Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.advisorMaldonado, María José
dc.contributor.advisorJaimes Fernández, Diego Alejandro
dc.contributor.authorSuarez Saavedra, Andrea Alexandra
dc.date.accessioned2023-05-09T13:56:12Z
dc.date.available2023-05-09T13:56:12Z
dc.date.issued2023-02-15
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10818/55224
dc.description76 páginases_CO
dc.description.abstractIntroducción: El feedback hace parte de las herramientas de evaluación y es un proceso interactivo, bidireccional que permite y facilita el logro de las competencias en el ambiente clínico. En el contexto de educación para profesionales de salud la retroalimentación es aún más relevante teniendo en cuenta que implica un alto grado de responsabilidad. Metodología: A través de 5 fases descritas por Arksey & O’Malley, se realizó una revisión panorámica para conocer qué se sabe sobre la interacción profesor/estudiante en los procesos de feedback en profesionales de salud en el contexto de posgrados: Fase 1 Identificación de la pregunta de investigación. Fase 2 Identificación de los estudios relevantes. Fase 3 Selección de estudios. Fase 4 Recolección y categorización de los datos. Fase 5 Resumen y comunicación de los resultados. Resultados: La búsqueda inicial arrojó un total de 6.306 estudios provenientes de 9 bases de datos (PubMed, Science Direct, OVID, SpringerLink, Google Scholar, Cochrane, Scielo, ERIC y LILACS). Luego de excluir duplicados, y realizar el cribado 3 pasos, se obtuvo un total de 76 estudios. Con el proceso de revisión de título, resumen y texto completo, se incluyeron 26 estudios que cumplían los criterios de elegibilidad. Conclusiones: El feedback es un dialogo bidireccional que analiza el rendimiento de un proceso frente a un estándar esperado para una competencia, que tiene como objetivo el mejoramiento para el alcance de esta, los procesos de feedback impactan en la percepción de los residentes de diferentes especialidades, en su criterio para la toma de decisiones. Es fundamental hacer frente a las barreras de contexto que tergiversan su uso y entrenar a los educadores para su uso apropiado.es_CO
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Feedback is part of the evaluation tools and is an interactive, two-way process that allows and facilitates the achievement of competencies in the clinical environment. In the context of education for health professionals, feedback is even more relevant considering that it implies a high degree of responsibility. Methodology: Through 5 phases described by Arksey & O’Malley, a panoramic review was carried out to find out what is known about teacher/student interaction in feedback processes in health professionals in the postgraduate context: Phase 1 Identification of the research question. Phase 2 Identification of relevant studies. Phase 3 Selection of studies. Phase 4 Collection and categorization of data. Phase 5 Summary and communication of the results. Results: The initial search yielded a total of 6,306 studies from 9 databases (PubMed, Science Direct, OVID, SpringerLink, Google Scholar, Cochrane, Scielo, ERIC, and LILACS). After excluding duplicates, and performing the 3-step screening, a total of 76 studies were obtained. Using the title, abstract, and full text review process, 26 studies meeting the eligibility criteria were included.en
dc.formatapplication/pdfes_CO
dc.language.isospaes_CO
dc.publisherUniversidad de La Sabanaes_CO
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.sourceUniversidad de La Sabana
dc.sourceIntellectum Repositorio Universidad de La Sabana
dc.title¿Qué se sabe de los Procesos de feedback utilizados durante la formación en profesionales de salud?es_CO
dc.typemaster thesises_CO
dc.identifier.local291629
dc.identifier.localTE12252
dc.type.hasVersionpublishedVersiones_CO
dc.rights.accessRightsrestrictedAccesses_CO
dc.subject.armarcEducación médica de postgrado
dc.subject.armarcSistemas de control por retroalimentación
dc.subject.decsInternado y residencia
dc.subject.decsHospitales universitarios
dcterms.referencesAl-Mously, N., Nabil, N. M., Al-Babtain, S. A., & Fouad Abbas, M. A. (2014). Undergraduate medical students’ perceptions on the quality of feedback received during clinical rotations. Medical Teacher, 36 Suppl 1, S17-23. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2014.886009
dcterms.referencesArcher, J. (2010). State of the science in health professional education: Effective feedback. Medical education, 44, 101-108. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03546.x
dcterms.referencesArksey, H., & O’Malley, L. (2005). Scoping Studies: Towards a Methodological Framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology: Theory & Practice, 8(1), 19-32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616
dcterms.referencesAschenbrener, C. A., Ast, C., & Kirch, D. G. (2015). Graduate Medical Education: Its Role in Achieving a True Medical Education Continuum. Academic Medicine: Journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, 90(9), 1203-1209. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000000829
dcterms.referencesBello, R. J., Sarmiento, S., Meyer, M. L., Rosson, G. D., Cooney, D. S., Lifchez, S. D., & Cooney, C. M. (2018). Understanding Surgical Resident and Fellow Perspectives on Their Operative Performance Feedback Needs: A Qualitative Study. Journal of Surgical Education, 75(6), 1498-1503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2018.04.002
dcterms.referencesBing-You, R. G., & Trowbridge, R. L. (2009). Why medical educators may be failing at feedback. JAMA, 302(12), 1330-1331. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2009.1393
dcterms.referencesBing-You, R., Ramesh, S., Hayes, V., Varaklis, K., Ward, D., & Blanco, M. (2018). Trainees’ Perceptions of Feedback: Validity Evidence for Two FEEDME (Feedback in Medical Education) Instruments. Teaching and Learning in Medicine, 30(2), 162-172. https://doi.org/10.1080/10401334.2017.1392863
dcterms.referencesBlack, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and Classroom Learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 7-74. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969595980050102
dcterms.referencesBoud, D., & Molloy, E. (2012). Rethinking models of feedback for learning: The challenge of design. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education - ASSESS EVAL HIGH EDUC, 38, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2012.691462
dcterms.referencesBowen, L., Marshall, M., & Murdoch-Eaton, D. (2017). Medical Student Perceptions of Feedback and Feedback Behaviors Within the Context of the «Educational Alliance». Academic Medicine: Journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, 92(9), 1303-1312. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000001632
dcterms.referencesBurns, J., Chetlen, A., Morgan, D. E., Catanzano, T. M., McLoud, T. C., Slanetz, P. J., & Jay, A. K. (2022). Affecting Change: Enhancing Feedback Interactions with Radiology Trainees. Academic Radiology, 29, S111-S117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2021.05.018
dcterms.referencesCanavan, C., Holtman, M. C., Richmond, M., & Katsufrakis, P. J. (2010). The Quality of Written Comments on Professional Behaviors in a Developmental Multisource Feedback Program: Academic Medicine, 85, S106-S109.
dcterms.referencesChaou, C.-H., Chang, Y.-C., Yu, S.-R., Tseng, H.-M., Hsiao, C.-T., Wu, K.-H., Monrouxe, L. V., & Ling, R. N. Y. (2019). Clinical learning in the context of uncertainty: A multicenter survey of emergency department residents’ and attending physicians’ perceptions of clinical feedback. BMC Medical Education, 19(1), 174. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1597-8
dcterms.referencesConnolly, K. A., Azouz, S. M., & Smith, A. A. (2015). Feedback in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Education: Past, Present, and Future. Journal of Craniofacial Surgery, 26(8), 2261-2263. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000002256
dcterms.referencesCook, M. R., Watters, J. M., Barton, J. S., Kamin, C., Brown, S. N., Deveney, K. E., & Kiraly, L. N. (2015). A Flexible Postoperative Debriefing Process Can Effectively Provide Formative Resident Feedback. Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 220(5), 959-967. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.12.048
dcterms.referencesCrossley, J., McDonnell, J., Cooper, C., McAvoy, P., Archer, J., & Davies, H. (2008). Can a district hospital assess its doctors for re-licensure? Medical Education, 42(4), 359-363. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2007.02977.x
dcterms.referencesDe, S. K., Henke, P. K., Ailawadi, G., Dimick, J. B., & Colletti, L. M. (2004). Attending, house officer, and medical student perceptions about teaching in the third-year medical school general surgery clerkship. Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 199(6), 932-942. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2004.08.025
dcterms.referencesDelva, D., Sargeant, J., & MacLeod, T. (2011). Feedback: A perennial problem. Medical Teacher, 33(10), 861-862.
