Show simple item record

School engagement and ict: a systematic review of literature

dc.contributor.advisorPiraquive Calderón, Javier Orlando
dc.contributor.advisorChiappe Laverde, Andrés
dc.contributor.authorTorres Castellanos, María Emelina
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-24T16:55:59Z
dc.date.available2020-08-24T16:55:59Z
dc.date.issued2020-06-05
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10818/42980
dc.description41 páginases_CO
dc.description.abstractEs notable la falta de interés y motivación que ocurre durante la adolescencia, especialmente en asuntos relacionados con la escuela, lo que genera problemas de abandono escolar y baja escolaridad desempeño, especialmente en países en desarrollo. Al respecto, el compromiso escolar se convierte en un asunto de gran interés para investigadores educativos, profesionales y aquellos responsables de El diseño y la gestión de políticas públicas para la educación secundaria, especialmente en un momento en que Las Tecnologías de la Información y la Comunicación (TIC) condicionan la relación de los adolescentes. con la escuela, con su familia y sus compañeros. Para aumentar la comprensión de este fenómeno, se realizó una revisión sistemática de la literatura. realizado con el propósito de identificar aspectos del uso de las TIC en la participación escolar fortalecimiento. Se llevaron a cabo dos procesos complementarios; la lectura en profundidad (n = 200) y minería de texto, cuya extracción de datos se consolidó en un proceso final de triangulación. Los resultados revelar varios factores clave relacionados con el uso de las TIC y la participación escolar, en sus cuatro dimensiones: cognitivo, conductual, físico y afectivo. Entre los resultados más relevantes vale la pena destacando las actividades de colaboración, la participación activa de los estudiantes y el desarrollo de habilidades TIC como principales facilitadores del aumento de su confianza y el logro de sus objetivos de aprendizaje.es_CO
dc.formatapplication/pdfes_CO
dc.language.isoenges_CO
dc.publisherUniversidad de La Sabanaes_CO
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.sourceinstname:Universidad de La Sabanaes_CO
dc.sourcereponame:Intellectum Repositorio Universidad de La Sabanaes_CO
dc.subjectTecnología educativaes_CO
dc.subjectAlfabetización informacionales_CO
dc.subjectTecnologías de la información y de la comunicaciónes_CO
dc.subjectAptitud de aprendizajees_CO
dc.subjectAprendizaje cognitivoes_CO
dc.titleSchool engagement and ict: a systematic review of literaturees_CO
dc.typemasterThesises_CO
dc.publisher.programMaestría en Informática Educativaes_CO
dc.publisher.departmentCentro de Tecnologías para la Academiaes_CO
dc.type.hasVersionpublishedVersiones_CO
dc.rights.accessRightsrestrictedAccesses_CO
dc.creator.degreeMagíster en Informática Educativaes_CO
dcterms.referencesAbramova, O., Baumann, A., Krasnova, H., & Lessmann, S. (2017). To phub or not to phub: Understanding off-task smartphone usage and its consequences in the academic environment. Proceedings of the 25th European Conference on Information Systems, ECIS 2017, 1984–1999. Retrieved from https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0- 85049343459&partnerID=40&md5=aa64ea4fef586453ec2fb797235fe1c2eng
dcterms.referencesAhlfeldt, S., Mehta, S., & Sellnow, T. (2005). Measurement and analysis of student engagement in university classes where varying levels of PBL methods of instruction are in use. Higher Education Research & Development, 24(1), 5–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/0729436052000318541eng
dcterms.referencesAlharbi, A. (2017). How have policy makers responded to the current state of ICT in schools in Saudi Arabia? A qualitative investigation. CSEDU 2017 - Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Computer Supported Education, 1, 537–542. Retrieved from https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0- 85023747308&partnerID=40&md5=809da245679e0e5b5cfc9efa74d8be30eng
dcterms.referencesAnnetta, L. A., Minogue, J., Holmes, S. Y., & Cheng, M.-T. (2009). Investigating the impact of video games on high school students’ engagement and learning about genetics. Computers & Education, 53(1), 74–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.12.020eng
dcterms.referencesAntelm Lanzat, A. M., Gil López, A. J., Cacheiro Gonzalez, M. L., & Perez Navio, E. (2018). Causas del fracaso escolar: Un análisis desde la perspectiva del profesorado y del alumnado. Enseñanza & Teaching, 36(1), 129–149. https://doi.org/10.14201/et2018361129149spa
dcterms.referencesAustin, R., Smyth, J., Rickard, A., Quirk‐Bolt, N., & Metcalfe, N. (2010). Collaborative digital learning in schools: Teacher perceptions of purpose and effectiveness. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 19(3), 327–343. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2010.513765eng
dcterms.referencesBalasooriya, I., Mor, E., & Rodríguez, M. E. (2018). Understanding User Engagement in Digital Education. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 10925 LNCS, 3–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91152-6_1eng
