Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Technologically mediated course design for contemporary university learners: accounting for stakeholders’ voices

dc.contributor.advisorCuesta Medina, Liliana Marcela
dc.contributor.authorHerrera Bohórquez, Luis Ignacio
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-01T16:23:38Z
dc.date.available2020-10-01T16:23:38Z
dc.date.issued2020-08-19
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10818/43448
dc.description187 páginases_CO
dc.description.abstractAlongside the rise of technology, many higher-education institutions have been embracing emerging technologies to support their students’ capacities to learn, interact, and produce through online environments, as well as to equip them with the 21st-century skills demanded by the contemporary job market. Notwithstanding, many contemporary online programs have been blindly implemented with neither knowledge-driven aims nor an online learning-purposely designed methodology. The present study aimed to characterize, contrast, and consolidate stakeholders’ perceptions about elements associated with effective online learning, as well as the role of 21st-century skills in online learning programs. The study used a mixed methods research design, with data collection instruments that include 3 extensive questionnaires, backed up with documentary analysis. Results comprised a set of particular elements to be incorporated in contemporary online programs, alongside an exploration of the roles that online stakeholders acquire as they partake. Moreover, a characterization of the necessary 21st-century skills in online learning environments has been presented.eng
dc.formatapplication/pdfes_CO
dc.language.isoenges_CO
dc.publisherUniversidad de La Sabanaes_CO
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.sourceinstname:Universidad de La Sabanaes_CO
dc.sourcereponame:Intellectum Repositorio Universidad de La Sabanaes_CO
dc.titleTechnologically mediated course design for contemporary university learners: accounting for stakeholders’ voiceseng
dc.typemasterThesises_CO
dc.identifier.local278522
dc.identifier.localTE10913
dc.type.hasVersionpublishedVersiones_CO
dc.rights.accessRightsrestrictedAccesses_CO
dc.subject.armarcTecnologías disruptivasspa
dc.subject.armarcInglés técnicospa
dc.subject.armarcInglés -- Semánticaspa
dc.subject.armarcLenguaje y lenguasspa
dcterms.referencesAdams, B. S., Cummins, M., Davis, A., Freeman, A., Hall, G. C., & Ananthanarayanan, V. (2017). NMC Horizon report: 2017 higher education edition. New Media Consortium NMC. https://www.sconul.ac.uk/sites/default/files/documents/2017-nmc-horizon-report-he-EN.pdfeng
dcterms.referencesAhmad, M., Karim, A. A., Din, R., & Albakri, I. S. M. A. (2013). Assessing ICT competencies among postgraduate students based on the 21st century ICT competency model. Asian Social Science, 9(16). https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v9n16p32eng
dcterms.referencesAlexander, S., & Boud, D. (2001). Learners still learn from experience when online. In J. Stephenson (Ed.), Teaching & learning online: New pedagogies for new technologies (pp. 3–15). Routledgeeng
dcterms.referencesAllen, Mi. W. (2007). Designing successful e-learning: Forget what you know about instructional design and do something interesting. Pfeiffer.eng
dcterms.referencesAlly, M. (2004). Foundations of educational theory for online learning. In Theory and practice of online learning (1st ed.). AU Press.eng
dcterms.referencesAlper, A., & Gülbahar, Y. (2011). Learning preferences and learning styles of online adult learners. In A. Mendez-Vilas (Ed.), Education in a technological world: Communicating current and emerging research and technological efforts (pp. 270–278). FORMATEX. http://www.formatex.info/ict/book/270-278.pdfeng
dcterms.referencesAltillo. (2018). Universidades a Distancia en Colombia - Carreras y Cursos Virtuales. Universidades Online En Colombia; Altillo. https://www.altillo.com/universidades/universidades_colol.aspspa
dcterms.referencesAlvarez, I., Guasch, T., & Espasa, A. (2009). University teacher roles and competencies in online learning environments: A theoretical analysis of teaching and learning practices. European Journal of Teacher Education, 32(3), 321–336. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619760802624104eng
dcterms.referencesAmelina, J., Yang, N., Zhuang, J. F., Chang, R. X., Cheng, T. W., Huang, R. H., & Liu, D. (2020). Guidance on active Learning at home during educational disruption: Promoting student’s self-regulation skills during COVID-19 outbreak. UNESCO INRULED; UNESCO IITE. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/igo/eng
dcterms.referencesAnderson, J., Boyles, L. J., & Rainie, L. (2012). The future impact of the Internet on higher education: Experts expect more-efficient collaborative environments and new grading schemes; they worry about massive online courses, the shift away from on-campus life. The Future of the Internet. http://www.pewinternet.org/topics/Future-of-the-internet.aspx http://www.imaginingtheinternet.org.%0A1eng
dcterms.referencesAnderson, T. (2004). Toward a theory of online learning. In T. Anderson (Ed.), Theory and practice of online learning (1st ed., pp. 45–74). AU Press.eng
dcterms.referencesAnderson, T., & Elloumi, F. (Eds.). (2004). Theory and practice of online learning. Athabasca Universityeng
dcterms.referencesAry, D., Jacobs, C. L., & Sorensen, C. (2010). Introduction to research in education (8th ed.). Wadsworth Publishing.eng
dcterms.referencesAzevedo, R., & Hadwin, A. F. (2005). Scaffolding self-regulated learning and metacognition: Implications for the design of computer-based scaffolds. Instructional Science, 33, 367– 379. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-005-1272-9eng
dcterms.referencesAzionya, C., & Oksiutycz, A. (2019). A teaching model to promote learning agility in a university course. Independent Journal of Teaching and Learning, 14(1), 6–18.eng
dcterms.referencesBaharin, A. T., Lateh, H., Nawawi, H. mohd, & Nathan, S. S. (2015). Evaluation of satisfaction using online learning with interactivity. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 171, 905–911. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.208eng
dcterms.referencesBanach, I., & Ognjen, S. (2017). How to design an online course. The Green European Foundation.eng
dcterms.referencesBandura, A. (1991). Social cognitive theory of self-regulation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 248–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90022- Leng
dcterms.referencesBandura, A. (2006). Toward a psychology of human Agency. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1(2), 164–180. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00011.xeng
dcterms.referencesBaran, E. (2012). The transformation of online teaching practice: Tracing successful online teaching in higher education. Graduate Theses and Dissertations. 12206. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/etd/12206eng
dcterms.referencesBaran, E., Correia, A., & Thompson, A. (2011). Transforming online teaching practice: Critical analysis of the literature on the roles and competencies of online teachers. Distance Education, 32(3), 421–439. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2011.610293eng
dcterms.referencesBates, A. W. (2015a). Methods of teaching with an online focus. Teaching in a digital age: Guidelines for designing teaching and learning. BCcampus.eng
dcterms.referencesBates, A. W. (2015b). Teaching in a Digital Age: Guidelines for designing teaching and learning. BCcampus.eng
dcterms.referencesBates, T. (2005). Technology, e-learning and distance education (2nd ed.). Routledge.eng
dcterms.referencesBauman, U., Shelley, M., Murphy, L., & White, C. (2008). New challenges, the role of the tutor in the teaching of languages at a distance. Distances et Savoirs, 6(3), 365–392. https://doi.org/10.3166/ds.6.365-392eng
dcterms.referencesBenson, R., & Brack, C. (2010). Introducing online learning and assessment: A planning guide. Chandos Publishing.eng
dcterms.referencesBergdahl, N., Nouri, J., & Fors, U. (2020). Disengagement, engagement and digital skills in technology-enhanced learning. Education and Information Technologies, 25(2), 957–983. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-09998-weng
dcterms.referencesBernard, H. R. (2002). Research methods in anthropology qualitative and quantitative approaches (4th ed.). AltaMira Presseng
dcterms.referencesBernard, R. M., Borokhovski, E., Schmid, R. F., Tamim, R. M., & Abrami, P. C. (2014). A metaanalysis of blended learning and technology use in higher education: From the general to the applied. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 26(1), 87–122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-013-9077-3eng
dcterms.referencesBeudean, P., Stompel, J., Grzymkowska, A., Moore, T., L’Henoret, A., Gunaydin, A., Sevincer, V., & Feighery, J. (2019). Training toolkit for youth workers & educators to deliver digital skills to young people. The Skill IT for Youth Project (2018-2020). https://digipathways.io/content/uploads/2019/11/Training_Toolkit_Skill_IT.pdfeng
dcterms.referencesBichsel, J. (2013). The state of e-Learning in higher education: An eye toward growth and increased access. CO: Educause: Center for Analysis and Research. http://www.educause.edu/ecareng
dcterms.referencesBinkley, M., Erstad, O., Herman, J., Raizen, S., Ripley, M., Miller-Ricci, M., & Rumble, M. (2012). Defining twenty-first century skills. In P. Griffin, B. McGaw, & E. Care (Eds.), Assessment and Teaching of 21st Century Skills (pp. 17–66). Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2324-5_2eng
dcterms.referencesBista, K., & Saleh, A. (2017). Examining factors impacting online survey response rates in educational research: Perceptions of graduate students. Journal of Multidisciplinary Evaluation, 13(29), 63–74.eng
dcterms.referencesBlayone, T. J. B., Van Oostveen, R., Barber, W., DiGiuseppe, M., & Childs, E. (2016, November 2-6). Developing learning communities in fully online spaces: Positioning the fully online learning community model [Paper presentation]. The Higher Education in Transformation Conference. file:///Users/faberd/Desktop/HEIT_2016_paper_29.pdf%0Ahttps://www.researchgate.net/p ublication/312087765eng
dcterms.referencesBoekaerts, M. (1997). Self-regulated learning: A new concept embraced by researchers, policy makers, educators, teachers, and students. Learning and Instruction, 7(2), 161–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(96)00015-1eng
dcterms.referencesBoekaerts, M. (1999). Self-regulated learning: Where we are today. International Journal of Educational Research, 31(6), 445–457. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-0355(99)00014-2eng
dcterms.referencesBolliger, D. U., & Wasilik, O. (2009). Factors influencing faculty satisfaction with online teaching and learning in higher education. Distance Education, 30(1), 103–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587910902845949eng
dcterms.referencesBonk, Curtis J, & Dennen, V. (2003). Frameworks for research, design, benchmarks, training, and pedagogy in web-based distance education. In G. M. Moore (Ed.), Handbook of distance education (pp. 331–348). Educational Technology Publications. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.91.534eng
dcterms.referencesBorges, F. (2007). The virtual environment student. An initial approximation. Digithum, (9). http://doi.org/10.7238/d.v0i9.520eng
dcterms.referencesBourgeois, D. (2014). Networking and communication. Information systems for business and beyond. The Sailor Academy https://resources.saylor.org/wwwresources/archived/site/textbooks/Information%20Systems %20for%20Business%20and%20Beyond.pdfeng
dcterms.referencesBowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027eng
dcterms.referencesBressler, L., Bressler, M., & Bressler, M. (2010). The role and relationship of hope, optimism and goal setting in achieving academic success: A study of students enrolled in online accounting courses. Academy of Educational Leadership Journal, 14(4), 37–51. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/martin_bressler/publication/282613197_the_role_and_ relationship_of_hope_optimism_and_goal_setting_in_achieving_academic_success_a_stud y_of_students_enrolled_in_online_accounting_courses/links/561427e808ae983c1b405483/t he-role-and-relationship-of-hope-optimism-and-goal-setting-in-achieving-academicsuccess-a-study-of-students-enrolled-in-online-accounting-courses.pdfeng
dcterms.referencesBroadbent, J., & Poon, W. L. (2015). Self-regulated learning strategies and academic achievement in online higher education learning environments: A systematic review. The Internet and Higher Education, 27, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.04.007eng
dcterms.referencesBrown, J. D. (2001). Using surveys in language programs. Cambridge University Press.eng
dcterms.referencesBryant, F. B., & Cvengros, J. A. (2004). Distinguishing hope and optimism: Two sides of a coin, or two separate coins? Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 23(2), 273–302. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.23.2.273.31018eng
dcterms.referencesBryman, A. (2006). Integrating quantitative and qualitative research: How is it done? Qualitative Research, 6(1), 97–113. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794106058877eng
dcterms.referencesBurns, M. (2011). Distance education for teacher training: Modes, models, and methods. Education Development Center. http://idd.edc.org/sites/idd.edc.org/files/Distance Education for Teacher Training by Mary Burns EDC.pdfeng
dcterms.referencesCambridge Dictionary. (n.d.). Convenience. Cambridge Dictionary. https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/convenienceeng
dcterms.referencesCaner, M. (2017). The definition of blended learning in higher education. In P.S. Anastasiades (Ed.), Blended Learning Environments for Adults (pp. 19–34). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-0939-6.ch002eng
dcterms.referencesCare, E., Griffin, P., & Wilson, M. (Eds.). (2018). Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills: Research and applications. Springer International Publishingeng
dcterms.referencesCarliner, S., & Shank, P. (Eds.). (2008). The e-Learning handbook: Past promises, present challenges. Pfeiffer.eng
dcterms.referencesChen, G., & Fu, X. (2003). Effects of multimodal information on learning performance and judgment of learning. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 29(3), 349–362. https://doi.org/10.2190/J54F-B24D-THN7-H9PHeng
dcterms.referencesCheng, G., & Chau, J. (2016). Exploring the relationships between learning styles, online participation, learning achievement and course satisfaction: An empirical study of a blended learning course. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47(2), 257–278. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12243v
dcterms.referencesCheurprakobkit, S., Hale, D. F., & Olson, J. N. (2002). Technicians’ perceptions about webbased courses: The University of Texas system experience. American Journal of Distance Education, 16(4), 245–257. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15389286AJDE1604_4eng
dcterms.referencesChickering, A. W., & Gamson, Z. F. (1989). Seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education. Biochemical Education, 17(3), 140–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/0307- 4412(89)90094-0eng
dcterms.referencesChigeza, P., & Halbert, K. (2014). Navigating e-learning and blended learning for pre-service teachers: Redesigning for engagement, access and efficiency. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 39(11), 133–146. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2014v39n11.8eng
dcterms.referencesChmiliar, L. (2011). Self regulation skills and the post secondary distance learner. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 29, 318–321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.11.245eng
dcterms.referencesClarke, A. (2004). E-learning skills (1st ed.). Palgrave Macmillan.eng
dcterms.referencesCochran, J. D., Baker, H. M., Benson, D., & Rhea, W. (2016). Business student perceptions of online learning: Using focus groups for richer understanding of student perspectives. Organization Management Journal, 13(3), 149–166. https://doi.org/10.1080/15416518.2016.1218195eng
dcterms.referencesCohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education (6th ed.). Routledgeeng
dcterms.referencesCollins, H. (2008). Distance learning, autonomy development and language: Discussing possible connections. DELTA: Documentação de Estudos Em Lingüística Teórica e Aplicada, 24(spe), 529–550. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-44502008000300008por
dcterms.referencesConrad, C., Neumann, A., Haworth, J. G., & Scott, P. (Eds.). (1993). Qualitative research in higher education: Experiencing alternative perspectives and approaches. Ginn Presseng
dcterms.referencesCorbett, F., & Spinello, E. (2020). Connectivism and leadership: Harnessing a learning theory for the digital age to redefine leadership in the twenty-first century. Heliyon, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03250eng
dcterms.referencesCorbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (3rd ed.). Sage Publications, Inceng
dcterms.referencesCraig, A., Goold, A., Coldwell, J., & Mustard, J. (2008). Perceptions of roles and responsibilities in online learning: A case study. Interdisciplinary Journal of E-Learning and Learning Objects, 4(1), 205–223. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/44856/eng
dcterms.referencesCreswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications, Inceng
dcterms.referencesCreswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Sage Publications, Inc.eng
dcterms.referencesCuesta, L. (2010). The design and development of online course materials: Some features and recommendations. Profile Issues in Teachers’ Professional Development, 12(1), 181–201.eng
dcterms.referencesCuesta, L. (2014). The role of scaffolding in fostering self-regulation in English language blended learning environments (Publication No. 171795818) [Doctoral dissertation, Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia-Madrid]. SemanticScholar.eng
dcterms.referencesDabbagh, N. (2007). The online learner: Characteristics and pedagogical implications. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 7(3), 217–226. https://citejournal.org/volume-7/issue-3-07/general/the-online-learner-characteristics-andpedagogical-implications/eng
dcterms.referencesDabbagh, N., & Bannan-Ritland, B. (2005). Online learning: Concepts, strategies, and application. Pearson Education.eng
dcterms.referencesDarling-Hammond, L., Flook, L., Cook-Harvey, C., Barron, B., & Osher, D. (2019). Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development. Applied Developmental Science, 24(2), 97–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2018.1537791eng
dcterms.referencesDarlington, Y., & Scott, D. (2002). Qualitative research in practice: stories from the field. Allen & Unwin.eng
dcterms.referencesDarwish, A., & Lakhtaria, K. I. (2011). The impact of the new web 2.0 technologies in communication, development, and revolutions of societies. Journal of Advances in Information Technology, 2(4), 204–216. https://doi.org/10.4304/jait.2.4.204-216eng
dcterms.referencesDass, R. (2014). Literature and the 21st century learner. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 123, 289-298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.1426eng
dcterms.referencesDaymont, T., Blau, G., & Campbell, D. (2011). Deciding between traditional and online formats: Exploring the role of learning advantages, flexibility, and compensatory adaptation. Journal of Behavioral and Applied Management, 12, 156–175. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Deciding-Between-Traditional-and-OnlineFormats%3A-of-Daymont-Blau/e6fc5f534852f1ba983c0d450d322800e0c70943eng
dcterms.referencesDel Greco, L., Walop, W., & McCarthy, R. H. (1987). Questionnaire development: 2. validity and reliability. CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association Journal, 136(7), 699–700. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3828925eng
dcterms.referencesDelialioglu, O., & Yildirim, Z. (2007). Students’ perceptions on effective dimensions of interactive learning in a blended learning environment. Educational Technology & Society, 10(2), 133–146. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Students'-Perceptions-on-EffectiveDimensions-of-in-Delialioglu-Yildirim/3e36def64f4713c2ee9f24716f6d60600b629c18eng
dcterms.referencesDenzin, N. (1978). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill.eng
dcterms.referencesDewey, J. (1925). My pedagogic creed. Journal of Education, 101(18), 490–490. https://doi.org/10.1177/002205742510101803eng
dcterms.referencesDoubler, S. J., Grisham, L., & Paget, K. F. (2003). Emerging faculty role: Teaching for deep understanding online [Paper presentation]. 55th Annual Meeting of the American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education.https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Emerging-Faculty-Role%3A-Teaching-for-DeepOnline.-Doubler-Grisham/03762ff501352f96943509a8dad09a0836168fe9eng
dcterms.referencesDriscoll, M. (2002). Blended learning: Let’s get beyond the hype. E-Learning Magazine. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/286029739_Blended_learning_Let's_get_beyond_ the_hypeeng
dcterms.referencesDuckworth, A. L., Peterson, C., Matthews, M. D., & Kelly, D. R. (2007). Grit: Perseverance and passion for long-term goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(6), 1087– 1101. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.92.6.1087eng
dcterms.referencesDudley-Evans, T., & St John, M.-J. (2011). Developments in ESP: A multi-disciplinary approach. Cambridge University Press.eng
dcterms.referencesDuke, B., Harper, G., & Johnston, M. (2013). Connectivism as a digital age learning theory [Special Issue]. The International HETL Review, 4–13. https://www.hetl.org/wpcontent/uploads/2013/09/HETLReview2013SpecialIssueArticle1.pdfeng
dcterms.referencesDurak, G. (2015). Learner views about a distance education course. Contemporary Educational Technology, 7(1), 85–105.eng
dcterms.referencesDwyer, C. P., Hogan, M. J., & Stewart, I. (2012). An evaluation of argument mapping as a method of enhancing critical thinking performance in e-learning environments. Metacognition and Learning, 7(3), 219–244. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-012-9092-1eng
dcterms.referencesDziuban, C, Hartman, J., & Moskal, P. (2004). Blended learning. Educase, 2004, 2. https://www.educause.edu/~/media/files/library/2004/3/erb0407-pdf.pdf?la=eneng
dcterms.referencesDziuban, Charles, Graham, C. R., Moskal, P. D., Norberg, A., & Sicilia, N. (2018). Blended learning: The new normal and emerging technologies. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 15(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-017-0087-5eng
dcterms.referencesDziuban, Charles, Moskal, P., & Hartman, J. (2005). Higher education, blended learning and the generations: Knowledge is power-no more. Elements of Quality Online Education: Engaging Communities. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687761003657614eng
dcterms.referencesEbner, C., & Gegenfurtner, A. (2019). Learning and satisfaction in webinar, online, and face-toface instruction: A meta-analysis. Frontiers in Education, 4(92). https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2019.00092eng
dcterms.referencesElaine Allen, I., & Seaman, J. (2008). Staying the course: online education in the United States, 2008. Babson Survey Research Group; Sloan Consortium.eng
dcterms.referencesElaine Allen, I., & Seaman, J. (2010). Class differences: Online education in the United States, 2010. Babson Survey Research Group; Sloan Consortium.eng
dcterms.referencesElaine Allen, I., & Seaman, J. (2013). Changing course: Ten years of tracking online education in the United States. Babson Survey Research Group; Person; Sloan Consortium.eng
dcterms.referencesEsani, M. (2010). Moving from face-to-face to online teaching. American Society for Clinical Laboratory Science, 23(3), 187–190. https://doi.org/10.29074/ascls.23.3.187eng
dcterms.referencesEynon, R., Fry, J., & Schroeder, R. (2008). The ethics of internet research. In N. Fielding, R. M. Lee, & G. Blank (Eds.), The Sage handbook of online research methods (1st ed.). Sage Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9780857020055.n2eng
dcterms.referencesFadde, P. J., & Vu, P. (2014). Blended online learning: benefits, challenges, and misconceptions. In Online Learning: Common misconceptions, benefits and challenges (pp. 33 – 48). Nova Science Publishing.eng
dcterms.referencesFadol, Y., Aldamen, H., & Saadullah, S. (2018). A comparative analysis of flipped, online and traditional teaching: A case of female Middle Eastern management students. International Journal of Management Education, 16(2), 266–280 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2018.04.003eng
dcterms.referencesFinch, D., & Jacobs, K. (2012). Online education: Best practices to promote learning. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 56th Annual Meeting, 56(1), 546–550. https://doi.org/10.1177/1071181312561114eng
dcterms.referencesFink, A. S. (2000). The role of the researcher in the qualitative research process: A potential barrier to archiving qualitative data. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 1(3), 1–11. https://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/1021/2201eng
dcterms.referencesFranco, C. de P. (2013). Understanding digital natives’ learning experiences. Revista Brasileira de Linguística Aplicada, 13(2), 643–658. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1984- 63982013005000001eng
dcterms.referencesFredericksen, E., Pickett, A., Shea, P., Pelz, W., & Swan, K. (2019). Student satisfaction and perceived learning with on-line courses: Principles and examples from the SUNY learning network. Online Learning, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v4i2.1899eng
dcterms.referencesFreeman, M. A., & Capper, J. M. (1998). An anonymous asynchronous web-based role play [Paper presentation]. ASCILITE98. https://ascilite.org/conferences/wollongong98/asc98- pdf/freemancapper.pdfeng
dcterms.referencesFreeman, R. E. (2004). The stakeholder approach revisited. Zeitschrift Für Wirtschafts- Und Unternehmensethik, 5(3), 228–254. https://doi.org/10.5771/1439-880X-2004-3-228eng
dcterms.referencesFreeman, R. E., & Mcvea, J. (2008). A stakeholder approach to strategic management. In E. Freeman, M. Hitt & J. Harrison (Eds.), Handbook of strategic management (pp. 183–201). Blackwell Publishingeng
dcterms.referencesFrese, M., Fay, D., Hilburger, T., Leng, K., & Tag, A. (1997). The concept of personal initiative: operationalization, reliability and validity in two German samples. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 70(2), 139–161. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044- 8325.1997.tb00639.xeng
dcterms.referencesFry, H., Ketteridge, S., & Marshall, S. (2009). A handbook for teaching and learning in higher education: Enhancing academic practice (3rd ed.). Routledge.eng
dcterms.referencesGanayem, A., & Zidan, W. (2018). 21st century skills: Student perception of online instructor role. Interdisciplinary Journal of E-Skills and Lifelong Learning, 14, 117–141. https://doi.org/10.28945/4090eng
dcterms.referencesGarrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (1999). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2–3), 87–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00016-6eng
dcterms.referencesGarrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2010). The first decade of the community of inquiry framework: A retrospective. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(1–2), 5–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.10.003eng
dcterms.referencesGarrison, D. R., & Kanuka, H. (2004). Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. Internet and Higher Education, 7(2), 95–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2004.02.001eng
dcterms.referencesGeorge Mason University. (2018). Online Courses. Mason Online. https://masononline.gmu.edu/programs-courses/courses/eng
dcterms.referencesGerstein, J. (2013, May 22). The other 21st century skills. User Generated Education. https://usergeneratededucation.wordpress.com/2013/05/22/the-other-21st-century-skills/eng
dcterms.referencesGillett-Swan, J. (2017). The challenges of online learning: Supporting and engaging the isolated learner. Journal of Learning Design, 10(1), 20. https://doi.org/10.5204/jld.v9i3.293eng
dcterms.referencesGlaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Aldine.eng
dcterms.referencesGlenn, M. (2008). The future of higher education: How technology will shape learning. The New Media Consortium.https://www.learntechlib.org/p/182088/eng
dcterms.referencesGordon, J., Halasz, G., Krawczyk, M., Leney, T., Michel, A., Pepper, D., Putkiewicz, E., & Wisnierwksi, J. (2009). Key competences in Europe: Opening doors for lifelong learners across the school curriculum and teacher education. In CASE Network Reports. CASECenter for Social and Economic Research.eng
dcterms.referencesGoyal, A., & Malhotram, S. (2013). Role of online education in modern education system. EVaani: An International Journal of Research in Management & IT, 1(1). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/338829743_Role_of_Online_Education_in_Mode rn_Education_Systemeng
dcterms.referencesGrabinger, R. S., & Dunlap, J. C. (2011). Rich environments for active learning: A definition. Research in Learning Technology, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v3i2.9606eng
dcterms.referencesGrady, C. E. (2016). Educational stakeholders’ perceptions of parental involvement in an urban school setting. Walden University.eng
dcterms.referencesGraham, C. R. (2006). Blended learning systems: Definition, current trends, and future directions. In C. J. Bonk & C. R. Graham (Eds.), Handbook of Blended Learning: Global perspectives, local designs. Pfeiffer Publishing.eng
dcterms.referencesGraham, C. R. (2013). Emerging practice and research in blended learning. In M. Graham (Ed.), Handbook of distance education (3rd ed., pp. 333–350). Routledge. https://www.routledgehandbooks.com/doi/10.4324/9780203803738.ch21eng
dcterms.referencesGreen, K., & Wagner, E. (2011). Online education: where is it going? what should boards know? Trusteeship, 19(1), 24–29. https://www.agb.org/trusteeship/2011/1eng
dcterms.referencesGreen, N. C., Edwards, H., Wolodko, B., Stewart, C., Brooks, M., & Littledyke, R. (2010). Reconceptualising higher education pedagogy in online learning. Distance Education, 31(3), 257–273. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2010.513951eng
dcterms.referencesGreenhow, C., & Robelia, B. (2009). Informal learning and identity formation in online social networks. Learning, Media and Technology, 34(2), 119–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439880902923580eng
dcterms.referencesGroff, J. (2013). Technology-rich innovative learning environments. OCED CERI Innovative Learning Environment Project, 1(30).eng
dcterms.referencesGuri-Rosenblit, S. (2018). E-Teaching in higher education: An essential prerequisite for eLearning. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 7(2), 93–97. https://doi.org/10.7821/naer.2018.7.298eng
dcterms.referencesHadiyanto, H., Noperdiman, Syamsurizal, Muhaimin, M., Yuliusman, Ramli, S., & Sulistiyo, U. (2018). Graduate candidates’ 21st century skills and challenge for the faculty and the university in online learning era. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 207– 216. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/330102413_Graduate_Candidates’_21st_Century _Skills_and_Challenge_for_the_Faculty_and_the_University_in_Online_Learning_Eraeng
dcterms.referencesHaghparast, M., Nasaruddin, F. H., & Abdullah, N. (2014). Cultivating critical thinking through e-learning environment and tools: A review. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 129, 527–535. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.710eng
dcterms.referencesHämäläinen, R., Kiili, C., & Smith, B. E. (2017). Orchestrating 21st century learning in higher education: A perspective on student voice. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(5), 1106–1118. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12533eng
dcterms.referencesHanson, W. E., Plano Clark, V. L., Petska, K. S., Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2005). Mixed methods research designs in counseling psychology. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52(2), 224–235. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.52.2.224eng
dcterms.referencesHarasim, L. (2002). What makes online learning communities successful? The role of collaborative learning in social and intellectual development. In C. Vrasidas & G. Glass (Eds.), Distance education and distributed learning (pp. 181–200). Information Age Publishingeng
dcterms.referencesHarasim, L. M. (2012). Learning theory and online technologies (1st ed.). Routledge.eng
dcterms.referencesHaythornthwaite, C., & Andrews, R. (2011). E-learning: Theory & practice (1st ed.). Sage.eng
dcterms.referencesHillman, D. C. A., Willis, D. J., & Gunawardena, C. N. (1994). Learner‐interface interaction in distance education: An extension of contemporary models and strategies for practitioners. American Journal of Distance Education, 8(2), 30–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923649409526853eng
dcterms.referencesHolec, H. (1981). Autonomy and foreign language learning. Oxford Pergamon.eng
dcterms.referencesHoltz, P., Kronberger, N., & Wagner, W. (2012). Analyzing internet forums: A practical guide. Journal of Media Psychology, 24(2), 55–66. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105/a000062eng
dcterms.referencesHosein Fallah, M. (2016). Blind scores in a graduate test: Conventional compared with online outcomes. In R. Ubell (Ed.), Going online: perspectives on digital learning (1st ed). Taylor & Francis group.eng
dcterms.referencesHoward, P. (2018). Twenty-first century learning as a radical re-thinking of education in the service of life. Education Sciences, 8(4), 189. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci8040189eng
dcterms.referencesHrastinsku, S. (2008). Asynchronous & synchronous e-learning: A study of asynchronous and synchronous e-learning methods discovered that each supports different purposes. Educause Quarterly, 31(4), 51–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071667608416307eng
dcterms.referencesHuertas-Abril, C.-A., & Gómez-Parra, M. E. (Eds.). (2020). International Approaches to Bridging the Language Gap. IGI Global.eng
dcterms.referencesHuertas, A. (2007). Teaching and learning logic in a virtual learning environment. Oxford University Press, 15(4), 321–331. https://doi.org/10.1093/jigpal/jzm023eng
dcterms.referencesHughes, J. (2019, July 3). The benefits of studying your masters course online. Onlinestudies. https://www.onlinestudies.com/article/the-benefits-of-studying-your-masters-course-online/eng
dcterms.referencesHughes, J. A. (2004). Supporting the online learner. In T. Anderson & F. Elloumi (Eds.), The theory and practice of online learning (1st ed.). Athabasca University.eng
dcterms.referencesIngram, C. (2019). How and why you should manage your research data: A guide for researchers. Jisc, 16(1), 274. https://www.jisc.ac.uk/guides/how-and-why-you-shouldmanage-your-research-dataeng
dcterms.referencesIsrael, M. J. (2015). Effectiveness of integrating MOOCs in traditional classrooms for undergraduate students. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 16(5), 102–118. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v16i5.2222eng
dcterms.referencesJahanian, F. (2018, January 17). 4 ways universities are driving innovation. World Economic Forum Annual Meeting. https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2018/01/4-ways-universities-aredriving-innovationeng
dcterms.referencesJana, L. (2019). Qi skills - Dr. Laura Jana. The QI Skills. http://www.drlaurajana.com/qi-skills/eng
dcterms.referencesJohnson, S. D., Aragon, S. R., & Shaik, N. (2000). Comparative analysis of learner satisfaction and learning outcomes in online and face-to-face learning environments. Journal of Interactive Learning Research. https://doi.org/182/6/3522 [pii]\r10.4049/jimmunol.0802280eng
dcterms.referencesJolliffe, A., Ritter, J., & Stevens, D. (2012). The online learning handbook: Developing and using web based learning. Routledge.eng
dcterms.referencesKalfagianni, A., Partzsch, L., & Beulting, M. (2020). Governance for global stewardship: Can private certification move beyond commodification in fostering sustainability transformations? Agriculture and Human Values, 37(1), 65–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-019-09971-weng
dcterms.referencesKanuka, H. (2008). Understanding e-learning technologies-in-practice through philosophies-inpractice. In T. Anderson & F. Elloumi (Eds.), Theory and Practice of Online Learning (2nd ed., pp. 91–118)eng
dcterms.referencesKanuka, H. (2011). Interaction and the online distance classroom: Do instructional methods effect the quality of interaction? Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 23(2–3), 143– 156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-011-9049-4eng
dcterms.referencesKauffman, H. (2015). A review of predictive factors of student success in and satisfaction with online learning. Research in Learning Technology, 23(1063519), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v23.26507eng
dcterms.referencesKavanagh, S., Luxton-Reilly, A., & Wuensche, B. (2017). A systematic review of virtual reality in education. Themes in Science & Technology Education, 10(2), 85–119. http://pmteu.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo_library/libweb/action/display.do?tabs=viewOnlineTab& ct=display&fn=search&doc=TN_ericEJ1165633&indx=6&recIds=TN_ericEJ1165633&rec Idxs=5&elementId=5&renderMode=poppedOut&displayMode=full&frbrVersion=&frbg= &&dscnteng
dcterms.referencesKebritchi, M., Lipschuetz, A., & Santiague, L. (2017). Issues and challenges for teaching successful online courses in higher education. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 46(1), 4–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047239516661713eng
dcterms.referencesKemp, N., & Grieve, R. (2014). Face-to-face or face-to-screen? Undergraduates’ opinions and test performance in classroom vs. online learning. Frontiers in Psychology, 5(NOV), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01278eng
dcterms.referencesKenny, A. (2000). Untangling the web: Barriers and benefits for nurse education, an Australian perspective. Nurse Education Today, 20(5), 381–388. https://doi.org/10.1054/nedt.1999.0440eng
dcterms.referencesKhlaif, Z., Nadiruzzaman, H., & Kwon, K. (2017). Types of interaction in online discussion forums: A case study. Journal of Educational Issues, 3(1), 155–169. https://doi.org/10.5296/jei.v3i1.10975eng
dcterms.referencesKjaergaard, A. (2017). Face-to-face activities in blended learning: New opportunities in the classroom? Academy of Management Proceedings, 2017(1), 16717. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMBPP.2017.16717abstracteng
dcterms.referencesKnowles, M. S. (1975). Self-Directed Learning: A guide for learners and teachers. Cambridge Adult Education.eng
dcterms.referencesKo, S., & Rossen, S. (2010). Teaching Online: A practical guide (3rd ed.). Routledge.eng
dcterms.referencesKop, R., & Hill, A. (2008). Connectivism: Learning theory of the future or vestige of the past? The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 9(3). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v9i3.523eng
dcterms.referencesKreber, C., & Kanuka, H. (2006). The scholarship of teaching and learning and the online classroom. Canadian Journal of University Continuing Education, 32(2), 109–131. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/105603eng
dcterms.referencesKundi, G. M., Nawaz, A., & Khan, S. (2010). The predictors of success for e-learning in higher education institutions (HEIs) in N-W.F.P, Pakistan. JISTEM Journal of Information Systems and Technology Management, 7(3), 545–578. https://doi.org/10.4301/S1807- 17752010000300003eng
dcterms.referencesLamb, S., Doecke, E., & Maire, Q. (2017). Key skills for the 21st century: An evidence-based review. In Education: Future Frontiers. https://education.nsw.gov.au/ourpriorities/innovate-for-the-future/education-for-a-changing-world/research-findings/futurefrontiers-analytical-report-key-skills-for-the-21st-century/Key-Skills-for-the-21st-CenturyAnalytical-Report.pdfeng
dcterms.referencesLapadat, J. C. (2002). Written interaction: A key component in online learning. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 7(4), 0–0. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083- 6101.2002.tb00158.xeng
dcterms.referencesLavrakas, P. (2008). Percentage frequency distribution. In P. Lavrakas (Ed.), Encyclopedia of survey research methods. Sage Publications, Inc.eng
dcterms.referencesLeavy, P. (2017). Research design: Quantitative, qualitative, mixed methods, arts-based, and community-based participatory research approaches. The Guilford Press.eng
dcterms.referencesLedesma, J. (2014). Conceptual frameworks and research models on resilience in leadership. SAGE Open, 4(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244014545464eng
dcterms.referencesLee, J., Song, H. D., & Hong, A. J. (2019). Exploring factors, and indicators for measuring students’ sustainable engagement in e-learning. Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/su11040985eng
dcterms.referencesLehmann, T., Hähnlein, I., & Ifenthaler, D. (2014). Cognitive, metacognitive and motivational perspectives on preflection in self-regulated online learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 32, 313–323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.07.051eng
dcterms.referencesLi, L.-Y., & Lee, L.-Y. (2016). Computer literacy and online learning attitude toward GSOE students in distance education programs. Higher Education Studies, 6(3), 147. https://doi.org/10.5539/hes.v6n3p147eng
dcterms.referencesLincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage Publications.eng
dcterms.referencesLindholm, M. (2018). Promoting curiosity? Science & Education, 27(9–10), 987–1002. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-018-0015-7eng
dcterms.referencesLoomis, K. D. (2000). Learning styles and asynchronous learning: Comparing the LASSI model to class performance. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Network, 4(1), 23–32. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v4i1.1908eng
dcterms.referencesMahlangu, V. P. (2018). The good, the bad, and the ugly of distance learning in higher education. In Trends in E-learning. InTech. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.75702eng
dcterms.referencesMann, C., & Stewart, F. (2000). Internet communication and qualitative research: A handbook for researching online. Sage Publications.eng
dcterms.referencesMarshall, C., & Rossman, G. (1999). Designing qualitative research. Sage Publications Ltd.eng
dcterms.referencesMason, R., & Rennie, F. (2008). E-learning and social networking handbook: Resources for higher education. Routledge. http://www.routledgeeducation.com/books/e-Learning-andSocial-Networking-Handbook-isbn9780415426077eng
dcterms.referencesMaxwell, J. A. (2010). Using numbers in qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 16(6), 475– 482. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800410364740eng
dcterms.referencesMayes, T. (2018). Learning technology and learning relationships. In J. Stephenson (Ed.), Teaching & learning online: New pedagogies for new technologies (pp. 16–26). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315042527-3eng
dcterms.referencesMcCutcheon, K., Lohan, M., Traynor, M., & Martin, D. (2015). A systematic review evaluating the impact of online or blended learning vs. face-to-face learning of clinical skills in undergraduate nurse education. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 71(2), 255–270. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.12509eng
dcterms.referencesMcDougald, J. S. (2020). Quality assurance: Breaking through the online learning plateau. In L. Kyei-Blankson, E. Ntuli, & J. Blankson (Eds.), Handbook of research on creating meaningful experiences in online courses (pp. 101–117). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-0115-3.ch008eng
dcterms.referencesMedina, L. C. (2018). Blended learning: Deficits and prospects in higher education. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.3100eng
dcterms.referencesMeloncon, L. (2007). Exploring electronic landscapes: Technical communication, online learning, and instructor preparedness. Technical Communication Quarterly, 16(1), 31–53. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15427625tcq1601_3eng
dcterms.referencesMendieta, J. (2012). Blended learning and the language teacher: A literature review. Colombia Applied Linguistics Journal, 14(2), 163–180. https://doi.org/10.14483/udistrital.jour.calj.2012.2.a10eng
dcterms.referencesMiles, M., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Sage Publications Ltd.eng
dcterms.referencesMitchel-Holder, S. (2016). Let’s talk: Effectively communicating with your online students. In W. K. Kilgore & W. H. Williams (Eds.), Humanizing online teaching and learning (1st ed.). CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform.eng
dcterms.referencesMısır, H., Koban Koç, D., & Engin Koç, S. (2018). An analysis of learner autonomy and autonomous learning practices in massive open online language courses. Arab World English Journal, 4(4), 24–39. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/call4.3eng
dcterms.referencesMonroe Community College. (2018). Hybrid and fully online courses. Online Learning. https://www.monroecc.edu/depts/distlearn/information-for-students/hybrid-and-fullyonline-courses/eng
dcterms.referencesMoore, Michael G. (1989). Editorial: Three types of interaction. American Journal of Distance Education, 3(2), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923648909526659eng
dcterms.referencesMoore, Michael G. (2013). Handbook of distance education. Routledge.eng
dcterms.referencesMoore, Michael G., & Kearsley, G. (2011). Distance education (3rd ed.). Cengage Learning.eng
dcterms.referencesMoore, Michael Grahame. (2003). Editorial: Handbook of distance education. The American Journal of Distance Education. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2004.00409_10.xeng
dcterms.referencesNagel, L., & Kotzé, T. G. (2010). Supersizing e-learning: What a CoI survey reveals about teaching presence in a large online class. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(1–2), 45– 51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.12.001eng
dcterms.referencesNational Research Council. (2012). Education for life and work: Developing transferable knowledge and skills in the 21st century. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/13398eng
dcterms.referencesNegash, S., Whitman, M., Woszczynski, A., Hoganson, K., & Mattord, H. (2008). Handbook of distance learning for real-time and asynchronous information technology education. IGI Global. http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.00969_15.xeng
dcterms.referencesNegash, S., & Wilcox, M. V. (2008). E-learning classifications: Differences and similarities. In S. Negash (Ed.), Handbook of distance learning for real-time and asynchronous Information technology education (pp. 1–23). Information Science Referenceeng
dcterms.referencesNeuhauser, C. (2002). Learning style and effectiveness of online and face-to-face instruction. American Journal of Distance Education. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15389286AJDE1602_4eng
dcterms.referencesNeuman, W. L. (2007). Basics of social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches (2nd ed.). Person Education, Inc.eng
dcterms.referencesNi Shé, C., Farrell, O., Brunton, J., Costello, E., Donlon, E., Trevaskis, S., Eccles, S., Shé, N., Farrell, C., Costello, J., & Donlon, E. (2019). Teaching online is different: Critical perspectives from the literature. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3479402eng
dcterms.referencesNortvig, A. M., Petersen, A. K., & Balle, S. H. (2018). A literature review of the factors influencing e-learning and blended learning in relation to learning outcome, student satisfaction and engagement. Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 16(1), 45–55eng
dcterms.referencesNunn, S., Avella, J. T., Kanai, T., & Kebritchi, M. (2016). Learning analytics methods, benefits, and challenges in higher education: A systematic literature review. Online Learning, 20(2), 13–29. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v20i2.790eng
dcterms.referencesO’Leary, Z. (2017). The essential guide to doing your research project (J. Seaman, Ed.). Sage Publications.eng
dcterms.referencesO’Neill, K., Singh, G., & Donoghue, J. O. (2004). Implementing elearning programmes for higher education: A review of the literature structural issues for traditional universities. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 3, 313–323. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ848665eng
dcterms.referencesO’Toole, V. R. (2013, March 3). Why curiosity is the most important skill to teach your child. How to Learn. https://www.howtolearn.com/2013/05/why-curiosity-is-the-most-importantskill-to-teach-your-child/eng
dcterms.referencesOECD. (2005a). E-learning in tertiary education. Policy Brief. http://www.oecd.org/education/ceri/35991871.pdfeng
dcterms.referencesOECD. (2005b). The definition and selection of key competences (DeSeCo). http://www.oecd.org/education/skills-beyond-school/definitionandselectionofcompetenciesdeseco.htmeng
dcterms.referencesOECD. (2018). Preparing our youth for an inclusive and sustainable world: The OECD PISA global competence framework. http://www.oecd.org/pisa/Handbook-PISA-2018-GlobalCompetence.pdfeng
dcterms.referencesOnwuegbuzie, A. J., Frels, R. K., & Hwang, E. (2016). Mapping Saldaňa’s coding methods onto the literature review process. Journal of Educational Issues, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.5296/jei.v2i1.8931eng
dcterms.referencesPaechter, M., & Maier, B. (2010). Online or face-to-face? students’ experiences and preferences in e-learning. Internet and Higher Education, 13(4), 292–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2010.09.004eng
dcterms.referencesPalloff, R., & Pratt, K. (2003). The virtual student: A profile and guide to working with online learners (1st ed.). Jossey-Bass.eng
dcterms.referencesParkes, M., Reading, C., & Stein, S. (2013). The competencies required for effective performance in a university e-learning environment. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 29(6), 771–791. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.38eng
dcterms.referencesPatton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Sage Publications. https://books.google.com.co/books/about/Qualitative_Research_Evaluation_Methods.html?i d=FjBw2oi8El4C&redir_esc=yeng
dcterms.referencesPearson, J., & Trinidad, S. (2005). OLES: An instrument for refining the design of e-learning environments. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21(6), 396–404. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2005.00146.xeng
dcterms.referencesPecori, R., Suraci, V., & Ducange, P. (2019). Efficient computation of key performance indicators in a distance learning university. Information Discovery and Delivery, 47(2), 96–105. https://doi.org/10.1108/IDD-09-2018-0050eng
dcterms.referencesPew Research Center. (2019). Experts optimistic about the next 50 years of digital life. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2019/10/28/4-the-internet-will-continue-to-make-lifebetter/eng
dcterms.referencesPhillips, R. A., Freeman, R. E., & Wicks, A. C. (2003). What stakeholder theory is not. Business Ethics Quarterly, 13(4), 479–502. https://doi.org/10.2307/3857968eng
dcterms.referencesPicciano, A. G. (2009). Blending with purpose: The multimodal model. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Network, 13(1), 7–18. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v13i1.1673eng
dcterms.referencesPicciano, A. G. (2017). Theories and frameworks for online education: Seeking an integrated model. Online Learning, 21(3). https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v21i3.1225eng
dcterms.referencesPicciano, A. G., Seaman, J., & Elaine Allen, I. (2010). Educational transformation through online learning: To be or not to be. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Network, 14(4), 17- 35. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ909909eng
dcterms.referencesPirila, K. & Yli-Luoma, P. (2007). Learning outcomes, interaction and motivation in e-learning. In T. Bastiaens & S. Carliner (Eds.), Proceedings of E-Learn 2007-World Conference on ELearning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education (pp. 6460-6467). Quebec, Canada: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/26809/.eng
dcterms.referencesPrice, P. C., Jhangiani, R. S., & Chiang, I.-C. A. (2015). Research methods in psychology (2nd ed.). BCcampus.eng
dcterms.referencesRedmond, P. (2011). From face-to-face teaching to online teaching: Pedagogical transitions. In G. Williams, P. Statham, N. Brown & B. Cleland (Eds.), Changing demands, changing directions (pp.1050-1060). Hobart, Australia: Proceedings ascilite Hobart 2011.eng
dcterms.referencesRichterich, R., & Chancerel, J.-L. (1980). Identifying the needs of adults learning a foreign language. Pergamon Press.eng
dcterms.referencesRiess, H. (2018). The empathy effect: seven neuroscience-based keys for transforming the way we live, love, work and connect across difference [ebook]. Sounds True.eng
dcterms.referencesRobertson, J. (2011). The educational affordances of blogs for self-directed learning. Computers & Education, 57(2), 1628–1644. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.03.003eng
dcterms.referencesRoddy, C., Amiet, D. L., Chung, J., Holt, C., Shaw, L., McKenzie, S., Garivaldis, F., Lodge, J. M., & Mundy, M. E. (2017). Applying best practice online learning, teaching, and support to intensive online environments: An integrative review. Frontiers in Education, 2. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2017.00059eng
dcterms.referencesRomiszowski, A. (2004). How’s the e-learning baby? Factors leading to success or failure of an educational technology innovation. Educational Technology: The Magazine for Managers of Change in Education, 44(1), 5–27.eng
dcterms.referencesRosenberg, M. J. (2001). E-Learning: Strategies for delivering knowledge in the digital age (1st ed.). McGraw-Hill.eng
dcterms.referencesRoss, B., & Cage, K. (2006). Global perspectives on blended learning: Insight from WebCT and our customers in higher education. In C. J. Bonk & C. R. Graham (Eds.), Handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs (pp. 155–168). Pfeiffer.eng
dcterms.referencesRoutley, N. (2020, June 3). 6 charts that show what employers and employees really think about remote working. World Economic Forum. https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2020/06/coronavirus-covid19-remote-working-officeemployees-employerseng
dcterms.referencesRovai, A. P. (2009). The Internet and higher education. In Chandos Internet Series. Chandos Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603100802181125eng
dcterms.referencesRutherford, L. H., & Grana, S. J. (1995). Retrofitting academe: Adapting faculty attitudes and practices to technology. T.H.E. Journal, 23(2), 82–86. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/81063eng
