Show simple item record

Improving third graders’ writing skills through the process writing approach

dc.contributor.advisorAcero Ríos, Claudia Lucía
dc.contributor.authorDoncel Rizo, Carmen Edith
dc.date.accessioned2014-11-13T16:11:31Z
dc.date.available2014-11-13T16:11:31Z
dc.date.created2014
dc.date.issued2014-11-13
dc.identifier.citationAnthony, A. (2014, January 17). http://everydaylife.globalpost.com. Retrieved from http://everydaylife.globalpost.com/writing-techniques-elementary-school-students- 9911.html>n.d.
dc.identifier.citationArmstrong, T. (1998). Awakening Genius in the Classroom. Alexandria, VA: Library of Congress Cataloging-in- Publication Data.
dc.identifier.citationBachman, L. (1991). What does language testing have to offer? TESOL Quarterly 25(4)., 671-704.
dc.identifier.citationBailey, K. M. (1984). Learning about Language Assessment: Dilemmas, Decisions, and Directions. California: Heinle & Heinle Publishers.
dc.identifier.citationBandura, A. and Schunk, D. H. (1981). Cultivating competence, self-efficacy, and intrinsic interest through proximal self-motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41., 586-598.
dc.identifier.citationBiber G., Conrad, S. and Leech G. (2002). Student Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Pearson Educational Limited
dc.identifier.citationBoyle, J. R., and Weishaar, M. . (1997). The effects of expert-generated versus studentgenerated cognitive organizers on the reading comprehension of students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 12 (4)., 228-235
dc.identifier.citationButler, J. L. (1999). Starting on the write foot: Helping parents understand how children learn to read and write. Guilford, CN.: McGraw-Hill/Dushkin.
dc.identifier.citationCameron, L. (2001). Teaching Languages to Young Learners. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
dc.identifier.citationCandy, P. C. (1991). Self-direction for Lifelong Learning. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers
dc.identifier.citationCarolina, T. U. (2014, February 20). The Writing Center. Retrieved from Brainstorming: http://writingcenter.unc.edu/handouts/brainstorming
dc.identifier.citationCarter, R. &. (2006). Cambridge Grammar of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
dc.identifier.citationChunling S., a. G. (2009). Process Approach to Teaching Writing Applied in Different Teaching Models. English Language Teaching., Vol. 2 (1) p.150.
dc.identifier.citationCook, V. (2001). Second language learning and language teaching. . New York: Oxford University Press. 3rd edition
dc.identifier.citationCouncil of Europe. (2002). Common reference levels. Common European framework of reference for languages: B1 Proficiency Level. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
dc.identifier.citationCraig, A. &. (2006, January 5). Fear of speaking: chronic anxiety and stammering. Advances in Psychiatric Treatment., 63-68. Retrieved from Fear of speaking: chronic anxiety and stammering. http://apt.rcpsych.org/content/12/1/63.full
dc.identifier.citationDaniel, J. h. (2002). The Process Writing Method. The Internet TESOL Journal, Vol. VIII, No. 7, July.
dc.identifier.citationDiCecco, V.M. and Gleason, M.M. (2002). Using graphic organizers to attain relational knowledge from expository text. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 35. 306-321.
dc.identifier.citationFormation, I. I. (2007). Practicum of The Educator’s Curriculum Guide. Second Language. Grade 3rd. Mexico: Publishers
dc.identifier.citationGaffield-Vile, N. (1998). Creative Writing in the ELT Classroom. Modern English . Teacher Journal 7. 31-36.
dc.identifier.citationGlaser, B. (1992). Basics of grounded theory analysis. Mill Valley, CA.: Sociology Press.
dc.identifier.citationGoldstein, A. and Carr, G. (1996). Can Students Benefit from Process Writing? NAEPfacts, v1 n3 Apr.
dc.identifier.citationHadley, A. (2003). Teaching Language in Context. Boston.: Heinle & Heinle.
dc.identifier.citationHalliday, M. (1985). Spoken and Written Language. Deakin: Deakin University Press (Language & Learning).