dcterms.referencesBarn, B., Barat, S., & Clark, T. (2017). Conducting Systematic Literature Reviews and Systematic Mapping Studies. Proceedings of the 10th Innovations in Software Engineering Conference on - ISEC ’17, 212–213. https://doi.org/10.1145/3021460.3021489eng
dcterms.referencesBeluce, A. C., & Oliveira, K. L. de. (2015). Students’ motivation for learning in virtual learning environments. Paidéia, 25(60), 105–113.eng
dcterms.referencesBhuasiri, W., Xaymoungkhoun, O., Zo, H., Rho, J. J., & Ciganek, A. P. (2012). Critical success factors for e-learning in developing countries: A comparative analysis between ICT experts and faculty. Computers & Education, 58(2), 843–855. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.10.010eng
dcterms.referencesBinkley, M., Erstad, E., Herman, J., Raizen, S., Ripley, M., Miller-Ricci, M., & Rumble, M. (2012). Defining 21st century skills. In P. Griffin, B. McGaw, & E. Care (Eds.), Assessment and Teaching of 21st Century Skills (pp. 17–66). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2324-5eng
dcterms.referencesBonfert-Taylor, P., May, V. V., Wilkinson, H. P. E., & Betsinger, A. (2017). Work in progress: Improving first-year retention through support and engagement. ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, 2017, 1–13. Retrieved from https://peer.asee.org/work-inprogress-improving-first-year-retention-through-support-and-engagement.pdfeng
dcterms.referencesBuijs, M., & Admiraal, W. (2013). Homework assignments to enhance student engagement in secondary education. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 28(3), 767–779. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-012-0139-0eng
dcterms.referencesBurns, M. (2013). Success, Failure or “No Significant Difference”? The Arguments For and Against Technology as a Learning Tool. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (IJET), 8(1), 38–45. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v8i1.2376eng
dcterms.referencesCakir, H. (2013). Use of blogs in pre-service teacher education to improve student engagement. Computers & Education, 68, 244–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.05.013eng
dcterms.referencesCamilleri, M. A., & Camilleri, A. C. (2017). Digital Learning Resources and Ubiquitous Technologies in Education. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 22(1), 65–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-016-9287-7eng
dcterms.referencesCasuso-Holgado, M. J., Cuesta-Vargas, A. I., Moreno-Morales, N., Labajos-Manzanares, M. T., BarónLópez, F. J., & Vega-Cuesta, M. (2013). The association between academic engagement and achievement in health sciences students. BMC Medical Education, 13(1), 33. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-13-33eng
dcterms.referencesChen, I.-S. (2017). Work engagement and its antecedents and consequences: A case of lecturers teaching synchronous distance education courses. Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 655–663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.10.002eng
dcterms.referencesCoco, A., & Short, P. (2004). History and Habit in the Mobilization of ICT Resources. The Information Society, 20(1), 39–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972240490269997eng
dcterms.referencesCuevas, R., García-Calvo, T., González, J., & Fernández-Bustos, J. G. (2018). Necesidades psicológicas básicas, motivación y compromiso en educación física. Psicología Del Deporte Vol 27, No 1, 2018: Revista de Psicología Del Deporte, 271(1), 97–104.spa
dcterms.referencesDawson, S. P., Macfadyen, L., & Lockyer, L. (2009). Learning or performance: Predicting drivers of student motivation. In R. Atkinson & C. McBeath (Eds.), Ascilite 2009: Same places, different space (pp. 184–193). Retrieved from https://ro.uow.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1115&context=edupaperseng
dcterms.referencesde Winter, J., Winterbottom, M., & Wilson, E. (2010). Developing a user guide to integrating new technologies in science teaching and learning: Teachers’ and pupils’ perceptions of their affordances. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 19(2), 261–267. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2010.491237eng
dcterms.referencesDhakal, R. K., & Pant, B. P. (2016). Assessment of teacher education curricula in Nepal: An ICT perspective. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 2(3), 96–107.eng
dcterms.referencesDufty, N. (2011). Engagement or education? Australian Journal of Emergency Management, 26(3), 35– 39.eng
dcterms.referencesDuran, D. M., & Ballares, I. A. (2015). Por primera vez el País mide la deserción en los Programas de Posgrado. Informado Decido: Boletín de La Educación Superior, 1, 1–2eng
dcterms.referencesEow, Y. L., Ali, W. Z. bte W., Mahmud, R. bt., & Baki, R. (2009). Form one students’ engagement with computer games and its effect on their academic achievement in a Malaysian secondary school. Computers & Education, 53(4), 1082–1091. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.05.013eng
dcterms.referencesFerreira, G. M. dos S., & Castiglione, R. G. M. (2018). TIC na educação: Ambientes pessoais de aprendizagem nas perspectivas e práticas de jovens. Educação e Pesquisa, 44(0), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1678-4634201702153673eng
dcterms.referencesFlórez Romero, M., Aguilar Barreto, A. J., Hernández, Y. K., Salazar Torres, P. J. P., Pinillos Villamizar, J. A., & Pérez Fuentes, C. A. (2017). Knowledge society, ICT and its influence on education [Sociedad del conocimiento, las TIC y su influencia en la educación]. Espacios, 38(35), 39–51eng
dcterms.referencesFonseca, L. M. S. (2016). La evaluación y su incidencia en la deserción escolar:?` Falla de un sistema, de las instituciones educativas, del docente o del estudiante? Educación y Humanismo, 18(31), 313–325.spa
dcterms.referencesFu, F.-L., Wu, Y.-L., & Ho, H.-C. (2009). An investigation of coopetitive pedagogic design for knowledge creation in Web-based learning. Computers & Education, 53(3), 550–562. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.01.004eng
dcterms.referencesFurlong, J., & Davies, C. (2012). Young people, new technologies and learning at home: Taking context seriously. Oxford Review of Education, 38(1), 45–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2011.577944eng
dcterms.referencesGershon, P., & Pellitteri, J. (2018). Promoting emotional intelligence in preschool education: A review of programs. International Journal of Emotional Education, 10(2), 26–41.eng
dcterms.referencesGuzdial, M., & Turns, J. (2000). Effective Discussion Through a Computer-Mediated Anchored Forum. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9(4), 437–469. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327809JLS0904_3eng
dcterms.referencesHart, M., & Rush, D. (2007). E‐Learning and the development of “voice” in business studies education. International Journal of Educational Management, 21(1), 68–77. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513540710716830eng
dcterms.referencesHolley, D., & Oliver, M. (2010). Student engagement and blended learning: Portraits of risk. Computers & Education, 54(3), 693–700. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.08.035eng
dcterms.referencesHomiakova, V., Arras, P., & Kozik, T. (2017). Challenges of using ICT in education. 2017 9th IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Data Acquisition and Advanced Computing Systems: Technology and Applications (IDAACS), 1094–1097. https://doi.org/10.1109/IDAACS.2017.8095254eng
dcterms.referencesHoward, J., Miles, G. E., & Rees-Davies, L. (2012). Computer use within a play-based early years curriculum. International Journal of Early Years Education, 20(2), 175–189. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669760.2012.715241eng
dcterms.referencesIgnatova, N., & Kurilovas, E. (2012). ICT based teaching and learning personalization trends in the context of Lithuanian education. Pedagogika, 106(1), 21–29.eng
dcterms.referencesIssaka, A., & Hopkins, L. (2017). Engagement with education: Music education in a paediatric hospital. International Journal of Educational Research, 83, 142–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2017.02.012eng
dcterms.referencesJones, T. (2013). Through the lens of home-educated children: Engagement in education. Educational Psychology in Practice, 29(2), 107–121. https://doi.org/10.1080/02667363.2012.755614eng
dcterms.referencesJunco, R., & Cotten, S. R. (2011). Perceived academic effects of instant messaging use. Computers & Education, 56(2), 370–378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.08.020eng
dcterms.referencesKearsley, G., & Shneiderman, B. (1998). Engagement theory: A framework for technology-based teaching and learning. Educational Technology, 38(5), 20–23.eng
dcterms.referencesKim, T.-Y., Kim, Y., & Kim, J.-Y. (2018). A Qualitative Inquiry on EFL Learning Demotivation and Resilience: A Study of Primary and Secondary EFL Students in South Korea. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 27(1), 55–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-017-0365-yeng
dcterms.referencesKirkwood, A. (2009). E‐learning: You don’t always get what you hope for. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 18(2), 107–121. https://doi.org/10.1080/14759390902992576eng
dcterms.referencesKrause, K., & Coates, H. (2008). Students’ engagement in first‐year university. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 33(5), 493–505. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930701698892eng
dcterms.referencesLawson, M. A., & Lawson, H. A. (2013). New Conceptual Frameworks for Student Engagement Research, Policy, and Practice. Review of Educational Research, 83(3), 432–479. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654313480891eng
dcterms.referencesLennox Terrion, J., & Aceti, V. (2012). Perceptions of the effects of clicker technology on student learning and engagement: A study of freshmen Chemistry students. Research in Learning Technology, 20(2), 16150. https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v20i0.16150eng
dcterms.referencesLim, Cher P., Nonis, D., & Hedberg, J. (2006). Gaming in a 3D multiuser virtual environment: Engaging students in Science lessons. British Journal of Educational Technology, 37(2), 211– 231. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2006.00531.xeng
dcterms.referencesLim, Cher Ping. (2007). Effective integration of ICT in Singapore schools: Pedagogical and policy implications. Educational Technology Research and Development, 55(1), 83–116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-006-9025-2eng
dcterms.referencesLoayza, J. (2015). Hacia en reencantamiento virtual del mundo social: Consecuencias de la tecnología en la juventud. Scientia, 17(17), 61–82.spa
dcterms.referencesMaguire, R., Egan, A., Hyland, P., & Maguire, P. (2017). Engaging students emotionally: The role of emotional intelligence in predicting cognitive and affective engagement in higher education. Higher Education Research & Development, 36(2), 343–357. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2016.1185396eng
dcterms.referencesMama, M., & Hennessy, S. (2010). Level of technology integration by primary teachers in Cyprus and student engagement. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 19(2), 269–275. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2010.491238eng
dcterms.referencesMeyer, B. (2009). Learning English through Serious Games – Reflections on Teacher and Learner Performance. In Z. Pan, A. D. Cheok, W. Müller, & M. Chang (Eds.), Transactions on Edutainment III (Vol. 5940, pp. 82–92). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-11245-4_8eng
dcterms.referencesMontenegro, A. (2017). Understanding the Concept of Agentic Engagement. Colombian Applied 38 Linguistics Journal, 19(1), 117. https://doi.org/10.14483/calj.v19n1.10472eng
dcterms.referencesMukandutiye, D., Sevilla, J., & Makhanu, E. (2014). Adoption of e-assessment in Strathmore University. 2014 IST-Africa Conference Proceedings, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISTAFRICA.2014.6880665eng
dcterms.referencesNkhoma, M. Z., Dang, D. P. T., & Lu, T. H. (2012). Towards an understanding of implementation and benefits of ICT in education: Review of issues to be considered by developing countries. ICSIT 2012 - 3rd International Conference on Society and Information Technologies, Proceedings, 31– 35. Retrieved from https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0- 85032924890&partnerID=40&md5=3e1f5961dcd14e97b5e4e4af8701fdc5eng
dcterms.referencesNwaocha, V. O. (2014). Incorporating ICTs in schools for effective education: Challenges and prospects. In H. Kaur & X. Tao (Eds.), ICTs and the millennium development goals: A United Nations perspective (pp. 127–137). New York: Springer US.eng
dcterms.referencesPahinis, K., Stokes, C. W., Walsh, T. F., & Cannavina, G. (2007). Evaluating a blended-learning course taught to different groups of learners in a dental school. Journal of Dental Education, 71(2), 269–278.eng
dcterms.referencesPapanastasiou, E. C., & Angeli, C. (2008). Evaluating the use of ICT in education: Psychometric properties of the survey of factors affecting teachers teaching with technology (SFA-T 3). Educational Technology and Society, 11(1), 69–86.eng
dcterms.referencesPelgrum, W. J. (2001). Obstacles to the integration of ICT in education: Results from a worldwide educational assessment. Computers & Education, 37(2), 163–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-1315(01)00045-8eng
dcterms.referencesPetticrew, M., & Roberts, H. (2006). Systematic reviews in the social sciences: A practical guide. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.eng
dcterms.referencesPineda-Báez, C., Hennig Manzuoli, C., & Vargas Sánchez, A. (2019). Supporting student cognitive and agentic engagement: Students’ voices. International Journal of Educational Research, 96, 81– 90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2019.06.005eng
dcterms.referencesReeve, J. (2012). A Self-determination Theory Perspective on Student Engagement. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Student Engagement (pp. 149–172). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_7eng
dcterms.referencesReeve, J., & Tseng, C.-M. (2011). Agency as a fourth aspect of students’ engagement during learning activities. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36(4), 257–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2011.05.002eng
dcterms.referencesRoblyer, M. D., & Wiencke, W. R. (2004). Exploring the interaction equation: Validating a rubric to assess and encourage interaction in distance courses. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 8(4), 24–37.eng
dcterms.referencesRomán, M. (2013). Factores asociados al abandono y la deserción escolar en América Latina: Una mirada de conjunto. REICE. Revista Electrónica Iberoamericana Sobre Calidad, Eficacia y Cambio En Educación, 11(2), 33–59.spa
dcterms.referencesRozgonjuk, D., Kattago, M., & Täht, K. (2018). Social media use in lectures mediates the relationship between procrastination and problematic smartphone use. Computers in Human Behavior, 89, 191–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.08.003eng
dcterms.referencesScheuermann, F., & Pedró, F. (2010). Assessing the Effects of ICT in Education: Indicators, Criteria and Benchmarks for International Comparisons. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264079786-eneng
dcterms.referencesSelwyn, N. (2008). An investigation of differences in undergraduates’ academic use of the internet. Active Learning in Higher Education, 9(1), 11–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787407086744eng
dcterms.referencesSheard, J., Carbone, A., & Hurst, A. J. (2010). Student engagement in first year of an ICT degree: Staff and student perceptions. Computer Science Education, 20(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/08993400903484396eng
dcterms.referencesShenton, A., & Pagett, L. (2007). From ‘bored’ to screen: The use of the interactive whiteboard for literacy in six primary classrooms in England. Literacy, 41(3), 129–136. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9345.2007.00475.xeng
dcterms.referencesSølvberg, A. M. (2003). Computer-Related Control Beliefs and Motivation: A Panel Study. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 35(4), 473–487. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2003.10782397eng
dcterms.referencesSomekh, B., & Saunders, L. (2007). Developing knowledge through intervention: Meaning and definition of ‘quality’ in research into change. Research Papers in Education, 22(2), 183–197. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671520701296155eng
dcterms.referencesStephen, C., & Plowman, L. (2008). Enhancing learning with information and communication technologies in pre‐school. Early Child Development and Care, 178(6), 637–654. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430600869571eng
dcterms.referencesSuh, A., Wagner, C., & Liu, L. (2018). Enhancing User Engagement through Gamification. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 58(3), 204–213. https://doi.org/10.1080/08874417.2016.1229143eng
dcterms.referencesTani, K. (2017). Academic Procrastination and the Effect on Students’ Results for ICT Students: International Journal of Cyber Behavior, Psychology and Learning, 7(2), 31–35. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJCBPL.2017040103eng
dcterms.referencesTaylor, P. G. (1999). Information technology skills development and the new problematik. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 7(1), 117–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681369900200053eng
dcterms.referencesTomás, J. M., Gutiérrez, M., Sancho, P., Chireac, S., & Romero, I. (2016). El compromiso escolar (school engagement) de los adolescentes: Medida de sus dimensiones. Enseñanza & Teaching: Revista Interuniversitaria de Didáctica, 34(1), 119. https://doi.org/10.14201/et2016341119135eng
dcterms.referencesVeiga, F. (2013). Envolvimento dos alunos na escola: Elaboração de uma nova escala de avaliação. International Journal of Developmental and Educational Psychology, 1(1), 441–450.eng
dcterms.referencesVekiri, I. (2010). Socioeconomic differences in elementary students’ ICT beliefs and out-of-school experiences. Computers & Education, 54(4), 941–950. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.09.029eng
dcterms.referencesWang, F., Guo, R., Hu, M., & Gu, X. (2017). Investigating the Factors Influencing the Use of ICT in Education: A Content Analysis. 2017 International Conference of Educational Innovation through Technology (EITT), 27–31. https://doi.org/10.1109/EITT.2017.15eng
dcterms.referencesWang, M.-J. (2010). Online collaboration and offline interaction between students using asynchronous tools in blended learning. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(6), 830–846.eng
dcterms.referencesWastiau, P., Blamire, R., Kearney, C., Quittre, V., Van de Gaer, E., & Monseur, C. (2013). The Use of ICT in Education: A survey of schools in Europe: The Use of ICT in Education: a survey of schools in Europe. European Journal of Education, 48(1), 11–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12020eng
dcterms.referencesYong, T. L., & Ping, L. C. (2008). Engaging academically at risk primary school students in an ICT mediated after school program. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 24(5), 521– 539.eng
dcterms.referencesZheng, Y., Li, H., & Zheng, T. (2018). Performance Evaluation of ICT-Based Teaching and Learning in Higher Education. In S. K. S. Cheung, L. Kwok, K. Kubota, L.-K. Lee, & J. Tokito (Eds.), Blended Learning. Enhancing Learning Success (Vol. 10949, pp. 378–390). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94505-7_31eng


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Artículo María Emelina-Javier.pdf
Size:
1.559Mb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Ver documento en PDF
View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 InternationalExcept where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International