dcterms.referencesSadeghi, M. (2019). A shift from classroom to distance learning: Advantages and limitations. International Journal of Research in English Education, 4(1), 80–88. https://doi.org/10.29252/ijree.4.1.80eng
dcterms.referencesSaks, K., & Leijen, Ä. (2014). Distinguishing self-directed and self-regulated learning and measuring them in the e-learning context. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 112, 190–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.1155eng
dcterms.referencesSaldaña, J. (2009). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (1st ed.). Sage Publications Ltd.eng
dcterms.referencesSaldaña, J. (2013). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (2nd ed.). Sage. http://www.amazon.com/Coding-Manual-QualitativeResearchers/dp/1446247376/ref=sr_1_4?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1443295925&sr=1- 4&keywords=Qualitative+researcheng
dcterms.referencesSalmon, G. (2004). E-tivities: The key to active online learning. Taylor & Francis e-Library.eng
dcterms.referencesSalmon, G. (2019). May the fourth be with you: Creating education 4.0. Journal of Learning for Development (JL4D), 6(1), 95–115. www.etymonline.com/word/lecture%0Ahttps://jl4d.org/index.php/ejl4d/article/view/352eng
dcterms.referencesSargeant, J., Sargeant, J., Curran, V., Curran, V., Allen, M., Allen, M., Jarvis-Selinger, S., JarvisSelinger, S., Ho, K., & Ho, K. (2006). Facilitating interpersonal interaction and learning online: Linking theory and practice. The Journal of continuing education in the health professions, 26(2). https://doi.org/10.1002/chp.61eng
dcterms.referencesSchafer, C. L. (2012). Online learning and the process of change: The experiences of faculty and students at a two-year college (Publication No. 153356384) [Doctoral dissertation, University of St. Thomas- Minnesota]. SemanticScholar.eng
dcterms.referencesSchensul, S., Schensul, J., & Lecompte, M. D. (2012). Initiating ethnographic research: A mixed methods approach (2nd ed.). AltaMira Press.eng
dcterms.referencesSelingo, J. (2018, April 16). The future of college looks like the future of retail. The Atlantic. https://www.theatlantic.com/education/archive/2018/04/college-online-degree-blendedlearning/557642/eng
dcterms.referencesShachar, M, & Neumann, Y. (2010). Twenty years of research on the academic performance differences between traditional and distance learning: Summative meta-analysis and trend. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 6(2), 318-334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneuroim.2004.11.015eng
dcterms.referencesShachar, Mickey, & Neumann, Y. (2003). Differences between traditional and distance education academic performances: A meta-analytic approach. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 4(2), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v4i2.153eng
dcterms.referencesShah, P. E., Weeks, H. M., Richards, B., & Kaciroti, N. (2018). Early childhood curiosity and kindergarten reading and math academic achievement. Pediatric Research, 84(3), 380–386. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41390-018-0039-3eng
dcterms.referencesSharma, P. (2010). Blended learning. ELT Journal, 64(4), 456–458. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccq043eng
dcterms.referencesShen, D., Cho, M. H., Tsai, C. L., & Marra, R. (2013). Unpacking online learning experiences: Online learning self-efficacy and learning satisfaction. Internet and Higher Education, 19, 10–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2013.04.001eng
dcterms.referencesSheridan, K., & Kelly, M. (2010). The indicators of instructor presence that are important to students in online courses. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 6(4). https://jolt.merlot.org/vol6no4/sheridan_1210.htmeng
dcterms.referencesSiemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: a new learning theory for the digital age. Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 2(1), 1–9. http://www.itdl.org/Journal/Jan_05/article01.htmeng
dcterms.referencesSoediono, B. (1989). A conceptual model for understanding self-directed learning in online environments. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 53(1), 160. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004eng
dcterms.referencesSong, S. (2010). E-learning: Investigating students’ acceptance of online learning in hospitality programs (Publication No. 11902) [Doctoral dissertation, Iowa State University- Iowa]. Graduate Theses and Dissertations.eng
dcterms.referencesSoo, K.-S., Bonk, C. J., & Marks, G. H. (1998, June 20-25). Interaction: What does it mean in online distance education? [Paper presentation]. ED-MEDIA/ED-TELECOM 98 World Conference on Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia & World Conference on Educational Telecommunications, Freiburg, Germany. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED428724.pdfeng
dcterms.referencesSteffens, K. (2001). Self-regulation and computer-based learning. The UB Journal of Psychology, 32(2), 77–94. https://revistes.ub.edu/index.php/Anuariopsicologia/article/view/8827/11094eng
dcterms.referencesStephenson, J. (2001). Learner managed Learning: An emerging pedagogy for online learning. In J. Stephenson (Ed.), Teaching & Learning Online New Pedagogies for New Technologies (1st ed.). Routledge.eng
dcterms.referencesStirling, D. (2008). Online learning in context. In Learners in a Changing Learning Landscape (pp. 165–186). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8299-3_8eng
dcterms.referencesStraub, D., & Gefen, D. (2004). Validation guidelines for IS positivist research. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 13, 380-427. https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.01324eng
dcterms.referencesSu, B., Bonk, C. J., Magjuka, R. J., Liu, X., & Lee, S. (2005). The Importance of interaction in web-based education: A program-level case study of online MBA courses. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 4(1), 1–19. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/TheImportance-of-Interaction-in-Web-Based-A-Case-SuBonk/92cd42a909d675b21cdd2b4c28721f429f38c6e5eng
dcterms.referencesSu, J. (2016). Successful graduate students ’ perceptions of characteristics of online learning environments [ Doctoral Dissertation, University of Tennessee]. TRACE Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss/3751eng
dcterms.referencesSugiura, L., Wiles, R., & Pope, C. (2017). Ethical challenges in online research: Public/private perceptions. Research Ethics, 13(3–4), 184–199. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016116650720eng
dcterms.referencesSun, A., & Chen, X. (2016). Online education and its effective practice: A research review. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 15, 157–190. https://doi.org/10.28945/3502eng
dcterms.referencesSun, P. C., Tsai, R. J., Finger, G., Chen, Y. Y., & Yeh, D. (2008). What drives a successful elearning? An empirical investigation of the critical factors influencing learner satisfaction. Computers and Education, 50(4), 1183–1202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2006.11.007eng
dcterms.referencesSutton, J., & Austin, Z. (2015). Qualitative research: Data collection, analysis, and management. The Canadian Journal of Hospital Pharmacy, 68(3), 226–231. https://doi.org/10.4212/cjhp.v68i3.1456eng
dcterms.referencesSutton, L.A. (2001). The principle of vicarious interaction in computer-mediated communications. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications, 7(3), 223-242. Norfolk, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/9534/eng
dcterms.referencesSwan, K., Garrison, D. R., & Richardson, J. C. (2009). A constructivist approach to online learning. In C. R. Payne (Ed.), Information Technology and Constructivism in Higher Education (pp. 43–57). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-60566-654-9.ch004eng
dcterms.referencesTallent-Runnels, M. K., Thomas, J. A., Lan, W. Y., Cooper, S., Ahern, T. C., Shaw, S. M., & Liu, X. (2006). Teaching courses online: A review of the research. Review of Educational Research, 76(1), 93–135. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543076001093eng
dcterms.referencesTashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (2010). Sage handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (2nd ed.). Sage Publications. https://books.google.com.co/books?id=v4wJF5hZhKgCeng
dcterms.referencesTashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (2015). Sage handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.eng
dcterms.referencesTaylor-Powell, E.; Renner, M. (2003). Analyzing qualitative data. Revista de Administração de Empresas, 45(2), 34–45. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr/16316438eng
dcterms.referencesTaylor, S. J., Bogdan, R., & DeVault, M. (2015). Introduction to qualitative research methods: A guidebook and resource (4th ed.). Wileyeng
dcterms.referencesThe American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education (AACTE), & Partnership for 21st Century Skills. (2010). 21st century knowledge and skills in educator preparation. Pearsoneng
dcterms.referencesThe Partnership For 21st Century Learning. (2015). P21 framework definitions. http://www.p21.org/documents/P21_Framework_Definitions.pdfeng
dcterms.referencesToharudin, U., Rahmat, A., & Kurniawan, I. S. (2019). The important of self-efficacy and selfregulation in learning: How should a student be? Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1157(2). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1157/2/022074eng
dcterms.referencesTolu, A. T. (2013). Creating effective communities of inquiry in online courses. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 70, 1049–1055. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.01.157eng
dcterms.referencesTrilling, B., & Fadel, C. (2012). 21st century skills learning for life in our times (1st ed.). John Wiley And Sons Inc.eng
dcterms.referencesU.S. Department of Education Office of Planning, Evaluation, and Policy Development Policy and Program Studies Service. (2010). Evaluation of evidence-based practices in online learning: A meta-analysis and review of online learning studies. https://www2.ed.gov/rschstat/eval/tech/evidence-based-practices/finalreport.pdfeng
dcterms.referencesU.S. Department of Education, Office of Planning. (2012). Understanding the implications of online learning for educational productivity. http://ctl.sri.com/publications/displayPublication.jsp?ID=913eng
dcterms.referencesUNESCO. (2007). New technologies in higher education: experiences from Chile and China. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, 7. http://docplayer.net/4542743-New-technologies-in-higher-education-experiences-fromchile-and-china.htmleng
dcterms.referencesUNESCO. (2020, April 9). Learning never stops: Tell UNESCO how you are coping with COVID-19 school closures. UNESCO. https://en.unesco.org/news/learning-never-stops-tellunesco-how-you-are-coping-covid-19-school-closures-0eng
dcterms.referencesUniversity of Massachusetts. (n.d.). Teaching and learning online: Communication, community and assessment: A handbook for UMass faculty (M. Poe & M. L. Stassen (Eds.). https://www.umass.edu/oapa/sites/default/files/pdf/handbooks/teaching_and_learning_onlin e_handbook.pdfeng
dcterms.referencesUniversity of Washington. (2018). Teaching with technology. Center for Teaching and Learning. http://www.washington.edu/teaching/teaching-resources/engaging-students-inlearning/teaching-with-technology-2/eng
dcterms.referencesUniversity of Wisconsin. (2016). Google forms: Creating, editing, and distributing. Whitewater.eng
dcterms.referencesUniversity of Zurich. (2016). 21st century main competence: Self-regulated learning from kindergarten to higher education. https://www.openaccessgovernment.org/wpcontent/uploads/2016/11/University-of-Zurich-Institute-of-Education-6884-WEB2.pdfeng
dcterms.referencesVan Laar, E., van Deursen, A. J. A. M., van Dijk, J. A. G. M., & de Haan, J. (2017). The relation between 21st-century skills and digital skills: A systematic literature review. Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 577–588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.03.010eng
dcterms.referencesVan Laar, E., van Deursen, A. J. A. M., van Dijk, J. A. G. M., & de Haan, J. (2020). Determinants of 21st-century skills and 21st-century digital skills for workers: A systematic literature review. Sage Open, 10(1), 215824401990017. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019900176eng
dcterms.referencesVivekanandan, R., & Pierre-Louis, M. (2020). 21st century skills: What potential role for the Global Partnership for education? A landscape review. https://www.globalpartnership.org/content/21st-century-skills-what-potential-role-globalpartnership-educationeng
dcterms.referencesWagner, N., Hassanein, K., & Head, M. (2008). Who is responsible for e-learning success in higher education? A stakeholders’ analysis. Educational Technology and Society. https://doi.org/citeulike-article-id:8060645eng
dcterms.referencesWagner, T. (2008). The Global Achievement Gap: Why even our best schools don’t teach the new survival skills our children need and what we can do about it. Basic Books.eng
dcterms.referencesWan, G., & Gut M, D. (2011). Bringing schools into the 21st century (G. Wan & D. M. Gut, Eds.). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0268-4eng
dcterms.referencesWan Husssin, W. T. T., Harun, J., & A Shukor, N. (2019). Online interaction in social learning environment towards critical thinking skill: A framework. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 9(1), 4. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.544eng
dcterms.referencesWang, C.-H., Shannon, D. M., & Ross, M. E. (2013). Students’ characteristics, self-regulated learning, technology self-efficacy, and course outcomes in online learning. Distance Education, 34(3), 302–323. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2013.835779eng
dcterms.referencesWaschull, S. B. (2001). The online delivery of psychology courses: Attrition, performance, and evaluation. Teaching of Psychology, 28(2), 143–147. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328023TOP2802_15eng
dcterms.referencesWatson, J. (2008). Blended learning: The convergence of online and face-to-face education. Promising Practices in Online Learning. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED509636.pdfeng
dcterms.referencesWatson, J., Murin, A., Vashaw, L., Gemin, B., & Rapp, C. (2011). Keeping pace with K-12 online learning: An annual review of policy and practice. Keeping Pace report. http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED535912eng
dcterms.referencesWatts, J. (2017). Beyond flexibility and convenience. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 31(4), 481–519. https://doi.org/10.1177/1050651917713251eng
dcterms.referencesWilliams, R. L., Oliver, R., & Stockdale, S. L. (2004). Psychological versus generic critical thinking as predictors and outcome measures in a large undergraduate human development course. The Journal of General Education, 53(1), 37–58. https://doi.org/10.1353/jge.2004.0022eng
dcterms.referencesWinne, P. H., & Hadwin, A. F. (1998). Studying as self-regulated learning. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Metacognition in educational theory and practice. (pp. 277–304). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.eng
dcterms.referencesWispé, L. (1986). The distinction between sympathy and empathy: To call forth a concept, a word is needed. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(2), 314–321. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.50.2.314eng
dcterms.referencesWoods, P. A., Woods, G. J., & Gunter, H. (2007). Academy schools and entrepreneurialism in education. Journal of Education Policy, 22(2), 237–259. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680930601158984eng
dcterms.referencesWorld Economic Forum, & The Boston Consulting Group. (2015). New vision for education: unlocking the potential of Technology. World Economic Forum. https://widgets.weforum.org/nve-2015/eng
dcterms.referencesZacharis, N. Z. (2009). Fostering students participation in online environments: Focus on interaction, communication and problem solving. Journal of College Teaching & Learning (TLC), 6(2), 25–34. https://doi.org/10.19030/tlc.v6i2.1169eng
dcterms.referencesZacharis, N. Z. (2009). Fostering students participation in online environments: Focus on interaction, communication and problem solving. Journal of College Teaching & Learning (TLC), 6(2), 25–34. https://doi.org/10.19030/tlc.v6i2.1169eng
dcterms.referencesZhang, Z., & Kenny, R. (2010). Learning in an online distance education course: Experiences of three international students. Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 11(1), 17–36. http://www.doaj.org/doaj?func=fulltext&aId=509342eng
dcterms.referencesZi, H., & Jiyuan, Y. (2016). Is online learning the future of education? World Economic Forum. https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2016/09/is-online-learning-the-future-of-education/eng
dcterms.referencesZimmerman, B. J. (1986). Becoming a self-regulated learner: Which are the key subprocesses? Contemporary Educational Psychology, 11(4), 307–313. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361- 476X(86)90027-5eng
dcterms.referencesZimmerman, B. J. (1990). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: An overview. Educational Psychologist, 25(1), 3–17. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2501_2eng
dcterms.referencesZimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 13–39). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012109890-2/50031-7eng
dcterms.referencesZimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: an overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(2), 64–70. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2eng
dcterms.referencesZimmerman, B. J., & Schunk, D. (2011). Handbook of self-Regulation of learning and performance. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Educational psychology handbook series. Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.eng
thesis.degree.disciplineDepartamento de Lenguas y Culturas Extranjerases_CO
thesis.degree.levelMaestría en Didáctica del Inglés con Énfasis en Ambientes de Aprendizaje Autónomoes_CO
thesis.degree.nameMagíster en Didáctica del Inglés con Énfasis en Ambientes de Aprendizaje Autónomoes_CO


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail
Nombre:
THESIS.pdf
Tamaño:
1.416Mb
Formato:
PDF
Descripción:
Ver documento en PDF
Ver/

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 InternationalExcepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International