Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

How may the use of organizational note-taking strategies through processor-based activities help in formal letter writing

dc.contributor.advisorÁlvarez Ayure, Claudia Patricia
dc.contributor.authorCárdenas Bello, Jaime
dc.date.accessioned2012-07-24T19:25:09Z
dc.date.available2012-07-24T19:25:09Z
dc.date.created2012-07-24
dc.date.issued2011
dc.identifier.citationAmberg, J. (1993). The learning skills handbook. /Glenview, IIl,: Goodyear Books/Scott Foresman
dc.identifier.citationAnderson, N. J. (1999). Exploring second language reading: Issues and strategies. Boston: Heinle&Heinle.
dc.identifier.citationAndrade, H., &Valtcheva, A. (2009). Promoting learning and achievement through self-assessment. Theory into practice, 48(1), pages. Retrieved from http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00405840802577544#preview
dc.identifier.citationApplebee, A. N., &Langer, J. A. (2006). The State of Writing Instruction in America’s Schools: What Existing Data Tell Us. Albany, NY: Center on English Learning &Achievement, University at Albany
dc.identifier.citationAriza, A. (2005). The process-writing approach: An alternative to guide the students’ compositions. Profile, (6), pages 37-46. Retrieved from http://www.scielo.unal.edu.co/scielo.php?pid=S1657- 07902005000100004&script=sci_arttext
dc.identifier.citationArmstrong, A. & Casement, C. (2000). The child and the machine. Beltsville, MA: Robins Lane Press.
dc.identifier.citationAuerbach, C. F. & Silverstein L. B. (2003). Qualitative data: An introduction to coding and analysis. New York, NY: NYU Press.
dc.identifier.citationBadger, R. &White, G. (2000). A process genre approach to teaching writing. ELT Journal, 54(2), 153- 160. Retrieved from http://eltj.oxfordjournals.org/content/54/2.toc
dc.identifier.citationBandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
dc.identifier.citationBangert-Drowns, R.L. (1993). The word processor as an instructional tool: A meta-analysis of word processing in writing instruction. Review of Educational Research,(63), 69-93.
dc.identifier.citationBeatty, K. (2003). Teaching and researching computer-assisted language learning. Location: Pearson Education Limited.
dc.identifier.citationBello, T. (1997). Improving ESL learners' writing skills. ERIC Digest. Washington, DC: National Clearinghouse for ESL Literacy Education. (ED No. 409 746)
dc.identifier.citationBereiter, C. & Scardamalia, M. (1987). The psychology of written composition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
dc.identifier.citationBoch, F. (2004). Note-taking and learning: A summary of research. Retrieved from http://wac.colostate.edu/journal/vol16/boch.pdf
dc.identifier.citationBrown, H, D. (2007). Principles of language learning and teaching (5thEd.). Location: Prentice Hall
dc.identifier.citationBurns, A. (1999). Collaborative action research for English language teachers. Cambridge, NY: Cambridge Language Teaching Library
dc.identifier.citationBurns, A. (2010). Doing action research in English language teaching: A guide for practitioners. New York, NY: Routledge.
dc.identifier.citationCamelo, M.J. (2010). Using metacognitive processes to improve students’ writing quality. Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal12 (1),54-69. Retrieved from http://revistas.udistrital.edu.co/ojs/index.php/calj/issue/view/14/showToc
dc.identifier.citationChamot, A. (1999). Learning strategy instruction in the English classroom. Retrieved from http://www.jalt-publications.org/tlt/articles/1999/06/chamot
dc.identifier.citationChamot, A., Barnhardt, S., El-Dinary, P.B., &Robbins, J. (1999).The learning strategies handbook. Location: Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.
dc.identifier.citationCohen, A.D. (1998).Strategies in learning and using a second language. London, UK: Longman
dc.identifier.citationCohen, L. &Manion, L. (1996). Research methods in education (4th Ed.). London, Routledge.
dc.identifier.citationCole, M., & Engestrom, Y. (1993). A cultural approach to distributed cognition. In G.Salomon (Ed.), Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations (1-46). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press
dc.identifier.citationColombia. Ministerio de Educación Nacional [men]. (2006b). Estándares básicos de competencias en lengua extranjera: inglés. Formar en lenguas extranjeras: el reto. Retrieved from: http://www.mineducacion.gov.co/cvn/1665/article-115174.html
dc.identifier.citationCorbin, J. & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research 3e. Location: Sage Publications.Creswell, J. W. (1994). Research design: Qualitative & quantitative approaches. Thousand Oaks,CA: Sage.
dc.identifier.citationDaniels, A. (2004). Composition instruction: Using technology to motivate students to write. Information Technology in Childhood Education Annual, 1, 155-177.
dc.identifier.citationDenzin, N.K. &Lincoln, Y.S. (2000). Handbook of Qualitative Research. London: Sage Publications.
dc.identifier.citationDíaz, G. M. (2010). Peer editing: A strategic source in EFL students’ writing process. Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal, (12), 85-98. Retrieved from http://revistas.udistrital.edu.co/ojs/index.php/calj/issue/view/14/showToc
dc.identifier.citationDörnyei, Z. &Csizér, K. (1998). Ten Commandments for motivating language learners: Results of an empirical study. Language Teaching Research, 2, 203-229.
dc.identifier.citationDowling, S. (2010). Using webquests and electronic journals to cultivate writing skills. Higher colleges of technology. Retrieved from: http://marifa.hct.ac.ae/2010/109
dc.identifier.citationDudeney, G. &Hockly, N. (2007). How to teach English with technology. Location: Pearson Education Limited.
dc.identifier.citationDweck, C. (1999) Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality and development. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
dc.identifier.citationFandiño, Y. (2010). Explicit teaching of socio-affective language learning strategies to beginner EFL Students. Ikala, 15(24), 145-169. Retrieved from http://aprendeenlinea.udea.edu.co/revistas/index.php/ikala/article/view/5099
dc.identifier.citationFerris, D., & Roberts, B. (2001). Error feedback in L2 writing classes: How explicit does it need to be? Journal of Second Language Writing, 10, 161-184
dc.identifier.citationFlower, L., Shriver, K., Carey, L., Haas, C., &Hayes, J.R. (1992).Planning in writing the cognition of a constructive process. Retrieved from http://books.google.com.co/books?hl=es&lr=&id=EpA3cTT6iskC&oi=fnd&pg=PA181&dq=outlining+ in+process+writing&ots=LYlYpoHgr3&sig=1rWi4xlMrWDhdwJPzEd0ABRLqlw#v=onepage& q=outlining%20in%20process%20writing&f=false
dc.identifier.citationFlower, L.S. & Hayes, J.R. (1980a). The dynamics of composing: Making plans and juggling constraints. In L.W. Gregg, & E.R. Steinberg (Eds.), Cognitive processes in writing. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
dc.identifier.citationFreeman, D. (1998).Doing teacher-research: From inquiry to understanding.Location: HeinleThomson
dc.identifier.citationGoodrich, H. (1997). Understanding rubrics. Educational Leadership, 54(4), 14–17.
dc.identifier.citationGoldberg, A., Russell, M., & Cook, A. (2003). The effect of computers on student writing: A metaanalysis of studies from 1992 to 2002. Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 2(1), page numbers. Retrieved from http://www.jtla.org
dc.identifier.citationGraham, S., Harris, K.R., & Mason, L. (2005). Improving the writing, knowledge, and motivation of struggling young writers: Effects of self-regulated strategy development with and without peer support. American Educational Research Journal, volume 43(2), 295-340.Retrieved from http://aer.sagepub.com/content/43/2/295.abstract
dc.identifier.citationGraham, S., &Perin, D. (2007).Writing next: Effective strategies to improve writing of adolescents in middle and high schools – A report to Carnegie Corporation of New York. Washington, DC: Alliance for Excellent Education.
dc.identifier.citationGraham, S. &Perin, D. (2007). A meta-analysis of writing instruction for adolescent students. Journal of Educational Psychology,99(3), 445-476. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.99.3.445
dc.identifier.citationHairston, M. (1982).The winds of change: Thomas Kuhn and the revolution in the teaching of writing. College Composition and Communication, 33, 76-78
dc.identifier.citationHarmer, J. (1998).How to teach English. Location: Pearson Longman.Hayes, J., & Flower, L. (1987). On the structure of the writing process.7 (4), 19-30
dc.identifier.citationHedge, T. (2005). Writing (2nd Ed.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
dc.identifier.citationHedge, T. (1988). Writing. Oxford: Oxford, UK: University Press.
dc.identifier.citationHolmes, N. (2004). The use of a process oriented approach to facilitate the planning and production stages of writing for adult students of English as a Foreign or Second Language. Retrieved from: http://www.developingteachers.com/articles_tchtraining/processw2_nicola.htm
dc.identifier.citationHyland, K. (2006). English for specific purposes: Some influences and impacts. In A. Cummins & C. Davison (Eds.), The international handbook of English language education (pp. 379-390). Norwell, Mass: Springer.
dc.identifier.citationHopkins, D. (2008). A teacher’s guide to classroom research. Location: Open University Press.
dc.identifier.citationHubbard, R. & Miller, B. (1993). The art of classroom inquiry: A handbook for teacherresearchers.New Hampshire: Heinemann
dc.identifier.citationHübner, S., Nückles, M., &Renkl, A. (2009), Writing learning journals: Instructional support to overcome learning‐strategy deficits. Learning and instruction, volume 20, Issue 1,18- 29.doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2008.12.001.
dc.identifier.citationJaramillo, L., & Medina Gutiérrez, A.S. (2011). Adolescents’ awareness of environmental care: Experiences when writing short descriptive texts in English. Profile, (13)1, 37-46. Retrieved from http://www.revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/profile/issue/view/1937/showToc
dc.identifier.citationKauffman, D.F. (2004). Self-regulated learning in web-based environments: Instructional tools designed to facilitate cognitive strategy use, metacognitive processing, and motivational beliefs. Journal of Educational Computer Research, 30(1-2), 139-161.Retrieved from http://baywood.metapress.com/openurl.asp?genre=article&id=doi:10.2190/AX2D-Y9VM-V7PX0TAD
dc.identifier.citationKelly. K. (2002). Computer- assisted writing instruction: A marriage of effective instruction and technology. Vol, 1(2), 1-12. Retrieved from: http://teach.valdosta.edu/are/vol1no2/litrev/KarenKelly.pdf
dc.identifier.citationKemmis, S. &MacTaggart, R. (1988). The Action research planner. Location: Deakin University Press.
dc.identifier.citationKieft, M. &Rijlaarsdam,G. (2006). Writing as a tool: Testing the role of students writing strategies. European Journal of Psycology of Education, 21(XXI (1)), 17-34. Retrieved from: http://www.hum.uu.nl/medewerkers/bergh102/Language%20Education/Artikelen/Kieft.pdf
dc.identifier.citationKrashen, S. (1984). Writing: Research, theory and applications. Hayward, CA: Alemany.
dc.identifier.citationKroll, B. (2003). Exploring the dynamics of second language writing. Cambridge, NY: Cambridge University Press.
dc.identifier.citationKrueger, R.A. & Casey, M.A. (2009). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research. Location: Sage.
dc.identifier.citationLee, K. W. (2000). English teachers' barriers to the use of computer-assisted language learning.Internet TESOL Journal, 6(12). Retrieved from:http://iteslj.org/Articles/Lee-CALLbarriers. html
dc.identifier.citationERIC Clearinghouse on Reading, English, and Communication(1995). Revision in the writing process. Bloomington, IN:Lehr.
dc.identifier.citationMcKenzie, J. (1991). Measuring Results: What happens to student writing with the word processor? Retrieved from: http://www.fromnowon.org/fnojun91.html
dc.identifier.citationMcKernan, J. (1996). Curriculum action research: A handbook of methods and resourcesfor the reflective practitioner. Location:Routhledge, Taylor &Francis Group.
dc.identifier.citationMcMullen, G.M. (2009). Using language learning strategies to improve the writing skills of Saudi EFL students. Science Direct System, 37,418-433.
dc.identifier.citationMendoza, L. E. (2005). Current state of the teaching of process writing in EFL Classes. An observational study in the last two years of secondary school. Profile, volume (6), 23-36.
dc.identifier.citationMi-Jeong, K. (2006). Process approach to the teaching of EFL writing. Journal of British & American Studies, 14,113-136.
dc.identifier.citationMitchell, S. V. (1996). Rethinking foreign language writing. Location: Heinle&Heinle Publishers.
dc.identifier.citationMu, C. & Carrington, S. (2007). An investigation of three Chinese students’ English writing strategies. TESL-EJ 11(1), 1-23.
dc.identifier.citationMuñoz, J.E. (2010). Instructional materials: A platform to enhance cognitive skills and writing development. Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal, (12), 27-53
dc.identifier.citationNational Council of Teachers of English. (2007).How writing shapes thinking: A study of teaching and learning. Urbana, IL:Langer and Applebee.
dc.identifier.citationNicol,D. J. &Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2006).Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education. 31(2)199-218.
dc.identifier.citationNunan, D. (1991). Language Teaching Methodology. Location: Prentice Hall International.
dc.identifier.citationO’ Malley, J.M., Chamot, A.U., Stewner-Manzanares, G., Kupper, L., & Russo, R. (1985). Learning strategy applications with students of English as a second anguage. TESOL Quarterly,19, 285- 296
dc.identifier.citationOxford, R. (1990a). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. New York: Newbury House.
dc.identifier.citationPajares, F. (2003). Self-efficacy beliefs, motivation and achievement in writing. Reading and writing Quarterly, 19, 139-158.
dc.identifier.citationPea, R.D. (1993).Practices of distributed intelligence and designs for education. In G. Salomon (Ed.), Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations(pp.47-87). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press
dc.identifier.citationPennington, M. C. (1996). Writing the natural way: On computer. Computer Assisted Language Learning. Retrieved from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0958822960090205
dc.identifier.citationRaimes, A. (2008). Keys for writers.Location: Wadsworth.
dc.identifier.citationRaimes, A. (1998).Exploring through writing: A process approach to ESL composition.(2nd Ed.).New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
dc.identifier.citationRiazi, A. (1997). Acquiring disciplinary literacy: A social-cognitive analysis of text production and learning among Iranian graduate students of education. Journal of Second Language Writing, 6(2), 105-137.
dc.identifier.citationRivers, W. (2001).Autonomy at all costs: Ethnography of metacognitive self-assessment and selfmanagement among experienced language learners. Modern Language Journal85 (2), 279-290.
dc.identifier.citationRogers, A. (2008). Using technology to facilitate process writing and interaction. Profile Issues in Teachers´ Professional Development, 9,197-218.
dc.identifier.citationSalomon, G., Kosminsky, E., &Asaf, M. (2003). Computers and Writing. In T. Nunes & Bryant,P. (Eds.),Handbook of children's literacy(pp. 409-442). London, UK: Kluwer.
dc.identifier.citationScott, V.M. (1996). Rethinking foreign language writing. Location: Heinle&Heinle Publishers.
dc.identifier.citationSeliger, H.W., & Shohamy, E. (1989). Second language research methods. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
dc.identifier.citationSilva, T., & Matsuda, P. K. (2001).On second language writing. Location: Lawrence Eribaum Associates, Inc.
dc.identifier.citationSilva, T. (1990). Second language composition instruction: Development, issues, and directions in ESL. In B. Kroll (Ed.), Second language writing: Research insights for the classroom (pp. 11–23). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
dc.identifier.citationStrauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). "Grounded Theory Research: Procedures, Canons and Evaluative Criteria”. Retrieved from: http://www.mendeley.com/research/grounded-theory-researchprocedures-canons-and-evaluative-criteria/
dc.identifier.citationStrauss, A., & Corbin, J. (2008) Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory applications and techniques. London, UK: Sage Publications
dc.identifier.citationTracy, B., Reid, R., & Graham, S. (2009). Teaching young students strategies for planning and drafting stories: The impact of self-regulated strategy development. Journal of Educational Research,102(5), 323-332
dc.identifier.citationTribble, C. (1996). Writing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
dc.identifier.citationUlusoy, M. (2006). The role of computers in writing process. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology,(5)4, 58-66.
dc.identifier.citationVan Lier, L (2000). From input to affordance: Social-interactive learning from an ecological perspective. In J.P. Lantolf (Ed.). Socio-cultural theory and second language learning: Recent advances (pp. 245-259). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
dc.identifier.citationVokic, G. (2008). Feedback in L2 writing: The students’ perspective. Porta linguarum 9,139-155. Retrieved from http://www.ugr.es/~portalin/articulos/PL_numero9/10%20Gabriela.pdf
dc.identifier.citationWallace, M.J. (1998). Action research for language teachers. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press
dc.identifier.citationWarschauer, M. (1997). Computer-mediated collaborative learning: Theory and practice. The Modern Language Journal, 81(4), 470–481. Retrieved from http://scholarspace.manoa.hawaii.edu/bitstream/10125/10585/1/RN17.pdf
dc.identifier.citationWenden, A. L. (1991). Metacognitive strategies in L2 writing: A case for task knowledge. In J. E. Alatis (Ed.), Georgetown University Round Table on Languages and Linguistics (pp. 302-322). Washington, D.C., USA: Georgetown University Press.
dc.identifier.citationWong, C.J. (1996). Computer grammarcheckers and teaching ESL writing. Retrieved from : http://commons.ucalgary.ca/at-wld/includes/relResearch06/ESL_Lit_Review.pdf
dc.identifier.citationWoolfolk, A. (2001).Educational psychology (8th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.Zamel, V. (1987).Recent research on writing pedagogy.TESOL Quarterly, 21(4), 679–715.
dc.identifier.citationZimmerman, B. J., &Risemberg, R. (1997). Caveats and recommendations about self-regulation of writing: A social cognitive rejoinder. ContemporaryEducationalPsychology, 22, 115-122
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10818/3162
dc.description121 Páginas.
dc.description.abstractEl objetivo de éste estudio es determinar si escribir con procesadores de texto y mediante el uso de determinadas estrategias de escritura cambia la calidad presenta de cambios en cartas escritas por estudiantes de séptimo grado en un colegio de carácter privado en la ciudad de Bogotá. En este estudio de investigación-acción la información fue recolectada mediante cuestionarios, diarios y entrevistas de grupo. Los resultados reflejan los cambios en la motivación derivados de la concientización de los estudiantes en los procesos de escritura, y los beneficios de la retro-alimentación y la auto-regulación de los estudiantes. Asimismo, en los resultados se puede evidenciar las mejoras en la calidad de sus cartas en aspectos tales como son la organización del texto, organización de párrafos. Además, los resultados de la retroalimentación del docente y retroalimentación de parejas se beneficiaron por los efectos positivos en factores emotivos que les ayudaron en el proceso de escritura. Estos factores les permitieron escribir textos de mayor extensión y les dieron mayor confianza en el proceso de escritura en la legua extranjera.es_CO
dc.language.isoenges_CO
dc.publisherUniversidad de La Sabana
dc.sourceUniversidad de La Sabana
dc.sourceIntellectum Repositorio Universidad de La Sabana
dc.subjectEscritura-Enseñanza con ayuda de computadoreses_CO
dc.subjectEscritura-Destreza manuales_CO
dc.subjectEscritura-Editores de textoes_CO
dc.titleHow may the use of organizational note-taking strategies through processor-based activities help in formal letter writinges_CO
dc.typemasterThesis
dc.publisher.programMaestría en Didáctica del Inglés con Énfasis en Ambientes de Aprendizaje Autónomo
dc.publisher.departmentDepartamento de Lenguas y Culturas Extranjeras
dc.identifier.local157710
dc.identifier.localTE05542
dc.type.localTesis de maestría
dc.type.hasVersionpublishedVersion
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccess
dc.creator.degreeMagíster en Didáctica del Inglés con Énfasis en Ambientes de Aprendizaje Autónomo


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail
Nombre:
Jaime_C_rdenas_Bello.pdf
Tamaño:
1.643Mb
Formato:
PDF
Descripción:
Ver documento en PDF
Ver/

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem