Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.advisorRincón Rodríguez, Carlos Javier
dc.contributor.advisorDuque, José Luis
dc.contributor.authorPaláu Pérez, Luis David
dc.contributor.authorMolina Giraldo, Saulo
dc.contributor.authorTorres, Camilo
dc.contributor.authorZárate, Diana
dc.date.accessioned2013-12-16T21:17:08Z
dc.date.available2013-12-16T21:17:08Z
dc.date.issued2013-12-16
dc.identifier.citationPaladini D., Volpo P.. Ultrasound of congenital fetal anomalies. Informal Hearthcare. London, 2007; pp.113-182
dc.identifier.citationMeberg A., Otterstard J., Froland G., Lindberg H., Orland S.. Outcome of congenital heart defect – a population - based study. Acta Pediatr. 2000; 89: 1344-55.
dc.identifier.citationAllan L., Sharland G., Milburn A., Lockhart S., Groves A., Anderson R., Cook A.. Prospective diagnosis of 1006 consecutive cases of congenital heart disease in the fetus. J.Am.Coll.Card. 1994; 23: 1452-8.
dc.identifier.citationNicolaides O., Falcon O.. La ecografiade las 11 -13+6 semanas. Fetal Medical Fundation. 2004
dc.identifier.citationFliedner R. , Chiriac A., Hartge D., Krapp M., et.al. Fetal cardiac abnormalities identified prior to 14 weeks gestation. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology 2008; 32: 333.
dc.identifier.citationBartrons J.. Ecografia fetal. Exámen de la anatomía y circulación normal del feto. Libro de Protocolos. Sociedad Española de Cardiología Pediátrica y Cardiopatías Congénitas. Cap. 48 pp: 713-730. www.secardioped.org/protocolos. 2009.
dc.identifier.citationRosano A., Botto L., Botting B., Mastroiacovo P. Infant mortality and congenital anomalies from 1950 to1994: an international perspective. J. Epidemiol. Community Healt- 2000; 54:660-6.
dc.identifier.citationMortera C., Maroto C.. Ecocardiografía Doppler de la circulación fetal. En: García Fernandez M.A.. Principios y práctica del Doppler cardíaco. Madrid: McGraw-Hill. 1995; p365-89.
dc.identifier.citationAllan L., Hornberger L., Sharland G.. Textbook of fetal cardiology 2000; Greenwick Medical Medial Limited. London.
dc.identifier.citationCrispi F., Gómez O., Bennasar M. Martínez J. Protocolo Ecocardiografía Funcional Fetal. Unidad de Cardiología Fetal, Sección de Ecografía, Área de Medicina Fetal, Servicio de Medicina Materno-Fetal. Institut Clínic de Ginecologia, Obstetrícia y Neonatologia, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona
dc.identifier.citationTei C, Ling LH, Hodge DO, Bailey KR, Oh JK, Rodeheffer RJ et al. New index of combined systolic and diastolic myocardial performance: a simple and reproducible measure of cardiac function-a study in normals and dilated cardiomyopathy. J Cardiol 1995; 26: 357-66.
dc.identifier.citationTei C, Dujardin KS, Hodge DO, Kyle RA, Tajik AJ, Seward JB. Doppler index combining systolic and diastolic myocardial performance: clinical value in cardiac amyloidosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996; 28: 658-64.
dc.identifier.citationTorres-Rojo YI y cols. Índice de funcionamiento miocárdico global con ecocardiografía Doppler Rev Mex Cardiol 2005; 16 (2): 60-64
dc.identifier.citationFriedman D, Buyon J, Kim M, Glickstein JS. Fetal cardiac function assessed by Doppler myocardial performance index (Tei Index). Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2003; 21: 33–36
dc.identifier.citationRaboisson MJ, Bourdages M, Fouron JC. Measuring left ventricular myocardial performance index in fetuses. Am J Cardiol 2003; 91: 919–921.
dc.identifier.citationCarvalho JS, Moscoso G, Ville Y. First-trimester transabdominal echocardiography. Lancet 1998; 351: 1023–1027
dc.identifier.citationHaak MC, Bartelings MM, Gittenberger-de Groot AC, van Vugt JM. Cardiac malformations in first-trimester fetuses with increased nuchal translucency: ultrasound diagnosis and postmortem morphology. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2002; 20: 14–21.
dc.identifier.citationWeiner Z, Lorber A, Shalev E. Diagnosis of congenital cardiac defects between 11 and 14 weeks’ gestation in high-risk patients. J Ultrasound Med 2002; 21: 23–29
dc.identifier.citationHuggon IC, Ghi T, Cook AC, Zosmer N, et.al.. Fetal cardiac abnormalities identified prior to 14 weeks’ gestation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2002; 20:22–29.
dc.identifier.citationMcAuliffe FM, Hornberger LK, Winsor S, Chitayat et.al.. Fetal cardiac defects and increased nuchal translucency thickness: a prospective study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004; 191: 1486–1490.
dc.identifier.citationRasiah SV, Publicover M, Ewer AK, Khan KS, et.al.. A systematic review of the accuracy of first- trimester ultrasound examination for detecting major congenital heart disease. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2006; 28: 110–116.
dc.identifier.citationLeiva MC, Tolosa JE, Binotto CN, Weiner S, et.al.. Fetal cardiac development and hemodynamics in the first trimester. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1999; 14: 169–174.
dc.identifier.citationMakikallio K, Jouppila P, Rasanen J.. Human fetal cardiac function during the first trimester of pregnancy. Heart 2005; 91: 334–338.
dc.identifier.citationWloch A, Rozmus Warcholinska W, Czuba B, Borowski D,et.al.. Doppler study of the embryonic heart in normal pregnant women. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2007; 20: 533–539.
dc.identifier.citationvan Splunder I., Wladimiroff W. Cardiac functional changes in the human fetus in the late first and early second trimesters. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1996; 7: 411–415
dc.identifier.citationHata T, Inubashiri E, Kanenishi K, Akiyama M,et.al.. Nuchal translucency thickness and fetal cardiac flow velocity in normal fetuses at 11–13 weeks of gestation. Gynecol Obstet Invest 2002; 53: 209–213
dc.identifier.citationHuggon IC, Turan O, Allan LD. Doppler assessment of cardiac function at 11– 14 weeks’ gestation in fetuses with normal and increased nuchal translucency. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2004; 24: 390–398
dc.identifier.citationHaak MC, Twisk JW, Bartelings MM, Gittenberger-de Groot AC, et.al. First trimester fetuses with increased nuchal translucency do not show altered intracardiac flow velocities. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2005; 25: 215–220
dc.identifier.citationRussel NE, McAuliffe FM. First-trimester fetal cardiac function. J Ultrasound Med 2008; 27: 379–383.
dc.identifier.citationHuhta JC. Fetal congestive heart failure. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med 2005; 10: 542–552
dc.identifier.citationPaladini D, Chita SK, Allan LD. Prenatal measurement of cardiothoracic ratio in evaluation of heart disease. Arch Dis Child 1990; 65: 20–23.
dc.identifier.citationChaoui R, Bollmann R, Goldner B, Heling KS, et.al.. Fetal cardiomegaly: echocardiographic findings and outcome in 19 cases. Fetal Diagn Ther 1994; 9: 92–104.
dc.identifier.citationGembruch U, Shi C, Smrcek JM. Biometry of the fetal heart between 10 and 17 weeks of gestation. Fetal Diagn Ther 2000; 15: 20–31.
dc.identifier.citationTongsong T, Tatiyapornkul T. Cardiothoracic ratio in the first half of pregnancy. J Clin Ultrasound 2004; 32: 186–189.
dc.identifier.citationAwadh AM, Prefumo F, Bland JM, Carvalho JS. Assessment of the intraobserver variability in the measurement of fetal cardiothoracic ratio using ellipse and diameter methods. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2006; 28: 53–56.
dc.identifier.citationStark RI, Myers MM, Daniel SS, Garland M, et.al.. Gestational age related changes in cardiac dynamics of the fetal baboon. Early Hum Dev 1999; 53: 219–237.
dc.identifier.citationVimpeli T, Huhtala H, Wilsgaard T, Acharya G. Fetal cardiac output and its distribution to the placenta at 11–20 weeks of gestation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2009; 33: 265–271.
dc.identifier.citationKenny J, Plappert T, Doubilet P, Salzman D, et.al.. Effects of heart rate on ventricular size, stroke volume, and output in the normal human fetus: a prospective Doppler echocardiographic study. Circulation 1987; 76: 52–58.
