dc.contributor.advisor | Guayacán Velasco, Luz Adriana | |
dc.contributor.author | Muñoz Melo, Adriana Helena | |
dc.contributor.author | Guayacán Velasco, Luz Adriana | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-10-17T15:32:56Z | |
dc.date.available | 2018-10-17T15:32:56Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2018 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Akkakoson, S. (2013). The relationship between strategic reading instruction, student learning of L2‐
based reading strategies and L2 reading achievement. Journal of Research in Reading, 36(4),
422-450 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Arismendi Gómez, F. A., Colorado López, D., & Grajales Marin, L. F. (2011). Reading comprehension
in face-to-face and web-based modalities: Graduate students' use of reading and language
learning strategies in EFL. Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal, 13(2), 11-28. | |
dc.identifier.citation | Black, P and Wiliam, D 1998, Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment.
School of Education, King's College, London, UK. Retrieved from
http://www.spd.dcu.ie/site/teaching_today/documents/raisingstandardsthroughclassroomassessm
ent.pdf | |
dc.identifier.citation | Boelens, R., De Wever, B., & Voet, M. (2017). Four key challenges to the design of blended learning: A
systematic literature review. Educational Research Review, 1. | |
dc.identifier.citation | Brown, J. D. (2005). Testing in language programs: A comprehensive guide to English language
assessment. New York: Mcgraw Hill. | |
dc.identifier.citation | Brown, Douglas (1994) Teaching by principles: an interactive approach to language pedagogy, Upper
Saddle River, Prentice Hall Regents. Retrieved from
https://pedufopenglish.files.wordpress.com/2014/06/teaching-by-principles-douglas-brown.pdf | |
dc.identifier.citation | Butler, Y. G., & Jiyoon Lee. (2006). On-Task versus Off-Task Self-Assessments among Korean
Elementary School Students Studying English. The Modern Language Journal, 90(4), 506–518.
Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/4127040 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Carrell, P., Devine, J., & Eskey, D. (Eds.). (1988). Interactive Approaches to Second Language Reading
(Cambridge Applied Linguistics). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
doi:10.1017/CBO9781139524513 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Clark, M. (2007). Structured text retrieval by means of affordances and genre. Retrieved March 26,
2015, from https://www.bing.com/cr | |
dc.identifier.citation | Correa Morales, E., & Mendieta, Jenny dir. (2013). Developing Reading Strategies to Foster Autonomy /
Elizabeth Correa Morales; dirección por Jenny Mendieta. Chía: Universidad de La Sabana. | |
dc.identifier.citation | Day, R. R., & Park, J. S. (2005). Developing Reading Comprehension Questions. Reading in a foreign
language, 17(1), 60-73. Retrieved from:http://nflrc.hawaii.edu/rfl/April2005/day/day.html | |
dc.identifier.citation | Durkin, D. (1978). What classroom observations reveal about reading comprehension instruction.
Reading Research Quarterly, 481-533.Retrieved from
https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/bitstream/handle/2142/17858/ctrstreadtechrepv01978i00106_opt.
pdf?sequence=1 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Denton, C. A., Vaughn, S., & Fletcher, J. M. (2003). Bringing Research-Based Practice in Reading
Intervention to Scale. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice,18(3), 201-211.
doi:10.1111/1540-5826.00075 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Downes, S. 2011. Connectivism and connective knowledge. Newsletter. http://www.downes.ca/
post/54540 (accessed 24 June 2012) | |
dc.identifier.citation | Dreyer, C., & Nel, C. (2003). Teaching reading strategies and reading comprehension within a
technology-enhanced learning environment. System, 31(3), 349-365. Retrieved
from:https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Charl_Nel/publication/222409446_Teaching_reading
_strategies_and_reading_comprehension_within_a_technologyenhanced_learning_environment/links/09e415118c009964e1000000.pdf | |
dc.identifier.citation | Ellis, R. (2012). Language Teaching Research and Language Pedagogy. Chapter 2 Methods for
researching second language classroom. Wiley-Blackwell. | |
dc.identifier.citation | Gersten, R., Fuchs, L. S., Williams, J. P., & Baker, S. (2001). Teaching reading comprehension
strategies to students with learning disabilities: A review of research. Review of Educational
Research, 71(2), 279-320. Retrieved from https://search-proquestcom.ez.unisabana.edu.co/docview/214115607?accountid=45375 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Ghonsooly, B., & Seyyedrezaie, Z. S. (2014). The comparison of language learning strategies and
reading comprehension of Iranian EFL students taking web-based and face-to-face instruction.
Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 4(6), 1296 | |
dc.identifier.citation | González-Videgaray, M., Hernández-Zamora, G., & Jesús, H. (2009). Learning objects in theory and
practice: A vision from Mexican University teachers. Computers & Education, 53(4), 1330-
1338 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Goodman, K. (1988). The reading process. Interactive approaches to second language reading, 11-21. | |
dc.identifier.citation | Grabe, W. (2009). Reading in a second language: Moving from theory to practice. New York:
Cambridge University Press. www.cambridge.org/download_file/753028/0 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Grabe, W. (2014). Key Issues in L2 Reading Development.”. In Proceedings of the 4th CELC
Symposium for English Language Teachers-Selected Papers (pp. 8-18). | |
dc.identifier.citation | Heinze, A., & Procter, C. T. (2004). Reflections on the use of blended learning. Retrieved from
http://usir.salford.ac.uk/1658/1/4247745025H__CP_-_paper9_5.pdf | |
dc.identifier.citation | Hoover, W. A., & Gough, P. B. (1990). The simple view of reading. Reading and writing, 2(2), 127-
160 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Johnson, A. P. (2005). A short guide to action research. Boston, MA: Pearson. | |
dc.identifier.citation | Johnson, R. B., Turner, L. A., & Onwuegbuzie, A. (2007, April). Toward a Definition of Mixed
Methods Research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1, 2nd ser., 122-133.
doi:10.4135/9781473930100 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Kemmins, S., & McTaggart, R. (1988). The action research planner (3rd ed., p. 5). Geelong, Victoria:
Deakin University Press. | |
dc.identifier.citation | Kumaravadivelu B. (2011) Understanding Language Teaching: From Method to Postmethod. Retrieved
from: http://livelongday.files.wordpress.com/2011/08/kumaraposmethod.pdf | |
dc.identifier.citation | LeBlanc, R., & Painchaud, G. (1985). Self-Assessment as a Second Language Placement Instrument.
TESOL Quarterly, 19(4), 673–687. Retrieved from
http://www.jstor.org.ezproxy.unisabana.edu.co/stable/3586670 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Levy, Roger, Dickerson, Claire, & Teague, Joanna. (2011). Developing Blended Learning Resources
and Strategies to Support Academic Reading: A Student-Centred Approach. Journal of Further
and Higher Education, 35(1), 89-106. Retrieved from
http://researchprofiles.herts.ac.uk/portal/files/395098/905175.pdf | |
dc.identifier.citation | Lysenko, L. V., & Abrami, P. C. (2014). Promoting reading comprehension with the use of technology.
Computers & Education, 75, 162-172 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Lopera Medina, S. A. (2014). Comparación de un curso de competencia lectora en inglés como lengua
Extranjera (LE) en dos modalidades: distancia/virtual y presencial. Núcleo, 26(31), 147-175.
Retrieved from http://www.scielo.org.ve/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0798-
97842014000100006. | |
dc.identifier.citation | Marton, F., & Booth, S. (2013). Learning and awareness. Routledge | |
dc.identifier.citation | Mccarthy, J. (2010). Blended learning environments: Using social networking sites to enhance the first
year experience. AJET Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(6), 729-740.
doi:10.14742/ajet.1039 | |
dc.identifier.citation | McGreal, R. (2004). Learning objects: A practical definition. International Journal of Instructional
Technology and Distance Learning (IJITDL), 9(1). | |
dc.identifier.citation | McMillan, J. H., & Hearn, J. (2008). Student self-assessment: The key to stronger student motivation
and higher achievement. Educational Horizons, 40-49 | |
dc.identifier.citation | McNamara, D. S. (Ed.). (2012). Reading comprehension strategies: Theories, interventions, and
technologies. Psychology Press | |
dc.identifier.citation | Mehring, J. G. (2005). Developing vocabulary in second language acquisition: From Theories to the
Classroom. Retrieved from
http://www.hpu.edu/CHSS/LangLing/TESOL/ProfessionalDevelopment/200680TWPfall06/03Me
hring. pdf | |
dc.identifier.citation | Ministry of National Education. (2014). Colombia very well! Programa nacional de inglés 2015- 2025:
Documento de socialización. Retrieved from
http://www.colombiaaprende.edu.co/html/micrositios/1752/articles-343287_recurso_1.pdf | |
dc.identifier.citation | Montalvo Bedoya, L. D. S., & Acero Rios, C. L. (2013). Improving reading comprehension and selfdirected
learning through the use of explicit reading strategies and personal blogs on high school
students | |
dc.identifier.citation | Moreillon, J. (2007). Collaborative Strategies for Teaching Reading Comprehension: Maximizing Your
Impact. Chicago: ALA Editions of the American Library Association. Retrieved from
http://search.ebscohost.com.ezproxy.unisabana.edu.co/login.aspx?direct=true&db=e000xww&A
N=269629&lang=es&site=ehost-live&scope=site&ebv=EB&ppid=pp_58 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Nation, P. (2014). How much input do you need to learn the most frequent 9,000 words? Reading in a
foreign language, 26(2), 1-16. Retrieved from
http://nflrc.hawaii.edu/rfl/October2014/articles/nation.pdf | |
dc.identifier.citation | Nicol, D. J., & Macfarlane‐Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self‐regulated learning: A model
and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in higher education, 31(2), 199-218. | |
dc.identifier.citation | Novak, J. D. (2002). Meaningful learning: The essential factor for conceptual change in limited or
inappropriate propositional hierarchies leading to empowerment of learners. Science
education, 86(4), 548-571. | |
dc.identifier.citation | Nunan, D. and Bailey, K. (2009). Exploring Second Language Classroom Research. Boston:
Heinle/Cengage Learning. | |
dc.identifier.citation | Osguthorpe, R. T., & Graham, C. R. (2003). Blended learning systems: Definitions and directions.
Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 4(3), 227–234 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Polsani, P. (2003). Use and Abuse of Reusable Learning Objects. Journal of Digital Information, 3(4).
Retrieved November 26, 2015, from
https://journals.tdl.org/jodi/index.php/jodi/article/view/89/88 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Pressley, M., Wharton-McDonald, R., Allington, R., Block, C. C., & Morrow, L. (1998). The Nature of
Effective First-Grade Literacy Instruction. Retrieved from
http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED427338.pdf | |
dc.identifier.citation | Pressley, M., & Afflerbach, P. (2009). Verbal protocols of reading: the nature of constructively
responsive reading. Retrieved from
https://books.google.com.co/books?hl=es&lr=&id=ojYqvDqdtsoC&oi=fnd&pg=PP2&ots=CMfa
ABpIk9&sig=ZTyzXTJ6V6wrvTnCVuEeiu6Cykw#v=onepage&q&f=false | |
dc.identifier.citation | Revell, R., & Sweeney, S. (1993). In print: reading business English. Cambridge University Press. | |
dc.identifier.citation | Richards, J. C. (2013). Curriculum Approaches in Language Teaching: Forward, Central, and Backward
Design. RELC Journal: A Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 44(1), 5-33. Retrieved
from https://www.dl.icdst.org/pdfs/files1/82447f2ce55d9cade0d7f1009f83739d.pdf | |
dc.identifier.citation | Roberts, C. (1994). Transferring literacy skills from L1 to L2: From theory to practice. The Journal of
Educational Issues of Language Minority Students, 13, 209-221. Retrieved from
https://ncela.ed.gov/files/rcd/BE019750/Transferring_Literacy.pdf | |
dc.identifier.citation | Sencibaugh, J. M., & Sencibaugh, A. M. (2015). The effects of questioning the author on the reading
comprehension of middle school students. Reading Improvement, 52(3), 85-92.. Retrieved from
http://web.a.ebscohost.com.ezproxy.unisabana.edu.co/ehost/ | |
dc.identifier.citation | Serravallo, J. (2014). Reading Time with GOALS IN MIND. Educational Leadership, 72(1), 54-59.
Retrieved from:
http://web.b.ebscohost.com.ez.unisabana.edu.co/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=1&sid=f16f3ff1
-9415-4c97-be33-5c4748ba2e1e%40sessionmgr104 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Sharma, P. (2010). Blended learning. ELT journal, 64(4), 456-458. Retrieved from
https://oup.silverchair-cdn.com/oup/backfile/Content_public/Journal/eltj/64/4/10.1093/ | |
dc.identifier.citation | Singhal, M. (1998). A comparison of L1 and L2 reading: Cultural differences and schema. The internet
TESL journal, 4(10), 4-10. | |
dc.identifier.citation | Smith, F. (2004). Understanding reading: A psycholinguistic analysis of reading and learning to read.
Routledge. | |
dc.identifier.citation | Snow, C. E., Science and Technology Policy Institute (Rand, C. (Rand Corporation), & United, S.
(2002). Reading for Understanding: Toward an R&D Program in Reading Comprehension. Santa
Monica, CA: RAND Corporation. retrieved from
http://web.b.ebscohost.com.ezproxy.unisabana.edu.co/ehost/ebookviewer/ebook/ | |
dc.identifier.citation | Swaffar, J. K. (1988). Readers, texts, and second languages: The interactive process. Modern Language
Journal, 80, 461-477. | |
dc.identifier.citation | Uribe-Enciso, O. (2015). Improving EFL students’ performance in reading comprehension through
explicit instruction in strategies. Rastros Rostros, 17(31). | |
dc.identifier.citation | Van Lier, Leo. (1994). Action research. Sintagma, 6: 31-37. Retrieved from
http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:zzwFAzv9imYJ:www.raco.cat/index.ph
p/Sintagma/article/download/60441/94230+&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=co | |
dc.identifier.citation | Wiley, D. A. (2000). Connecting learning objects to instructional design theory: A definition, a
metaphor, and a taxonomy. In D. A. Wiley (Ed.), The instructional use of learning objects (pp. 1-
23). Retrieved July 30, 2016, from http://www.reusability.org/read/chapters/wiley.doc. | |
dc.identifier.citation | Wiley, D. (2011). Learning Objects, Content Management, and E-Learning. In Ferran & Minguillón
Content management for e-learning. New York: Springer | |
dc.identifier.citation | Yang, Y. F. (2011). Blended learning for college students with English reading difficulties. Computer
Assisted Language Learning, 25(5), 393-410. Retrieved from
http://lc.yuntech.edu.tw/dmdocuments/5._Blending_learning_for_college_students.pdf | |
dc.identifier.citation | Zimmerman, M. (1990). Toward a theory of learned hopefulness: A structural model analysis of
participation and empowerment. Journal of Research in Personality, 24(1), 71-86. | |
dc.identifier.citation | Zimmerman, B. J., & Schunk, D. H. (Eds.). (2001). Self-Regulated Learning and Academic
Achievement: Theoretical Perspectives. Routledge. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10818/34113 | |
dc.description | 127 Páginas | es_CO |
dc.description.abstract | This project is a research report, which inquired about the reading comprehension level of tenth and eleventh graders from a public high school. Before that, a needs analysis and a KET (Key English Test) as a diagnostic test were applied. The objectives of this research were to assess how students recognize explicit information in a text to answer questions with the appropriate response through the use of digital learning objects in a blended environment; and to determine if the use of these DLO contributed to improve students’ reading comprehension and the acquisition of new vocabulary. The project was applied in a public school in Bogotá to students of tenth and eleventh grade, due to the low reading comprehension found after applying them a KET test and a needs analysis. This action research used task based methodology in a blended learning environment where thirteen lessons were created based on digital learning objects in a MOODLE platform. These lessons helped students to improve their reading comprehension strategies and to increase their vocabulary. A mixed method analysis allowed researchers to determine that both objectives were effectively met while students enhanced their self-directed learning process. | es_CO |
dc.format | application/pdf | es_CO |
dc.language.iso | eng | es_CO |
dc.publisher | Universidad de La Sabana | es_CO |
dc.rights | Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International | * |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | * |
dc.source | Universidad de La Sabana | |
dc.source | Intellectum Repositorio Universidad de La Sabana | |
dc.subject | Comprensión de lectura | es_CO |
dc.subject | Educación secundaria | es_CO |
dc.subject | Innovaciones tecnológicas | es_CO |
dc.subject | Innovaciones educativas | es_CO |
dc.subject | Aprendizaje | es_CO |
dc.subject | Moodle (Programa para computadora) | es_CO |
dc.subject.other | Reading comprehension strategies | |
dc.subject.other | digital learning objects | |
dc.subject.other | blended learning | |
dc.title | Developing high school students’ reading comprehension and self-directed learning strategies through the use of digital learning objects | es_CO |
dc.type | masterThesis | es_CO |
dc.publisher.program | Maestría en Didáctica del Inglés para el Aprendizaje Autodirigido (Virtual) | es_CO |
dc.publisher.department | Departamento de Lenguas y Culturas Extranjeras | es_CO |
dc.identifier.local | 269589 | |
dc.identifier.local | TE09824 | |
dc.type.hasVersion | publishedVersion | es_CO |
dc.rights.accessRights | openAccess | es_CO |
dc.creator.degree | Magíster en Didáctica del Inglés para el Aprendizaje Autodirigido | es_CO |