Apresentar o registro simples

dc.contributor.advisorCuesta Medina, Liliana Marcela
dc.contributor.authorSierra Mansueto, Marvin
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-02T13:33:23Z
dc.date.available2021-03-02T13:33:23Z
dc.date.issued2021-02-08
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10818/47061
dc.description138 páginases_CO
dc.description.abstractGlobal advancements necessitated L2 English acquisition as the world progresses to greater internationalization and towards a more competitive world of standardized comparisons. This study investigated the use of Total Physical Response (TPR) strategy in remediating English reading difficulties of Colombian learners. A three-phase quasi-experimental concurrent-nested mixed methods study was designed to: (1) devise and implement an action/intervention strategy; (2) quantitatively evaluate the intervention conducted; and (3) the qualitatively analyze the verbal and non-verbal responses of the learners towards the intervention. It was found out that the intervention bore significant results to learners’ reading achievement (Z=-3.7) and reading comprehension (Z=-3.9). Further, it was also revealed that reading achievement, unlike reading comprehension, is not influenced by learners’ appraisal of the intervention, and their reading attitude. Meanwhile, results of the qualitative analysis reports that TPR encourages learner engagement and creativity and that it is a challenging pedagogical strategy especially when involving higher grade level learners. The findings of quantitative and qualitative analyses were further corroborated leading to a more meaningful and comprehensive evaluation of TPR as an intervention. This study provides a breakthrough in TPR research from Colombian educational context and is further found significant for English L2 learners and teachers, school administrators, and the entire academic community.eng
dc.description.abstractLos avances globales requirieron la adquisición del inglés L2 a medida que el mundo avanza hacia una mayor internacionalización y hacia un mundo más competitivo de comparaciones estandarizadas. Este estudio investigó el uso de la estrategia de Respuesta Física Total (TPR) para remediar las dificultades de lectura en inglés de los estudiantes colombianos. Se diseñó un estudio cuasi experimental de métodos mixtos anidados concurrentes de tres fases para: (1) diseñar e implementar una estrategia de acción / intervención; (2) evaluar cuantitativamente la intervención realizada; y (3) analizar cualitativamente las respuestas verbales y no verbales de los alumnos hacia la intervención. Se descubrió que la intervención arrojó resultados significativos en el rendimiento en lectura (Z = -3.7) y la comprensión de lectura (Z = -3.9) de los estudiantes. Además, también se reveló que el rendimiento en lectura, a diferencia de la comprensión lectora, no se ve influenciado por la valoración de la intervención por parte de los alumnos ni por su actitud lectora. Mientras tanto, los resultados del análisis cualitativo informan que TPR fomenta el compromiso y la creatividad de los estudiantes y que es una estrategia pedagógica desafiante, especialmente cuando se trata de estudiantes de niveles superiores. Los hallazgos de los análisis cuantitativos y cualitativos se corroboraron aún más, lo que condujo a una evaluación más significativa y completa de la TPR como intervención. Este estudio proporciona un gran avance en la investigación de TPR del contexto educativo colombiano y además se considera significativo para los estudiantes y maestros de inglés L2, administradores escolares y toda la comunidad académica.spa
dc.formatapplication/pdfes_CO
dc.language.isoenges_CO
dc.publisherUniversidad de La Sabanaes_CO
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.titleEffect of total physical response strategy in remediating english reading difficulties of spanish speaking learnerses_CO
dc.typemasterThesises_CO
dc.identifier.local280948
dc.identifier.localTE11195
dc.type.hasVersionpublishedVersiones_CO
dc.rights.accessRightsrestrictedAccesses_CO
dc.subject.armarcPlanificación educativaspa
dc.subject.armarcInglés -- Enseñanzaspa
dc.subject.armarcLecturaspa
dc.subject.armarcComprensión de lecturaspa
dc.subject.armarcEstudiantesspa
dc.subject.armarcPersonal docentespa
dcterms.referencesAgudelo, W. C. (2017). Estos son los 10 colegios con mejor calidad educativa en Santa Marta 2017. Www.Seguimiento.Co. https://seguimiento.co/la-samaria/estos-son-los-10-colegioscon-mejor-calidad-educativa-en-santa-marta-2017-7839es_CO
dcterms.referencesAkbari, Z. (2014). The role of grammar in second language reading comprehension: Iranian ESP context. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98(2000), 122–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.397en
dcterms.referencesAlderson, J. C. (2000). Assessing reading. Cambridge University Press.en
dcterms.referencesAlderson, J. C. (2000). Assessing reading. Cambridge University Press.en
dcterms.referencesAllen, L. Q. (1995). The effects of emblematic gestures on the development and access of mental representations of French expressions. The Modern Language Journal, 79(4), 521–529.en
dcterms.referencesAllen, L. Q. (1995). The effects of emblematic gestures on the development and access of mental representations of French expressions. The Modern Language Journal, 79(4), 521–529.en
dcterms.referencesAmerican Psychological Association. (2017). Ethical principles of pschologists and code of conduct. Author.en
dcterms.referencesAnderson, C. (2011). CLIL for CALP in the multilingual, pluricultural, globalized knowledge society: Experiences and backgrounds to L2 English usage among Latin American L1 Spanish-users. Latin American Journal of Content & Language Integrated Learning, 4(2), 51–66. https://doi.org/10.5294/laclil.2011.4.2.5en
dcterms.referencesAnderson, N. J. (1999). Exploring Second Language Reading: Issues and Strategies. Heinle & Heinleen
dcterms.referencesAraujo, L. (2014). Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research (A. C. Michalos (Ed.); Issue January). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5en
dcterms.referencesAsher, J. J. (1966). The learning strategy of the Total Physical Response: A review. The Modern Language Journal, 50(2), 79–84.en
dcterms.referencesAsher, J. J. (1977). Learning another language through actions: The complete teacher’s guidebook. Sky Oaks Productions.en
dcterms.referencesAsher, J. J. (1977). Learning another language through actions: The complete teacher’s guidebook. Sky Oaks Productions.en
dcterms.referencesAsher, J. J. (2012). Learning another language through actions (7th ed.). Sky Oaks Productions.en
dcterms.referencesAsher, J. J., & Price, B. S. (1967). The learning strategy of the total physical response: Some age differences. Child Development, 4(38), 1219–1227.en
dcterms.referencesBasallo Gómez, J. S. (2016). Adult EFL reading selection: Influence on literacy. PROFILE Issues in Teachers’ Professional Development, 18(1), 167–181. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.15446/profile.v18n1.49943en
dcterms.referencesBauer, L., & Nation, I. S. P. (1993). Word families. International Journal of Lexicography, 6(4), 253–279.en
dcterms.referencesBaumann, J., & Stevenson, J. (1982). Understanding standardized reading achievement test scores. The Reading Teacher, 35(6), 648–654.en
dcterms.referencesBayat, S. (2017). Reading comprehension skills of bilingual children in Turkey. European Journal of Education Studies, 3(May), 72–93. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.572344en
dcterms.referencesBechtel, W. (2008). Mental Mechanisms: Philosophical Perspectives on Cognitive Neuroscience. Taylor & Francis.en
dcterms.referencesBlachowicz, C., & Ogle, D. (2008). Reading comprehension: Strategies for independent learners (2nd ed.). The Guilford Press.en
dcterms.referencesBlind men and the elephant. (n.d.)en
dcterms.referencesBloomberg. (2018). Company overview of Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press Co., Ltd. Bloomberg Media; Bloomberg. https://www.bloomberg.com/research/stocks/private/snapshot.asp?privcapid=28486571en
dcterms.referencesBogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (2007). Qualitative research in education: An introduction to theory and practice (5th ed.). Allyn & Bacon.en
dcterms.referencesBowen, T. (n.d.). Teaching approaches: Total physical response.en
dcterms.referencesBowey, J. A. (2005). Predicting individual differences in learning to read. In M. J. Snowling & C. Hulme (Eds.), The science of reading: A handbook (pp. 155–172)en
dcterms.referencesBrashdi, B. A. (2002). Reading in English as a foreign language: Problems and strategies. docshare01.docshare.tips/files/18243/182432816.pdfen
dcterms.referencesBraun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oaen
dcterms.referencesBruner, J. S. (1983). Child’s talk: Learning to use language. W. W. Norton.en
dcterms.referencesBurns, A. (2010). Doing action research in English language teaching: A guide for practitioners. Routledge.en
dcterms.referencesButler, T., & Fowler, M. (2015). Improving English learners reading comprehension through the use of vocabulary strategies. Publications, 3. https://tigerprints.clemson.edu/eugene_pubs/60en
dcterms.referencesCain, K., & Oakhill, J. (2009). Reading comprehension development from 8 to 14 y ears: The contribution of component skills and processes. In Beyond decoding: The behavioral and biological foundations of reading comprehension (p. 146)en
dcterms.referencesCatts, H. W., & Kamhi, A. G. (Eds.). (2005). The connections between language and reading disabilities. Lawrence Erlbaum. https://doi.org/10.1177/0142723706067863en
dcterms.referencesChall, J. S., & Stahl, S. (2008). Reading. In Microsoft® Student 2009 [DVD]. Microsoft Corporationen
dcterms.referencesCheung, C. K. (2001). The Use of Popular Culture as a Stimulus to Motivate Secondary Students’ English Learning in Hong Kong. ELT Journal, 55, 55–61.en
dcterms.referencesChoi, D., & Kim, M. (2015). The effects of visual stimulation and body gesture on language learning achievement and course interest. Educational Technology International, 16(2), 141–166en
dcterms.referencesChomsky, N. (1959). A review of B. F. Skinner’s verbal behavior. Language, 35(1), 26–58en
dcterms.referencesChou, P. T. M. (2011). The effects of vocabulary knowledge and background knowledge on reading comprehension of Taiwanese EFL students. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 8(1), 108–115. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb050773en
dcterms.referencesChristensen, L. B., Johnson, R. B., & Turner, L. A. (2015). Research design, methods, and analysis (12th ed.). Pearson.en
dcterms.referencesCirino, P. T., Romain, M. A., Barth, A. E., Tolar, T. D., Fletcher, J. M., & Vaughn, S. (2013). Reading skill components and impairments in middle school struggling readers. Read Writ, 26(7), 1059–1086. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9085-7en
dcterms.referencesColtheart, M. (2005). Modeling reading: The dual-route approach. In M. J. Snowling & C. Hulme (Eds.), The science of reading: A handbook (1st ed., p. 6). Blackwell Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470757642en
dcterms.referencesCorbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (3rd ed.). Sage Publications, Incen
dcterms.referencesCordray, D., Pion, G., Brandt, C., Molefe, A., & Toby, M. (2012). The impact of the Measures of Academic Progress (MAP) program on student reading achievement. National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED564093en
dcterms.referencesCouncil of Europe. (2001). Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge University Press. http://www.coe.int/t/dg4/linguistic/Source/Framework_EN.pden
dcterms.referencesCreswell, J., & Plano-Clark, V. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. SAGE.en
dcterms.referencesCrowder, R. G. (1993). Systems and principles in memory theory: Another critique of pure memory. In A. F. Collins, S. E. Gathercole, M. A. Conway, & P. E. Morris (Eds.), Theories of memory (pp. 139–161). Erlbaum.en
dcterms.referencesCrystal, D. (2003). English as a global language (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Pressen
dcterms.referencesCummins, J. (1979). Linguistic interdependence and the educational development of bilingual children. Review of Educational Research, 49, 222–251en
dcterms.referencesDay, R., & Bamford, J. (1998). Extensive Reading in the Second Language Classroom. Cambridge University Pressen
dcterms.referencesde Nooijer, J. A., van Gog, T., Paas, F., & Zwaan, R. A. (2013). Effects of imitating gestures during encoding or during retrieval of novel verbs on children’s test performance. Acta Psychologica, 144, 173–179en
dcterms.referencesDenzin, N. (2006). Sociological Methods: A Sourcebook (5th ed.). Aldine Transaction.en
dcterms.referencesDewey, J. (1897). My pedagogic creed. School Journal, 54(3), 77–80.en
dcterms.referencesEhri, L. C. (2005). Development of sight word reading: Phases and findings. In M. J. Snowling & C. Hulme (Eds.), The science of reading: A handbook (pp. 135–154). Blackwell Publishing.en
dcterms.referencesElleman, A., & Oslund, E. (2019). Reading comprehension research: Implications for practice and policy. Policy Insights from Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 6(1), 3–11.en
dcterms.referencesElliott, E., & Yountchi, L. (2009). Total physical response and Russian multi-and unidirectional verbs of motion: A case study in acquisition. The Slavic and East European Journal, 3(53), 428–450en
dcterms.referencesEngelkamp, J., & Zimmer, H. D. (1997). Sensory factors in memory for subject-performed tasks.Acta Psychologica, 96(1), 43–60.en
dcterms.referencesEscamilla, K., & Hopewell, S. (2011). When learners speak two or more languages. In D. Lapp & D. Fisher (Eds.), Handbook of research on teaching the English language arts (3rd ed., pp. 17–21). Routledge.en
dcterms.referencesFargier, R., Paulignan, Y., Boulenger, V., & Nazir, T. A. (2012). Learning to associate novel words with motor actions: Language-induced motor following short training. Cortex, 48(7), 888–899.en
dcterms.referencesFarr, R. & Anastasiow, N. (1971). Tests of reading readiness and achievement: A review and evaluation. International Reading Association.en
dcterms.referencesFarrall, M. L. (2012). Reading assessment: Linking literacy, language and cognition. John Wiley & Sonsen
dcterms.referencesFielding, N. G. (2012). Triangulation and Mixed Methods Designs. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 6(2), 124–136. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689812437101en
dcterms.referencesForeign Language Teaching and Research Press. (n.d.). Questionnaire on reading comprehension. Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press. http://old.fltrp.com/wyzx/07techer/doc/taskdemo/class1/Group 5 -- Questionnaire on English Reading Comprehension.docen
dcterms.referencesFraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (2009). How to design and evaluate research in education (7th ed.). McGraw-Hillen
dcterms.referencesFreebody, P. (2007). Literacy education in school: Research perspective from the past, for the future (C. Glascodine (Ed.)).en
dcterms.referencesGagne, R. M. (1974). Instruction and the conditions of learning. In W. M. Bart & M. R. Wong (Eds.), Psychology of school learning: Views of the learner. Volume 1: Environmentalism (pp. 153–175). MSS Information Corporation.en
dcterms.referencesGarbys-Baker, D. (2011). APPRAISAL SYSTEMS IN TEACHER TRAINING : FOCUS ON CRITICAL INCIDENTS ( CI ). Linguistica Silesiana, 32, 259–274en
dcterms.referencesGarcia, G. (1991). Factors influencing the English reading test performance of Spanish-speaking Hispanic children. Reading Research Quarterly, 26(4), 371–392en
dcterms.referencesGarcía, O., & Lin, A. (2017). Extending understandings of bilingual and multilingual education. In O. Garcia, A. Lin, & S. May (Eds.), Bilingual and multilingual education (3rd ed., pp. 1– 20). Springeren
dcterms.referencesGeneva Emotion Research Group. (2002). Geneva Appraisal Questionnaire (GAQ): Format, development, and utilization. Authoren
dcterms.referencesGibson, E. (2000). The dependency locality theory : A distance-based theory of linguistic complexity. In Image, language, brain (pp. 95–126)en
dcterms.referencesGibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Houghton Mifflinen
dcterms.referencesGlenberg, A. M. (2011). How reading comprehension is embodied and why that matters. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 4(1), 5–18.en
dcterms.referencesGlenberg, A. M., Havas, D., Becker, R., & Rinck, M. (2005). Grounding language in bodily states: The case for emotion. In D. Pecher & R. Zwaan (Eds.), The grounding of cognition: The role of perception and action in memory, language, and thinking (pp. 115–128). Cambridge University Pressen
dcterms.referencesGlende, L. (2013). Vocabulary and word study to increase comprehension in content areas for struggling readers. Fisher Digital Publications, 2–70. http://fisherpub.sjfc.edu/education_ETD_masters/247en
dcterms.referencesGómez, F. A. A., López, D. C., & Marin, L. F. G. (2011). Reading comprehension in face-to-face and web-based modalities : Graduate students ’ use of reading and language learning strategies in EFL. Colombian Applied Linguistics, 13(2), 11–28.en
dcterms.referencesGordon, P. C., Hendrick, R., & Johnson, M. (2004). Memory and language effects of noun phrase type on sentence complexity. Journal of Memory and Language, 51, 97–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2004.02.003en
dcterms.referencesGunning, T. G. (2002). Assessing and correcting reading and writing difficulties. Allyn & Baconen
dcterms.referencesGunning, T. G. (2003). The role of readability in today’s classrooms. Topics in Language Disorders, 23, 175–200en
dcterms.referencesHahn, E. R., & Gershkoff-Stowe, L. (2010). Children and adults learn actions for objects more readily than labels. Language Learning and Development, 6(4), 283–308en
dcterms.referencesHarnad, S. (1990). The symbol grounding problem. Physica D, 42, 335–346.en
dcterms.referencesHashemi, M., & Azizinezhad, M. (2011). Teaching English to Children: A Unique, Challenging Experience for Teachers, Effective Teaching Ideas. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 30, 2083 – 2087.en
dcterms.referencesHenning, J. E., Stone, J. M., & Kelly, J. L. (2009). Using action research to improve instruction : an interactive guide for teachers. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203887295en
dcterms.referencesHess, K. (2006). Reading Development & Assessment of Early Literacy: A Review of the Literatureen
dcterms.referencesHinkel, E. (2005). Handbook of Research in Second Language Teaching and Language. In Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 419–435). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263106260297en
dcterms.referencesHostetter, A. B. (2011). When do gestures communicate? A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 137, 297–315en
dcterms.referencesHsu, H., & Lin, C. (2012). The effects of Total Physical Response on English functional vocabulary learning for resource classroom students in the elementary school.en
dcterms.referencesInhelder, B., & Piaget, J. (1958). The growth of logical thinking: From childhood to adolescence. Basic Booksen
dcterms.referencesJacob, S., & Hartshorne, T. S. (2003). Ethics and law for school psychologists (4th ed.). John Wiley & Sons.en
dcterms.referencesJenkins, J., Hudson, R., & Lee, S. H. (2007). Using CBM-Reading Assessments to Monitor Progress How to Monitor Progress in Reading. Perspectives on Language and Literacy, 33(2)en
dcterms.referencesJohnson, D. C. (2013). Language policy. Palgrave Macmillanen
dcterms.referencesJoshi, R. M., & Aaron, P. G. (2000). The component model of reading: Simple view of reading made a little more complex. Reading Psychology, 21, 85–97.en
dcterms.referencesKaschak, M. P., Jones, J. L., Coyle, J. M., & Sell, A. (2009). Language and body. In R. Wagner, C. Schatschneider, & C. Phythian-Sense (Eds.), Beyong decoding: The behavioral and biological foundations of reading comprehension (p. 3). The Guilford Press.en
dcterms.referencesKitzen, K. (2001). Prosodic sensitivity, morphological ability, and reading ability in young adults with and without childhood histories of reading difficulty. University of Colombia, Colombia.en
dcterms.referencesKolers, P. A., & Roediger, H. L. (1984). Procedures of mind. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 23, 425–449.en
dcterms.referencesKrashen, S. (1999). Condemned Without a Trial: Bogus Arguments Against Bilingual Education. Heinemanen
dcterms.referencesKroll, T., & Neri, M. (2009). Designs for Mixed Methods Research. In S. Andrew & E. Halcomb (Eds.), Mixed Methods Research for Nursing and Health Sciences (pp. 31–49). WileyBlackwellen
dcterms.referencesKung, F. (2019). Teaching second language reading comprehension: the effects of classroom materials and reading strategy use. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 13(1), 93–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2017.1364252en
dcterms.referencesKunihira, S., & Asher, J. (1966). The strategy of the total physical response: an application to learning Japanese. Internation Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 4(3), 277–290en
dcterms.referencesKuo, F., Hsu, C., Fang, W., & Chen, N. (2014). The effects of embodiment-based TPR approach on student English vocabulary learning achievement , retention and acceptance. Journal of King Saud University - Computer and Information Sciences, 26(1), 63–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksuci.2013.10.003en
dcterms.referencesLakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh. Basic Books.en
dcterms.referencesLeach, J. M., Scarborough, H. S., & Rescorla, L. (2003). Late-emerging reading disabilities. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 211–224en
dcterms.referencesLesaux, N. K., & Kieffer, M. J. (2010). Exploring Sources of Reading Comprehension Difficulties Among Language Minority Learners and Their Classmates in Early Adolescence. American Educational Research Journal, 47(3), 596–632. https://doi.org/doi: 10.3102/0002831209355469en
dcterms.referencesLester, P. E., Inman, D., & Bishop, L. (2014). Handbook of tests and measurements in education and the social sciences (3rd ed.). Rowman & Littlefielden
dcterms.referencesMacmillan. (2016). Chinese publishing. Macmillan Education; Macmillan. http://www.macmillaneducation.com/chineseen
dcterms.referencesMaguire, M., & Delahunt, B. (2017). Doing a Thematic Analysis: A Practical, Step-by-Step Guide for Learning and Teaching Scholars. AISHE-J - The All Ireland Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 8(3), 3551–33514. http://ojs.aishe.org/index.php/aishej/article/view/335en
dcterms.referencesMangubhai, F. (1991). How does one learn a second language? Let me count the number of ways. RELC Regional Seminar on Language Acquisition and the Second/Foreign Language Classroomen
dcterms.referencesMarín, J. H. M., & Moncada, A. G. (2010). Teaching reading comprehension in English in a distance web-based course : New roles for teachers. PROFILE, 12(2), 69–85en
dcterms.referencesMarlatt, E. A. (1995). Learning language through Total Physical Response. Perspectives in Education and Deafness, 13(4), 18–20.en
dcterms.referencesMartin-Chang, S. Y., & Gould, O. N. (2008). Revisiting print exposure: Exploring differential links to vocabulary, comprehension and reading rate. Journal of Research in Reading, 31, 273–284en
dcterms.referencesMcdougald, J. S. (2009). The state of language and content instruction in Colombia. Latin American Journal of Content & Language Integrated Learning, 2(2), 44–48. https://doi.org/10.5294/laclil.2009.2.2.15en
dcterms.referencesMcInerney, D., & McInerney, V. (1998). Educational psychology: Constructing learning (2nd ed.). Prentice Hallen
dcterms.referencesMcKay, S. (2002). Teaching English as an international language: Rethinking goals and perspectives. The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language, 7(1), 81–101. http://www.tesl-ej.org/wordpress/issues/volume7/ej25/ej25r5/?wscr=en
dcterms.referencesMckenna, M. C., Conradi, K., & Meyer, J. P. (2012). Reading attitudes of middle school students: Results of a U.S. survey. Reading Research Quarterly, 47(3), 283–306. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/RRQ.021en
dcterms.referencesMeisel, J. M. (2011). First and second language acquisition: Parallels and differences. Cambridge University Pressen
dcterms.referencesMenken, K., & García, O. (Eds.). (2010). Negotiating language policies in schools: Educators as policymakers. Routledgeen
dcterms.referencesMinisterio de Educación Nacional. (2018). Colombia mejora progresivamente en calidad educativa, así lo evidencian los resultados del ISCE: presidente Santos. https://www.mineducacion.gov.co/1759/w3-article-369629.htmlen
dcterms.referencesMustapha, R., & Abdullah, A. (2004). Malaysia transitions toward a knowledge-based economy. The Journal of Technology Studies, 30(3). https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Abdullah_Abu/publication/251443005_Malaysia_Tran sitions_Toward_a_KnowledgeBased_Economy/links/55921a7f08ae47a34910ce03/Malaysia-Transitions-Toward-aKnowledge-Based-Economy.pdf#page=53en
dcterms.referencesMustapha, R., & Abdullah, A. (2004). Malaysia transitions toward a knowledge-based economy. The Journal of Technology Studies, 30(3). https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Abdullah_Abu/publication/251443005_Malaysia_Tran sitions_Toward_a_KnowledgeBased_Economy/links/55921a7f08ae47a34910ce03/Malaysia-Transitions-Toward-aKnowledge-Based-Economy.pdf#page=53en
dcterms.referencesMustapha, R., & Abdullah, A. (2004). Malaysia transitions toward a knowledge-based economy. The Journal of Technology Studies, 30(3). https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Abdullah_Abu/publication/251443005_Malaysia_Tran sitions_Toward_a_KnowledgeBased_Economy/links/55921a7f08ae47a34910ce03/Malaysia-Transitions-Toward-aKnowledge-Based-Economy.pdf#page=53en
dcterms.referencesNation, P., & Waring, R. (1997). Vocabulary size, text coverage and word lists. http://www2.caes.hku.hk/maal6018/files/2009/12/Vocabulary_size_text_coverage_word_lis ts.pdfen
dcterms.referencesNation, P., & Waring, R. (1997). Vocabulary size, text coverage and word lists. http://www2.caes.hku.hk/maal6018/files/2009/12/Vocabulary_size_text_coverage_word_lis ts.pdfen
dcterms.referencesNorthwest Evaluation Association. (2013). Measures of Academic Progress: A comprehensive guide to the MAP K-12 computer adaptive interim assessment.en
dcterms.referencesNWEA. (2017). MAP Growth fact sheet. Northwest Evaluation Association. https://www.nwea.org/content/uploads/2017/05/MAP-Growth-Fact-Sheet.pdfen
dcterms.referencesNWEA. (2017). MAP Growth fact sheet. Northwest Evaluation Association. https://www.nwea.org/content/uploads/2017/05/MAP-Growth-Fact-Sheet.pdfen
dcterms.referencesOlson, A. (2007). Growth measures for systemic change. School Administrator, 64(1). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ757412en
dcterms.referencesOlson, A. (2007). Growth measures for systemic change. School Administrator, 64(1). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ757412en
dcterms.referencesPerfetti, C., Landi, N., & Oakhill, J. (2005). The acquisition of reading comprehension skill. In M. J. Snowling & C. Hulme (Eds.), The science of reading: A handbook (pp. 227–247). Blackwell Publishingen
dcterms.referencesPerfetti, C., Landi, N., & Oakhill, J. (2005). The acquisition of reading comprehension skill. In M. J. Snowling & C. Hulme (Eds.), The science of reading: A handbook (pp. 227–247). Blackwell Publishingen
dcterms.referencesPiaget, J. (1974). The language and thought of the child. Meridianen
dcterms.referencesPinkasová, M. (2011). Total Physical Response in different age groups. Univerzita Karlova v Prazeen
dcterms.referencesPourhosein Gilakjani, A., & Sabouri, N. B. (2016). A study of factors affecting EFL learners’ reading comprehension skill and the strategies for improvement. International Journal of English Linguistics, 6(5), 180. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v6n5p180Sabouri, N. B. (2016). A study of factors affecting EFL learners’ reading comprehension skill and the strategies for improvement. International Journal of English Linguistics, 6(5), 180. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v6n5p180en
dcterms.referencesQian, D. D. (1999). Assessing the roles of depth and breadth of vocabulary knowledge in reading comprehension. Canadian Modern Language Review, 56(2), 282–308.en
dcterms.referencesRadach, R., Schmitten, C., Glover, L., & Huestegge, L. (2009). How children read for comprehension: Eye movements in developing readers. In Beyond decoding: The behavioral and biological foundations of reading comprehension (pp. 75–106). The Guilford Pressen
dcterms.referencesRadach, R., Schmitten, C., Glover, L., & Huestegge, L. (2009). How children read for comprehension: Eye movements in developing readers. In Beyond decoding: The behavioral and biological foundations of reading comprehension (pp. 75–106). The Guilford Pressen
dcterms.referencesReed, D. K., & Vaughn, S. (2012). Comprehension instruction for students with reading disabilities in grades 4 through 12. Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal, 10(1), 17–33en
dcterms.referencesRichards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2001). Approaches and methods in language teaching (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Pressen
dcterms.referencesRizzolatti, G., & Craighero, L. (2004). The mirror-neuron system. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 27, 169–192en
dcterms.referencesRodriguez Sanchez, A. (2017). Reading comprehension course through a genre-oriented approach at a school in Colombia. HOW, 24(2), 35–62. https://doi.org/10.19183/how.24.2.331en
dcterms.referencesSahlberg, P. (2006). Education reform for raising economic competitiveness. Journal of Educational Change, 7(4), 259–287. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-005-4884-6en
dcterms.referencesSariyati, I. (2013). The effectiveness of TPR (Total Physical Response) method in English vocabulary. Parole: Journal of Linguistics and Education, 3(1), 50–64en
dcterms.referencesScarborough, H. S. (1990). Very early language deficits in dyslexic children. Child Development, 61, 1728–1743en
dcterms.referencesScherer, K. R. (2001). Appraisal processes in emotion: Theory, methods, research. In K. Scherer, A. Schorr, & T. Johnstone (Eds.), Appraisal considered as a process of multi-level sequential checking. Oxford University Pressen
dcterms.referencesScott, C. M. (2009). A case for the sentence in reading comprehension. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 40(April), 184–192en
dcterms.referencesShapiro, L. (2019). Embodied cognition (2nd ed.). Routledge.en
dcterms.referencesShare, D. L., Jorm, A. F., Maclean, R., & Matthews, R. (1984). Sources of individual differences in reading acquisition. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 1309–1324.en
dcterms.referencesSharpe, K., & Zwicker, S. N. (2003). Introduction: Discovering the Renaissance reader. In K. Sharpe & S. N. Zwicker (Eds.), Reading, society, and politics in early modern England (p. 1). Cambridge University Pressen
dcterms.referencesShen, Z. (2013). The effects of vocabulary knowledge and dictionary use on EFL reading performance. English Language Teaching, 6(6), 77–85. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v6n6p77en
dcterms.referencesSiiner, M., Hult, F. M., & Kupisch, T. (2018). Situating language acquisition planning. In M. Siiner, F. M. Hult, & T. Kupisch (Eds.), Language policy and language acquistion planning (pp. 1–12). Springeren
dcterms.referencesSivesind, K., Afsar, A., & Bachmann, K. E. (2016). Transnational policy transfer over three curriculum reforms in Finland: The constructions of conditional and purposive programs (1994–2016). European Educational Research Journal, 15(3), 345–365. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474904116648175en
dcterms.referencesSkinner, B. (1957). Verbal behavior. Prentice Hall.en
dcterms.referencesSnow, C. (2002). Reading for understanding: Toward an R & D program in reading comprehension. RAND. http://www.rand.org/publications/MR/MR1465/en
dcterms.referencesStudent Self-Assessment Reading. (n.d.). Microsoft. https://forms.office.com/Pages/ResponsePage.aspx?id=2xxMGwmbU21muzjbPS8QHA5cQMuHShKssXmVLHR-wVURU4xMElMS0k2REQyVTI4OURWUTdNU1RXRy4u%0Aen
dcterms.referencesTellier, M. (2008). The effect of gestures on second language memorisation by young children. Gesture, 8(2), 219–235en
dcterms.referencesThompson, C., & Shapiro, L. (2007). Complexity in treatment of syntactic deficits. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 18, 30–42en
dcterms.referencesThompson, C., & Shapiro, L. (2007). Complexity in treatment of syntactic deficits. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 18, 30–42en
dcterms.referencesTyler, R. W. (2004). Basic principles of curriculum and instruction. In D. J. Flinders & S. J. Thornton (Eds.), The curriculum studies reader (2nd ed., pp. 51–60). RoutledgeFalmeren
dcterms.referencesVygotsky, L. (1986). Thought and language (A. Kozulin (Ed.)). MIT Pressen
dcterms.referencesWagner, R. (2009). Beyond decoding: The behavioral and biological foundations of reading comprehension (R. Wagner, C. Schatschneider, & C. Phythian-Sense (Eds.)). The Guilford Press.en
dcterms.referencesWagner, R., Schatschneider, C., & Phythian-Sense, C. (Eds.). (2009). Beyond decoding: The behavioral and biological foundations of reading comprehension. The Guilford Pressen
dcterms.referencesWeijen, D. van. (2012). The language of (future) scientific communication. In Research Trends (Issue 31, pp. 7–9). http://www.researchtrends.com/issue-31-november-2012/the-languageof-future-scientific-communication/en
dcterms.referencesWest, M. R. (2012). Education and global competitiveness : Lessons for the United States from international evidence. In K. Hassett (Ed.), Rethinking competitiveness. American Enterprise Institute Press. http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:9544459en
dcterms.referencesWolfe, D. E., & Jones, G. (2008). Integrating total physical response stragegy in a level 1 Spanish class. Foreign Language Annals, 4(15), 273–280.en
dcterms.referencesWong, A. Y. (1983). A comparison of the audio-lingual approach and the total physical response approach to teaching English as a second language to third grade Chinese students. In Un published Doctoral Thesis. University of San Francisco, CA.en
dcterms.referencesWoolley, G. (2011). Reading comprehension. In Reading comprehension: Assisting children with reading difficulties (pp. 15–34). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1174-7en
dcterms.referencesYang, L. (2004). Development of a Validated Perceived Self-efficacy Scale on English Reading Strategies. Journal of Education & Psychology, 27, 377–398.en
dcterms.referencesYang, Y. T. C., Chuang, Y. C., Li, L. Y., Tseng, S. S., Harmer, J., Flynn, T. M., Beasley, J., Huang, Y.-M. Y.-M., Huang, Y.-M. Y.-M., Huang, S.-H., Lin, Y.-T., Yalçın, Ö., İnceçay, V., Flowerdew, J., Miller, L., Kamler, B., Thomson, P., Khan, N., Ali, A., … Kizilkaya, G. (2010). Teaching Listening and Speaking: From Theory to Practice. Computers and Education, 55(2), 317. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2011.643130en
thesis.degree.disciplineFacultad de Educaciónes_CO
thesis.degree.levelMaestría en Didáctica del Inglés para el Aprendizaje Autodirigido (Virtual)es_CO
thesis.degree.nameMagíster en Didáctica del Inglés para el Aprendizaje Autodirigidoes_CO


Arquivos deste item

Thumbnail

Este item aparece na(s) seguinte(s) coleção(s)

Apresentar o registro simples

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 InternacionalExceto quando indicado o contrário, a licença deste item é descrito como Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional