Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Grammatical accuracy improvement in virtual learning environments using screencast feedback

dc.contributor.advisorAcero Ríos, Claudia Lucía
dc.contributor.authorCuéllar Sánchez, Diana Mireya
dc.date.accessioned2016-11-04T13:11:06Z
dc.date.available2016-11-04T13:11:06Z
dc.date.created2016
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.citationAlvira, R. (2013). The impact of direct, coded, oral and written feedback on the improvement of paragraph writing of B1 level EFL students at university level (Master’s thesis). Universidad de La Sabana, Chia.
dc.identifier.citationAhangari, S., & Barghi, A. (2012). Consistency of Measured Accuracy in Grammar Knowledge Tests and Writing: TOEFL PBT. Language Testing in Asia, 2(2). Retrieved from http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/2229-0443-2-2-5
dc.identifier.citationBaker, J., Brizee, A., & Angeli, E. (2013). Descriptive Essays. Retrieved from: https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/685/03/
dc.identifier.citationBarajas, M., & Owen, M. (2000). Implementing virtual learning environments: Looking for holistic approach. Educational Technology & Society, 3(3). Retrieved from http://www.ifets.info/journals/3_3/barajas.html
dc.identifier.citationBritish Council. (n.d.). Accuracy. Retrieved from https://www.teachingenglish.org.uk/article/accuracy
dc.identifier.citationBritish Broadcasting Company. (2011). Understanding different types of text. Retrieved from http://downloads.bbc.co.uk/skillswise/english/en03text/factsheet/en03text-e3- f-different-types-of-text.pdf
dc.identifier.citationBrookhart, S., (2008). How to Give Effective Feedback to Your Students. Virginia: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
dc.identifier.citationBuley-Meissner, M. L. (1981). Error Analysis in Basic Writing. Washington D.C.: ERIC Clearinghouse.
dc.identifier.citationCambridge Online Dictionary. (n.d.). Accuracy. Retrieved from http://dictionary.cambridge.org/es/diccionario/ingles/accuracy
dc.identifier.citationCardona, J., & Novoa A. (2013). The Development of Student Self-efficacy through Modeling Strategies for Writing Skills. (Master’s thesis). Universidad de La Sabana, Chia.
dc.identifier.citationCavanaugh, A. J., & Song, L. (2014). Audio feedback versus written feedback: Instructors' and students' perspectives. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 122-138. Retrieved from: http://jolt.merlot.org/vol10no1/cavanaugh_0314.pdf
dc.identifier.citationCelce-Murcia, M. (1991). Grammar pedagogy in second and foreign language teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 459-480.
dc.identifier.citationCleary, Y. (2012). Online support for students’ writing skills development in a technical communication introductory module. In Information Resource management Association (Eds.), Virtual Learning Environment: Concepts, methodologies, tools and applications (pp. 772-785). Pennsylvania: Information Science Reference.
dc.identifier.citationCorder, S. (1967). The significance of learner's errors. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 4, 161-169.
dc.identifier.citationCouncil of Europe. (2002). Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge, U.K: Cambridge University Press.
dc.identifier.citationCreswell, J. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches. (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
dc.identifier.citationDillenbourg, P. (2000). Learning in the new millennium: Building new education strategies for schools. Workshop on Virtual learning environment. EUN Conference. Retrieved from http://tecfa.unige.ch/tecfa/publicat/dil-papers-2/Dil.7.5.18.pdf
dc.identifier.citationDörnyei, Z. (2007). Research Methods in Applied Linguistics. New York: Oxford University Press.
dc.identifier.citationEdwards, K., Dujardin, A., & Williams, N. (2012). Screencast feedback for essays on a distance learning MA in professional communication: An action research project. Journal of Academic Writing, 2 (1), 95–126.
dc.identifier.citationEllis, A., Standal, T., & Rummel, M. K. (1989). Elementary language arts instruction. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
dc.identifier.citationEllis, R. (2006). Current Issues in the Teaching of Grammar: An SLA Perspective. TESOL Quarterly, 40(1), 83–107.
dc.identifier.citationEllis, R. (2009). A typology of written corrective feedback types. ELT Journal, 63(2). doi:10.1093/elt/ccn023
dc.identifier.citationFirkins, A., Forey G. & Sengupta, S. (2007). Teaching writing to low proficiency EFL students. ELT Journal, 61 (4), 367-368. doi:10.1093/elt/ccm055
dc.identifier.citationGearhart, D. (2008). Understanding flexible learning theory nd how it is used in online learning. In R. Z. Zheng, & S. P. Ferris. Understanding online instructional modeling: Theories and practices (pp. 288). New York: Information Science Reference.
dc.identifier.citationHarmer, J. (2001). The practice of English language teaching. (3rd Ed.). Hong Kong: Longman.
dc.identifier.citationHernandez, R, Fernandez, C., & Baptista, P. (2010). Metodología de la investigación. México: McGraw Hill.
dc.identifier.citationHinnon, A. (2010). Common errors in English writing and suggested solutions of Thai university students. Humanities and Social Science, 31(3), 165- 180
dc.identifier.citationHyland, F. & Hyland, K. (2001). Sugaring the pill: Praise and criticism in written feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing, 10, 85-202.
dc.identifier.citationHyland, K., & Hyland, F. (2006b). Feedback on second language students’ writing. Language Teaching, 39, 83-101.
dc.identifier.citationJessop, T., El Hakim, Y. and Gibbs, G. The whole is greater than the sum of its parts: a large-scale study of students' learning in response to different programme assessment patterns. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education. 39(1).73-88. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2013.792108
dc.identifier.citationKeh, C. L. (1990). Feedback in the writing process: a model and methods for implementation. ELT Journal, 44(4), 294-304. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/elt/44.4.294
dc.identifier.citationKomalasari, A. (2013). Employing experiential learning to teach writing for English as a foreign language learners through a reflection project. International Journal on Education, 1(1)
dc.identifier.citationLandazabal, D. (2006). Mediación en entornos virtuales de aprendizaje: Análisis de las estrategias metacognoscitivas y de las herramientas comunicacionales. Paper presented at the VIII Congreso Colombiano de Informática Educativa, Cali, Colombia. Abstract Retrieved from http://www.colombiaaprende.edu.co/html/mediateca/1607/articles106651_archivo.pdf
dc.identifier.citationLee, I. (2003). How Do Hong Kong English teachers correct errors in writing? Education Journal, 31(1), 153-169. Retrieved from: http://hkier.fed.cuhk.edu.hk/journal/wpcontent/uploads/2009/10/ej_v31n1_153-169.pdf
dc.identifier.citationLee, I. (2008). Student reactions to teacher feedback in two Hong Kong secondary classrooms. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17, 144–164
dc.identifier.citationLunsford, A., & Lunsford, K. (2008). Mistakes are a fact of life: A national comparative study. College Composition and Communication. Retrieved from www.csudh.edu/ccauthen/575S12/Lunsford.pdf
dc.identifier.citationMaltby, A., & Mackie, S. (2009). Virtual learning environments – Help or hindrance for the “dis-engaged” student?. ALT-J, 17(1), 49-62. doi: 10.1080/09687760802657577
dc.identifier.citationMathisen, P. (2012). Video feedback in higher education: A contribution to improving the quality of written feedback. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 7(2), 97-116.
dc.identifier.citationMiddleton, A., & Nortcliffe, A. L. (2010). Effective assignment feedback through personal digital audio engagement. In John O‟Donoghue (Ed.), Technology supported environments for personalized learning: Methods and case studies (pp. 409-428).
dc.identifier.citationMotteram, G. (Ed.). (2013). Innovations in learning technologies for English language teaching. British Council, Teaching English, 175.
dc.identifier.citationNdon, U. T. (2010). Hybrid-Context Instructional Model: The Internet and the Classrooms: The way teachers experience it. North Carolina: Information age publishing, INC
dc.identifier.citationNunan, D. (1999). Focus on language: Second language teaching and learning. Boston: Heinle Cengage Learning
dc.identifier.citationNunan, D., & Bailey, K. (2009). Exploring second language classroom research. Boston: Heinle
dc.identifier.citationO'Malley, P. J. (2011). Combining screencasting and a tablet PC to deliver personalized student feedback. New Directions, 7, 27-30.
dc.identifier.citationOxford University Press’ Online Resource Center. (2015). VLE. Retrieved from http://global.oup.com/uk/orc/learnvle/
dc.identifier.citationPeterson, S.S. & McClay, J. (2010). Assessing and providing feedback for student writing in Canadian classrooms, Assessing Writing 15, 86-99, doi: 10.1016/j.asw..2010.05.003
dc.identifier.citationPongsiriwet, C. (2001). Relationships among grammatical accuracy, discourse features, and the quality of second language writing: The case of Thai EFL learners. (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from http://wvuscholar.wvu.edu:8881/R/?func=dbin-jump-full&object_id=5939
dc.identifier.citationPuengpipattrakul. (2009). The use of journals to develop grammatical accuracy in writing. MANUSYA: Journal of Humanities Regular, 12 (2), 90-108. Retrieved from http://www.manusya.journals.chula.ac.th/files/essay/Walaipun_p.90-108_new.pdf
dc.identifier.citationRichards, J., Platt, J., & Weber, A. H. (1985). Longman dictionary of applied linguistics. London: longman
dc.identifier.citationRingbom, H. (1987). The role of first language in foreign language learning. U.S.A.: Multilingual Matters, Ltd.
dc.identifier.citationSaravia-Shore, M. (2008). Diverse Teaching Strategies for Diverse Learners. In Cole, R. W. (Eds.). Educating Everybody's Children: Diverse Teaching Strategies for Diverse Learners, Revised and Expanded. Retrieved from http://www.ascd.org/publications/books/107003/chapters/Diverse-TeachingStrategies-for-Diverse-Learners.aspx
dc.identifier.citationSchultz, J. (2000). Computers and collaborative writing in the foreign language curriculum. In M. Warschauer, & R. Kern (Eds.), (2000). Network-based language teaching: concepts and practice (pp. 121-150) Cambridge, UKg: Cambridge University Press
dc.identifier.citationSéror, J. (2012). Show me! Enhanced feedback through screencasting technology. TESL Canada Journal, 30(1), 104-116.
dc.identifier.citationSmalley, R.L., Ruetten, M.K., & Kozyrev, J.R. (2001). Refining Composition Skills (5th ed.). Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
dc.identifier.citationStevenson, M., & Liu, M. (2010). Learning a Language with Web 2.0: Exploring the use of social networking features of foreign language learning websites. CALICO Journal, 27(2), 233-259
dc.identifier.citationStrauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1994). Grounded theory methodology. In N.K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 217-285). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
dc.identifier.citationThompson R., & Lee, M. (2012). Talking with students through screencasting: experimentations with video feedback to improve student learning. The Journal of Interactive Technology and Pedagogy, 1(1).
dc.identifier.citationTurbill, J. B. & Bean, W. M. (2006). Writing Instruction K-6: Understanding process, purpose, audience. (1 ed.). Katonah, N.Y., USA: Richard C Owen Publishers, Inc.
dc.identifier.citationUniversidad Nacional Abierta y a Distancia (UNAD). (2008). Proyecto Académico Pedagógico Solidario.
dc.identifier.citationUnivio, D., & Perez, A. (2014). Ipsative assessment of essay writing to foster reflection and self-awareness of progress (Master’s thesis). Universidad de La Sabana, Chia.
dc.identifier.citationWardiman, A., Jahur, M. B., & Sukiman, M. (2008). English in focus for grade vii junior high school. Jakarta: Pusat Perbukuan Departemen Pendidikan Nasional
dc.identifier.citationWarschauer, M. (2007). Technology and writing. In C. Davidson & J. Cummins (Eds.), The international handbook of english language teaching (pp. 907-912). Norwell, MA: Springer.
dc.identifier.citationWisdom, J., & Creswell, J. (2013) Mixed methods: Integrating Quantitative and qualitative data collection and analysis while studying patient-centered medical home models.
dc.identifier.citationRockville. MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Retrieved from https://pcmh.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/attachments/MixedMethods_032513comp.p df
dc.identifier.citationZhao, Y. (2003). Recent developments in technology and language learning: A literature review and meta-analysis. CALICO Journal, 21 (1), 7-27.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10818/27993
dc.description122 Páginas.es_CO
dc.description.abstractThis research was carried out with 49 undergraduate students enrolled in a Colombian, virtual, public university. It aimed to analyze the grammatical accuracy improvement of students when writing short descriptive texts after they received feedback through screencasts. This study was a mixed action research since qualitative and quantitative methods to gather data were used; this approach allowed the researcher to use four types of instruments: a pre intervention survey, students' short descriptive texts, a teacher's journal and a post intervention survey. Data was analyzed using Descriptive Statistics and Grounded Theory. Findings revealed that students who were developing their language competencies in a virtual learning environment benefited through the use of image and audio in a single resource, which allowed the teacher to combine oral and written comments, provide observations on specific issues, and suggest how errors should be corrected. In like manner, screencast feedback proved to be a strategy that not only allowed students to have the opportunity to understand and improve their grammatical errors when writing short descriptive texts but also the teacher to make appropriate and punctual suggestions. ​​es_CO
dc.formatapplication/pdfes_CO
dc.language.isoenges_CO
dc.publisherUniversidad de La Sabanaes_CO
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.sourceUniversidad de La Sabana
dc.sourceIntellectum Repositorio Universidad de La Sabana
dc.subjectInnovaciones tecnológicas
dc.subjectInnovaciones educativas
dc.subjectInglés -- Enseñanza
dc.subjectGramática comparada y general
dc.titleGrammatical accuracy improvement in virtual learning environments using screencast feedbackes_CO
dc.typemasterThesises_CO
dc.publisher.programMaestría en Didáctica del Inglés para el Aprendizaje Autodirigidoes_CO
dc.publisher.departmentDepartamento de Lenguas y Culturas Extranjeras.es_CO
dc.identifier.local262771
dc.identifier.localTE08638
dc.type.localTesis de maestría
dc.type.hasVersionpublishedVersiones_CO
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccesses_CO
dc.creator.degreeMagíster en Didáctica del Inglés para el Aprendizaje Autodirigidoes_CO


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail
Nombre:
Diana Mireya Cuéllar Sánchez ...
Tamaño:
3.157Mb
Formato:
PDF
Descripción:
Ver documento en PDF
Ver/

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 InternationalExcepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International