Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

The influence of goanimate and cooperative work in a1 fourth and sixth graders’ writing skills.

dc.contributor.advisorÁlvarez Ayure, Claudia Patricia
dc.contributor.authorQuiroga, Gina Marcela
dc.contributor.authorToro Nieto, Olga Stella
dc.date.accessioned2015-11-25T14:46:39Z
dc.date.available2015-11-25T14:46:39Z
dc.date.created2015
dc.date.issued2015-11-25
dc.identifier.citationAdams, D., & Hamm, M. (1996). Cooperative learning: Critical thinking and collaboration across the curriculum. C. Thomas, Publishers, 2600 South First Street, Springfield. Eric.
dc.identifier.citationAhangari, S., & Samadian, Z. (2014). The effect of cooperative learning activities on writing skills of Iranian EFL learners. Linguistics and Literature Studies, 2(4), 121-130.
dc.identifier.citationAl-Munawwarah, S. F. (2015). Teachers’ perceptions on the use of ICT in Indonesian EFL learning context. English Review: Journal of English Education, 3(1).
dc.identifier.citationAnderson, J., & Weert, T. (2002). Information and communication technology in education: A curriculum for schools and programme of teacher development. France: Unesco.
dc.identifier.citationBarrera-Osorio, F., & Linden, L. L. (2009). The use and misuse of computers in education: Evidence from a randomized experiment in Colombia. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper Series, (Vol, 1,pp. 43). University of Texas: Wbp
dc.identifier.citationBell, J. (2014). Doing your research project: A guide for first-time researchers. England, McGraw-Hill Education.
dc.identifier.citationBenson, P. (2013). Teaching and researching: Autonomy in language learning. 711 Third Avenue, New York, NY 10017, USA: Routledge.
dc.identifier.citationBoscolo, P., & Mason, L. (2001). Writing to learn, writing to transfer. Writing as a learning tool. pp. 83-104. doi: 10.1007/978-94-010-0740-5_6
dc.identifier.citationBoud, D. (2012). Developing student autonomy in learning. New York, NY: Nichols Publishing Company.
dc.identifier.citationBreen, M. P., & Mann, S. (1997). Shooting arrows at the sun: Perspectives on a pedagogy for autonomy. Autonomy and Independence in Language Learning. In: Benson & Voller’s. (Eds.). Autonomy and independence in language learning. New York, NY: Addison Wesley Longman.
dc.identifier.citationBritton, J. (1972). Writing to learn and learning to write. Philadelphia. USA. John Benjamins Publishing.
dc.identifier.citationBrophy, J. E. (2013). Motivating students to learn. New York, NY. Routledge.
dc.identifier.citationBrown, H. D. (1994). Teaching by principles. London. Longman.
dc.identifier.citationBush, M. D., & Terry, R. M. (1997). Technology-enhanced language learning. Ntc Publishing Group.
dc.identifier.citationButler-Pascoe, M. E., & Wiburg, K. M. (2003). Technology and teaching English language learners. Farmville, VA: Pearson College Division.
dc.identifier.citationCamilleri, G. (2007). Pedagogy for autonomy, teachers’ attitudes and institutional change: A case study. Challenges in Teacher Development: Learner Autonomy and Intercultural Competence, English Language Teaching Journal. 81-102.
dc.identifier.citationCampbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56(2), 81 - 105. doi:10.1037h0046016
dc.identifier.citationCandy, P. C. (1991). Self-direction for lifelong learning. A comprehensive guide to theory and practice. San Francisco. ERIC.
dc.identifier.citationCarr, W., & Kemmis, S. (1983). Becoming critical: Knowing through action research. Geelong, Victoria: Deakin University.
dc.identifier.citationCarr, W., & Kemmis, S. (2003). Becoming critical: Education knowledge and action research. New York, NY: Routledge.
dc.identifier.citationCarson, T. R., Connors, B., Smits, H., & Ripley, D. (1989). Creating Possibilities: An Action Research Handbook. University of Alberta. Faculty of Education.
dc.identifier.citationCarver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1999). Themes and issues in the self-regulation of behaviour. Wyer. Jr. R.S. (Ed).Perspectives on behavioural self-regulation (pp. 1- 105) Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
dc.identifier.citationCenteno Moncada, E., Montenegro, G. M., Montes, S. M., Cristina, R., & Acero, C. L. (2013). Collaborative Learning Teams: A Strategy to Foster Self-Directed Language Learning in A1 Colombian Students.
dc.identifier.citationChapelle, C. (2003). English language learning and technology: Lectures on applied linguistics in the age of information and communication technology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
dc.identifier.citationClavijo Olarte, A., & Quintero, L. M. (2012). An experience of initial English teaching training incorporating ICT in language teaching. Bogota: Universidad Distrital.
dc.identifier.citationCohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2004). A guide to teaching practice. (4th ed.). New York: Routledge.
dc.identifier.citationCollins, A., & Greeno, J. G. (2011). Situational view of learning. In Aukrust, V; editor, Learning and cognition, pages 64-68. Elsevier.
dc.identifier.citationCooke, N. J. (1994). Varieties of knowledge elicitation techniques. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 41(6), 801-849.
dc.identifier.citationCorbin, J. M., & Strauss, A. (1990). Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qualitative Sociology, 13(1), 3-21.
dc.identifier.citationCorbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2014). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Sage publications.
dc.identifier.citationCórdoba, J., & Midgley, G. (2006). Broadening the boundaries: An application of critical systems thinking to IS planning in Colombia. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 57(9), 1064-1080.
dc.identifier.citationCox, M. J. (2002). 2 motivating pupils through the use of ICT. Learning to Teach using ICT in the Secondary School: A Companion to School Experience. Oxford, UK: Routledge.
dc.identifier.citationCraig, D. V. (2009). Action research essentials. San Francisco, CA: Jossey - Bass.
dc.identifier.citationCresswell, A. (2000). Self-monitoring in student writing: Developing learner responsibility. ELT Journal, 54(3), 235-244.
dc.identifier.citationCuesta, L., & Rincón, S. (2010). Short story student-writers: Active roles in writing through the use of e-portfolio dossier. Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal, 12(1), 99-114.
dc.identifier.citationDabbagh, N., & Kitsantas, A. (2012). Personal learning environments, social media, and selfregulated learning: A natural formula for connecting formal and informal learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 15(1), 3-8. Elsevier Inc. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.06.002
dc.identifier.citationDickinson, L., Strevens, P., & Altman, H. B. (1987). Self-instruction in language learning. Cambridge, UK: University Press.
dc.identifier.citationDişlen, G. (2011). Exploration of how students perceive autonomous learning in an EFL Context. Edited by David Gardner.
dc.identifier.citationDudeney, G. (2007). The internet and the language classroom. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
dc.identifier.citationFerlazzo, L. (2007). The best math sites for English language learners-2007. Larry Ferlazzo’s Websites of the Day. http://larryferlazzo.edublogs.org/
dc.identifier.citationFraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (1993). How to design and evaluate research in education. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill
dc.identifier.citationGanci, J. (2013) "Go and animate with go! Animate". Learning solutions magazine. Retrieved from: http://www.learningsolutionsmag.com/articles/1142/go-and-animate-with-goanimate.
dc.identifier.citationGillespie, J., & McKee, J. (1999). Does it fit and does it make any difference? Integrating CALL into the curriculum. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 12(5), 441-455.
dc.identifier.citationGlaser, B. G. (1978). Theoretical sensitivity: Advances in the methodology of grounded theory Sociological Press.
dc.identifier.citationGlaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative inquiry. Chicago: Aldine
dc.identifier.citationGonzález, A. (2007) Professional Development of EFL Teachers in Colombia: Between Colonial and Local Practices. Ikala, Revista de Lenguaje y Cultura 12, 309-332.
dc.identifier.citationGooden-Jones, E. M., & Carrasquillo, A. L. (1998). Developing English writing proficiency in limited English proficient college students through cooperative learning strategies. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED423668)
dc.identifier.citationGraham, S. (2008). Effective writing instruction for all students. Wisconsin Rapids : Renaissance learning
dc.identifier.citationGraham, S., & Harris, K. R. (2006). Graham, S., & Harris, K. R. (2006). Strategy instruction and the teaching of writing. Handbook of Writing Research, 187-207.
dc.identifier.citationGraham, S. (2006). Strategy instruction and the teaching of writing: A meta-analysis. In C. A. MacArthur, S. Graham, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (pp. 187-207). New York, NY: Guilford
dc.identifier.citationGraham, S., & Perin, D. (2007). Writing next: Effective strategies to improve writing of adolescents in middle and high schools. A report to the Carnegie Corporation of New York. Washington, DC: Alliance for Excellent Education.
dc.identifier.citationGreenhow, C., Robelia, B., & Hughes, J. E. (2009). Learning, teaching, and scholarship in a digital age web 2.0 and classroom research: What path should we take now? Educational Researcher, 38(4), 246-259.
dc.identifier.citationHarmer, J. (2006). How to teach writing. Harlow: Longman-Pearson.
