Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorShepherd, David
dc.contributor.authorTinoco Restrepo, Katya Bibiana
dc.date.accessioned2013-04-04T15:17:04Z
dc.date.available2013-04-04T15:17:04Z
dc.date.created2012
dc.date.issued2013-04-04
dc.identifier.citationAhluwalia, G., Gupta, D., & Aggarwal, D., (2011). The use of blogs in English language learning: A study of student perceptions. PROFILE, 13(2), 29-41.
dc.identifier.citationArndt, V., (October, 1987). Six writers in search of texts: a protocol-based study of L1 and L2 writing. ELT Journal, 41(4), 257-267.
dc.identifier.citationBadger, R., & White, W., (April, 2000). A process genre approach to teaching writing. ELT Journal, 54(2), 153-160.
dc.identifier.citationBates, A. W., (2005). Technology, e-learning and distance education. Oxon: Routledge Falmer Studies in Distance Education.
dc.identifier.citationBerger, A., (2008). The academic writer’s toolkit: A user’s manual. California: Left coast Press Inc.
dc.identifier.citationBerlanga, A., Kalz, M., Stoyanov, S., Rosmalen, P., Smithies, A., & Braidman, I., (2011). Language technologies to support formative feedback. CELSTEC. Open University of the Netherlands.
dc.identifier.citationBeuningen, C.G., Jong, N.H., & Kuiken, F., (2008). The effect of direct and indirect corrective feedback on L2 learners’ written accuracy. Amsterdam Center for Language and Communication: University of Amsterdam.
dc.identifier.citationBlake, R., (2008). Brave new digital classroom: Technology and foreign language learning. Washington D.C.: Georgetown University Press.
dc.identifier.citationBoughey, C., (April, 1997). Learning to write by writing to learn. ELT Journal, 51(2), 126-134.
dc.identifier.citationBrown, H.D., (2007). Principles of language learning and teaching. New York: Pearson Education, Inc.
dc.identifier.citationBurns, A. (1999). Collaborative action research for English language teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
dc.identifier.citationChamot, A., & O’Malley, M., (1994). The CALLA Handbook. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
dc.identifier.citationChapelle, C., (2003). English language learning and technology: Lectures on applied linguistics in the age of information and communication technology. John Benjamins Publishing Company.
dc.identifier.citationCohen, A., & Cavalcanti, M., (1990) Feedback on compositions: Teacher and Student Verbal Reports. In Kroll, B., (Ed.) . Second language writing. (pp. 155-177) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
dc.identifier.citationCohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K., (2007/8). Research methods in education. London: Routledge Falmer.
dc.identifier.citationCorbin, J., & Strauss, A., (2008). Basics of qualitative research. (3Ed.). California: Sage Publications, Inc.
dc.identifier.citationCotos, E., (2011). Potential of automated writing evaluation feedback. CALICO Journal, 28(2), 1-40.
dc.identifier.citationCouncil of Europe. (2011).Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
dc.identifier.citationCresswell, A., (2000). Self-monitoring in student writing: developing learner responsibility. ELT Journal, 54 (3), 235-244.
dc.identifier.citationDörnyei, Z., (2001). Teaching and researching motivation. England: Pearson Education Limited.
dc.identifier.citationDyer, B., (October,1996). L1 and L2 composition theories: Hillocks’ environmental mode and task-based language teaching. ELT Journal Volume 50(4), 312-317.
dc.identifier.citationDudeney, G., & Hockly, N., (2007). How to teach English with technology. Harlow: Pearson Educated Limited.
dc.identifier.citationEllis, R., (1999). Learning a second language through interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company
dc.identifier.citationEmig, J., (1994). Reassessing Janet Emig’s the composing processes of twelfth graders. Rhetoric Review, 13(1), 108-130.
dc.identifier.citationFidalgo, R., (2010). Cognitive strategic and self-regulated instruction in writing processes. In Mertens, N.L., (Ed.). Writing: Processes, tools and techniques. (pp. 129-152) New York: Nova Science Publishers.
dc.identifier.citationGardner, R., (1972). Attitudes and motivation in second-language learning. Massachusetts: Newbury House Publishers, Inc.
dc.identifier.citationGraham, S., McArthur, C., & Fitzgerald, J. (Eds.). (2007). Best practices in writing instruction.
dc.identifier.citationNew York, NY, USA: Guilford Press
dc.identifier.citationGómez, J., (2011). Teaching EFL academic writing in Colombia: Reflections in contrastive rhetoric. PROFILE, 13(1), 205-213.
dc.identifier.citationHarmer, J., (2004). How to teach writing. Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.
dc.identifier.citationHarmer, J., (2007). How to teach English. Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.
dc.identifier.citationHattie, J., & Timperley, H., (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81-112.
dc.identifier.citationHendricks, C., (2006). Improving schools through action research. Boston: Pearson Education, Inc.
dc.identifier.citationHoetker, J., (1982). Essay examination topics and student writing. College Composition and Communication, 33 (4), 377-392.
dc.identifier.citationHyland, K., (2003). Second language writing. New York: Cambridge University Press.
dc.identifier.citationHyland, K., & Hyland, F.,(Eds.).(2006). Feedback in second language writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
dc.identifier.citationHyland, K., (2007). Genre pedagogy: language, literacy and L2 writing instruction. Journal of Second Language Writing, 16, 148-164.
dc.identifier.citationJacobs, G., (1986). Quickwriting: a technique for invention in writing. ELT Journal, 40 (4), 282- 290.
dc.identifier.citationKeegan, S., (2009). Qualitative research: Good decision making through understanding people, cultures and markets. London: Kogan Page.
dc.identifier.citationKeh, C., (1990). Feedback in the writing process: a model and methods for implementation. ELT Journal, 44 (4), 294-304.
dc.identifier.citationKongpetch, S. (2006). Using a genre-based approach to teach writing to Thai students: A case study. Prospect, 21(2), 3-33.
dc.identifier.citationLee, S., (2008). Attitude in undergraduate persuasive essays. Prospect: An Australian Journal of TESOL, 23(3), 43-58
dc.identifier.citationLewis, T., & Hurd, S., (Eds.) (2008). Language learning strategies in independent settings. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
dc.identifier.citationMcKay and Tom. (1990). Teaching adult second language learners. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
dc.identifier.citationMendoza, E., (2005). Current state of the teaching of process writing in EFL Classes. An observational study in the last two years of secondary school. PROFILE 6, 6(1), 197-218.
dc.identifier.citationMuller, K. & Len, S., (2007). Techniques for college writing: The thesis statement and beyond. United States: Cengage Learning, Inc.
dc.identifier.citationOlive, T., (2010) Methods, techniques and tools for the on-line study of the writing process. In Mertens, N.L., (Ed.) . Writing: processes, tools and techniques. (pp. 1-18) New York: Nova Science Publishers.
dc.identifier.citationPaltridge, B., Harbon, L., Hirsh, D., Shen, H., Stevenson, M., Phakiti, A., & Woodrow, L., (2009). Teaching academic writing. United States: University of Michigan Press.
dc.identifier.citationPasadena City College, (n.d.). Why is a thesis statement necessary? Retrieved from http://www.pasadena.edu/divisions/english/writing/documents/dbdistin_524.pdf
dc.identifier.citationPeregoy, S., & Boyle, O., (2001). Reading, writing, & learning in ESL. United States: Addison Wesley Longman Inc.
dc.identifier.citationPennington, M., (1996). Writing the natural way: on computer. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 9 (2-3), 125-142.
dc.identifier.citationPennington, M., (2001). Teaching essay strategies. Unites States: Pennington Publishing.
dc.identifier.citationReeve, J. (1992). Understanding motivation and emotion. United States of America: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc.
dc.identifier.citationRinnert, C., & Kobayashi, H., (2009). Situated writing practices in foregn language settings: The role of previous experience and instruction. In Manchón, R., (Ed.). Writing in foreign language contexts: Learning, teaching and research. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
dc.identifier.citationRogers, A., (2008). Using technology to facilitate process writing and Interaction. PROFILE 9, 197-218
dc.identifier.citationRojas, G., (2011). Writing using blogs: A way to engage Colombian adolescents in meaningful communication. PROFILE, 13(2), 11-27.
dc.identifier.citationScrivener, J., (1994). Learning teaching. Oxford: McMillan Education
dc.identifier.citationSilva, T., (1990) Second language composition instruction: Developments, issues and directions in ESL. In Kroll, B., Ed.) . Second language writing. (pp 11-23) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
dc.identifier.citationSun, Y., & Chang, Y., (2011). Blogging to learn: Becoming EFL academic writers. Language Learning & Technology,16 (1), 43-61
dc.identifier.citationSundem, G., (2006). Improving student writing skills. United States: Shell Education.
dc.identifier.citationTapscott, W., (2010). Three reasons why a thesis statement is important in persuasive writing. Retrieved from http://voices.yahoo.com/three-reasons-why-thesis-statement-important6447144.html?cat=4
dc.identifier.citationThe Writing Center, (n.d.). Why is a thesis statement necessary. Pasadena City College. Retrieved from http://www.pasadena.edu/divisions/english/writing/documents/dbdistin_524.pdf
dc.identifier.citationThornbury, S. (2005). How to teach English. Harlow: Longman
dc.identifier.citationUniversity of Cambridge. International Examinations. IGCSE English First Language (0500). 2012 Syllabus. Retrieved on August 17, 2011 from http://www.cie.org.uk/qualifications/academic/middlesec/igcse/subject?assdef_id=852
dc.identifier.citationViafara, J., (2008). From pre-school to university: Student-teachers’ characterize their EFL writing development. Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal 10, 73-92
dc.identifier.citationWu, S., (2008). Investigating the effectiveness of arguments in undergraduate essays from an evaluation perspective. Prospect: An Australian Journal of TESOL, 23(3), 59-58.
dc.identifier.citationWang, S., & Wu, P., (2008). The role of feedback and self-efficacy on web-based learning: The social cognitive perspective. Computers & Education 51, 1589-1598.
dc.identifier.citationWarschauer M., (1996). Computer Assisted Language Learning: an Introduction. In Fotos S. (ed.) Multimedia language teaching, Tokyo: Logos International: pp. 3-20.
dc.identifier.citationWebb, M., (n.d.). Feedback enabled by new technologies as a key component of pedagogy. United Kingdom: King’s College London.
dc.identifier.citationWoodward-Kron, R., (2005). The role of genre and embedded genres in tertiary students’ writing. Prospect, 20(3), 24-41.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10818/6655
dc.description131 Páginas.
dc.description.abstractFomentar estrategias de escritura en EFL / ESL ha ocasionado que los programas institucionales reconozcan su importancia. En secundaria, los procesos de escritura con énfasis en productos finales tienen limitaciones de tiempo, poca retroalimentación significativa y falta de claridad y cohesión. Este estudio propone usar generadores de tesis en línea para ayudar a estudiantes de secundaria a escribir declaraciones de tesis claras para ensayos persuasivos más cohesivos y coherentes. También propone una metodología concreta de auto-reflexión durante la etapa de pre-escritura acompañada de retroalimentación. Los resultados revelaron que aunque la precisión lingüística obstaculizó usar los generadores de tesis en línea, estos fueron bien acogidos para producir y organizar ideas. Además, la retroalimentación fue útil para mejorar la competencia lingüística.es_CO
dc.language.isoenges_CO
dc.publisherUniversidad de La Sabana
dc.sourceUniversidad de La Sabana
dc.sourceIntellectum Repositorio Universidad de La Sabana
dc.subjectInglés-Enseñanza secundaria-Estudiantes extranjeros-Investigacioneses_CO
dc.subjectInglés-Ejercicios de redacción-Investigacioneses_CO
dc.titleUsing online thesis generators to write persuasive essays in EFL with secondary school studentses_CO
dc.typemasterThesis
dc.publisher.programMaestría en Didáctica del Inglés con Énfasis en Ambientes de Aprendizaje Autónomo
dc.publisher.departmentDepartamento de Lenguas y Culturas Extranjeras
dc.identifier.local159410
dc.identifier.localTE05819
dc.type.localTesis de maestría
dc.type.hasVersionpublishedVersion
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccess
dc.creator.degreeMagíster en Didáctica del Inglés con Énfasis en Ambientes de Aprendizaje Autónomo


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record