Evaluation of two strategies for debriefing simulation in the development of skills for neonatal resuscitation: a randomized clinical trial
Enlaces del ItemURI: http://hdl.handle.net/10818/43145
Visitar enlace: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/p ...
EstadísticasVer as estatísticas de uso
Métricas de Altmetric y Scopus
Catalogación bibliográficaApresentar o registro completo
AutorGamboa Garay, Oscar Andrés; Agudel, Sergio Iván; Maldonado, María Jose; Leguizamón, Diana C.; Cala, Sandra M.
Objective To evaluate two debriefing strategies for the development of neonatal resuscitation skills in health professionals responsible for the critical newborn care in a high-complexity university Hospital. Results A simple blind randomized clinical trial was conducted. Twenty-four professionals (pediatricians, nurses, and respiratory therapists) were randomly assigned for two interventions; one group received oral debriefing and the other oral debriefing assisted by video. Three standardized clinical scenarios that were recorded on video were executed. A checklist was applied for the evaluation, administered by a reviewer blinded to the assignment of the type of debriefing. The two debriefing strategies increased the technical and behavioral neonatal resuscitation skills of the participants, without one being superior to the other. The coefficient of the difference in the compliance percentage between the two types of debriefing was − 3.6% (95% CI − 13.77% to 6.47%). When comparing the development of technical and behavioral skills among the professionals evaluated, no significant differences were found between the types of debriefing. The two debriefing strategies increase compliance percentages, reaching or approaching 100%.
BMC Res Notes. 2018 Oct 17;11(1):739
Colecciones a las que pertenece
- Facultad de Medicina