dc.identifier.citationHayes, D. N. (2007). ICT and learning: Lessons from Australian classrooms. Computers & Education, 49(2), 385-395. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2005.09.003
dc.identifier.citationHerrera Ramirez, Y. E. (2015). Metacognitive Awareness and Enhanced Autonomy through the use of Collaborative Writing and Storybird. Universidad de la Sabana. (Doctoral Dissertation).
dc.identifier.citationHerrera Ramírez, Y. E. (2013). Writing skill enhancement when creating narrative texts through the use of collaborative writing and the storybird web 2.0 tool. Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal, 15(2), 166-183.
dc.identifier.citationHjalmarsson, H. (2015). The effects of ICT on affective factors and teaching practices in the EFL and ESL classroom. https://gupea.ub.gu.se/handle/2077/38731
dc.identifier.citationHopkins, D. (2014). A teacher's guide to classroom research. UK: McGraw-Hill Education.
dc.identifier.citationHudelson, S. (1989). Write on: Children writing in ESL. Englewood Cliffs, NJ 07632: Prentice Hall Regents.
dc.identifier.citationHutchinson, T., & Waters, A. (1987). English for specific purposes. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
dc.identifier.citationJohnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1987). Learning together and alone: Cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning. (2nd ed.), Engelwood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
dc.identifier.citationJohnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1999). Making cooperative learning work. Theory into Practice, 38(2), 67-73.
dc.identifier.citationJohnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Stanne, M. B. (2000). Cooperative Learning Methods: A Meta-Analysis. http://www.cooperation.org/pages/cl-methods.htm
dc.identifier.citationKellogg, R. T., & Raulerson, B. A. (2007). Improving the writing skills of college students. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14(2), 237-242.
dc.identifier.citationLemos Tello, N. C., & Cuesta, L. (2013). Cooperative Learning-Based Strategies to Faster Speaking Confidence through the Participation in an Online Radio show.
dc.identifier.citationLittle, D. (1991). Learner autonomy: Definitions, issues and problems Authentic Language Dublin: Learning Resources Limited.
dc.identifier.citationLiu, N., & Carless, D. (2006). Peer feedback: The learning element of peer assessment. Teaching in Higher Education, 11(3), 279-290.
dc.identifier.citationMartin, J. R. (1992). English text: System and structure. Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing.
dc.identifier.citationMcDougald, J. S. (2013). The use of new technologies among in-service Colombian ELT teachers. Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal, 15(2), 247-264.
dc.identifier.citationMcLoughlin, C., & Lee, M. J. (2007). Social software and participatory learning: Pedagogical choices with technology affordances in the Web 2.0 era. ICT: Providing Choices for Learners and Learning. Proceedings Ascilite Singapore 2007, 664-675.
dc.identifier.citationMcMackin, M. C., & Dawes, E. T. (2009). Learning to write with purpose: Effective instruction in grades 4-8. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
dc.identifier.citationMontague, M. (1990). Computers, cognition, and writing instruction. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
dc.identifier.citationNunan, D. (1992). Collaborative language learning and teaching. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press.
dc.identifier.citationOhri, M., & Dawes, K. (2009). Successful abstract writing: An essential skill for medical writers. The Write Stuff, 18(1), 27-28.
dc.identifier.citationOxford, R. M. N. (2004). Effects of technology-enhanced language learning on second language composition of university-level intermediate Spanish students. University of North Texas.
dc.identifier.citationQuintero, L. M. (2008). Blogging: A way to foster EFL writing. Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal, (10), 7-49.
dc.identifier.citationRestrepo, J. (2006). Estándares básicos en competencias ciudadanas: una aproximación al problema de la formación ciudadana en Colombia. Pap. Polit., Enero-Junio 1(11). 137-176
dc.identifier.citationRijlaarsdam, G., Bergh, H., & Couzijn, M. (2004). Effective learning and teaching of writing: A handbook of writing in education. Springer Science & Business Media.
dc.identifier.citationRodríguez, M. (2009). El plan nacional de TIC 2008–2019. Asociación Colombiana De Ingenieros De Sistemas. Bogota. Universidad Distrital.
dc.identifier.citationRogers, C. (1983). Freedom to learn for the eighties. USA: McMillan Merrill.
dc.identifier.citationRojas Álvarez, G. (2011). Writing using blogs: A way to engage Colombian adolescents in meaningful communication. Profile Issues in Teachers’ Professional Development, 13(2), 11-27.
dc.identifier.citationSharples, M. (1995). An account of writing as creative design. In The Science of Writing, Theories, Methods, Individual Differences and Applications (eds. C.M. Levy & S. Ransdell) pp. 127-148. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.
dc.identifier.citationShih, R. (2011). Can web 2.0 technology assist college students in learning English writing? Integrating Facebook and peer assessment with blended learning. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 27(5), 829-845. http://www.ascilite.org.au/ajet/ajet27/shih.html
dc.identifier.citationSigala, M. (2007). Integrating web 2.0 in e-learning environments: A socio-technical approach. International Journal of Knowledge and Learning, vol. 3, pp. 628-648.
dc.identifier.citationSinclair, J. M., & Coulthard, M. (1975). Towards an analysis of discourse: The English use by teachers and pupils. London: Oxford University Press
dc.identifier.citationSlavin, R. E. (1991). Synthesis of research of cooperative learning. Educational Leadership, 48(5), 71-82.
dc.identifier.citationSolomon, G., & Schrum, L. (2007). Web 2.0: New tools, new schools, Eugene, OR: ISTE.
dc.identifier.citationSorapure, M. (2010). Information visualization, web 2.0, and the teaching of writing. Computers and Composition, 27(1), 59-70.
dc.identifier.citationTavakol, M., & Dennick, R. (2011). Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha. International Journal of Medical Education, 2, 53-55.
dc.identifier.citationVargas, A., Tejada, H., & Colmenares, S. (2011). Estándares básicos de competencias en lenguas extranjeras (Inglés): Una lectura crítica. Lenguaje: Revista de la Escuela de Ciencias del Lenguaje de la Universidad del Valle, 36(1), 241-275.
dc.identifier.citationVygotsky, L. (1987). Zone of proximal development. Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Vol. 5291.
dc.identifier.citationVygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher mental processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
dc.identifier.citationWarschauer, M. (1995). Virtual connections: Online activities & projects for networking language learners. Honolulu: Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center, University of Hawaii at Manoa. TESL reporter 30, 27 -33.
dc.identifier.citationWells, G. (1981). Learning through interaction: Volume 1: The study of language development New York: Cambridge University Press.
dc.identifier.citationWenger, E. (2000). Communities of practice and social learning systems. Organization, 7(2), 225-246
dc.identifier.citationWuest, J. (2012). Grounded theory: The method. Nursing Research: A Qualitative Perspective, 4th Ed. Boston: Massachusetts, Jones and Barlett. 225-256.
dc.identifier.citationZhiwen Hu, S. (2009). ICT, EFL teacher development and the reform of college English in china: An implementation study. 17(2), 147 – 165.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10818/20255
dc.description100 páginas incluye diagramas.
dc.description.abstractEste estudio de investigación acción analizó la influencia del trabajo cooperativo para desarrollar las habilidades de escritura a través del uso de la herramienta GoAnimate. Este estudio fue aplicado en un con Colegio público de la ciudad de Bogotá, Colombia con la participación de 74 estudiantes de cuarto y sexto grado. Al inicio de la intervención se observó dificultad por parte de los estudiantes para trabajar en grupos así como para escribir textos en ingles puesto que no tenían el hábito de trabajar cooperativamente ni de crear composiciones en segunda lengua. Producciones de los estudiantes, entrevistas y listas de control por parte de estudiantes y profesores fueron los instrumentos utilizados para recolectar datos los cuales se analizaron para identificar la influencia de GoAnimate y el trabajo cooperativo en el progreso de escritura en niños y niñas que se encuentran en nivel A1 de segunda lengua a través del método de teoría fundamentada.es_CO
dc.language.isoenges_CO
dc.publisherUniversidad de La Sabana
dc.sourceUniversidad de La Sabana
dc.sourceIntellectum Repositorio Universidad de La Sabana
dc.subjectEducación básica -- Colombia
dc.subjectInglés básico -- Colombia
dc.subjectTrabajo en grupos (Educación) -- Colombia
dc.titleThe influence of goanimate and cooperative work in a1 fourth and sixth graders’ writing skills.es_CO
dc.typemasterThesis
dc.publisher.programMaestría en Didáctica del Inglés con Énfasis en Ambientes de Aprendizaje Autónomo
dc.publisher.departmentDepartamento de Lenguas y Culturas Extranjeras
dc.identifier.local176424
dc.identifier.localTE07911
dc.type.localTesis de maestría
dc.type.hasVersionpublishedVersion
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccesses_CO
dc.creator.degreeMagíster en Didáctica del Inglés con Énfasis en Ambientes de Aprendizaje Autónomo


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail
Nombre:
Gina Marcela Quiroga (tesis).pdf
Tamaño:
5.111Mb
Formato:
PDF
Descripción:
Ver documento en PDF
Ver/

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem