Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorNovoa M.P
dc.contributor.authorRengifo C
dc.contributor.authorCobo M
dc.contributor.authorFigueredo M.
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-09T14:28:12Z
dc.date.available2024-10-09T14:28:12Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.identifier.issn3603199
dc.identifier.otherhttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85197036148&doi=10.1016%2fj.ijhydene.2024.06.354&partnerID=40&md5=9f879865a185951b8303e797ea425968
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10818/61916
dc.description.abstractPower to Methane (PtM) systems are considered an attractive alternative for power generation, renewable sources’ potential harnessing, and atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) utilization. This study analyzes the potential use of Synthetic Natural Gas (SNG) for electrical power generation or its direct injection into the currently available Natural Gas Transportation infrastructure. A simulation approach using Aspen Plus v14 software was employed to assess various PtM configurations. Six different systems were analyzed for methanation processes, utilizing three types of electrolysis systems: Alkaline (AE), Proton Exchange Membrane (PEME), and Solid Oxide (SOE). Two primary methane applications were considered: integrated into a combined cycle for power generation and a standalone gas treatment stage for grid injection. As a result, the PEME-based system showed the highest generated-to-fed power ratio, larger than SOE (1.45% higher) and AE (20.66% higher). In addition, PEME technology reports the largest generation of SNG per power supply, exceeding 3.4% and 16.4% of those of SOE and AE, respectively. However, the SOE technology showed a larger efficiency than PEME technology by 8.2% and a PtM efficiency larger than PEME by 12.4%. Fixed capital investment for the PtM systems is around 8.6 and 13.9 million USD$, and their total earnings are between −8.2 and 20.9 thousand USD$ a year, depending on the electrolysis technology, methane application, and carbon credits scenario. According to these results, the PEME-based system is the most suitable option regarding technical and economic criteria. © 2024 The Authorsen
dc.formatapplication/pdfes_CO
dc.language.isoenges_CO
dc.publisherInternational Journal of Hydrogen Energyes_CO
dc.relation.ispartofseriesInternational Journal of Hydrogen Energy Vol. 78
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.sourceUniversidad de La Sabanaes_CO
dc.sourceIntellectum Repositorio Universidad de La Sabanaes_CO
dc.subject.otherAlkaline electrolysisen
dc.subject.otherPower to methaneen
dc.subject.otherProton exchange membrane electrolysisen
dc.subject.otherSolid oxide electrolysis cellen
dc.subject.otherSynthetic natural gas (SNG)en
dc.titleTechno-economic assessment of the Synthetic Natural Gas production using different electrolysis technologies and product applicationsen
dc.typejournal articlees_CO
dc.type.hasVersionpublishedVersiones_CO
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccesses_CO
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.06.354


Ficheros en el ítem

FicherosTamañoFormatoVer

No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem.

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 InternationalExcepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International