Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.advisorMendieta Aguilar, Jenny
dc.contributor.authorPasuy Pedroza, Nathaly
dc.date.accessioned2013-12-13T19:45:59Z
dc.date.available2013-12-13T19:45:59Z
dc.date.created2013
dc.date.issued2013-12-13
dc.identifier.citationAdams, C., Pierce, R., & Pierce, L. (2006). Differentiating Instruction: A Practical Guide to Tiered Lessons in the Elementary Grades. United States of America. Library of congress cataloging –in-Publication Data.
dc.identifier.citationBaumgartner, T., Lipowski, M., & Rush, C. (2003, May 1). Increasing Reading Achievement of Primary and Middle School Students through Differentiated instruction. Retrieved from EBSCOhost.
dc.identifier.citationBlachowicz, C. & Ogle, D. (2008).Reading Comprehension: Strategies for Independent Learners. United States of America. Library of congress cataloging –in-Publication Data.
dc.identifier.citationBender, W.N., (2008). Differentiating instruction for students with learning disabilities: best teaching practices for general and special educators. London. Corwin Press.
dc.identifier.citationBenjamin, A. (2003). Differentiated Instruction: A Guide for Elementary School Teachers. United States of America. Library of congress cataloging –in- Publication Data.
dc.identifier.citationBrown, D (2009) Principles of Language Learning and Teaching, Pearson education.
dc.identifier.citationBuehl, D. (2009).Classroom Strategies for Interactive Learning. United States of America. . Library of congress Cataloging –in- Publication Data
dc.identifier.citationBurns, A. (1999). Collaborative Action Research for English Language Teacher. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
dc.identifier.citationChapman, C & King, R. (2009) Differentiated Instructional Strategies for Reading in the Content Areas. United States of America. Corwin Press.
dc.identifier.citationCohen, L., Manion, K & Morrison, J. (2007). Research Methods in Education. United States of America. Library of congress Cataloging –in- Publication Data.
dc.identifier.citationColegio Bilingüe Buckingham (2002). Manual de Convivencial Institucional.
dc.identifier.citationConklin, W. (2009). Applying Differentiation Strategies. Hunhington Beach. Shell Education
dc.identifier.citationCordova, D., & Lepper, M. (1996). Intrinsic motivation and the process of learning. Beneficial effects of contextualization, personalization, and choice. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 715-730
dc.identifier.citationCousin, G. (2009).Researching Learning in Higher Education: An Introduction to Contemporary Methods and Approaches. New York. Library of congress Cataloging –in- Publication Data
dc.identifier.citationCraig, D. (2009). Action Research Essentials. Library of congress Cataloging –in- Publication Data. United States of America
dc.identifier.citationDerry, S.J. (1996). Cognitive schema theory in the constructivist debate. Educational Psychologist, 31, 163-174
dc.identifier.citationDrapeau, P. (2004). Differentiated Instruction: Making It Work: A Practical Guide to Planning, Managing, and Implementing Differentiated Instruction to Meet the Needs of All Learners. Scholastic.
dc.identifier.citationFlaherty, S., & Hackler, R. (2010, May 1). Exploring the Effects of Differentiated Instruction and Cooperative Learning on the Intrinsic Motivational Behaviors of Elementary Reading Students. Online Submission, Retrieved from EBSCOhost.
dc.identifier.citationFranken, R. (2007). Human Motivation. United States of America. Library of congress Cataloging –in- Publication Data.
dc.identifier.citationFreeman, D. (1998). Doing Teacher- Research: From Inquiry to Understanding. Canada. Heinle & Heinle Publishers.
dc.identifier.citationGibson, V. (2011). Differentiating Instruction: Teaching Differently to Improve reading Instruction. Minnesota. Read Naturally. Retrieved from http://www.readnaturally.com/pdf/differentiating-instruction-wp.pdf
dc.identifier.citationGilakjani, A., & Ahmadi, S. (2011). The relationship between 12 reading comprehension and schema theory: A matter of text familiarity. International Journal of Information and Education Technology. Retrieved from http://www.ijiet.org/papers/24-K002.pdf
dc.identifier.citationGlass, K. (2009). Lesson Design for Differentiated Instruction, Grades 4-9. United States of America. . Corwin Press.
dc.identifier.citationGraesser, A., Pomeroy, V., & Craig, S. (2002). Psychological and computational research on theme comprehension. In M. Louwerse & W. van Peer (Eds.), Thematics: Interdisciplinary studies (pp. 19-34). Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
dc.identifier.citationGood, Melinda (2006, May). Differentiated Instruction: Principles and Techniques for the Elementary Grades. Retrieved October 31, 2011, from http://www.ascd.org/research-a-topic/differentiated- instruction-resources.aspx#research.