dc.identifier.citationAcharya G, Rasanen J, Kiserud T, Huhta JC. The fetal cardiac function. Curr Cardiol Rev 2006; 2: 41–53.
dc.identifier.citationHernandez E., Lopez J., Figueroa H., Sanin .J, et.al.. A modified myocardial performance (Tei) index based on the use of valve clicks improves reproducibility of fetal left cardiac function assessment. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2005; 26: 227–232
dc.identifier.citationRaboisson MJ, Bourdages M, Fouron JC. Measuring left ventricular myocardial performance index in fetuses. Am J Cardiol 2003; 91: 919–921.
dc.identifier.citationTsutsumi T, Ishii M, Eto G, Hota M, et.al.. Serial evaluation for myocardial performance in fetuses and neonates using a new Doppler index. Pediatr Int 1999; 41: 722–727.
dc.identifier.citationEidem BW, Edwards JM, Cetta F. Quantitive assessment of fetal ventricular function. Echocardiography 2001; 1: 9–13.
dc.identifier.citationFriedman D, Buyon J, Kim M, Glickstein JS. Fetal cardiac function assessed by Doppler myocardial performance index (Tei Index). Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2003; 21: 33–36.
dc.identifier.citationHuhta JC. Guidelines for the evaluation of heart failure in the fetus with or without hydrops. Pediatr Cardiol 2004; 25:274–286.
dc.identifier.citationHernandez E, Figueroa H, Kottman C, Illanes S., et.al. Gestational ageadjusted reference values for the modified myocardial performance index for evaluation of fetal left cardiac function. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2007; 29: 321–325.
dc.identifier.citationCarceller-Blanchard AM, Fouron JC. Determinants of the Doppler flow velocity profile through the mitral valve of the human fetus. Br Heart J 1993; 70: 457– 460.
dc.identifier.citationBorrell A, Martinez JM, Serés A, Borobio V,et.al.. Ductus venosus assessment at the time of nuchal translucency measurement in the detection of fetal aneuploidy. Prenat Diagn 2003; 23: 921–926.
dc.identifier.citationMaiz N, Plasencia W, Dagklis T, Faros E, et.al.. Ductus venosus Doppler in fetuses with cardiac defects and increased nuchal translucency thickness. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2008; 31: 256–260.
dc.identifier.citationRozmus-Warcholinska W, Wloch A, Acharya G, Cnota W, Czuba B, Sodowski K et al. Reference values for variables of fetal cardiocirculatory dynamics at 11-14 weeks of gestation. Ultrasound Obstet.Gynecol. 2010; 35: 540-47.
dc.identifier.citationRoyston P, Wright EM. How to construct ‘normal ranges’ for fetal variables. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1998; 11: 30–38.
dc.identifier.citationACOG Practice Bulletin No. 101: Ultrasonography in pregnancy.Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Feb;113 (2 Pt 1):451-61
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10818/9431
dc.description.abstractIntroducción: El ultrasonido es un método diagnóstico ampliamente usado para evaluación tanto el crecimiento como la anatomía fetal. Es un procedimiento que proporciona hallazgos diagnósticos que pueden facilitar el manejo de problemas a lo largo del embarazo, como son alteraciones del crecimiento fetal que causen aumento de la morbilidad y mortalidad perinatal tanto en los países desarrollados como en vía de desarrollo. La Organización Mundial de la Salud en el 2005, concluyó que las anomalías del crecimiento fetal se relacionaban con múltiples causas como alteraciones genéticas, alteraciones en la nutrición materna, tabaquismo, edad y enfermedades de la madre3. El tamizaje de las anomalías cromosómicas ha sido tema de investigación e interés en el ámbito materno fetal, siendo la ecografía obstétrica temprana (semana 11 a la 14), un método fiable, no invasivo y representa el estudio de elección actual para la estratificación del riesgo fetal. Nota: Para consultar la carta de autorización de publicación de este documento por favor copie y pegue el siguiente enlace en su navegador de internet: http://hdl.handle.net/10818/9432es_CO
dc.language.isospaes_CO
dc.subjectEcográfía -- Fetos -- Ultrasonografía
dc.subjectDiagnostico ultrasónico -- Fetos
dc.subjectImagen ultrasónica -- Fetos
dc.titleComportamiento del índice de TEI en semana 11 a la 14 en fetos sanoses_CO


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem