsen W.M and Leary H. (2015). A Pilot Meta-Analysis of Computer-Based Scaffolding in STEM Education A Pilot Meta-Analysis of Computer-Based Scaffolding in STEM Education. International Forum of Educational Technology & Society 18(1): 183–97.
dc.identifier.citationBernard, R M, E Borokhovski, R F Schmid, and R M Tamim. (2014). An Exploration of Bias in Meta-Analysis: The Case of Technology Integration Research in Higher Education. Journal of Computing in Higher Education 26(3): 183–209.
dc.identifier.citationBordas, M. Inmaculada, and Flor Cabrera. (2001). Estrategias de Evaluación de Los Aprendizajes Centrados En El Proceso. Revista Española de Pedagogía 59(218): 25–48. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23765840?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
dc.identifier.citationBuente, W., Winter, J. S., Kramer, H., Dalisay, F., Hill, Y. Z., & Buskirk, P. A. (2015). Program-Based Assessment of Capstone ePortfolios for a Communication BA Curriculum. International Journal of ePortfolio, 5(2), 169-179.
dc.identifier.citationChapelle, C. A., & Voss, E. (2016). 20 years of technology and language assessment in Language Learning & Technology.” Language Learning & Technology 20(2): 116–28
dc.identifier.citationCorn, Jenifer O’sullivan. (2006). Investigating the Validity and Reliability of the School Technology Needs Assessment (STNA).American Evaluation Association, Baltimore: 30.
dc.identifier.citationCusi, Annalisa, Francesca Morselli, and Cristina Sabena. (2013). The Use of Technology in Formative Assessment to Raise Achievement. FaSMEd. Position paper.
dc.identifier.citationDochy, Filip, Mien R.Segers, and Sabine Dierick. (2002). Nuevas Vías de Aprendizaje y Enseñanza y Sus Consecuencias: Una Nueva Era de Evaluación. Revista de Docencia Universitaria; 2 (2): 20-57
dc.identifier.citationEsteve Mon, Francesc M, and Mercè Gisbert Cervet. (2011). El Nuevo Paradigma de Aprendizaje y Nuevas Tecnologías. REDU. Revista de Docencia Universitaria 9(3): 55–73
dc.identifier.citationFerenchick, G. S., Solomon, D., Foreback, J., Towfiq, B., Kavanaugh, K., Warbasse, L., ... & Mohmand, A. (2013). Mobile technology for the facilitation of direct observation and assessment of student performance. Teaching and learning in medicine, 25(4): 292-299.
dc.identifier.citationFink, A. (2013). Conducting Research Literature Reviews: From the Internet to Paper. SAGE Publications. https://books.google.com.co/books?id=Dg5zAwAAQBAJ.
dc.identifier.citationGarcía-Jiménez, E. (2015). Assessment of learning: From feedback to self-regulation. The role of technologies. Electronic Journal of Educational Research, Assessment & Evaluation, 21(2).
dc.identifier.citationGarcía-Valcárcel, Ana, Basilotta Verónica, and Camino López Salamanca. (2014). Las TIC En El Aprendizaje Colaborativo En El Aula de Primaria y Secundaria. Revista Científica de Educomunicación 21: 65-74.
dc.identifier.citationGacía, J., Demetrio, S., Hambleton, R., & Guzman, E. (2015). Guest editorial: Technology supported assessment in formal and informal learning. Educational Technology and Society, 18(2), 1-2.
dc.identifier.citationGautreau, C. (2011). Motivational factors affecting the integration of a learning management system by faculty. Journal of Educators Online, 8(1)
dc.identifier.citationGough, D., Thomas, J., & Oliver, S. (2012). Clarifying differences between review designs and methods. Systematic reviews, 1(1), 28.
dc.identifier.citationHersh, M. (2014). Evaluation Framework for ICT-Based Learning Technologies for Disabled People. Computers & Education 78: 30–47. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.05.001.
dc.identifier.citationHu, C. (2016). Application of e-learning assessment based on AHP-BP algorithm in the cloud computing teaching platform. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 11(08), 27-32
dc.identifier.citationIzquierdo, B. (2008). De la evaluación clásica a la evaluación pluralista: criterios para clasificar los distintos tipos de evaluación. Empiria: Revista de metodología de ciencias sociales, (16), 115-134.
dc.identifier.citationJagodziński, P., & Wolski, R. (2015). Assessment of application technology of natural user interfaces in the creation of a virtual chemical laboratory. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 24(1), 16-28.
dc.identifier.citationKim, M. K., Zouaq, A., & Kim, S. M. (2016). Automatic detection of expert models: The exploration of expert modeling methods applicable to technology-based assessment and instruction. Computers & Education, 101, 55-69.
dc.identifier.citationKleij, Fabienne M Van Der, Theo J H M Eggen, Caroline F Timmers, and Bernard P Veldkamp. (2012). Effects of feedback in a computer-based assessment for learning. Computers & Education, 58(1), 263-272
dc.identifier.citationKuo-Hung, C., Kuo-En, C., Chung-Hsien, L., & Yao-Ting, S. (2016). Integration of mobile AR technology in performance assessment. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 19(4), 239
dc.identifier.citationMaas, N. A., & Flood, L. S. (2011). Implementing high-fidelity simulation in practical nursing education. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 7(6), e229-e235.
dc.identifier.citationMartín Gámez, C., Ruiz Mora, A. B., & Ruiz-Mora, I. (2015). The blog for the acquisition of professional competences in higher education. [El blog para la adquisición de competencias profesionales en la enseñanza superior] Opcion, 31(Special Issue 2), 730-752
dc.identifier.citationMathrani, A., Shelly, C., & Ponder-Sutton, A. (2016). PlayIT: game based learning approach for teaching programming concepts. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 19(2), 5.
dc.identifier.citationMoreno, G., Gómez-escalonilla, M., & Durán G. (2011). Students' perspective on on-line college education in the field of journalism. Revista Comunicar, 19(37), 73-80
dc.identifier.citationMsila, V. (2014). Assessment in a Transforming Higher Learning Institution: A Case for Open-Book Examinations. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 5(14), 365.
dc.identifier.citationMuñoz, J. M. (2008). NNTT, TIC, NTIC, TAC... en educación¿ pero esto qué es. Quaderns digitals: Revista de Nuevas Tecnologías y Sociedad, 51, 43-60.
dc.identifier.citationNavazesh, M., Rich, S. K., & Tiber, A. (2014). The rationale for and implementation of learner-centered education: experiences at the Ostrow School of Dentistry of the University of Southern California. Journal of dental education, 78(2), 165-180..
dc.identifier.citationNga, I. Chan, J., Kong, S., & Leung, K. (2016). Effectiveness and Obstacle of Using Facebook as a Tool to Facilitate Student-Centred Learning in Higher Education. In Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 17(2), 2-10
dc.identifier.citationPásztor, A., Molnár, G., & Csapó, B. (2015). Technology-based assessment of creativity in educational context: the case of divergent thinking and its relation to mathematical achievement. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 18, 32-42
dc.identifier.citationPirnay-Dummer, P., Ifenthaler, D., & Spector, J. M. (2010). Highly integrated model assessment technology and tools. Educational Technology Research and Development, 58(1), 3-18..
dc.identifier.citationRied, L. (2010). A distance education course in statistics. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 74(9), 172.
dc.identifier.citationRitchie, S. (2016). Self-assessment of video-recorded presentations: Does it improve skills?. Active Learning in Higher Education, 17(3), 207-221.
dc.identifier.citationRust, C. (2002). The impact of assessment on student learning: How can the research literature practically help to inform the development of departmental assessment strategies and learner-centred assessment practices?. Active learning in higher education, 3(2), 145-158.
dc.identifier.citationRyan, B. J. (2013). Line up, line up: using technology to align and enhance peer learning and assessment in a student centred foundation organic chemistry module. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 14(3),229-238.
dc.identifier.citationSaid, H., Kirgis, L., Verkamp, B., & Johnson, L. (2015). On-line vs. face-to-face delivery of information technology courses: Students’ assessment. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 14, 297-312.
dc.identifier.citationSánchez, M., Espinosa, M., & Fernández, J. (2013). Tecnologías semánticas para la evaluación en red: análisis de una experiencia con la herramienta OeLE. Revista de Investigación Educativa, 31(2), 447–64.
dc.identifier.citationShih, R. C. (2011). Can Web 2.0 technology assist college students in learning English writing? Integrating Facebook and peer assessment with blended learning. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 27(5).
dc.identifier.citationSingh, L. (2013). Guided Assessment or Open Discourse: A Comparative Analysis of Students Interaction on Facebook Groups. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 14(1), 35-43.
dc.identifier.citationSummak, M. S., Samancioğlu, M., & Bağlibel, M. (2010). Technology integration and assesment in educational settings. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 1725-1729.
dc.identifier.citationTaras, M. (2010). Assessment for learning: assessing the theory and evidence. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 3015-3022.
dc.identifier.citationvan Niekerk, E., Ankiewicz, P., & de Swardt, E. (2010). A process-based assessment framework for technology education: a case study. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 20(2), 191-215.
dc.identifier.citationVan Rooij, S. W. (2010). Higher Education and FOSS for e-Learning: The Role of Organizational Sub-cultures in Enterprise-wide Adoption. International Journal of Open Source Software and Processes (IJOSSP), 2(1), 15-31.
dc.identifier.citationWakimoto, D. K., & Lewis, R. E. (2014). Graduate student perceptions of eportfolios: Uses for reflection, development, and assessment. The Internet and Higher Education, 21, 53-58.
dc.identifier.citationWang, S. (2014). The college physical education teaching evaluation based on the Fuzzy AHP-Entropy and the computer simulation. International Journal of Multimedia and Ubiquitous Engineering, 9(10), 45-56
dc.identifier.citationWilliams, K., Wryobeck, J., Edinger, W., McGrady, A., Fors, U., & Zary, N. (2011). Assessment of competencies by use of virtual patient technology. Academic Psychiatry, 35(5), 328-330.
dc.identifier.citationWilson, M., Gochyyev, P., & Scalise, K. (2016). Assessment of Learning in Digital Interactive Social Networks: A Learning Analytics Approach. Online Learning, 20(2), 97-119
dc.identifier.citationYuretich, R. F., & Kanner, L. C. (2015). Examining the effectiveness of team-based learning (TBL) in different classroom settings. Journal of Geoscience education, 63(2), 147-156.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10818/34594
dc.description16 páginases_CO
dc.description.abstractEl presente artículo tiene como propósito develar las estrategias de evaluación mediadas por TIC, de acuerdo con una revisión sistemática de literatura. Para el caso particular se tuvo en cuenta las tendencias, usos, tipos de evaluación y herramientas que se han utilizado en los últimos años para mediar o para apoyar los procesos evaluativos. Como evidencia principal, es notorio que el uso de TIC en los procesos de evaluación ha tomado fuerza gradualmente, así como su interacción frente a las diferentes metodologías que toman parte en estos procesos. Sin embargo, aún existen contrastes en donde la tecnología no es tenida en consideración del docente, sin darle importancia en procesos de enseñanza-aprendizaje y evaluación.es_CO
dc.formatapplication/pdfes_CO
dc.language.isospaes_CO
dc.publisherUniversidad de La Sabanaes_CO
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.sourceUniversidad de La Sabana
dc.sourceIntellectum Repositorio Universidad de La Sabana
dc.subjectEvaluaciónes_CO
dc.subjectEducación -- Estudio y enseñanzaes_CO
dc.subjectInnovaciones tecnológicases_CO
dc.subjectPlanificación educativaes_CO
dc.titleEvaluación por competencias a través de un med basado en juegos serios en la práctica de la asignatura de control automatizado y robótica en la Universidad Militar Nueva Granadaes_CO
dc.typemasterThesises_CO
dc.publisher.programMaestría en Informática Educativaes_CO
dc.publisher.departmentCentro de Tecnologías para la Academiaes_CO
dc.identifier.local270177
dc.identifier.localTE09949
dc.type.hasVersionpublishedVersiones_CO
dc.rights.accessRightsrestrictedAccesses_CO
dc.creator.degreeMagíster en Informática Educativaes_CO


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail
Nombre:
Artículo Tesis - Hugo Vega.pdf
Tamaño:
417.2Kb
Formato:
PDF
Descripción:
Ver documento en PDF
Ver/

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 InternationalExcepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International