dc.identifier.citationHarmer, J. (2001). The practice of English Language Teaching. Popular Methodology, A4 Communicative Approach. Harlow, England.: Logman, Third Edition.
dc.identifier.citationHiemstra, R. (1991). Creating Environments for Effective Adult Learning (New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, No. 50). San Francisco, California.: JosseyBass Publishers.
dc.identifier.citationHomstad, T., & Thorson, H. Technical Report Series No. 8. (1994). Writing Theory and Practice in the Second Language Classroom: A Selected Annotated Biography”. Minneapolis, MN.: University of Minnesota
dc.identifier.citationJensen, E. (1998). The Learning Brain. . Del Mar, CA: Turning Point Publishing.
dc.identifier.citationKauchak, D. Eggen, P. . (1989). Learning and Teaching: Research based Methods. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon Publishing.
dc.identifier.citationKondrat, A. (2009, March 24). Retrieved from http://www.suite101.com/content/importance-of-good-writing-and-reading-skillsa97681&gt.
dc.identifier.citationKrashen, S. D. (1984). Writing: Research, theory and applications. Oxford: Pergamon Institute of English
dc.identifier.citationLarsen-Freeman, D. (2003). Teaching Language: From Grammar to Grammarian. Canada: Thomson-Heinle.
dc.identifier.citationLarsen-Freeman, D. (2003). Teaching Language: From Grammar to Grammarian. Toronto, Can.: Thomson-Heinle.
dc.identifier.citationLene, J. (2009, September 5). http://www.classicalwriting.com. Retrieved from http://www.classicalwriting.com/blog/2009/09/05/the-importance-of-outlining/.
dc.identifier.citationLinse, C. (2005). Practical English language teaching: Young Learners. New York: McGraw-Hill.
dc.identifier.citationLittle, D. (1991). Learner autonomy 1: Definitions, issues andproblems. Dublin.: Authentik.
dc.identifier.citationLynn, S. C. (2010). Rhetoric and Composition: An Introduction. Cambrige: Cambridge Univ. Press.
dc.identifier.citationMaxwell, J. A. (1992). Understanding and Validity in Qualitative Research. Boston, MA: Harvard Educational.
dc.identifier.citationMcKensie, L. a. (1984). Evaluating Students' Writing: A Process Approach. Journal of Teaching Writing, v3 n2 .
dc.identifier.citationMelgarejo, D. (2009). Assessing Children´s Perceptions of Writing in EFL based on the process approach. Colomb. Appl. Linguist. J. Number 12 • ISSN 0123-4641, 70-84.
dc.identifier.citationMiller, W. S. (2000). Strategies for developing emergent literacy. Boston, M.A.: McGrawHill
dc.identifier.citationNunan, D. (1991). Language Teaching Methodology: a textbook for Teachers. New York, NY: Prentice Hall
dc.identifier.citationNunan, D. (2011). Teaching English to Young Learners. Assessment and evaluation. Anaheim, CA.: Anaheim University Press
dc.identifier.citationOxford, R. (1990). Language Learning Strategies: What Every Teacher Should Know. Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
dc.identifier.citationPinter, A. (2006). Teaching young language learners. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
dc.identifier.citationRichards, J. (1990). New Trends in the Teaching of Writing in ESL/ EFL in Wang Z. (ed.). Beijing. ELT in China. Papers Presented at the International Symposium on Teaching English Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press,.
dc.identifier.citationRichards, J. C. (2006). Communicative language teaching today. New York. New York: Cambridge University Press.
dc.identifier.citationSasaki, M. (1996). Second Language Proficiency. Foreign Language Aptitude and Intelligence: Quantitative and Qualitative Analyses. New York: Peter Lang
dc.identifier.citationSavignon, S. J. (2002). Communicative language teaching: Linguistic theory and classroom practice. . New Haven, CT.: Yale University Press.
dc.identifier.citationSchmuck, R. A. (1997). Practical action research for change. Arlington Heights, IL: Skylight Professional Development.
