Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Deserción en los MOOC: algunos factores clave

dc.contributor.authorCastillo Caro, Blanca Diana Lorena
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-24T14:23:30Z
dc.date.available2019-07-24T14:23:30Z
dc.date.issued2019-06-13
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10818/36303
dc.description27 páginases_CO
dc.description.abstractLa deserción de los estudiantes en los Cursos Masivos Abiertos y en línea (MOOC) ha venido siendo tema de debate y preocupación por parte de educadores e investigadores en distintos niveles educativos a lo largo del planeta, durante la última década. Teniendo en cuenta el crecimiento de los MOOC como tendencia educativa y la emergente investigación generada en esta materia, se adelantó una revisión sistemática de literatura sobre 131 estudios realizados acerca de la deserción tanto en los cMOOC como en los xMOOC, cuyos resultados resaltan el papel de la colaboración, el sentido de comunidad, la necesidad de certificación y el riesgo de la estandarización como algunos de los factores principales que afectan la deserción en los MOOC.es_CO
dc.formatapplication/pdfes_CO
dc.language.isospaes_CO
dc.publisherUniversidad de La Sabanaes_CO
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.sourceUniversidad de La Sabana
dc.sourceIntellectum Repositorio Universidad de La Sabana
dc.subjectInnovaciones educativases_CO
dc.subjectMooc (Plataforma virtual)es_CO
dc.subjectAprendizaje colaborativoes_CO
dc.titleDeserción en los MOOC: algunos factores clavees_CO
dc.title.alternativeDesertion in MOOCs: some key factorses_CO
dc.typemasterThesises_CO
dc.publisher.programMaestría en Informática Educativaes_CO
dc.publisher.departmentCentro de Tecnologías para la Academiaes_CO
dc.identifier.local272902
dc.identifier.localTE10236
dc.type.hasVersionpublishedVersiones_CO
dc.rights.accessRightsrestrictedAccesses_CO
dc.creator.degreeMagister en Informática Educativaes_CO
dcterms.referencesAdamopoulos, P. (2013). What makes a great MOOC? An interdisciplinary analysis of student retention in online courses. En Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS 2013): Reshaping Society Through Information Systems Design (Vol. 5, pp. 4720– 4740). Milan, Italy: AIS. Recuperado de https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0- 84897795912ypartnerID=40ymd5=0851525eea67bd826c83e58beff68500eng
dcterms.referencesAdmiraal, W., Huisman, B., y Pilli, O. (2015). Assessment in Massive Open Online Courses. Electronic Journal of E-learning, 13(4), 207–216.eng
dcterms.referencesAlmeda, M. V., Zuech, J., Baker, R. S., Utz, C., Higgins, G., y Reynolds, R. (2018). Comparing the Factors That Predict Completion and Grades Among For-Credit and Open/MOOC Students in Online Learning. Online Learning, 22(1). https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v22i1.1060eng
dcterms.referencesAlraimi, K. M., Zo, H., y Ciganek, A. P. (2015). Understanding the MOOCs continuance: The role of openness and reputation. Computers y Education, 80, 28–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.08.006eng
dcterms.referencesAmo, D., Casany, M. J., y Alier, M. (2014). Approaches for quality in pedagogical and design fundamentals in MOOCS. Teoría de la Educación. Educación y Cultura en la Sociedad de la Información, 15(1)eng
dcterms.referencesAnderson, T. (2013). Promise and/or peril: MOOCs and open and distance education. Athabasca University. Recuperado de http://www.ethicalforum.be/sites/default/files/MOOCsPromisePeril.pdfeng
dcterms.referencesAndres, J. M. L., Baker, R. S., Gašević, D., Siemens, G., Crossley, S. A., y Joksimović, S. (2018). Studying MOOC completion at scale using the MOOC replication framework. En Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge - LAK ’18 (pp. 71–78). Sydney, New South Wales, Australia: ACM Press. https://doi.org/10.1145/3170358.3170369eng
dcterms.referencesBarn, B., Barat, S., y Clark, T. (2017). Conducting Systematic Literature Reviews and Systematic Mapping Studies. En Proceedings of the 10th Innovations in Software Engineering Conference on - ISEC ’17 (pp. 212–213). Jaipur, India: ACM Press. https://doi.org/10.1145/3021460.3021489eng
dcterms.referencesBates, A. W. (2014). Comparing xMOOCs and cMOOCs: philosophy and practice. Recuperado 14 de octubre de 2018, de https://www.tonybates.ca/2014/10/13/comparing-xmoocs-andcmoocs-philosophy-and-practice/eng
dcterms.referencesBates, T. (2015). Teaching in a digital age: Guidelines for designing teaching and learning for a digital age. British Columbia: BC Open Texbooks. Recuperado de http://opentextbc.ca/teachinginadigitalage/eng
dcterms.referencesBreslow, L., Pritchard, D. E., DeBoer, J., Stump, G. S., Ho, A. D., y Seaton, D. T. (2013). Studying learning in the worldwide classroom research into edX’s first MOOC. Research y Practice in Assessment, 8, 13–25.eng
dcterms.referencesBrunton, J., Brown, M., Costello, E., Farrell, O., y Mahon, C. (2017). Giving Flexible Learners a Head Start on Higher Education: Designing and Implementing a Pre-induction Socialisation MOOC. En C. Delgado Kloos, P. Jermann, M. Pérez-Sanagustín, D. T. Seaton, y S. White (Eds.), Digital Education: Out to the World and Back to the Campus (Vol. 10254, pp. 10–19).eng
dcterms.referencesCham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59044-8_2eng
dcterms.referencesConijn, R., Van den Beemt, A., y Cuijpers, P. (2018). Predicting student performance in a blended MOOC. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 34(5), 615–628. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12270eng
dcterms.referencesCrosslin, M., Dellinger, J. T., Joksimovic, S., Kovanovic, V., y Gasevic, D. (2017). Customizable Modalities for Individualized Learning: Examining Patterns of Engagement in Dual-Layer MOOCs. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learningeng
dcterms.referencesDaniel, J. (2012). Making Sense of MOOCs: Musings in a Maze of Myth, Paradox and Possibility. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2012(3), 18. https://doi.org/10.5334/2012-18eng
dcterms.referencesDavis, D., Jivet, I., Kizilcec, R. F., Chen, G., Hauff, C., y Houben, G.-J. (2017). Follow the successful crowd: raising MOOC completion rates through social comparison at scale. En Proceedings of the Seventh International Learning Analytics y Knowledge Conference on - LAK ’17 (pp. 454–463). Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada: ACM Press. https://doi.org/10.1145/3027385.3027411eng
dcterms.referencesDawson, S., Joksimović, S., Kovanović, V., Gašević, D., y Siemens, G. (2015). Recognising learner autonomy: Lessons and reflections from a joint x/c MOOC. En Proceedings of Higher Education Research and Development Society of Australia 2015 (Vol. 38, pp. 117–129). Melbourne, Australia: HERDSA. Recuperado de http://www.herdsa.org.au/system/files/HERDSA_2015_Dawson.pdfeng
dcterms.referencesde Freitas, S. I., Morgan, J., y Gibson, D. (2015). Will MOOCs transform learning and teaching in higher education? Engagement and course retention in online learning provision: Engagement and course retention in online learning provision. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(3), 455–471. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12268eng
dcterms.referencesDe Waard, I. (2015). MOOC factors influencing teachers in formal education. Revista Mexicana de Bachillerato a distancia, 7(13), 1–12.eng
dcterms.referencesDespujol, I. M., Turró, C., Castañeda, L., y Busquets, J. (2017). Effect of Free Certificate Discontinuation in Completion Rates of MOOC. En C. Delgado Kloos, P. Jermann, M. PérezSanagustín, D. T. Seaton, y S. White (Eds.), Digital Education: Out to the World and Back to the Campus (Vol. 10254, pp. 182–187). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59044-8_21eng
dcterms.referencesDhorne, L., Deflandre, J.-P., Bernaert, O., Bianchi, S., y Thirouard, M. (2017). Mentoring Learners in MOOCs: A New Way to Improve Completion Rates? En C. Delgado Kloos, P.eng
dcterms.referencesJermann, M. Pérez-Sanagustín, D. T. Seaton, y S. White (Eds.), Digital Education: Out to the World and Back to the Campus (Vol. 10254, pp. 29–37). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59044-8_4eng
dcterms.referencesEl Said, G. R. (2017). Understanding How Learners Use Massive Open Online Courses and Why They Drop Out: Thematic Analysis of an Interview Study in a Developing Country. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 55(5), 724–752. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633116681302eng
dcterms.referencesEngle, D., Mankoff, C., y Carbrey, J. (2015). Coursera’s introductory human physiology course: Factors that characterize successful completion of a MOOC. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 16(2), 46–68.eng
dcterms.referencesEstévez-Ayres, I., Crespo-García, R. M., Fisteus, J. A., y Kloos, C. D. (2013). An algorithm for peer review matching in Massive courses for minimising students’ frustration. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 19(15), 2173–2197.eng
dcterms.referencesFerschke, O., Yang, D., Tomar, G., y Rosé, C. P. (2015). Positive Impact of Collaborative Chat Participation in an edX MOOC. En C. Conati, N. Heffernan, A. Mitrovic, y M. F. Verdejo (Eds.), Artificial Intelligence in Education (Vol. 9112, pp. 115–124). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19773-9_12eng
dcterms.referencesFidalgo-Blanco, Á., Sein-Echaluce, M. L., y García-Peñalvo, F. J. (2013). MOOC cooperativo. Una integración entre cMOOC y xMOOC Cooperative MOOC. An integration between cMOOC and xMOOC. Recuperado de https://gredos.usal.es/jspui/handle/10366/122486eng
dcterms.referencesFidalgo-Blanco, Á., Sein-Echaluce, M. L., y García-Peñalvo, F. J. (2016). From massive access to cooperation: lessons learned and proven results of a hybrid xMOOC/cMOOC pedagogical approach to MOOCs. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 13(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-016-0024-zeng
dcterms.referencesFreitas, S. I., Morgan, J., y Gibson, D. (2015). Will MOOCs transform learning and teaching in higher education? Engagement and course retention in online learning provision. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(3), 455–471.eng
dcterms.referencesGamage, D., Fernando, S., y Perera, I. (2015). Quality of MOOCs: A review of literature on effectiveness and quality aspects. En Ubi-Media Computing (UMEDIA), 2015 8th International Conference on (pp. 224–229). IEEE.eng
dcterms.referencesGardner, J., y Brooks, C. (2018). Student success prediction in MOOCs. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 28(2), 127–203. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11257-018-9203-zeng
dcterms.referencesGasevic, D., Kovanovic, V., Joksimovic, S., y Siemens, G. (2014). Where is research on massive open online courses headed? A data analysis of the MOOC Research Initiative. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 15(5). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v15i5.1954eng
dcterms.referencesGreene, J. A., Oswald, C. A., y Pomerantz, J. (2015). Predictors of Retention and Achievement in a Massive Open Online Course. American Educational Research Journal, 52(5), 925–955. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831215584621eng
dcterms.referencesHill, P. (2013, agosto 30). Some validation of MOOC student patterns graphic. Recuperado de https://mfeldstein.com/validation-mooc-student-patterns-graphic/eng
dcterms.referencesHo, A. D., Reich, J., Nesterko, S. O., Seaton, D. T., Mullaney, T., Waldo, J., y Chuang, I. (2014). HarvardX and MITx: The first year of open online courses (HarvardX and MITx Working Paper No. 1).eng
dcterms.referencesHone, K. S., y El Said, G. R. (2016). Exploring the factors affecting MOOC retention: A survey study. Computers y Education, 98, 157–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.03.016eng
dcterms.referencesJansen, D., Rosewell, J., y Kear, K. (2017). Quality Frameworks for MOOCs. En Open Education: from OERs to MOOCs (pp. 261–281). Springer.eng
dcterms.referencesJasnani, P. (2013). Designing MOOCs. A White Paper on Instructional Design for MOOCs. Publisher: Tata Interactive Systems.eng
dcterms.referencesJordan, K. (2015). MOOC Completion Rates: The Data. Recuperado de http://www.katyjordan.com/MOOCproject.htmleng
dcterms.referencesKevat, P. (2014). Open2Study Research Report - Cohorts 1 to 12.eng
dcterms.referencesKop, R. (2011). The challenges to connectivist learning on open online networks: Learning experiences during a massive open online course. The International Review Of Research In Open And Distributed Learning, 12(3), 19–38.eng
dcterms.referencesLiao, S. C., Hunt, E. A., y Chen, W. (2010). Comparison between inter-rater reliability and interrater agreement in performance assessment. Annals of the Academy of Medicine Singapore, 39(8), 613–618.eng
dcterms.referencesLuik, P., Lepp, M., Palts, T., Säde, M., Suviste, R., Tõnisson, E., y Gaiduk, M. (2018). Completion of programming mooc or dropping out: Are there any differences in motivation? En Proceedings of the European Conference on e-Learning, ECEL (Vol. 2018-November, pp. 329– 337). Athens, Greece. Recuperado de https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0- 85057999485ypartnerID=40ymd5=5d9cf09e1e33275c5c9ca542d1982c3aeng
dcterms.referencesMacKay, J. R. D., Langford, F., y Waran, N. (2016). Massive Open Online Courses as a Tool for Global Animal Welfare Education. Journal of Veterinary Medical Education, 43(3), 287–301. https://doi.org/10.3138/jvme.0415-054R2eng
dcterms.referencesMilligan, C., Littlejohn, A., y Margaryan, A. (2013). Patterns of engagement in connectivist MOOCs. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 9(2), 149–159.eng
dcterms.referencesMohamed, M. H., y Hammond, M. (2018). MOOCs: a differentiation by pedagogy, content and assessment. International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 35(1), 2–11. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJILT-07-2017-0062eng
dcterms.referencesPadilla Rodriguez, B. C., Armellini, A., y Caceres Villalba, V. C. (2016). Massive open online courses (MOOCs) behind the scenes. En P. Kirby y G. Marks (Eds.), Proceedings of Global Learn 2016 (pp. 359–366). Waynesville, N.C.: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).eng
dcterms.referencesPark, J.-H., y Choi, H. J. (2009). Factors influencing adult learners’ decision to drop out or persist in online learning. Journal of Educational Technology y Society, 12(4).eng
dcterms.referencesRhoads, R. A., Camacho, M. S., Toven-Lindsey, B., y Lozano, J. B. (2015). The Massive Open Online Course Movement, xMOOCs, and Faculty Labor. The Review of Higher Education, 38(3), 397–424. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.2015.0016eng
dcterms.referencesRizzardini, R. H., Chan, M. M., y Guetl, C. (2016). An Attrition Model for MOOCs. En Formative Assessment, Learning Data Analytics and Gamification (pp. 295–311). London, UK: Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-803637-2.00014-2eng
dcterms.referencesRodriguez, B. C. P., Armellini, A., y Villalba, V. C. C. (2016). Massive open online courses (MOOCs) behind the scenes. En Global Learn (pp. 359–366). Ireland: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).eng
dcterms.referencesRodriguez, O. (2013). The concept of openness behind c and x-MOOCs (Massive Open Online Courses). Open Praxis, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.5.1.42eng
dcterms.referencesRoscorla, T. (2012, julio 18). Massively Open Online Courses Are “Here to Stay”. Recuperado de http://www.centerdigitaled.com/policy/MOOCs-Here-to-Stay.htmleng
dcterms.referencesRosé, C. P., Carlson, R., Yang, D., Wen, M., Resnick, L., Goldman, P., y Sherer, J. (2014). Social factors that contribute to attrition in MOOCs. En Proceedings of the first ACM conference on Learning @ scale conference - L@S ’14 (pp. 197–198). Atlanta, Georgia, USA: ACM Press. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556325.2567879eng
dcterms.referencesRosé, C. P., y Ferschke, O. (2016). Technology support for discussion based learning: From computer supported collaborative learning to the future of massive open online courses. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 26(2), 660–678.eng
dcterms.referencesSokolovskaya, A. (2015). Connectivist Knowledge Building, Collaborative Learning, and Social Presence in a Connectivist Massive Open Online Course: A Study of PLENK2010 (Master’s Thesis). Concordia University, Montréal. Recuperado de https://spectrum.library.concordia.ca/979895/1/Sokolovskaya_MA_S2015.pdfeng
dcterms.referencesVihavainen, A., Luukkainen, M., y Kurhila, J. (2012). Multi-faceted support for MOOC in programming. En Proceedings of the 13th annual conference on Information technology education - SIGITE ’12 (p. 171). Calgary, Alberta, Canada: ACM Press. https://doi.org/10.1145/2380552.2380603eng
dcterms.referencesVitiello, M., Walk, S., Chang, V., Hernandez, R., Helic, D., y Guetl, C. (2017). MOOC Dropouts: A Multi-system Classifier. En É. Lavoué, H. Drachsler, K. Verbert, J. Broisin, y M. Pérez-Sanagustín (Eds.), Data Driven Approaches in Digital Education (Vol. 10474, pp. 300– 314). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66610-5_22eng
dcterms.referencesWang, Z., Anderson, T., y Chen, L. (2018). How learners participate in connectivist learning: An analysis of the interaction traces from a cMOOC. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 19(1), 44–67.eng
dcterms.referencesWang, Zhijun, Anderson, T., Chen, L., y Barbera, E. (2017). Interaction pattern analysis in cMOOCs based on the connectivist interaction and engagement framework. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(2), 683–699. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12433eng
dcterms.referencesWarriem, J. M., Murthy, S., y Iyer, S. (2016). Shifting the focus from learner completion to learner perseverance: Evidences from a teacher professional development MOOC. En ICCE 2016 - 24th International Conference on Computers in Education: Think Global Act Local - Main Conference Proceedings (pp. 531–540). Mumbai, India: Asia-Pacific Society for Computers in Education. Recuperado de https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0- 85018948672ypartnerID=40ymd5=5e6fc73c77dcb71e0425d85d89f19068eng
dcterms.referencesYin, Y. (2016). Chinese Learners’ Perceptions of MOOCs A Case Study (PhD Thesis). Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorfeng
dcterms.referencesYousef, A. M. F., Chatti, M. A., Schroeder, U., Wosnitza, M., y Jakobs, H. (2014). MOOC: A Review of the State-of-the-Art. En Proceedings of CSEDU 2014 (Vol. 3, pp. 9–20). Barcelona, Spain: SCITEPRESS - Science and Technology Publications, Lda. https://doi.org/10.5220/0004791400090020eng
dcterms.referencesZhang, Q., Peck, K., Hristova, A., Jablokow, K., Hoffman, V., Park, E., y Bayeck, R. (2016). Exploring the communication preferences of MOOC learners and the value of preference-based groups: Is grouping enough? Educational Technology Research y Development, 64(4), 809–837. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9439-4eng
dcterms.referencesZheng, S., Rosson, M. B., Shih, P. C., y Carroll, J. M. (2015). Understanding Student Motivation, Behaviors and Perceptions in MOOCs. En Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work y Social Computing - CSCW ’15 (pp. 1882–1895). Vancouver, BC, Canada: ACM Press. https://doi.org/10.1145/2675133.2675217eng


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail
Nombre:
Deserción en los MOOC - Lorena ...
Tamaño:
894.0Kb
Formato:
PDF
Descripción:
Ver documento en PDF
Ver/

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 InternationalExcepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International