Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAntonio Sánchez-Cárdenas M
dc.contributor.authorXimena León-Delgado M
dc.contributor.authorMaría Vargas-Escobar L
dc.contributor.authorElizabeth Muñoz Medina S
dc.contributor.authorMilena Buitrago Florian P
dc.contributor.authorAndrade Fonseca D
dc.contributor.authorEsteban Correa-Morales J.
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-07T21:38:47Z
dc.date.available2024-10-07T21:38:47Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.identifier.issn1472684X
dc.identifier.otherhttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85197250548&doi=10.1186%2fs12904-024-01427-1&partnerID=40&md5=2dd60a88c36cba8b59ea44601856e0de
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10818/61863
dc.description.abstractBackground: National palliative care plans depend upon stakeholder engagement to succeed. Assessing the capability, interest, and knowledge of stakeholders is a crucial step in the implementation of public health initiatives, as recommended by the World Health Organisation. However, utilising stakeholder analysis is a strategy underused in public palliative care. Objective: To conduct a stakeholder analysis characterising a diverse group of stakeholders involved in implementing a national palliative care plan in three rural regions of an upper-middle-income country. Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional study design, complemented by a quantitative stakeholder analysis approach, was executed through a survey designed to gauge stakeholders’ levels of interest and capability in relation to five fundamental dimensions of public palliative care: provision of services, accessibility of essential medicines, palliative care education, financial support, and palliative care vitality. Stakeholders were categorised as promoters (high-power, high-interest), latent (high-power, low-interest), advocates (low-power, high-interest), and indifferent (low-power and low-interest). Stakeholder self-perceived category and knowledge level were also assessed. Results: Among the 65 surveyed stakeholders, 19 were categorised as promoters, 34 as advocates, 9 as latent, and 3 as indifferent. Stakeholders’ self-perception of their category did not align with the results of the quantitative analysis. When evaluated by region and palliative care dimensions the distribution of stakeholders was nonuniform. Palliative care funding was the dimension with the highest number of stakeholders categorised as indifferent, and the lowest percentage of promoters. Stakeholders categorised as promoters consistently reported a low level of knowledge, regardless of the dimension, region, or their level of interest. Conclusions: Assessing the capability, interest, and knowledge of stakeholders is a crucial step when implementing public health initiatives in palliative care. It allows for a data-driven decision-making process on how to delegate responsibilities, administer financial resources, and establish governance boards that remain engaged and work efficiently. © The Author(s) 2024.en
dc.formatapplication/pdfes_CO
dc.language.isoenges_CO
dc.publisherBMC Palliative Carees_CO
dc.relation.ispartofseriesBMC Palliative Care Vol. 23 N° 1 art. 163
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.sourceUniversidad de La Sabanaes_CO
dc.sourceIntellectum Repositorio Universidad de La Sabanaes_CO
dc.subject.otherColombiaen
dc.subject.otherNational planen
dc.subject.otherPalliative careen
dc.subject.otherPublic healthen
dc.subject.otherStakeholder analysisen
dc.titlePalliative care national plan implementation through stakeholder analysisen
dc.typejournal articlees_CO
dc.type.hasVersionpublishedVersiones_CO
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccesses_CO
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12904-024-01427-1


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 InternationalExcept where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International