dc.identifier.citationSeow, A. (2002). The writing process and process writing. In j. a. Richards, Methodology in language teaching: An anthology of current practice (pp. 315-320). USA: Cambridge University Press.
dc.identifier.citationSteele, V. P. (2010, March 17). www.teachingenglish.org.uk. Retrieved from http://www.teachingenglish.org.uk/article/product-process-writing-a-comparison.
dc.identifier.citationStrauss, A., and Corbin, J. (1990). Grounded Theory, Procedures and techniques. Basics of qualitative research. Londo, U.K: Seage Publications.
dc.identifier.citationTabbert, R. (1984). Parsing the Question “Why Teach Grammar?". The English Journal. Vol. 73, 38-42
dc.identifier.citationTomlinson, B. (2010). Principles and procedures for self-access materials. Studies in SelfAccess Learning Journal, 1(2), 72-86.
dc.identifier.citationUniversity, W. (2014, February 22 ). Outlining Section. Paragraph 1. Retrieved from http://academicanswers.waldenu.edu/search.php
dc.identifier.citationViáfara, J. (2008). From pre-school to university: student-teachers’ characterize their EFL writing development. Colomb. Appl. Linguist. J. 10, 73 - 92.
dc.identifier.citationWesche, M. (1983). Communicative testing in a second language. Modern Language Journal, 67(1), 41-54.
dc.identifier.citationWhitaker, A. (2009). A Step by Step Guide to Writing Academic Papers. Seattle, WA: City University of Seattle
dc.identifier.citationWhite, R., and Arnold, V. (1991). Process writing. London, U.K: Longman.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10818/12440
dc.description99 Páginas.
dc.description.abstractEste un estudio de acción investigación que examinó cómo mejorar las habilidades de escritura de los estudiantes de grado tercero, implementando en el proceso de escritura los tres primeros pasos que de aquí en adelante denominará PW (lluvia de ideas, estructurar ideas y primer borrador) favoreciendo el desarrollo de las habilidades de escritura en un grupo de niños aprendices en un colegio bilingüe en Bogotá, Colombia. Este estudio examina cómo enseñarles habilidades de lenguaje a niños aprendices, la importancia de la estructura de la lengua (precisión y coherencia), y, el enfoque de escritura. Durante la etapa de implementación, los datos fueron recogidos por medio de gráficos organizadores, exámenes y un foro de participación. El análisis de este proceso de escritura con estudiantes del grado tercero reveló tres hallazgos importantes: primero, la importancia de planear antes de escribir; segundo, usar la motivación como una estrategia para ayudarle a los estudiantes a organizar ideas y enfocarse para lograr una finalizar una tarea de escritura; y, tercero, expresar ideas usando un lenguaje claro y efectivo. En general, las habilidades de escritura de los niños de tercero mejoraron significativamente, además se concientizaron de completar los trece pasos que conforman el ciclo de escritura. En este estudio la investigadora fue capaz de ver la influencia del enfoque del proceso de escritura por medio de la evaluación centrada en cómo los niños organizaban su conocimiento, se enfocaban y expresaban sus ideas usando un lenguaje claro y efectivo.es_CO
dc.language.isoenges_CO
dc.publisherUniversidad de La Sabana
dc.sourceUniversidad de La Sabana
dc.sourceIntellectum Repositorio Universidad de La Sabana
dc.subjectIngles -- Enseñanza
dc.subjectEscritura -- Inglés -- Colombia
dc.subjectAprendizaje -- Inglés -- Colombia
dc.titleImproving third graders’ writing skills through the process writing approaches_CO
dc.typemasterThesis
dc.publisher.programMaestría en Didáctica del Inglés para el Aprendizaje Autodirigido
dc.publisher.departmentDepartamento de Lenguas y Culturas Extranjeras
dc.type.localTesis de maestría
dc.type.hasVersionpublishedVersion
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccess
dc.creator.degreeMagíster en Didáctica del Inglés para el Aprendizaje Autodirigido


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Carmen Edith Doncel Rizo (tesi ...
Size:
2.024Mb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Ver documento en PDF
View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record