Show simple item record

Differentiated instruction and oral tiered activities to impact a1 students’ english level in a multilevel classroom

dc.contributor.advisorJiménez Bonilla, María Sonia Stella
dc.contributor.authorGarcía Fonseca, Jaime Andrés
dc.contributor.authorCasallas Gordillo, Wilmar Javier
dc.date.accessioned2016-05-21T17:03:05Z
dc.date.available2016-05-21T17:03:05Z
dc.date.created2016
dc.date.issued2016-04-25
dc.identifier.citationAdams, C. M., & Pierce, R. (2006). Differentiating instruction: A practical guide for tiered lessons in the elementary grades. Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
dc.identifier.citationAl-Shammakhi, F., & Al-Humaidi, S. (2015). Challenges Facing EFL Teachers in Mixed Ability Classes and Strategies Used to Overcome Them. World Journal of English Language, 5(3), 33.
dc.identifier.citationAndersen, K. (2009). What does the literature on differentiated instruction recommend to teachers who want to meet the needs of all their students? (Doctoral dissertation, Bemidji State University, Bemidji, MN).
dc.identifier.citationAusubel, D. P. (2000). The acquisition and retention of knowledge: A cognitive view. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
dc.identifier.citationBalliro, L. (1997). Multiple levels multi responsibilities. National Center for the Study of Adult Learning and Literacy. 1(C), 6-8.
dc.identifier.citationBarnes, J. A. (1980) Who Should Know What? Social science, privacy, and ethics. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
dc.identifier.citationBell, J. (1991). Teaching multilevel classes in ESL. San Diego, CA: Dominie Press.
dc.identifier.citationBenefits of learning journals / logs in EFL classrooms. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.academia.edu/7606301/benefits_of_learning_journals_logs_in_EFL_classroom s
dc.identifier.citationBenson, P. (2007). Autonomy in language teaching and learning. Language Teaching, 40(1), 21- 40.
dc.identifier.citationBenson, P. (2010). Teacher education and teacher autonomy: creating spaces for experimentation in secondary school English language teaching. Language Teaching Research, 14(3), 259- 275.
dc.identifier.citationBerry, E. & Williams, M.S. (1992). Multilevel ESL curriculum guide. Salem, OR: Oregon State Department of Education.
dc.identifier.citationBirks, M., & Mills, J. (2011).Grounded theory: A practical guide. Los Angeles, CA: Sage
dc.identifier.citationBizzell, P. (1989). Review of social construction of written communication. College Composition and Communication 40, 483–486.
dc.identifier.citationBloom, B. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals, by a committee of college and university examiners. New York, NY: D. McKay. Bondley, D. (2011). How will Differentiated Instruction affect Student Learning? (Doctoral dissertation, Minot State University, Minot, ND).
dc.identifier.citationBrown, H.D. (1980). Principles of Language Learning and Teaching. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
dc.identifier.citationBrown, H.D. (1994). Teaching by principles: an interactive approach to language pedagogy. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall Regents.
dc.identifier.citationBrown, R. S., & Nation, P. (1997). Teaching speaking: Suggestions for the classroom. The Language Teacher- Kyoto-JALT. 21, 11-15.
dc.identifier.citationBryant, P. (1995). Collaborative action research "on the cutting edge". (Doctoral dissertation, University of Lethbridge, Lethbridge, Canada).
dc.identifier.citationBurns, A. (2003). Collaborative action research for English language teachers. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
dc.identifier.citationBurns, A., & Joyce, H. (1997). Focus on Speaking. North Ryde, N.S.W, Australia: National Centre for English Language Teaching and Research
dc.identifier.citationBurt, M. (1997). The multilevel umbrella. National Center for the Study of Adult Learning and Literacy, 1(C).
dc.identifier.citationButt, R. L., Townsend, D., & Raymond, D. (1990). Bringing Reform to Life: Teachers' Stories and Professional Development. Cambridge Journal of Education, 20(3), 255-268. doi: 10.1080/0305764900200305
dc.identifier.citationBygate, M. (2006). Areas of research that influence L2 speaking instruction. In Juan, E. U., & Flor, A. M. (Eds.), Studies on Language Acquisition. Current trends in the Development and Teaching of the Four Language Skills, 159-186. Berlin, Germany: M. de Gruyter.
