Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorSanchez, Nestor
dc.contributor.authorRuiz Pardo, Ruth Yolanda
dc.contributor.authorInfante Beltrán, Nicolás
dc.contributor.authorCobo Ángel, Martha Isabel
dc.date.accessioned5/29/2018 10:05
dc.date.available5/29/2018 10:05
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.citationSánchez, N.,Ruiz, R., Infante, N. y Cobo, M. (2017). Bioethanol Production from Cachaza as Hydrogen Feedstock: Effect of Ammonium Sulfate during Fermentation. Energies, 10 (2112), 1-16.es_CO
dc.identifier.otherhttp://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/10/12/2112/htm
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10818/33054
dc.description10 páginases_CO
dc.description.abstractCachaza is a type of non-centrifugal sugarcane press-mud that, if it is not employed efficiently, generates water pollution, soil eutrophication, and the spread of possible pathogens. This biomass can be fermented to produce bioethanol. Our intention is to obtain bioethanol that can be catalytically reformed to produce hydrogen (H2) for further use in fuel cells for electricity production. However, some impurities could negatively affect the catalyst performance during the bioethanol reforming process. Hence, the aim of this study was to assess the fermentation of Cachaza using ammonium sulfate ((NH4)2SO4) loadings and Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain to produce the highest ethanol concentration with the minimum amount of impurities in anticipation of facilitating further bioethanol purification and reforming for H2 production. The results showed that ethanol production from Cachaza fermentation was about 50 g·L−1 and the (NH4)2SO4 addition did not affect its production. However, it significantly reduced the production of branched alcohols. When a 160 mg·L−1 (NH4)2SO4 was added to the fermentation culture, 2-methyl-1-propanol was reduced by 41% and 3-methyl-1-butanol was reduced by 6%, probably due to the repression of the catabolic nitrogen mechanism. Conversely, 1-propanol doubled its concentration likely due to the higher threonine synthesis promoted by the reducing sugar presence. Afterwards, we employed the modified Gompertz model to fit the ethanol, 2M1P, 3M1B, and 1-propanol production, which provided acceptable fits (R2 > 0.881) for the tested compounds during Cachaza fermentation. To the best of our knowledge, there are no reports of the modelling of aliphatic production during fermentation; this model will be employed to calculate yields with further scaling and for life cycle assessment.en
dc.formatapplication/pdfes_CO
dc.language.isoenges_CO
dc.publisherEnergieses_CO
dc.relation.ispartofseriesEnergies 2017, 10, 2112
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.sourceUniversidad de La Sabanaes_CO
dc.sourceIntellectum Repositorio Universidad de La Sabanaes_CO
dc.subjectAgroindustrial wastesen
dc.subjectBiomassen
dc.subjectFermentation impuritiesen
dc.subjectRenewable energyen
dc.subjectSugarcaneen
dc.titleBioethanol Production from Cachaza as Hydrogen Feedstock: Effect of Ammonium Sulfate during Fermentationen
dc.typejournal articlees_CO
dc.type.hasVersionpublishedVersiones_CO
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccesses_CO
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/en10122112


Ficheros en el ítem

FicherosTamañoFormatoVer

No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem.

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 InternationalExcepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International