Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorDuarte Gómez, Daniela Patricia
dc.contributor.authorQuesada Gutierrez, Laura Susana
dc.contributor.authorSánchez Cordoba, Felix Gonzalo
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-25T19:42:34Z
dc.date.available2020-11-25T19:42:34Z
dc.date.issued2020-10-16
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10818/45178
dc.description40 páginases_CO
dc.description.abstractContent and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) is an educational approach combining linguistic and subject-based learning to develop competencies needed for success in a globalized world. A mixed-method study investigated how CLIL could be implemented in (10) K-11 schools in Bogota, Colombia. Data were collected using surveys, structured and semi-structured interviews from 121 in-service teachers in private schools. Data analysis using the grounded theory approach showed that the participants had limited awareness of the CLIL approach and principles. Accordingly, findings revealed that more focus on fundamental CLIL concepts is needed along with more formalized teacher training programs. Furthermore, context orientated resources also emerged as a priority amongst participants, considering that schools were merely trying to replicate European models of delivering CLIL with no clear adaptions and no consideration for local teachers’ voices. Consequently, bilingual schools in Bogotá, who are much prone to using CLIL-orientated solutions need to create a network to facilitate CLIL training programs to equip in-service teachers who are immersed in content and language environments.eng
dc.formatapplication/pdfes_CO
dc.language.isoenges_CO
dc.publisherUniversidad de La Sabanaes_CO
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.sourceinstname:Universidad de La Sabanaes_CO
dc.sourcereponame:Intellectum Repositorio Universidad de La Sabanaes_CO
dc.titleCLIL: a straight jacket or a golden opportunity? an overview of bilingual teachers’ perceptionses_CO
dc.typemasterThesises_CO
dc.identifier.local279839
dc.identifier.localTE11025
dc.type.hasVersionpublishedVersiones_CO
dc.rights.accessRightsrestrictedAccesses_CO
dc.subject.armarcBilingüismospa
dc.subject.armarcPersonal docentespa
dc.subject.armarcFormación profesional de maestrosspa
dc.subject.armarcModelos de enseñanzaspa
dc.subject.armarcLenguaje y educaciónspa
dcterms.referencesAguilar Cortés, C. E., & Alzate B., N. E. (2015). The dialogues between content and language: Cautions and challenges in the emergence of a bilingual education program. Latin American Journal of Content and Language Integrated Learning, 8(2), 161–183. https://doi.org/10.5294/laclil.2015.8.1.5eng
dcterms.referencesAl., C. et. (2017). A journey through the content and language integrated learning landscape : problems and prospects, 218.eng
dcterms.referencesAnderson, C. E. (2011). CLIL for CALP in the multilingual, pluricultural, globalized knowledge society: Experiences and backgrounds to L2 English usage among Latin American L1 Spanish-users. Latin American Journal of Content and Language Integrated Learning, 4(2), 51–66. https://doi.org/10.5294/laclil.2011.4.2.5eng
dcterms.referencesAnderson, C. E., McDougald, J. S., & Cuesta Medina, L. (2015). CLIL for young learners. In Children learning English: From research to practice (pp. 137–151). Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/16843409/CLIL_for_young_learners%5Cnhttps://www.research gate.net/publication/282862288_CLIL_for_young_learnerseng
dcterms.referencesAnna Várkuti. (2010). Linguistic Benefits of the CLIL Approach: Measuring linguistic competences. International CLIL Research Journal, 1(3), 67–79eng
dcterms.referencesBanegas, D. L. (2012). Integrating content and language in English language teaching in secondary education : Models , benefits , and challenges. Studies in Second Langauge Learning and Teaching, 1(11/2012), 111–136.eng
dcterms.referencesBanegas, D. L., Poole, P. M., & Corrales, K. A. (2020). Content and language integrated learning in Latin America 2008-2018 : Ten years of research and practice, 10(2), 283–305eng
dcterms.referencesBroca, Á. (2016). CLIL and non-CLIL: Differences from the outset. ELT Journal, 70(3). https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccw011eng
dcterms.referencesBrown, H. D. (2006). Principles of Language Learning and Teaching. Language (Vol. 57). https://doi.org/10.2307/414380eng
dcterms.referencesBruton, A. (2013). CLIL: Some of the reasons why... and why not. System, 41(3), 587–897. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2013.07.001eng
dcterms.referencesBurns, A. (2010). Doing action research in English language teaching: A guide for practitioners. New York, NY: Routledgeeng
dcterms.referencesCammarata, L. (2010). Foreign Language Teachers’ Struggle to Learn Content-Based Instruction. L2 Journal, 2(1), 89-118.eng
dcterms.referencesCano Blandón, R. D. (2015). Evaluating the implementation of content classes delivered in English in light of a CLIL-based curriculum. Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana, Medellin, Colombia. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11912/2477eng
dcterms.referencesCatenaccio, P., & Giglioni, C. (2016). CLIL Teaching at Primary School Level and the Academia/Practice Interface: Some Preliminary Considerations. LCM - La Collana / The Series. https://doi.org/10.7359/791-2016-cateeng
dcterms.referencesCenoz, J. (2015). Content-based instruction and content and language integrated learning: the same or different? Language, Culture and Curriculum. https://doi.org/10.1080/07908318.2014.1000922eng
dcterms.referencesCorrales, K. A., Paba Rey, Lourdes, A., & Escamilla, N. S. (2016). Is EMI Enough? Perceptions from University Professors and Students. Latin American Journal of Content & Language Integrated Learning, 9(2), 17–36. https://doi.org/doi:10.5294/laclil.2016.9.2.6eng
dcterms.referencesCouncil of Europe. (2018). Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, Aassessment (CEFR). Strasbourg Cedex, France.eng
dcterms.referencesCoyle, D., Holmes, B., & King, L. (2009). Towards an integrated curriculum – CLIL National Statement and Guidelines. Retrieved from http://www.rachelhawkes.com/PandT/CLIL/CLILnationalstatementandguidelines.pdfeng
dcterms.referencesCoyle, D., Hood, P., & Marsh, D. (2010a). A window on CLIL. CLIL Content and Language Integrated Learning, 01, 170.eng
dcterms.referencesCoyle, D., Hood, P., & Marsh, D. (2010b). CLIL: Content and Language Integrated Learning (1st ed.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Presseng
dcterms.referencesCummins, J. (1999). BICS and CALP: Clarifying the Distinction. Eric, (1), 1–9.eng
dcterms.referencesCummins, J. (2000). Language Proficiency in Academic Contexts Evolution of the Conversational/Academic Language Proficiency Distinction. In Language, Power, and Pedagogy.eng
dcterms.referencesCummins, Jim. (2009). Bilingual and Immersion Programs. In The Handbook of Language Teaching (pp. 159–181). Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444315783.ch10eng
dcterms.referencesCurtis, A. (2012a). Colombian teachers’ questions about CLIL: What can teachers’ questions tell us? (Part II). Latin American Journal of Content and Language Integrated Learning. https://doi.org/10.5294/laclil.2012.5.2.6eng
dcterms.referencesCurtis, A. (2012b). Colombian teachers’ questions about CLIL: What can teachers’ questions tell us? (Part II). Latin American Journal of Content and Language Integrated Learning. https://doi.org/10.5294/laclil.2012.5.2.6eng
dcterms.referencesDale, L., & Tanner, R. (2012). CLIL activities: a resource for subject and language teachers. Cambridge University Press.eng
dcterms.referencesDalton-Puffer, C. (2011). Content-and-language integrated learning: From practice to principles? Annual Review of Applied Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190511000092eng
dcterms.referencesDewaele, J.-M., Wei, L., & Beardsmore, H. (2003). Bilingualism: beyond basic principles. Frankfurt Lodge: Multilingual Matterseng
dcterms.referencesDicker, C., Chamot, A. U., & O’Malley, J. M. (2006). The CALLA Handbook: Implementing the Cognitive Academic Language Learning Approach. TESOL Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587323eng
dcterms.referencesEdelenbos, P., Johnstone, R., & Kubanek, A. (2006). The main pedagogical Principles Underlying the Teaching of Languages to Very Young Learners. Languages for the Children of Europe. Published Research, Good Practice and Main principle, (October), 1– 196eng
dcterms.referencesFaculty of Education in Jagodina. (2012). Content and language integrated learning in teaching English to young learners - 2nd international conference (2nd ed.). Jagodina, Serbia: University of Kragujevac.eng
dcterms.referencesFortanet-Gómez, I. (2010). CLIL in Spain: Implementation, Results and Teacher Training. (Y. R. de Zarobe & D. Lasagabaster, Eds.). Cambridge Scholars.eng
dcterms.referencesGlasow, P. (2005). Fundamentals of survey research methodology. Washington.eng
dcterms.referencesGraham, K. M., Choi, Y., Davoodi, A., Razmeh, S., & Dixon, L. Q. (2018). Language and Content Outcomes of CLIL and EMI: A Systematic Review. Latin American Journal of Content & Language Integrated Learning, 11(1), 19–38. https://doi.org/10.5294/laclil.2018.11.1.2eng
dcterms.referencesGuerrero, C. H. (2008). Bilingual Colombia : What does it mean to be bilingual within the framework of the national plan of bilingualism? Profile, 10, 27–45.eng
dcterms.referencesHalbach, A. (2012). Questions about basic interpersonal communication skills and cognitive language proficiency. Applied Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/ams058eng
dcterms.referencesHinds, P. S., Vogel, R. J., & Clarke- Steffen, L. (1997). The possibilities and pitfalls of doing a secondary analysis of a qualitative data set. Qualitative Health Research, 7(3), 408–424.eng
dcterms.referencesHunt, M. (2011). Learners’ perceptions of their experiences of learning subject content through a foreign language. Educational Review. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2011.571765eng
dcterms.referencesInstitutional Review Board for Social and Behavioral Sciences. (2019). Oral Consent.eng
dcterms.referencesKhatib, M., & Taie, M. (2016). BICS and CALP: Implications for SLA. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 7(2), 382. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.0702.19eng
dcterms.referencesLasagabaster, D., & Sierra, J. M. (2009a). Immersion and CLIL in English: More differences than similarities. ELT Journal, 64(4), 367–375. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccp082eng
dcterms.referencesLasagabaster, D., & Sierra, M. J. (2009b). Language attitudes in CLIL and international EFL classes. International CLIL Research Journal, 1(2), 4–17eng
dcterms.referencesLeal, J. (2016). Assessment in CLIL: Test development at content and language for teaching natural science in English as a foreign language. Latin American Journal of Content & Language Integrated Learning, 9(2), 293–317. https://doi.org/10.5294/laclil.2016.9.2.3eng
dcterms.referencesLin, A. M. Y. (2015). Conceptualising the potential role of L1 in CLIL. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 28(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/07908318.2014.1000926eng
dcterms.referencesMariño, C. M. (2014). Towards implementing CLIL (Content and Language Integrated Learning) at CBS (Tunja, Colombia). Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal, 16(2), 151. https://doi.org/10.14483/udistrital.jour.calj.2014.2.a02eng
dcterms.referencesMarsh, D. (2002). CLIL/EMILE-The European dimension: Actions, trends and foresight potential.eng
dcterms.referencesMarsh, D. (2012). Content and language integrated learning (CLIL). A development trajectory. (U. de Cordoba, Ed.) (1st ed.). https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2006.9979eng
dcterms.referencesMarsh, D., Maljers, A., & Hartiala, A.-K. (2001). Profiling European CLIL classrooms: Languages open doors. University of Jyväskyläeng
dcterms.referencesMcDougald, J. S. (2009). The state of language and content instruction in Colombia. Latin American Journal of Content and Language Integrated Learning, 2(2), 44–48. https://doi.org/10.5294/laclil.2009.2.2.15eng
dcterms.referencesMcDougald, J. S. (2015). Teachers’ attitudes, perceptions and experiences in CLIL: A look at content and language. Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal, 17(1), 25–41. https://doi.org/10.14483/udistrital.jour.calj.2015.1.a02eng
dcterms.referencesMcDougald, J. S. (2016). CLIL approaches in education: Opportunities, challenges, or threats? Latin American Journal of Content & Language Integrated Learning, 9(2), 253–266. https://doi.org/10.5294/laclil.2016.9.2.1eng
dcterms.referencesMcDougald, J. S., & Pissarrello, D. (2020). Content and Language Integrated Learning: Teachers’ knowledge and perceptions of the program before and after its implementation. Íkala, Revista de Lenguaje y Cultura, 25(2). https://doi.org/http://doi.org/1017533/udea.ikala.v25n02a03eng
dcterms.referencesMurillo-Caicedo, A. J. (2016). Coaching for CLIL: a training proposal for non-CLIL content primary teachers in the Principado de Mónaco Bilingual School ((Published Master’s thesis)). Universidad Internacional de La Rioja.eng
dcterms.referencesNovotná, J., Hadj-Moussová, Z., & Hofmannová, M. (2001). Teacher Training for CLIL: Competences of a CLIL Teacher. Proceedings SEMT 01.eng
dcterms.referencesOtálora, B. (2009). CLIL research at Universidad de La Sabana in Colombia. Latin American Journal of Content and Language Integrated Learning, 2(1), 46–50. https://doi.org/10.5294/laclil.2009.2.1.7eng
