Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.advisorGuevara Castañeda, Diego Alejandro
dc.contributor.authorBarbano Fernández, Stefano
dc.date.accessioned2016-12-12T15:05:12Z
dc.date.available2016-12-12T15:05:12Z
dc.date.created2016-12-12
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.citationAcemoglu, D., Johnson, S., and Robinson, J. A. (2005). Institutions as a fundamental cause of long-run growth. Handbook of economic growth, 1:385–472.
dc.identifier.citationAshenfelter, O. and Card, D. (2010). HANDBOOK OF LABOR ECONOMICS, VOL 4A, volume 4. Elsevier.
dc.identifier.citationAtkinson, A. B., Piketty, T., and Saez, E. (2011). Top incomes in the long run of history. Journal of economic literature, 49(1):3–71.
dc.identifier.citationAutor, D. (2014a). Polanyi’s paradox and the shape of employment growth. Number 20485. National Bureau of Economic Research.
dc.identifier.citationAutor, D., Katz, L. F., and Kearney, M. S. (2008). Trends in us wage inequality: Revising the revisionists. The Review of economics and statistics, 90(2):300–323.
dc.identifier.citationAutor, D. H. (2014b). Skills, education, and the rise of earnings inequality among the” other 99 percent”.
dc.identifier.citationBaldwin, R. E. et al. (2003). Decline of us labor unions and the role of trade, the. Peterson Institute Press: All Books.
dc.identifier.citationDavid, H. and Dorn, D. (2013). The growth of low-skill service jobs and the polarization of the us labor market. The American Economic Review, 103(5):1553–1597.
dc.identifier.citationDavid, H., Katz, L. F., and Krueger, A. B. (1997). Computing inequality: have computers changed the labor market? Technical report, National Bureau of Economic Research.
dc.identifier.citationIssa, E. E. (2015). 2015 american household credit card debt study.
dc.identifier.citationKatz, Lawrence F, D. H., , and Kearney, M. S. (2006). The polarization of the us labor market. Technical report, National Bureau of Economic Research.
dc.identifier.citationKatz, Lawrence F, G. C. (2007). Long-run changes in the us wage structure: narrowing, widening, polarizing. Technical report, National Bureau of Economic Research.
dc.identifier.citationKatz, L. and Autor, D. (1999). Changes in the wage structure and earnings inequality. Handbook of labor economics, 3:1463–1555.
dc.identifier.citationPiketty, T. and Saez, E. (2001). Income inequality in the united states, 1913-1998 (series updated to 2000 available). Technical report, National bureau of economic research.
dc.identifier.citationReich, R. (2013). Inequality for all. 72 Productions.
dc.identifier.citationRosenfeld, J. (2010). Little labor: How union decline is changing the american landscape. Pathways, 3:3–6.
dc.identifier.citationStiglitz, J. E. (1984). Equilibrium wage distributions.
dc.identifier.citationStiglitz, J. E. (2012). The price of inequality: How today’s divided society endangers our future. WW Norton & Company.
dc.identifier.citationStiglitz, J. E. (2016). America’s great malaise and what to do about it. Journal of Policy Modeling.
dc.identifier.citationWallerstein, M. and Western, B. (2000). Unions in decline? what has changed and why. Annual Review of Political Science, 3(1):355–377.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10818/29090
dc.description25 Páginas.es_CO
dc.description.abstractThis paper analyzes an evolution in the US wage structure. Looking to understand the rise of the top 1% and a weakening middle class. We document how different factors helped change the American economy and displaced income to the upper tail of the distribution. Furthermore the shift in the labor market was found to be a complete shock to the common American worker. The idea of this paper is not to solve this issue, because as you read along you will understand how their is not just one reason at fault here which would mean we need to look at many solution that would work in conjunction. We look to understand the problem and offer constructive criticism to enact change. Starting from the 1980‘s research about US wage inequality has been extensive with empirical and theoretical contributions from economists such as David Autor, Daron Acemoglu, Anthony Atkinson, Leonard Katz, Joseph Stiglitz and Piketty. To further simplify the amount of information at hand, this paper is organized in the following way. First I will show based on the thinking of notorious authors what happened. Later on we will discuss why it happened. In the second section I will start by showing the main theories behind why income inequality happened. Later I will attempt to add my grain of sand to the dessert of ideas that try to explain this phenomenon.es_CO
dc.language.isospaes_CO
dc.publisherUniversidad de La Sabanaes_CO
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.sourceUniversidad de La Sabana
dc.sourceIntellectum Repositorio Universidad de la Sabana
dc.subjectSalarios -- Estados Unidos
dc.subjectDeducciones salariales -- Estados Unidos
dc.subjectEconomía -- Estados Unidos
dc.subjectCiclos económicos
dc.titleIncome Inequality: How did it get to this point?es_CO
dc.typebachelorThesises_CO
dc.publisher.programEconomía y Finanzas Internacionales
dc.publisher.departmentEscuela Internacional de Ciencias Económicas y Administrativas
dc.identifier.local263108
dc.identifier.localTE08807
dc.type.localTesis de pregrado
dc.type.hasVersionpublishedVersion
dc.rights.accessRightsrestrictedAccess
dc.creator.degreeEconomista con énfasis en Finanzas Internacionales.


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 InternationalExcepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International