Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.advisorVelasco, María Consuelo
dc.contributor.authorDevia Fierro, John Edison
dc.date.accessioned2017-11-02T18:05:58Z
dc.date.available2017-11-02T18:05:58Z
dc.date.created2017
dc.date.issued2017-11-02
dc.identifier.citationAdams, M. J. (1990). Begining to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Akhondi, M., Malayeri, F. A., & Samad, A. A. (2011). How to teach expository text sructure to facilitate reading comprehension. Reading Teacher, 64(5), 368-372.
dc.identifier.citationAlderson, J. C. (2005). Assessing reading. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
dc.identifier.citationAlsamadani, H. A. (2009). The relationship between Saudi EL college-level students' use of reading strategies and their EFL reading comprehension. Retrieved June 8, 2016, from http://etd.ohiolink.edu/sendpdf.cgi/Alsamadani%20Hashem%20A.pdf?ohiou1224685570
dc.identifier.citationAlverman, D., & Boothby, P. (1984). The effect of graphci organizer on furt graders' comprehension of social studies text. Journal of Social Studies Research, 8, 13-21.
dc.identifier.citationArmbruster, B., Lehr, F., & Osborn, J. (2001). Put reading first: The research building blocks for teaching children to read. Washington, D. C.: Partnership for Reading.
dc.identifier.citationAusubel, D. (1963). The psychology of meaninful verbal learning. New York: Grune & Stratton.
dc.identifier.citationBarton, D. (2006). Literacy: An introduction to the ecology of written language. Oxford: Blackwell.
dc.identifier.citationBernhardt, T. M. (2010). Using graphic organizers to enhance reading comprehension. Retrieved September 25, 2016, from https://search-proquestcom.ez.unisabana.edu.co/docview/756051133?accountid=45375
dc.identifier.citationBogoya, A. (2011). Fostering fifth graders' reading comprehension through the use of intensive reading in physical science. Colombian Applied Linguistics, 13(1), 35-53.
dc.identifier.citationBorjalizadeh, M., Shabani, M., & Sorahi, M. A. (2015). The effect of graphic organizers on EFL learners' writing skill. Modern Journal of Language Teaching Methods, 5(4), 174-184.
dc.identifier.citationBrown, A. L., Armbruster, B. B., & Baker, L. (1986). The role of metacognition in reading and studying. In J. Orasanu, Reading Comprehension: From Research to Practice (pp. 49-75). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
dc.identifier.citationBrown, H. D. (2007). Principles of language learning and teaching. New York: Longman.
dc.identifier.citationBrown, H. D., & Abeywickrama, P. (2010). Language assessment: Principles and classroom practices (2 ed.). White Plains, NY: Pearson Education.
dc.identifier.citationBuelh, D. (2013). Classroom strategies for interactive learning. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
dc.identifier.citationCarr, D. (1995). Improvig reading motivation through the use of oral reading strategies.
dc.identifier.citationCarrell, P. L., Devine, J., & Eskey, D. E. (1988). Interactive approaches to second language reading. New York: Cambridge University Press.
dc.identifier.citationClark, A. (2007). GOs and the school library program. University of Alberta, Department of Elementary Education.
dc.identifier.citationCollins, N. D. (1996). Motivating low performing adolescent readers: ERIC clearinghouse on reading. English and Communication Digest(112).
dc.identifier.citationCorbin, J., & Strauss, A. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
dc.identifier.citationDiCecco, V. M., & Gleason, M. M. (2002). Using graphic organizers to attain relational knowledge from expository text. Hammill Institute on Disabilities(35), 306-320.
dc.identifier.citationDrake, S. M., & Burns, R. C. (2004). Integrated curriculum, meeting standards through. Virginia: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
dc.identifier.citationDrever, E., & Munn, P. (1990). Using questionnaires in small-scale research: A teacher's guide. Edinburgh, Scotland: Scottish Council for Research in Education.
dc.identifier.citationDye, G. (2000). Graphic organizers to the rescue! Teaching Exceptional Children, 32, 1-5. Echeverry, L. M., & Mac Nutly, M. (2010). Reading strategies to develop higher thinking. Profile, 12(1).
dc.identifier.citationElliot, J. (1991). Action research for language educational change. Philadelphia: Open University Press.
dc.identifier.citationEllis, N. C. (2001). Memory for language. In P. Robinson, Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 33-68). Cambridge: Cambridge Unversity Press.
dc.identifier.citationElllis, E. (2004). Q&A: What´s the big deal with graphic organizers? Retrieved August 16, 2016, from Graphic Organizers: https://mcsold1.monet.k12.ca.us/Academics/el712/Graphic%20Organizers/Q%20and%20A%20about%20G%20O.pdf
dc.identifier.citationFealy, E. M. (2010). Explicit instruction of graphic organizers as an informational text reading comprehension strategy: Third-grade students' strategies and perceptions. Retrieved September 26, 2016, from https://search-proquestcom.ez.unisabana.edu.co/docview/749233749?accountid=45375
dc.identifier.citationFieldler, R. L., & Salas, E. (2004). Concept mapping: How to help learners visualize knowledge. Master thesis, Univeristy of Central Florida. Florida.
dc.identifier.citationFountas, I., & Pinell, G. (2001). Guiding readers and writers grades 3-6: Teaching comprehension, genre, an content literacy. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
dc.identifier.citationGoodman, K. S. (1994). Reading, writing and written texts: a transactional sociopsycholinguistic view. In R. R. B, M. R. Rudell, H. Singer, R. B. Rudell, M. R. Rudell, & H. Singer (Eds.), Theoretical Models and Processes of Reading. Newark: Interantional Reading Association.
dc.identifier.citationGoss, P. (2009). The influence of graphic orgnizers on students´abilitiy to summarize and comprehend science content regarding the earth´s changing surface. Retrieved from http://etd.fela.edu/CF/CF0002595/Goss_Patricia_A_200905_MEd.pdf
dc.identifier.citationGrabe, W., & Stoller, F. L. (2002). Teaching and researching reading. New York: Pearson Education.
dc.identifier.citationGrabe, W., & Stroller, F. L. (2001). Reading for academc purposes: Guidelines for the ESL/EFL teacher. In M. Celce-Murcia, Teaching English as a second language or foreign language (3 ed., pp. 187-203). Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle.
dc.identifier.citationGraphic Organizers. (n.d). LD School. Retrieved Noviembre 27, 2015, from http://s3.amazonaws.com/heroku-ldatschool/wpcontent/uploads/2016/07/12201518/Graphic-organizers.pdf
dc.identifier.citationGray, J., & Campbell-Evans, G. (2002). Beginning teachers as teachers-researchers. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 27(1).
dc.identifier.citationHammerman, E. L. (2009). Formative assessment strategies for enhanced learning in Science, K-8. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
dc.identifier.citationHibbard, K. M., & Wagner, E. A. (2003). Assessing and teaching reading comprehension and writing, K-3. Larchmont, NY: Eye on Education.
dc.identifier.citationHughes, A. (2003). Kinds of tests and testing. In Testing for Language Teachers (2 ed., pp. 11-23). Cambridge University Press.
dc.identifier.citationImprovement. (2016). Macmillan Dictionary Online. Retrieved September 9, 2016, from http://www.macmillandictionary.com/dictionary/british/improvement
dc.identifier.citationJiang, X. (2012). Effects of discourse structure graphic organizers of EFL reading comprehension. Reading in a Foreign Language, 24(1), 84-105.
dc.identifier.citationJiang, X., & Grabe, W. (2007). Graphic organizers in reading instructions: Research findings and issues. Reading in a Foreign Language, 37(2), 34-35.
dc.identifier.citationKaplan, R. B. (2002). The Oxford handbook of applied linguistics. Oxford University Press.
dc.identifier.citationKashani, M., Nikoo, F. R., & Boyandi, A. (2013). The role of schema or background knowledgge activation and graphic organizer on Iranian EFL learners' reading comprehension. European Online Journal of Natural and Social Sciences, 2(2), 229- 241
dc.identifier.citationKim, A., Vaughn, S., Wanzek, J., & Wei, S. (2004). Graphic organizers and their effects on the reading comprehension of students with LD:A synthesis of research. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 37(2), 105-118
dc.identifier.citationKintsch, W., & Van Dijk, T. A. (1978). Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Review, 85(5), 363-394
dc.identifier.citationLankshear, C., & Knobel, M. (2007). A handbook for teacher research (1 ed.). Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill International (UK) Ltd.
dc.identifier.citationLee, L. (2002). Decoding abilities in reading of ESL primary 4 children in selected schools in Kedah. University of Sains Malasya.
dc.identifier.citationLee, Y., Baylor, A. L., & Nelson, D. (2005). Supporting problem solving performance through the construction of knowledge maps. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 16(2), 117 - 131.
dc.identifier.citationLeedy, P. D., & Ormrod, J. E. (2001). Practical research: Planning and design (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merril Prentice Hall.
dc.identifier.citationLewis, J., & Ritchie, J. (2003). Qualitative research practice: A guide for social science students and researchers. London: Sage .
dc.identifier.citationMack, N., Woodsong, C., Macqueen, K., Guest, G., & Namey, E. (2005). Qualitative research methods: A data collector´s field guide. Retrieved from https://www.fhi360.org/sites/default/files/media/documents/Qualitative%20Research% 20Methods%20-%20A%20Data%20Collector's%20Field%20Guide.pdf
dc.identifier.citationMcElroy, L. T., & Coughlin, C. N. (2009). The other side of the story: Using graphic organizers as cognitive learning tools to teach students to construct effective analysis. Unpublished thesis, University of Baltimore, Baltimore
dc.identifier.citationMeyen, E. L., Vergason, G. A., & Whelan, R. J. (1996). Strategies for teaching exceptional children in inclusive setting. Denver, CO: Love.
dc.identifier.citationMigyanka, M. J., Policastro, C., & Lui, G. (2005). Using a think-aloud with diverse students: Three primary grade students experience chrysanthemum. Early Childhood Education Journal, 33(3), 171-177
dc.identifier.citationMikulecky, B. S. (2008). Teaching reading in second language. ESL Magazine, 68(3-4), 10- 11
dc.identifier.citationMuniz, J. S. (2015). How do graphic organizers and multiple response strategies help ELL students comprehend text. Retrieved January 17, 2017, from https://search-proquestcom.ez.unisabana.edu.co/docview/1654781282?accountid=45375
dc.identifier.citationNational Reading Panel (U.S.); National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (U.S). (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel: Teaching children to read : an evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. Washington, D.C.: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health
dc.identifier.citationNovak, J. D., & Cañas, A. J. (2006). The theory underlying concept maps and how to construt them. Technical Report IHMC Cmap Tools, Institute for Human and Machine Cognition, Florida.
dc.identifier.citationNuttall, C. (1996). Teaching reading skills in a foreign language (2nd ed.). Oxford: Heinemann.
dc.identifier.citationOduke, O. (2014). Learning French oral skills using role play as a learning strattegy: The Kenyan experience. Hamburg, Germany: Anchor.
dc.identifier.citationOlsen, W. (2004). Triangualtion in social research: Qualitative and quantitative methods can really be mixed. Retrieved August 15, 2016, from http://research.apc.org/images/5/54/Triangulation.pdf
dc.identifier.citationPang, Y. (2013). Graphic organizers and other visual strategies to improve young ELLs´reading comprehension. New England Reading Association Journal, 48(2), 52- 58.
dc.identifier.citationParan, A. (2003). Intensive reading. English Teaching Professional, 28, 40-48.
dc.identifier.citationPatton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3 ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
dc.identifier.citationPressley, M. (1997). The cognitive science of reading. Contemporary Educational Psychology(22), 247-259.
dc.identifier.citationRayner, K., & Pollastek, F. (1989). The psychology of reading. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
dc.identifier.citationReyes, A. (2011). Connecting knowledge for text construction through the use of graphic organizers. Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal, 13(1), 7-19.
dc.identifier.citationRoa, P. (2011). Impact of graphic organizers in reading comprehension and summarization. Master's disertation, Universidad de la Sabana, Bogota.
dc.identifier.citationRobinson, D. H., & Kiewra, K. A. (1995). Visual argument: Graphic organizers are superior to outlines in improving learning from text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87(3), 455-467
dc.identifier.citationRobinson, D. H., Katayama, A. D., Beth, A., Odom, S., Ya-ping, H., & Vanderveen, A. (2006). Increasing text comprehension and graphic note taking using a partial graphic organizer. Journal of Education Research, 100(2), 103-111.
dc.identifier.citationRudell, R. B., & Unrau, N. J. (1995). Reading as a meaning-construction process: the reader, the text and the teacher. In R. B. Rudell, M. R. Rudell, & H. Singer (Eds.), Theoretical Models and Processes of Reading. Newark: International Reading Association
dc.identifier.citationRumelhart, D. E. (1980). Schemata: the building blocks of cognition. In R. J. Spiro, & et al (Eds.), Theoretical Issues in Reading Comprehension. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
dc.identifier.citationShaw, S., Nihalani, P., Mayrath, M., & Robinson, D. H. (2012). Graphic organizers or graphic overviews? Educational Technology, Research and Development, 60(5), 807-820
dc.identifier.citationSolomon, P. (2012). The effects of graphic organizers on improving the summarizing shills of fourth grade students. Retrieved January 17, 2017, from https://search-proquestcom.ez.unisabana.edu.co/docview/928947623?accountid=45375
dc.identifier.citationSuarez, K. (2011). Graphic organizers and higher order thinking skills with nonfiction text. Retrieved September 26, 2016, from https://search-proquestcom.ez.unisabana.edu.co/docview/910282536?accountid=45375
dc.identifier.citationTang, G. (1992). The effect of graphic representations of knowledge structures on ESL reading comprehension. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 14, 177-195.
dc.identifier.citationThomas, D. R. (2006). A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. American Journal of Evaluation, 27, 237-246.
dc.identifier.citationUniversity, T. (n.d). Reasearcher log. Retrieved April 26, 2016, from www.tarleton.edu/departments/library/library_module/unit3/3log_lm.html
dc.identifier.citationVacha-Haase, T., Henson, R. K., & Caruso, J. C. (2002). Releability generalization: Moving toward improved understanding and use of score reliability. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 62, 562-569.
dc.identifier.citationVan den Broek, P., & Kremer, K. E. (2000). The mind in action: What it means to comprehend during reading. In M. F. Taylor, F. Graves, & P. Den Broek (Eds.), Reading for meaning: Fostering comprehension in the middle grades. Newark: International Reading Association.
dc.identifier.citationVan Patten, B. (2002). Communicative classrooms, processing instruction, and pedagogical norms. In S. Gass, K. Bardovi-Harlig, S. Sieloff Magnan, & J. Walz (Eds.), Pedagogical norms for second and foreign language learning and teaching: Studies in honour of Albert Valdam (pp. 105-118). Amsterdan: John Benjamins.
dc.identifier.citationWillis, J. (2008). Teaching the brain to read. Alexandria, VA: Association for supervision and curriculum development
dc.identifier.citationWinter, G. (2000). A comprative discussion of notion of validity in qualitative and quantitative research. The Qualitative Report, 4(3)
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10818/31908
dc.description95 Páginas.es_CO
dc.description.abstractEste estudio cualitativo se enfocó en la identificación de la utilidad de los organizadores gráficos para el mejoramiento de las habilidades de comprensión lectora de un grupo de 15 estudiantes en un colegio en la ciudad de Neiva – Colombia. El objetivo general de este estudio fue reconocer la efectividad de los organizadores gráficos para identificar las ideas principales y secundarias y si había alguna mejora en otra habilidad de comprensión lectora. La información fue recolectada a través de cuestionarios, el uso de organizadores gráficos, anotaciones de los estudiantes y tests de conocimiento. Se encontró que los estudiantes necesitaban entrenamiento en el uso de los organizadores gráficos ya que ellos no los habían usado previamente; pero cuando ellos habían aprendido a usarlos, muchos estudiantes fueron capaces de superar sus dificultades en la comprensión de textos cuando leen textos diseñados para el aprendizaje de inglés como lengua extranjera. De hecho, muchos estudiantes fueron capaces de identificar las ideas principales y secundarias, realizar resúmenes y obtener conclusiones de los textos proveídos.es_CO
dc.formatapplication/pdfes_CO
dc.language.isoenges_CO
dc.publisherUniversidad de La Sabanaes_CO
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.sourceUniversidad de La Sabana
dc.sourceIntellectum Repositorio Universidad de La Sabana
dc.subjectComprensión de lectura
dc.subjectLectura -- Enseñnaza
dc.subjectDesarrollo de la lectura
dc.subjectLectura -- Pruebas de aptitud
dc.titleImproving main and supporting ideas identification, summarizing and drawing conclusions skills through graphic organizerses_CO
dc.typemasterThesises_CO
dc.publisher.programMaestría en Didáctica del Inglés con Énfasis en Ambientes de Aprendizaje Autónomoes_CO
dc.publisher.departmentDepartamento de Lenguas y Culturas Extranjerases_CO
dc.identifier.local266829
dc.identifier.localTE09349
dc.type.localTesis de maestría
dc.type.hasVersionpublishedVersiones_CO
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccesses_CO
dc.creator.degreeMagíster en Didáctica del Inglés con Énfasis en Ambientes de Aprendizaje Autónomoes_CO


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 InternationalExcepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International