dcterms.referencesOuazizi, K. (2016). The Effects of CLIL Education on the Subject Matter (Mathematics) and the Target Language (English). Latin American Journal of Content & Language Integrated Learning, 9(1), x–x. https://doi.org/10.5294/laclil.2016.8.1.5eng
dcterms.referencesPavlou, P , Ioainnou-Georgou, S. (2011). Guidelines for CLIL Implementation in Primary and Pre-Primary Education.eng
dcterms.referencesPérez Cañado, M. L. (2016a). Are teachers ready for CLIL? Evidence from a European study. European Journal of Teacher Education, 39(2), 202–221. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2016.1138104eng
dcterms.referencesPérez Cañado, M. L. (2016b). Teacher training needs for bilingual education: in-service teacher perceptions. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2014.980778eng
dcterms.referencesPistorio, M. I. (2009). Teacher training and competences for effective CLIL teaching in Argentina. Latin American Journal of Content & Language Integrated Learning, 2(2), 37– 43. https://doi.org/10.5294/laclil.2009.2.2.14eng
dcterms.referencesPonce, O. A., & Pagán-Maldonado, N. (2015). Mixed methods research in education: Capturing the complexity of the profession. International Journal of Educational Excellence, 1(1), 111–135. https://doi.org/10.18562/ijee.2015.0005eng
dcterms.referencesPuerto, A. M., & Rojas, J. F. (2017). CLIL state of the art: Implementation, including institutional characterization and profile of the in-service teachers, in public schools in Bogotá, Colombia. Universidad de La Sabana.eng
dcterms.referencesQuintana Aguilera, J. A., Restrepo Castro, D., Romero, G., & Cárdenas Messa, G. A. (2019). The effect of Content and Language Integrated Learning on the development of English reading comprehension skills. Lenguaje, 47(2), 427–452. https://doi.org/10.25100/lenguaje.v47i2.7699eng
dcterms.referencesRanney, S. (2012). Defining and teaching academic language: Developments in K-12 ESL. Linguistics and Language Compass, 6(9), 560–574. https://doi.org/10.1002/lnc3.354eng
dcterms.referencesRichard, K., & Halley, P. (2014). Why teacher voice matters? Elsevier, 1(1), 1–15.eng
dcterms.referencesRodriguez Bonces, J. (2012). Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL): Considerations in the Colombian Context. GIST Education and Learning Research Journal, 6(6), 177–189. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/1697491872?accountid=8144eng
dcterms.referencesRodríguez Bonces, M. (2011). CLILL: Colombia leading into content language learning. Íkala, Revista de Lenguaje y Cultura.eng
dcterms.referencesRowley, J. (2014). Designing and using research questionnaires. Management Research Review, 37(3), 308–330. https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-02-2013-0027eng
dcterms.referencesSalamanca, C., & Montoya, S. I. (2018). Using CLIL Approach to Improve English Language in a Colombian Higher Educational Institution. English Language Teaching. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v11n11p19eng
dcterms.referencesSweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12, 257–285.eng
dcterms.referencesTatzl, D. (2011). English-medium masters’ programmes at an Austrian university of applied sciences: Attitudes, experiences and challenges. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 10(4), 252–270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2011.08.003eng
dcterms.referencesTomlinson, B. (2013). Developing materials for language teaching. (B. Tomlinson & Contributors, Eds.) (2nd ed., Vol. 1). New York and London: Bloomsbury Publishing Plceng
dcterms.referencesTorres-Rincon, J. C., & Cuesta-Medina, L. M. (2019). Situated Practice in CLIL: Voices from Colombian Teachers. GiST Education and Learning Research Journal. https://doi.org/10.26817/16925777.456eng
dcterms.referencesVilkancienė, L., & Rozgienė, I. (2017). CLIL Teacher competences and attitudes. Sustainable Multilingualism, 11(1), 196–218. https://doi.org/10.1515/sm-2017-0019eng
dcterms.referencesXanthou, M. (2011). The impact of CLIL on L2 vocabulary development and content knowledge. English Teaching, 10(4), 116–126.eng
thesis.degree.disciplineDepartamento de Lenguas y Culturas Extranjerases_CO
thesis.degree.levelMaestría en Didáctica del Inglés con Énfasis en Ambientes de Aprendizaje Autónomoes_CO
thesis.degree.nameMagíster en Didáctica del Inglés con Énfasis en Ambientes de Aprendizaje Autónomoes_CO


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 InternationalExcepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International