dcterms.referencesDomínguez, L. C. (2021). Cerrando las brechas entre profesores y estudiantes en la evaluación formativa. Iatreia, 34(4), 293-294. https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.iatreia.127
dcterms.referencesDuitsman, M. E., van Braak, M., Stommel, W., ten Kate-Booij, M., de Graaf, J., Fluit, C. R. M. G., & Jaarsma, D. A. D. C. (2019). Using conversation analysis to explore feedback on resident performance. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 24(3), 577-594. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-019-09887-4
dcterms.referencesEaton, M., Scully, R., Schuller, M., Yang, A., Smink, D., Williams, R. G., Bohnen, J. D., George, B. C., Fryer, J. P., & Meyerson, S. L. (2019). Value and Barriers to Use of the SIMPL Tool for Resident Feedback. Journal of Surgical Education, 76(3), 620-627. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2019.01.012
dcterms.referencesEl Boghdady, M., & Alijani, A. (2017). Feedback in surgical education. The Surgeon, 15(2), 98-103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surge.2016.06.006
dcterms.referencesElnicki, D. M., Kolarik, R., & Bardella, I. (2003). Third-Year Medical Students’ Perceptions of Effective Teaching Behaviors in a Multidisciplinary Ambulatory Clerkship. Academic Medicine, 78(8), 815-819.
dcterms.referencesElnicki, D. M., Layne, R. D., Ogden, P. E., & Morris, D. K. (1998). Oral versus written feedback in medical clinic. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 13(3), 155-158. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.1998.00049.x
dcterms.referencesEnde, J. (1983). Feedback in clinical medical education. JAMA, 250(6), 777-781.
dcterms.referencesFerguson, J., Wakeling, J., & Bowie, P. (2014). Factors influencing the effectiveness of multisource feedback in improving the professional practice of medical doctors: A systematic review. BMC Medical Education, 14(1), 76. https://doi.org/10.1186/14726920-14-76
dcterms.referencesGonzález Rodríguez, R., & Cardentey García, J. (2015). Percepción de estudiantes de medicina sobre el desempeño del profesor en el escenario docente. Revista Habanera de Ciencias Médicas, 14(6), 855-862.
dcterms.referencesHalman, S., Dudek, N., Wood, T., Pugh, D., Touchie, C., McAleer, S., & Humphrey-Murto, S. (2016). Direct Observation of Clinical Skills Feedback Scale: Development and Validity Evidence. Teaching and Learning in Medicine, 28(4), 385-394. https://doi.org/10.1080/10401334.2016.1186552
dcterms.referencesHarrison, R., Tsyrulnik, A., Wood, D., Coughlin, R., Della-Giustina, D., & Goldflam, K. (2019). An Innovative Feedback Tool Leading to Improved Faculty Feedback and Positive Reception by Residents. Western Journal of Emergency Medicine, 21(1), 47-51. https://doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2019.10.44302
dcterms.referencesHattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The Power of Feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81-112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487
dcterms.referencesHayward, M. F., Curran, V., Curtis, B., Schulz, H., & Murphy, S. (2014). Reliability of the Interprofessional Collaborator Assessment Rubric (ICAR) in Multi Source Feedback (MSF) with post-graduate medical residents. BMC Medical Education, 14(1), 1049. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-014-0279-9
dcterms.referencesHolmboe, E. S., Yamazaki, K., Edgar, L., Conforti, L., Yaghmour, N., Miller, R. S., & Hamstra, S. J. (2015). Reflections on the First 2 Years of Milestone Implementation. Journal of Graduate Medical Education, 7(3), 506-511. https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-07-03-43
dcterms.referencesHunt, E., Shoaleh, B., & Mirhosseini, F. (2021). A Practical Guide for Medical Teachers -6th Edition -Elsevier.
dcterms.referencesKarim, A. S., Sternbach, J. M., Bender, E. M., Zwischenberger, J. B., & Meyerson, S. L. (2017). Quality of Operative Performance Feedback Given to Thoracic Surgery Residents Using an App-Based System. Journal of Surgical Education, 74(6), e81e87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2017.10.001
dcterms.referencesKim, B., Rajagopalan, A., Tabasky, E. M., Reddy, S. S., & Topor, D. R. (2022). Sharing perspectives on feedback: A combined resident-faculty workshop. BMC Medical Education, 22(1), 197. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03253-6
dcterms.referencesLeber, M., He, C., Akhtar, S., Asher, S., Bania, T., Di, C., Steinberg, E., Webster, A., & Clark, M. (2012). 111 A Comparison of Individualized Feedback Versus Standard Didactic Lecture to Teach Interpersonal Communication Skills to Emergency Medicine Residents: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial. Annals of Emergency Medicine, 60(4), S41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2012.06.088
dcterms.referencesLevac, D., Colquhoun, H., & O’Brien, K. K. (2010). Scoping studies: Advancing the methodology. Implementation Science, 5(1), 69. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-569
dcterms.referencesMann, K., van der Vleuten, C., Eva, K., Armson, H., Chesluk, B., Dornan, T., Holmboe, E., Lockyer, J., Loney, E., & Sargeant, J. (2011). Tensions in informed self-assessment: How the desire for feedback and reticence to collect and use it can conflict. Academic Medicine: Journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, 86(9), 1120-1127. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e318226abdd
dcterms.referencesMatthews, D. (2007). Book Review: Mindset: The New Psychology of Success, by Dweck, C. S. (2006). 2, 3.
dcterms.referencesMatthiesen, M., Kelly, M. S., Dzara, K., & Begin, A. S. (2022). Medical residents and attending physicians’ perceptions of feedback and teaching in the United States: A qualitative study. Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions, 19, 9. https://doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2022.19.9
dcterms.referencesMiller, A., & Archer, J. (2010). Impact of workplace based assessment on doctors’ education and performance: A systematic review. BMJ, 341, c5064. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.c5064
dcterms.referencesNaeem, N. (2013). Validity, reliability, feasibility, acceptability and educational impact of direct observation of procedural skills (DOPS). Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons--Pakistan: JCPSP, 23(1), 77-82. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181ed4cdb
dcterms.referencesPaterson, C., Paterson, N., Jackson, W., & Work, F. (2020). What are students’ needs and preferences for academic feedback in higher education? A systematic review. Nurse Education Today, 85, 104236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2019.104236
dcterms.referencesPeters, M., Godfrey, C., McInerney, P., Soares, C. B., Khalil, H., & Parker, D. (2015). Methodology for jbi scoping reviews. The Joanna Briggs Institute Reviewers Manual 2015, 3-24.
dcterms.referencesPrince, K. J. A. H., Van De Wiel, M., Scherpbier, A. J. J. A., Can Der Vleuten, C. P. M., & Boshuizen, H. P. A. (2000). A Qualitative Analysis of the Transition from Theory to Practice in Undergraduate Training in a PBL-Medical School. Advances in Health Sciences Education: Theory and Practice, 5(2), 105-116. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009873003677
dcterms.referencesRamani, S. (2009). Twelve tips to promote excellence in medical teaching. Medical Teacher, 28(1), 19-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/01421590500441786
dcterms.referencesRavichandran, L., Sivaprakasam, E., Balaji, S., & Swaminathan, N. (2019). Effectiveness of the 1-Minute Preceptor on Feedback to Pediatric Residents in a Busy Ambulatory Setting. Journal of Graduate Medical Education, 11(4 Suppl), 204. https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-D-19-00440
dcterms.referencesRethans, J.-J., Norcini, J. J., Barón-Maldonado, M., Blackmore, D., Jolly, B. C., LaDuca, T., Lew, S., Page, G. G., & Southgate, L. H. (2002). The relationship between competence and performance: Implications for assessing practice performance. Medical Education, 36(10), 901-909. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2923.2002.01316.x
dcterms.referencesRichman, P. S., Olvet, D. M., Ahmad, S., & Chandran, L. (2019). Use of student feedback to drive quality improvement (QI) in a preclinical U.S. medical school course. Medical Education Online, 24(1), 1583968. https://doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2019.1583968
dcterms.referencesRitchie, K. C., Sjaus, A., Munro, A., & George, R. B. (2020). An interpretive phenomenological analysis of formative feedback in anesthesia training: The residents’ perspective. BMC Medical Education, 20(1), 493. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02402-z
dcterms.referencesSaddawi-Konefka, D., Sullivan, A., Beltran, C., & Baker, K. (2021). Doing More With Written Feedback: Improving Learner Satisfaction and Reflection With the LEAF (LearnerEngaged Analysis of Feedback) Method. Academic Medicine, 96(10), 1425-1430. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000004046
dcterms.referencesSargeant, J., Mann, K., Sinclair, D., Van der Vleuten, C., & Metsemakers, J. (2007). Challenges in multisource feedback: Intended and unintended outcomes. Medical Education, 41(6), 583-591. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2007.02769.x
dcterms.referencesSender Liberman, A., Liberman, M., Steinert, Y., McLeod, P., & Meterissian, S. (2005). Surgery residents and attending surgeons have different perceptions of feedback. Medical Teacher, 27(5), 470-472. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142590500129183
dcterms.referencesShenoy, R. V., Newbern, D., Cooke, D. W., Chia, D. J., Panagiotakopoulos, L., DiVall, S., Torres-Santiago, L., Vangala, S., & Gupta, N. (2022). The Structured Oral Examination: A Method to Improve Formative Assessment of Fellows in Pediatric Endocrinology. Academic Pediatrics, 22(7), 1091-1096. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acap.2021.12.032
dcterms.referencesSpinnewijn, L., Bolte, A. C., Braat, D. D. M., Scheele, F., & Aarts, J. W. M. (2022). Structurally collecting patient feedback on trainee skills: A pilot study in Obstetrics and Gynaecology. Patient Education and Counseling, 105(5), 1276-1282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2021.08.026
dcterms.referencesTelio, S., Ajjawi, R., & Regehr, G. (2015). The «educational alliance» as a framework for reconceptualizing feedback in medical education. Academic Medicine: Journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, 90(5), 609-614. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000000560
dcterms.referencesTelio, S., Regehr, G., & Ajjawi, R. (2016). Feedback and the educational alliance: Examining credibility judgements and their consequences. Medical Education, 50(9), 933-942. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.13063
dcterms.referencesVan De Ridder, J. M. M., Stokking, K. M., McGaghie, W. C., & Ten Cate, O. T. J. (2008). What is feedback in clinical education? Medical Education, 42(2), 189-197. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2007.02973.x
dcterms.referencesvan der Leeuw, R. M., & Slootweg, I. A. (2013). Twelve tips for making the best use of feedback. Medical Teacher, 35(5), 348-351. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2013.769676
dcterms.referencesVaporciyan, A. A. (2019). How to Give Effective Formative Feedback in Thoracic Surgery Education. Thoracic Surgery Clinics, 29(3), 249-257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.thorsurg.2019.03.003
dcterms.referencesWatling, C., Driessen, E., van der Vleuten, C. P. M., & Lingard, L. (2014). Learning culture and feedback: An international study of medical athletes and musicians. Medical Education, 48(7), 713-723. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.12407
dcterms.referencesWhite, M., Schunemman, L., Choroco, V. A., Carranza-Esteban, R. F., Landa-Barzola, M., & Huancahuire-Vega, S. (2021). Traducción, adaptación cultural, validez de contenido y constructo del cuestionario Feedback in medical education (FEEDME-Proveedor) en estudiantes de medicina humana. Iatreia, 34(4), Art. 4. https://doi.org/10.17533/10.17533/udea.iatreia.117
dcterms.referencesYama, B. A., Hodgins, M., Boydell, K., & Schwartz, S. B. (2018). A qualitative exploration: Questioning multisource feedback in residency education. BMC Medical Education, 18(1), 170. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-018-1270-7
dcterms.referencesYoung, J. Q., Sugarman, R., Schwartz, J., & O’Sullivan, P. S. (2020). Overcoming the Challenges of Direct Observation and Feedback Programs: A Qualitative Exploration of Resident and Faculty Experiences. Teaching and Learning in Medicine, 32(5), 541551. https://doi.org/10.1080/10401334.2020.1767107
thesis.degree.disciplineFacultad de Medicinaes_CO
thesis.degree.levelMaestría en Educación Médicaes_CO
thesis.degree.nameMagíster en Educación Médicaes_CO


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 InternacionalExcepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional