Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorGuayacán Velasco, Luz Adriana
dc.contributor.authorMuñoz Melo, Adriana Helena
dc.contributor.authorGuayacán Velasco, Luz Adriana
dc.date.accessioned2018-10-17T15:32:56Z
dc.date.available2018-10-17T15:32:56Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.citationAkkakoson, S. (2013). The relationship between strategic reading instruction, student learning of L2‐ based reading strategies and L2 reading achievement. Journal of Research in Reading, 36(4), 422-450
dc.identifier.citationArismendi Gómez, F. A., Colorado López, D., & Grajales Marin, L. F. (2011). Reading comprehension in face-to-face and web-based modalities: Graduate students' use of reading and language learning strategies in EFL. Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal, 13(2), 11-28.
dc.identifier.citationBlack, P and Wiliam, D 1998, Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. School of Education, King's College, London, UK. Retrieved from http://www.spd.dcu.ie/site/teaching_today/documents/raisingstandardsthroughclassroomassessm ent.pdf
dc.identifier.citationBoelens, R., De Wever, B., & Voet, M. (2017). Four key challenges to the design of blended learning: A systematic literature review. Educational Research Review, 1.
dc.identifier.citationBrown, J. D. (2005). Testing in language programs: A comprehensive guide to English language assessment. New York: Mcgraw Hill.
dc.identifier.citationBrown, Douglas (1994) Teaching by principles: an interactive approach to language pedagogy, Upper Saddle River, Prentice Hall Regents. Retrieved from https://pedufopenglish.files.wordpress.com/2014/06/teaching-by-principles-douglas-brown.pdf
dc.identifier.citationButler, Y. G., & Jiyoon Lee. (2006). On-Task versus Off-Task Self-Assessments among Korean Elementary School Students Studying English. The Modern Language Journal, 90(4), 506–518. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/4127040
dc.identifier.citationCarrell, P., Devine, J., & Eskey, D. (Eds.). (1988). Interactive Approaches to Second Language Reading (Cambridge Applied Linguistics). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9781139524513
dc.identifier.citationClark, M. (2007). Structured text retrieval by means of affordances and genre. Retrieved March 26, 2015, from https://www.bing.com/cr
dc.identifier.citationCorrea Morales, E., & Mendieta, Jenny dir. (2013). Developing Reading Strategies to Foster Autonomy / Elizabeth Correa Morales; dirección por Jenny Mendieta. Chía: Universidad de La Sabana.
dc.identifier.citationDay, R. R., & Park, J. S. (2005). Developing Reading Comprehension Questions. Reading in a foreign language, 17(1), 60-73. Retrieved from:http://nflrc.hawaii.edu/rfl/April2005/day/day.html
dc.identifier.citationDurkin, D. (1978). What classroom observations reveal about reading comprehension instruction. Reading Research Quarterly, 481-533.Retrieved from https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/bitstream/handle/2142/17858/ctrstreadtechrepv01978i00106_opt. pdf?sequence=1
dc.identifier.citationDenton, C. A., Vaughn, S., & Fletcher, J. M. (2003). Bringing Research-Based Practice in Reading Intervention to Scale. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice,18(3), 201-211. doi:10.1111/1540-5826.00075
dc.identifier.citationDownes, S. 2011. Connectivism and connective knowledge. Newsletter. http://www.downes.ca/ post/54540 (accessed 24 June 2012)
dc.identifier.citationDreyer, C., & Nel, C. (2003). Teaching reading strategies and reading comprehension within a technology-enhanced learning environment. System, 31(3), 349-365. Retrieved from:https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Charl_Nel/publication/222409446_Teaching_reading _strategies_and_reading_comprehension_within_a_technologyenhanced_learning_environment/links/09e415118c009964e1000000.pdf
dc.identifier.citationEllis, R. (2012). Language Teaching Research and Language Pedagogy. Chapter 2 Methods for researching second language classroom. Wiley-Blackwell.
dc.identifier.citationGersten, R., Fuchs, L. S., Williams, J. P., & Baker, S. (2001). Teaching reading comprehension strategies to students with learning disabilities: A review of research. Review of Educational Research, 71(2), 279-320. Retrieved from https://search-proquestcom.ez.unisabana.edu.co/docview/214115607?accountid=45375
dc.identifier.citationGhonsooly, B., & Seyyedrezaie, Z. S. (2014). The comparison of language learning strategies and reading comprehension of Iranian EFL students taking web-based and face-to-face instruction. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 4(6), 1296
dc.identifier.citationGonzález-Videgaray, M., Hernández-Zamora, G., & Jesús, H. (2009). Learning objects in theory and practice: A vision from Mexican University teachers. Computers & Education, 53(4), 1330- 1338
dc.identifier.citationGoodman, K. (1988). The reading process. Interactive approaches to second language reading, 11-21.
dc.identifier.citationGrabe, W. (2009). Reading in a second language: Moving from theory to practice. New York: Cambridge University Press. www.cambridge.org/download_file/753028/0
dc.identifier.citationGrabe, W. (2014). Key Issues in L2 Reading Development.”. In Proceedings of the 4th CELC Symposium for English Language Teachers-Selected Papers (pp. 8-18).
dc.identifier.citationHeinze, A., & Procter, C. T. (2004). Reflections on the use of blended learning. Retrieved from http://usir.salford.ac.uk/1658/1/4247745025H__CP_-_paper9_5.pdf
dc.identifier.citationHoover, W. A., & Gough, P. B. (1990). The simple view of reading. Reading and writing, 2(2), 127- 160
dc.identifier.citationJohnson, A. P. (2005). A short guide to action research. Boston, MA: Pearson.
dc.identifier.citationJohnson, R. B., Turner, L. A., & Onwuegbuzie, A. (2007, April). Toward a Definition of Mixed Methods Research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1, 2nd ser., 122-133. doi:10.4135/9781473930100
dc.identifier.citationKemmins, S., & McTaggart, R. (1988). The action research planner (3rd ed., p. 5). Geelong, Victoria: Deakin University Press.
dc.identifier.citationKumaravadivelu B. (2011) Understanding Language Teaching: From Method to Postmethod. Retrieved from: http://livelongday.files.wordpress.com/2011/08/kumaraposmethod.pdf
dc.identifier.citationLeBlanc, R., & Painchaud, G. (1985). Self-Assessment as a Second Language Placement Instrument. TESOL Quarterly, 19(4), 673–687. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org.ezproxy.unisabana.edu.co/stable/3586670
dc.identifier.citationLevy, Roger, Dickerson, Claire, & Teague, Joanna. (2011). Developing Blended Learning Resources and Strategies to Support Academic Reading: A Student-Centred Approach. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 35(1), 89-106. Retrieved from http://researchprofiles.herts.ac.uk/portal/files/395098/905175.pdf
dc.identifier.citationLysenko, L. V., & Abrami, P. C. (2014). Promoting reading comprehension with the use of technology. Computers & Education, 75, 162-172
dc.identifier.citationLopera Medina, S. A. (2014). Comparación de un curso de competencia lectora en inglés como lengua Extranjera (LE) en dos modalidades: distancia/virtual y presencial. Núcleo, 26(31), 147-175. Retrieved from http://www.scielo.org.ve/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0798- 97842014000100006.
dc.identifier.citationMarton, F., & Booth, S. (2013). Learning and awareness. Routledge
dc.identifier.citationMccarthy, J. (2010). Blended learning environments: Using social networking sites to enhance the first year experience. AJET Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(6), 729-740. doi:10.14742/ajet.1039
dc.identifier.citationMcGreal, R. (2004). Learning objects: A practical definition. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning (IJITDL), 9(1).
dc.identifier.citationMcMillan, J. H., & Hearn, J. (2008). Student self-assessment: The key to stronger student motivation and higher achievement. Educational Horizons, 40-49
dc.identifier.citationMcNamara, D. S. (Ed.). (2012). Reading comprehension strategies: Theories, interventions, and technologies. Psychology Press
dc.identifier.citationMehring, J. G. (2005). Developing vocabulary in second language acquisition: From Theories to the Classroom. Retrieved from http://www.hpu.edu/CHSS/LangLing/TESOL/ProfessionalDevelopment/200680TWPfall06/03Me hring. pdf
dc.identifier.citationMinistry of National Education. (2014). Colombia very well! Programa nacional de inglés 2015- 2025: Documento de socialización. Retrieved from http://www.colombiaaprende.edu.co/html/micrositios/1752/articles-343287_recurso_1.pdf
dc.identifier.citationMontalvo Bedoya, L. D. S., & Acero Rios, C. L. (2013). Improving reading comprehension and selfdirected learning through the use of explicit reading strategies and personal blogs on high school students
dc.identifier.citationMoreillon, J. (2007). Collaborative Strategies for Teaching Reading Comprehension: Maximizing Your Impact. Chicago: ALA Editions of the American Library Association. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com.ezproxy.unisabana.edu.co/login.aspx?direct=true&db=e000xww&A N=269629&lang=es&site=ehost-live&scope=site&ebv=EB&ppid=pp_58
dc.identifier.citationNation, P. (2014). How much input do you need to learn the most frequent 9,000 words? Reading in a foreign language, 26(2), 1-16. Retrieved from http://nflrc.hawaii.edu/rfl/October2014/articles/nation.pdf
dc.identifier.citationNicol, D. J., & Macfarlane‐Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self‐regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in higher education, 31(2), 199-218.
dc.identifier.citationNovak, J. D. (2002). Meaningful learning: The essential factor for conceptual change in limited or inappropriate propositional hierarchies leading to empowerment of learners. Science education, 86(4), 548-571.
dc.identifier.citationNunan, D. and Bailey, K. (2009). Exploring Second Language Classroom Research. Boston: Heinle/Cengage Learning.
dc.identifier.citationOsguthorpe, R. T., & Graham, C. R. (2003). Blended learning systems: Definitions and directions. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 4(3), 227–234
dc.identifier.citationPolsani, P. (2003). Use and Abuse of Reusable Learning Objects. Journal of Digital Information, 3(4). Retrieved November 26, 2015, from https://journals.tdl.org/jodi/index.php/jodi/article/view/89/88
dc.identifier.citationPressley, M., Wharton-McDonald, R., Allington, R., Block, C. C., & Morrow, L. (1998). The Nature of Effective First-Grade Literacy Instruction. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED427338.pdf
dc.identifier.citationPressley, M., & Afflerbach, P. (2009). Verbal protocols of reading: the nature of constructively responsive reading. Retrieved from https://books.google.com.co/books?hl=es&lr=&id=ojYqvDqdtsoC&oi=fnd&pg=PP2&ots=CMfa ABpIk9&sig=ZTyzXTJ6V6wrvTnCVuEeiu6Cykw#v=onepage&q&f=false
dc.identifier.citationRevell, R., & Sweeney, S. (1993). In print: reading business English. Cambridge University Press.
dc.identifier.citationRichards, J. C. (2013). Curriculum Approaches in Language Teaching: Forward, Central, and Backward Design. RELC Journal: A Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 44(1), 5-33. Retrieved from https://www.dl.icdst.org/pdfs/files1/82447f2ce55d9cade0d7f1009f83739d.pdf
dc.identifier.citationRoberts, C. (1994). Transferring literacy skills from L1 to L2: From theory to practice. The Journal of Educational Issues of Language Minority Students, 13, 209-221. Retrieved from https://ncela.ed.gov/files/rcd/BE019750/Transferring_Literacy.pdf
dc.identifier.citationSencibaugh, J. M., & Sencibaugh, A. M. (2015). The effects of questioning the author on the reading comprehension of middle school students. Reading Improvement, 52(3), 85-92.. Retrieved from http://web.a.ebscohost.com.ezproxy.unisabana.edu.co/ehost/
dc.identifier.citationSerravallo, J. (2014). Reading Time with GOALS IN MIND. Educational Leadership, 72(1), 54-59. Retrieved from: http://web.b.ebscohost.com.ez.unisabana.edu.co/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=1&sid=f16f3ff1 -9415-4c97-be33-5c4748ba2e1e%40sessionmgr104
dc.identifier.citationSharma, P. (2010). Blended learning. ELT journal, 64(4), 456-458. Retrieved from https://oup.silverchair-cdn.com/oup/backfile/Content_public/Journal/eltj/64/4/10.1093/
dc.identifier.citationSinghal, M. (1998). A comparison of L1 and L2 reading: Cultural differences and schema. The internet TESL journal, 4(10), 4-10.
dc.identifier.citationSmith, F. (2004). Understanding reading: A psycholinguistic analysis of reading and learning to read. Routledge.
dc.identifier.citationSnow, C. E., Science and Technology Policy Institute (Rand, C. (Rand Corporation), & United, S. (2002). Reading for Understanding: Toward an R&D Program in Reading Comprehension. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation. retrieved from http://web.b.ebscohost.com.ezproxy.unisabana.edu.co/ehost/ebookviewer/ebook/
dc.identifier.citationSwaffar, J. K. (1988). Readers, texts, and second languages: The interactive process. Modern Language Journal, 80, 461-477.
dc.identifier.citationUribe-Enciso, O. (2015). Improving EFL students’ performance in reading comprehension through explicit instruction in strategies. Rastros Rostros, 17(31).
dc.identifier.citationVan Lier, Leo. (1994). Action research. Sintagma, 6: 31-37. Retrieved from http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:zzwFAzv9imYJ:www.raco.cat/index.ph p/Sintagma/article/download/60441/94230+&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=co
dc.identifier.citationWiley, D. A. (2000). Connecting learning objects to instructional design theory: A definition, a metaphor, and a taxonomy. In D. A. Wiley (Ed.), The instructional use of learning objects (pp. 1- 23). Retrieved July 30, 2016, from http://www.reusability.org/read/chapters/wiley.doc.
dc.identifier.citationWiley, D. (2011). Learning Objects, Content Management, and E-Learning. In Ferran & Minguillón Content management for e-learning. New York: Springer
dc.identifier.citationYang, Y. F. (2011). Blended learning for college students with English reading difficulties. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 25(5), 393-410. Retrieved from http://lc.yuntech.edu.tw/dmdocuments/5._Blending_learning_for_college_students.pdf
dc.identifier.citationZimmerman, M. (1990). Toward a theory of learned hopefulness: A structural model analysis of participation and empowerment. Journal of Research in Personality, 24(1), 71-86.
dc.identifier.citationZimmerman, B. J., & Schunk, D. H. (Eds.). (2001). Self-Regulated Learning and Academic Achievement: Theoretical Perspectives. Routledge.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10818/34113
dc.description127 Páginases_CO
dc.description.abstractThis project is a research report, which inquired about the reading comprehension level of tenth and eleventh graders from a public high school. Before that, a needs analysis and a KET (Key English Test) as a diagnostic test were applied. The objectives of this research were to assess how students recognize explicit information in a text to answer questions with the appropriate response through the use of digital learning objects in a blended environment; and to determine if the use of these DLO contributed to improve students’ reading comprehension and the acquisition of new vocabulary. The project was applied in a public school in Bogotá to students of tenth and eleventh grade, due to the low reading comprehension found after applying them a KET test and a needs analysis. This action research used task based methodology in a blended learning environment where thirteen lessons were created based on digital learning objects in a MOODLE platform. These lessons helped students to improve their reading comprehension strategies and to increase their vocabulary. A mixed method analysis allowed researchers to determine that both objectives were effectively met while students enhanced their self-directed learning process.es_CO
dc.formatapplication/pdfes_CO
dc.language.isoenges_CO
dc.publisherUniversidad de La Sabanaes_CO
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.sourceUniversidad de La Sabana
dc.sourceIntellectum Repositorio Universidad de La Sabana
dc.subjectComprensión de lecturaes_CO
dc.subjectEducación secundariaes_CO
dc.subjectInnovaciones tecnológicases_CO
dc.subjectInnovaciones educativases_CO
dc.subjectAprendizajees_CO
dc.subjectMoodle (Programa para computadora)es_CO
dc.subject.otherReading comprehension strategies
dc.subject.otherdigital learning objects
dc.subject.otherblended learning
dc.titleDeveloping high school students’ reading comprehension and self-directed learning strategies through the use of digital learning objectses_CO
dc.typemasterThesises_CO
dc.publisher.programMaestría en Didáctica del Inglés para el Aprendizaje Autodirigido (Virtual)es_CO
dc.publisher.departmentDepartamento de Lenguas y Culturas Extranjerases_CO
dc.identifier.local269589
dc.identifier.localTE09824
dc.type.hasVersionpublishedVersiones_CO
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccesses_CO
dc.creator.degreeMagíster en Didáctica del Inglés para el Aprendizaje Autodirigidoes_CO


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 InternationalExcept where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International