Palliative care national plan implementation through stakeholder analysis
Enlaces del Item
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10818/61863Visitar enlace: https://www.scopus.com/inward/ ...
ISSN: 1472684X
DOI: 10.1186/s12904-024-01427-1
Compartir
Estadísticas
Ver Estadísticas de usoCatalogación bibliográfica
Mostrar el registro completo del ítemAutor/es
Antonio Sánchez-Cárdenas M; Ximena León-Delgado M; María Vargas-Escobar L; Elizabeth Muñoz Medina S; Milena Buitrago Florian P; Andrade Fonseca D; Esteban Correa-Morales J.Fecha
2024Resumen
Background: National palliative care plans depend upon stakeholder engagement to succeed. Assessing the capability, interest, and knowledge of stakeholders is a crucial step in the implementation of public health initiatives, as recommended by the World Health Organisation. However, utilising stakeholder analysis is a strategy underused in public palliative care. Objective: To conduct a stakeholder analysis characterising a diverse group of stakeholders involved in implementing a national palliative care plan in three rural regions of an upper-middle-income country. Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional study design, complemented by a quantitative stakeholder analysis approach, was executed through a survey designed to gauge stakeholders’ levels of interest and capability in relation to five fundamental dimensions of public palliative care: provision of services, accessibility of essential medicines, palliative care education, financial support, and palliative care vitality. Stakeholders were categorised as promoters (high-power, high-interest), latent (high-power, low-interest), advocates (low-power, high-interest), and indifferent (low-power and low-interest). Stakeholder self-perceived category and knowledge level were also assessed. Results: Among the 65 surveyed stakeholders, 19 were categorised as promoters, 34 as advocates, 9 as latent, and 3 as indifferent. Stakeholders’ self-perception of their category did not align with the results of the quantitative analysis. When evaluated by region and palliative care dimensions the distribution of stakeholders was nonuniform. Palliative care funding was the dimension with the highest number of stakeholders categorised as indifferent, and the lowest percentage of promoters. Stakeholders categorised as promoters consistently reported a low level of knowledge, regardless of the dimension, region, or their level of interest. Conclusions: Assessing the capability, interest, and knowledge of stakeholders is a crucial step when implementing public health initiatives in palliative care. It allows for a data-driven decision-making process on how to delegate responsibilities, administer financial resources, and establish governance boards that remain engaged and work efficiently. © The Author(s) 2024.
Ubicación
BMC Palliative Care Vol. 23 N° 1 art. 163
Colecciones a las que pertenece
- Facultad de Medicina [1345]