dc.identifier.citationByrne, D. (1991). Teaching oral English. Harlow, England: Longman
dc.identifier.citationCarson, T., Connors, B., Ripley, D., & Smits, H. (1989). Creating Possibilities: An action research handbook. Edmonton, AB: University of Alberta, Faculty of Education.
dc.identifier.citationCohen, L., Manion, L., and Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education (6th ed). London, England: Routledge Falmer
dc.identifier.citationConklin, W. (2007). Applying Differentiation Strategies: Teacher's handbook for grades 3-5. Huntington Beach, CA: Shell Education.
dc.identifier.citationCowles, S. K. (1997). Technology melts classroom walls. National Center for the Study of Adult Learning and Literacy. 1(C), 11-13. Retrieved from http://ncsall.net/index.php@id=440.html
dc.identifier.citationDeepa, S. (2012). Task-based oral communication teaching. English for Specific Purposes World. 12(35).
dc.identifier.citationDing, A. (2009). Tensions and struggles in fostering collaborative teacher autonomy online. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 3(1), 65-81. doi:10.1080/17501220802655490
dc.identifier.citationField, P.A., & Morse, J.M. (1992). Nursing research. The application of qualitative approaches. Rockville, MD: Aspen Systems.
dc.identifier.citationFlorez, M. C. (1999). Improving Adult English Language Learners' Speaking Skills. Washington, DC: National Clearinghouse for ESL Literacy Education.
dc.identifier.citationGlaser, B. (1965). The Constant Comparative Method of Qualitative Analysis. Social Problems, 12(4), 436-445. doi: 10.1525/sp.1965.12.4.03a00070
dc.identifier.citationGubrium, J. F., & Holstein, J. A. (2002). Handbook of interview research: Context and method. London, England: Sage.
dc.identifier.citationHeacox, D. (2012). Differentiating instruction in the regular classroom: How to reach and teach all learners. Minneapolis, MN: Free Spirit Publishing.
dc.identifier.citationHess, N. (2001). Teaching large multilevel classes. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
dc.identifier.citationHume, K. (2008). Start where they are: Differentiating for success with the young adolescent. Toronto, ON. Pearson Education Canada.
dc.identifier.citationIberri-Shea, G. (2009). Using public speaking tasks in English language teaching. English Teaching Forum, 47(2), 18-36. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ923450.pdf
dc.identifier.citationJohnsen, S. (2003). Adapting instruction with heterogeneous groups. Gifted Child Today, 26(3), 5-5
dc.identifier.citationKhan, S., & Blaya, M. V. (2010). Strategies and spoken production on three oral communication tasks:A study of high and low proficiency EFL learners. (Unpublished master’s thesis). Universitat Aut noma de Barcelona, Barcelona, España. Retrieved from http://www.tdx.cat/bitstream/handle/10803/32083/sk1de1.pdf?sequence=1
dc.identifier.citationKingore, B. (2006). Tiered instruction: Beginning the process. Teaching for High Potential, 5-6.
dc.identifier.citationKirkey, T. L. (2005). Differentiated instruction and enrichment opportunities: An action research report. The Ontario Action Researcher, 8(3), 1-5.
dc.identifier.citationKohn, A. (1993). Choices for children: Why and how to let students decide. Phi Delta Kappan, 75(1), 8-16. Retrieved from http://www.alfiekohn.org/article/choices-children/
dc.identifier.citationKvale, S. (1996). Interviews. An introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
dc.identifier.citationLandrum, T. J., & McDuffie, K. A. (2010). Learning styles in the age of differentiated instruction. Exceptionality, 18(1), 6-17. doi: 10.1080/09362830903462441
dc.identifier.citationLieberman, A. (1995). Practices that support teacher development: Transforming conceptions of professional learning. Phi Delta Kappan, 76(8), 591-596.
dc.identifier.citationMorrow, D. G., Leirer, V. O., Andrassy, J. M., Hier, C. M., & Menard, W. E. (1998). The influence of list format and category headers on age differences in understanding medication instructions. Experimental aging research, 24(3), 231-256. doi: 10.1080/036107398244238
dc.identifier.citationMunhall, P. (1988). Ethical considerations in qualitative research. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 10(2), 150-162. doi:10.1177/019394598801000204
dc.identifier.citationPasuy, N. (2013). Exploring Third Graders’ Reading Comprehension through the Implementation of Tiered products for Differentiated Instruction. (Unpublished master's thesis for master's degree). Universidad de la Sabana, Chía, Colombia.
dc.identifier.citationPeña, M., & Onatra, A. (2009). Promoting oral production through the task-based learning approach: a study in a public secondary school in Colombia. Profile Issues in Teachers Professional Development, 11(2), 11-26
dc.identifier.citationPierce, R. L., & Adams, C. M. (2005). Using tiered lessons in mathematics. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 11(3), 144-149.
dc.identifier.citationRamos, M.C. (1989). Some ethical implications of qualitative research. Research in Nursing & Health, 12,(1), 57-63. doi:10.1002/nur.4770120109
dc.identifier.citationRichards, J. C. (2006). Communicative language teaching today. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
dc.identifier.citationRichards, J. C., Rodgers, T. S. (2001). Approaches and methods in language teaching: A description and analysis (2nd ed.). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
dc.identifier.citationRichards, M. R. E., & Omdal, S. N. (2007). Effects of tiered instruction on academic performance in a secondary science course. Journal of Advanced Academics, 18(3), 424- 453.
dc.identifier.citationRoberts, M. (2007). Teaching in the multilevel classroom. Pearson Education Inc. 1-4. Retrieved from http://www.pearsonlongman.com/ae/download/adulted/multilevel_monograph.pdf
dc.identifier.citationSagor, R. (1992). How to conduct collaborative action research. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
dc.identifier.citationSantopietro, K. (1991). Multi-level ESL classroom instruction module. Denver, CO: Colorado Department of Education.
dc.identifier.citationSchmoker, M. (2010). When pedagogic fads trump priorities. Education Week, 30(5), 22-23. Retrieved from: http://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2010/09/29/05schmoker.h30.html
dc.identifier.citationScriven, M. (2000). The logic and methodology of checklists. [PDF file]. Retrieved from http://preval.org/documentos/2075.pdf
dc.identifier.citationShank, C. & Terrill, L. (1995). Teaching multilevel adult ESL classes. Washington, DC: ERIC National Clearinghouse for ESL Literacy Education. Retrieved from http://www.cal.org/caela/esl_resources/digests/SHANK.html
dc.identifier.citationStenbacka, C. (2001). Qualitative research requires quality concepts of its own. Management Decision, 39(7), 551-555. doi:10.1108/eum0000000005801
dc.identifier.citationStevens, J.R., Lasso, H. N., & Quintero, J. (2012). Speaking activities and pedagogical strategies to promote oral participation among fifth grade-introverted students. Undergraduate thesis. Universidad Tecnológica de Pereira. Retrieved from: http://recursosbiblioteca.utp.edu.co/tesisd/textoyanexos/3022242S844.pdf
dc.identifier.citationStraightforward Beginner and Elementary Placement test (2012) Retrieved from http://www.macmillanstraightforward.com/resources/tests/
dc.identifier.citationStrauss, A. & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research. Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage
dc.identifier.citationStrauss, A. & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
dc.identifier.citationStrauss, A., & Corbin, J. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. (3rd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
dc.identifier.citationStringer, E. T. (2007). Action research. (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
dc.identifier.citationSvärd, A. (2006). The challenge of mixed-ability classes. How should upper secondary English teachers work in order to help the weaker students?. Jönköping, Sweden: Högskolan för lärande och kommunikation. (HLK)
dc.identifier.citationTaba, H. (1966). Teaching strategies and cognitive functioning in elementary school children. San Francisco, CA: San Francisco State College
dc.identifier.citationTakač, V.P. (2008). Vocabulary learning strategies and foreign language acquisition, Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
dc.identifier.citationThomas, D. & Inkson, K. (2009). Cultural intelligence: Living and working globally. (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler.
dc.identifier.citationTomlinson, C. A. (1995). Deciding to differentiate instruction in the middle school: One school's journey. Gifted Child Quarterly, 39(2), 77-114. doi: 10.1177/001698629503900204
dc.identifier.citationTomlinson, C. A. (1999). The differentiated classroom: Responding to the needs of all learners. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
dc.identifier.citationTomlinson, C. A. (2001). How to differentiate instruction in mixed-ability classrooms. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
dc.identifier.citationTomlinson, C. A. (2001 b). Differentiated instruction in the regular classroom: What does it mean? How does it look? Understanding Our Gifted, 14(1), 3-6.
dc.identifier.citationTomlinson, C. A. (2014). The differentiated classroom: Responding to the needs of all learners. (2nd ed.). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development
dc.identifier.citationTomlinson, C. A., & Allan, S. D. (2000). Leadership for differentiating schools & classrooms. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
dc.identifier.citationUr, P. (1991). A Course in language teaching. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
dc.identifier.citationValentic, D. (2005). ELT in multilevel classes. Hupe Newsletter, 23, 1-4.
dc.identifier.citationVan Duzer, C. (1997). Improving ESL learners’ listening skills: At the workplace and beyond. Washington, DC: National Clearinghouse for ESL Literacy Education, Project in Adult Immigrant Education. Retrieved from http://www.cal.org/caela/esl_resources/digests/LISTENQA.html
dc.identifier.citationVancouver Community College Learning Center (2013) Checklist for improving speaking skills. Vancouver, BC: Author.
dc.identifier.citationVygotsky, L.S. (1986). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
dc.identifier.citationVygotsky, L. S. & Cole, M. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, England: Harvard University Press.
dc.identifier.citationWeiss, R. S. (1994). Learning from strangers: The art and method of qualitative interview studies. New York, NY: Free Press.
dc.identifier.citationWillis, J. (1996). A Framework for task-based learning, London, England: Longman.
dc.identifier.citationYorkey, R. (1985). Talk-a-tivities: Problem solving and puzzles for pairs. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10818/24260
dc.description1 archivo de lectura en pdf.es_CO
dc.description.abstract​Este proyecto de investigación acción colaborativa se llevó a cabo en una institución pública de Bogotá llamada Reino de Holanda. Los participantes fueron 25 estudiantes entre 13 y 16 años de edad de los grados octavo y noveno. Los objetivos de este proyecto de investigación fueron determinar el posible impacto que la instrucción diferenciada y las actividades orales por niveles podrían tener en el mejoramiento de las habilidades de los estudiantes en inglés y examinar los posibles beneficios (si los hay), que las actividades por niveles tienen en el interés de los estudiantes por aprender inglés. Los instrumentos seleccionados para llevar a cabo la toma de datos fueron una prueba oral, una lista de control, y los registros de los estudiantes. Esta implementación se realizó mediante el aumento de la complejidad en las actividades y centrándose en el desarrollo de actividades orales de los estudiantes. Los resultados demuestran que la enseñanza diferenciada y las actividades orales por niveles mejoraron el nivel de inglés de los estudiantes, fomentaron la conciencia hacia su proceso de aprendizaje, metas futuras, el compromiso y la motivación. En este proyecto, algunos estudios de investigación basados en los constructos de instrucción diferenciada y actividades por nivel fueron mencionados, pero ninguno de estos implementó ambos constructos para enseñar inglés como lengua extranjera basados actividades orales. Es por ello, que este proyecto de investigación innova incorporando ambos constructos para enseñar inglés como lengua extranjera basado en actividades orales. Por último, la instrucción diferenciada podría ser un método para resolver las dificultades que los profesores pueden encontrar en las aulas multinivel no sólo en inglés como lengua extranjera, sino también en otras asignaturas del plan de estudios en nuestro contexto.es_CO
dc.formatapplication/pdfes_CO
dc.language.isoenges_CO
dc.publisherUniversidad de La Sabanaes_CO
dc.sourceUniversidad de La Sabana
dc.sourceIntellectum Repositorio Universidad de La Sabana
dc.titleDifferentiated instruction and oral tiered activities to impact a1 students’ english level in a multilevel classroomes_CO
dc.typemasterThesises_CO
dc.publisher.programMaestría en Didáctica del Inglés para el Aprendizaje Autodirigidoes_CO
dc.publisher.departmentDepartamento de Lenguas y Culturas Extranjeraes_CO
dc.identifier.local262091
dc.identifier.localTE08271
dc.type.localTesis de maestría
dc.type.hasVersionpublishedVersiones_CO
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccesses_CO
dc.creator.degreeMagíster en Didáctica del Inglés para el Aprendizaje Autodirigidoes_CO
dc.subject.armarcEnseñanza del inglés -- Método bilingue -- Colombia
dc.subject.armarcInglés básico
dc.subject.armarcInglés técnico
dc.identifier.repourlhttp://intellectum.unisabana.edu.co/


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Jaime Andres Garcia Fonseca ...
Size:
1.865Mb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Ver documento en PDF
View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record