dc.identifier.citationGregory,G & Chapman, C. (2007) Differentiated instructional strategies: one size doesn't fit all. California. Corwin Press.
dc.identifier.citationHeacox, D, (2002). Differentiating instruction in the regular classroom: how to reach and teach all learners, Grades 3-12. Minneapolis. Free Spirit Publishing Inc.
dc.identifier.citationHeacox, D., & Wormeli, R (2009). Making Differentiation a Habit: How to Ensure Success in Academically diverse classrooms. Minneapolis. Copyright
dc.identifier.citationInternational Baccalaureate Organization (2002). Diploma Programme Language b. Geneva, Switzerland: International Baccalaureate Organization. Retrieved from http://www.holyhearthigh.ca/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/FrenchB-2012.pdf
dc.identifier.citationKamil, M., Manning, J., & Walberg, H. (2002). Successful reading instruction. United States of America. Library of congress cataloging –in- Publication Data.
dc.identifier.citationKeene, E. & Zimmerman, S. (1997). Mosaic of Thought. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
dc.identifier.citationKoeze, P. (2007). Differentiated instruction: the effect on student achievement in an elementary school. Theses and Doctoral Dissertations paper 31. Retrieved November 2, 2011 from http://commons.emich.edu/theses/31.
dc.identifier.citationMack, N., & MacQueen, K. (2005).Qualitative Research Methods: A Data Collector’s Field Guide. United States of America. Family Health International.
dc.identifier.citationMacnamara, D. (2007) Reading comprehension strategies: theories, interventions, and technologies. Taylor & Francis group, LLC
dc.identifier.citationMcArdle, Geri. (1991). Developing Instructional Design : A Step-by-Step Guide to Success. California. Crisp Publications, Inc
dc.identifier.citationMerriam, S. (2009). Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation. Education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass
dc.identifier.citationO'Connor, R & Vadasy, P (2011).Handbook of Reading Interventions. New York . The Guilford press.
dc.identifier.citationOlmos, M., & Cruz, M. (2001). Reading Strategies for Young Learners. Universidad Distrital Francisco Jose de Caldas.
dc.identifier.citationO'Meara, J. (2010). Beyond Differentiated Instruction. California. Corwin press.
dc.identifier.citationOrlich, D., and Harder, R. (2010). Teaching Strategies: A Guide to Effective Instruction. Boston. Library of congress Cataloging –in- Publication Data
dc.identifier.citationPierce, R.,& Adams, A (2004). Tiered Lessons: One way to Differentiate Mathematics Instruction Spring, vol, 27 No 2, p. 58-66
dc.identifier.citationRasinski, T., Brassell, D., Yopp, H. (2008). Comprehension That Works: Taking Students Beyond Ordinary Understanding to deep comprehension. Huntington Beach. Corinne Burton, M.A. Ed.
dc.identifier.citationReid, J. (1995) Learning Styles in the ESL/EFL classroom. Boston Massachusetts: Heinle & Heinle Publishers. United States: Cambridge University Press.
dc.identifier.citationRoe, B., & Smith, S. (2009). Teaching Reading in today’s Elementary Schools. United States of America. Library of Congress.
dc.identifier.citationRogers, A. (2005). Students’ voice: Bridges to Learning. Seattle: University of Washington.
dc.identifier.citationSadeghi, N. (2012). Learning Styles, Personality Types and Reading Comprehension Performance. English Language Teaching. Vol 5. N°4; April 2012. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/elt.v5n4p116
dc.identifier.citationSagor, R. (2011). The Action Research Guidebook: A Four-Stage Process for Educators and School Teams. Corwin. United States of America.
dc.identifier.citationSaracho, O. (1997). Teachers’ and Students’ Cognitive Styles in Early Childhood. United States of America. Library of congress cataloging –in- Publication Data
dc.identifier.citationSnow, C.E., (2002). Reading for understanding: Toward a research and development program in reading comprehension. Pittsburgh. RAND Corporation.
dc.identifier.citationStrauss, A. & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research. Grounded theory procedures and techniques. London: Siege Publications.
dc.identifier.citationStrong, R. W., Silver, H. F., and Perini, M. J. (2001). Making students as important as standards.Educational Leadership, 59(3), 56-61.
dc.identifier.citationSuter, W. (2011). Introduction to Educational Research: A Critical Thinking Approach. United States of America. Library of congress Cataloging –in- Publication Data.
dc.identifier.citationTomal, D. (2010). Action Research for Educators. Library of congress Cataloging –in- Publication Data. United States of America
dc.identifier.citationTomlinson, C. Differentiation of instruction in the elementary grades. Retrieved March,26, 2012 from http://www.ed.gov/database/ERIC_Digests/ed443572.htlm
dc.identifier.citationTomlinson, C., Callahan, C., & Brighton, C. (1997). Differentiating Instruction in Response to Student Readiness, Interest, and Learning Profile in Academically Diverse Classrooms: A Review of Literature. Journal for the Education of the Gifted. Retrieved from https://moodle.emu.edu/pluginfile.php/95452/mod_resource/content/1/7su.pdf
dc.identifier.citationTomlinson,C., & Eidson, C. (2003). Differentiation in practice: A resource guide for differentiating curriculum, Grades 5-9. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development
dc.identifier.citationTomlinson, C. A., (2001). How to differentiate instruction in mixed-ability classrooms. (2nd Ed.) Alexandria, VA: ASCD
dc.identifier.citationTomlinson, C. A. (1999). The differentiated classroom: Responding to the needs of all learners. Alexandria, Virginia: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
dc.identifier.citationWallace, Catherine. (1992). Reading. New York. Oxford University Press.
dc.identifier.citationWalpole,S., & McKenna, M (2007)Differentiated reading instruction: strategies for the primary grades. United States of America. The Guilford Press
dc.identifier.citationWiley, J. (2010). Methods in Educational Research: From Theory to Practice. United States of America. Library of congress Cataloging –in- Publication Data
dc.identifier.citationWillis, J. (2008).Qualitative Research Methods in Education and Educational Technology. United States of America. Copyright Information Age Publishing Inc.
dc.identifier.citationWoolley, G (2011). Reading Comprehension: Assisting Children with Learning Difficulties. Springer Dordrecht Heidelberg. London New York
dc.identifier.citationWorthy, J. & McKool, S. (1996). Students who say they hate to read: The importance of opportunity, choice, and access. In D.J. Leu, C.K. Kinzer, & K.A. Hinchman (Eds.), Literacies for the 21st century: Research and practice. 45th yearbook of the National Reading Conference (pp. 245-256). Chicago: National Reading Conference
dc.identifier.citationZwaan, R.A., Radvansky, G.A., Whitten, S.N. (2002). Situation models and themes. In M. Louwerse & W. van Peer (Eds.), Thematics: Interdisciplinary studies (pp. 35- 53). Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
dc.identifier.citationZwiers, J. (2010).Building Reading Comprehension Habits in Grades 6-12: A Toolkit of Classroom activities. United States of America. Library of congress cataloging –in- Publication Data
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10818/9294
dc.description105 Páginas.
dc.description.abstractEste estudio cualitativo de investigación- acción fue llevado a cabo en un colegio bilingüe con un grupo de 17 estudiantes de primaria. El objetivo general de este estudio fue analizar el impacto que el uso de productos diferenciados tuvo en la comprensión lectora de los participantes mencionados anteriormente. Los datos recogidos durante la intervención provienen de artefactos de los participantes, entrevistas semi-estructuradas y diarios de aprendizaje. Los resultados obtenidos indican que el uso de productos diferenciados durante la instrucción lectora mejoran el proceso de comprensión de lectura mediante el fomento de la motivación hacia la lectura y el desarrollo de habilidades de construcción de sentido tales como la conceptualización de ideas principales y las conexiones con la vida para identificar el mensaje central de las historias. Estos resultados permitieron al investigador concluir que los productos diferenciados resultaron ser una estrategia eficaz para fomentar las destrezas de comprensión y motivación que apoyan el desempeño de los estudiantes antes, durante y después de la lectura.es_CO
dc.language.isoenges_CO
dc.publisherUniversidad de La Sabana
dc.sourceUniversidad de La Sabana
dc.sourceIntellectum Repositorio Universidad de La Sabana
dc.subjectComprensión de lectura
dc.subjectPromoción de la lectura
dc.subjectActitud hacia la lectura
dc.titleExploring third graders’ reading comprehension through the implementation of tiered products for differentiated instructiones_CO
dc.typemasterThesis
dc.publisher.programMaestría en Didáctica del Inglés con Énfasis en Ambientes de Aprendizaje Autónomo
dc.publisher.departmentDepartamento de Lenguas y Culturas Extranjeras
dc.identifier.local256458
dc.identifier.localTE06211
dc.type.localTesis de maestría
dc.type.hasVersionpublishedVersion
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccess
dc.creator.degreeMagíster en Didáctica del Inglés con Énfasis en Ambientes de Aprendizaje Autónomo


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem