Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

The effects of peer-correction and peer-assessment on students’ spoken fluency

dc.contributor.advisorEscobar Almeciga, Wilder Yesid
dc.contributor.authorCaicedo Álvarez, Oscar Alfonso
dc.date.accessioned2016-06-16T14:17:06Z
dc.date.available2016-06-16T14:17:06Z
dc.date.created2016
dc.date.issued2016-06-16
dc.identifier.citationArnold, J. (2000). Affect in Language Learning. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.
dc.identifier.citationBandura, A. (1993). Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning. Educational Psychologist, 28, 117-148.
dc.identifier.citationBartram, M. &Walton, R. (1991). Correction. Language Teaching Publications. pp. 87 – 91
dc.identifier.citationBoud, D. (1990). Assessment and the promotion of academic values. Studies in higher education, 15 (1), 101-111
dc.identifier.citationBrown, H. D. (1994). Principles of language learning and teaching. (3rd ed.). NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc
dc.identifier.citationBrown, S., Rust, C., & Gibbs, G. (1994). Involving students in the assessment process, in strategies for diversifying assessments in higher education. Oxford: Oxford centre for staff development, and at DeLiberations http://www.lgu.ac.uk/deliberations/ocsdpubs/div-ass5.html
dc.identifier.citationBrumfit, C. (1984). Communicative methodology in language teaching. The Roles of fluency and Accuracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
dc.identifier.citationBurns, A. (2009). Doing action research in English language teaching: A guide for practitioners. New York, NY: Routledge.
dc.identifier.citationBurns, A., & Joyce, H. (1997). Focus on speaking. Sydney: National Center for English Language Teaching and Research.
dc.identifier.citationBurns, D. (2007). Systemic Action Research. Policy Press
dc.identifier.citationCanale, M. (1984). A communicative approach to language proficiency assessment in a minority setting. In Rivera, C. (Ed.), Communicative competence approaches to language proficiency assessment: Research and application, 107-122. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
dc.identifier.citationCanale, M., & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics,1, 1-47.
dc.identifier.citationCelce-Murcia, M., Dornyei,Z., & Thurrell, S. (1995). Communicative Competence: A Pedagogically Motivated Model with Content specification. University of California.
dc.identifier.citationChaney, A. (1998). Teaching Oral Communication. In: Grandes K-8. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
dc.identifier.citationChastain, K. (1975). Affective And Ability Factors In Second-Language Acquisition. Language Learning, 25(1), 153-161.
dc.identifier.citationChen, Q. (2009). The potential barriers to college English assessment policy change in China. A Sociocultural Perspective. In B. Garrick, S. Poed, &. J, Skinner (Eds) , Educational Planet Shapers: Researching hypothesizing, dreaming the future (pp 115-126). Brisbane: Post Press.
dc.identifier.citationChen, Y., & Tsai, C. (2009). An educational research course facilitated by online peer assessment. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 46(1), 105-117.
dc.identifier.citationCheng, W., & Warren, M. (2005). Peer assessment of language proficiency. Language Testing, 22(1), 93– 121
dc.identifier.citationChomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
dc.identifier.citationClément, R., Dörnyei, Z., & Noels, K. A. (1994). Motivation, Self-confidence, and Group Cohesion in the Foreign Language Classroom. Language Learning, 44(3), 417-448
dc.identifier.citationCrystal, D. (1987). The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
dc.identifier.citationCohen, A. D. (1996). Developing the Ability to Perform Speech Acts. Studies in Second Language Acquisition Stud. Sec. Lang. Acq., 18(02), 253
dc.identifier.citationCohen L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education. (6th ed.). London: Routledge Falmer
dc.identifier.citationCorbin, J., & Strauss, A. (Eds.). (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Sage
dc.identifier.citationCunningham, M. (1999). Improving adult english language learners' speaking skills. National Center for ESL Literacy Education Retrieved from: http://www.cal.org/caela/esl_resources/digests/speak.html
dc.identifier.citationDewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. London: Collier Books.
dc.identifier.citationDuque, M. (2014). Young adult learners’ self-assessment of their own vocabulary: How does it Influence their oral fluency? (Unpublished Master‘s thesis). Universidad de la Sabana. Chía, Colombia.
dc.identifier.citationEmbark, S. (2013). Understanding communicative competence. Faculty of Education- Ajelat. University Bulletin. Retrieved from: http://www.bulletin.zu.edu.ly/issue_n15_3/Contents/E_07.pdf
dc.identifier.citationFalchikov, N. (1995). Peer Feedback Marking: Developing Peer Assessment. Innovations in Education & Training International, 32(2), 175-187
dc.identifier.citationFalchikov, N. (2005). Improving Assessment through student involvement: Practical solution for aiding learning in higher and further education. New York: Routledge Falmer.
dc.identifier.citationFairclough, N. (1995). General introduction. Critical discourse analysis. The critical study of language. London and New York: Longman, pp. 1-20.
dc.identifier.citationFillmore, L. W. (1979). Individual differences in second language acquisition, in Fillmore, C, Kempler, D and Wang, W Y S (Eds) Individual Differences in Language Ability and Language Behavior, New York, NY: Academic Press.
dc.identifier.citationFreeman, M. (1995). Peer assessment by groups of group work. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 20(3), 289-300
dc.identifier.citationFriesner, T,. & Hart, M. (2005). Learning Logs: Assessment or Research Method? Business and Management, University of Chichester, UK. Retrieved from: file:///C:/Users/User/Downloads/ejbrm-volume3-issue2-article155.pdf
dc.identifier.citationGarner, E. (1996). Seven barriers to communication. London: Manage Train Learn
dc.identifier.citationGanji, M. (2009). Teacher-correction, Peer-correction and Self- correction: Their Impacts on Iranian Students‘ IELTS Essay Writing Performance. The journal of Asia TEFL Vol. 6, No. 1, pp. 117-139,
dc.identifier.citationGielen, S., Dochy, F., Onghena, P., Struyven, K., & Smeets, S. (2011). Goals of peer assessment and their associated quality concepts. Studies in Higher Education, 36(6), 719-735.
dc.identifier.citationGlaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago, IL: Aldine
dc.identifier.citationGomes, D. (2014). The impact of peer and self-assessment on teenage B2 students´ Use of Present Perfect Simple, Present Perfect Continuous and Past Perfect Simple in their Spontaneous Spoken Production (Unpublished Master‘s thesis). Universidad de la Sabana, Chía, Colombia
dc.identifier.citationGower, D,. Phillips, S. Walters. (1995). Teaching Practice Handbook. London: Macmillan Heinemann English Language Teaching.
dc.identifier.citationHaastrup, K,. & Phillipson, R. (1984). Learner language and language learning. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters 14
dc.identifier.citationHarmer, J. (2004). How to Teach English. London: Longman.
dc.identifier.citationHidden curriculum (2014). In S. Abbott (Ed.), The glossary of education reform. Retrieved from http://edglossary.org/hidden-curriculum
dc.identifier.citationHouse, J. (1996). Developing Pragmatic Fluency in English as a Foreign Language: Routines and Metapragmatic Awareness. Studies in Second Language Acquisition Stud. Sec. Lang. Acq., 18(02), 225
dc.identifier.citationHedge, T. (2000). Teaching and learning in the language classroom. Oxford, Oxford University Press
dc.identifier.citationHymes, D.H. (1972). ―On Communicative Competence‖ In: J.B. Pride and J. Holmes (eds) Sociolinguistics. Selected Readings. Harmondsworth: Penguin, pp. 269-293. (Part 2)
dc.identifier.citationKemmis, S., & McTaggart, R. (2000). Participatory action research. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 567–605). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
dc.identifier.citationKoponen, M. & Riggenbach, H. (2000). Overview: Varying perspectives on fluency. In H. Riggenbach (Ed.). Perspectives on Fluency. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press, 5–25.
dc.identifier.citationKrashen, S., Terrell D. (1983). The natural approach: Language acquisition in the classroom. Hayward, CA: Alemany Press
dc.identifier.citationKrashen, S. (1982). Principles and Practice in Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
dc.identifier.citationKrashen, S. (1987). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Prentice Hall International.
dc.identifier.citationLangan, A. M., Shuker, D. M., Cullen, W. R., Penney, D., Preziosi, R. F., & Wheater, C. P. (2008). Relationships between student characteristics and self‐, peer- and tutor evaluations of oral presentations. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 33(2), 179-190.
dc.identifier.citationLi, S. (2008). Exploration of a Conceptual Framework for Intercultural Communicative English Language Teaching in China (Doctoral dissertation). Shanghai: Shanghai International Studies University
dc.identifier.citationMacaro, E. (1997). Target language, collaborative learning and autonomy. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
dc.identifier.citationMarshall, B., & Rossman, G. B. (1999). Designing qualitative research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
dc.identifier.citationMertler, C. A. (2001). Using performance assessment in your classroom. Unpublished manuscript, Bowling Green State University
dc.identifier.citationMinisterio de Educación Nacional de Colombia. [MEN] (2004). Programa Nacional de Bilingüismo. Retrieved January 10, 2010 from: http://www.colombiaaprende.edu.co/html/productos/1685/article-158720.html; and http://www.colombiaaprende.edu.co/html/docentes/1596/article-82607.html#h2_4
dc.identifier.citationMorgan, B. D. (1998). The ESL classroom: Teaching, critical practice, and community development. University of Toronto Press.
dc.identifier.citationNi, H. (2012). The Effects of Affective Factors in SLA and Pedagogical Implications. TPLS Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 2(7)
dc.identifier.citationNilson, L,. (2003) Improving student peer feedback. College Teaching, 51(1), 34-38
dc.identifier.citationNunan, D., & Bailey, K. M. (2009). Exploring second language classroom research: A comprehensive guide. Heinle Cengage Learning
dc.identifier.citationNunan, D. (1989). The teacher as researcher' in C. Brumfit and R. Mitchell , Research in the language classroom . London: Modern English Publications
dc.identifier.citationOchs, E. (1979). Acquisition of Discourse Competence. Oxford Encyclopedia of Linguistics, Vol 1, pp-358-361.
dc.identifier.citationO‘Malley, J., & Valdez, L. (1996). Authentic assessment for English teachers: Practical approaches for teachers. London: Addison-Wesley.
dc.identifier.citationPeng, J. (2010). Peer assessment in EFL context: Attitudes and correlation. Second Language Research Forum, ed. Matthew T. Prior et al., 89-107. Somerville, MA. Indiana University
dc.identifier.citationRichert, A. E. (1990). Teaching teachers to reflect: A consideration of programme structure. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 22(6), 509-527.
dc.identifier.citationRitchie J., & Lewis, J. (2003). Qualitative research practice. London: Sage
dc.identifier.citationRichards, J. C. (2013). Curriculum Approaches in Language Teaching: Forward, Central, and Backward Design. RELC Journal, 44(1), 5-33.Retrieved from: http://www.professorjackrichards.com/wp-content/uploads/Curriculum-Approaches-inLanguage-Teaching.pdf
dc.identifier.citationRichards, J. C., Platt, J., & Weber, H. (1985). Longman dictionary of applied linguistics. London: Longman
dc.identifier.citationRoskams, T. (1999). Chinese Efl Students' Attitudes To Peer Feedback and Peer Assessment in an Extended Pairwork Setting. RELC Journal, 30(1), 79-123
dc.identifier.citationRollinson, P. (2005). Using peer feedback in the ESL writing class. ELT Journal, 59(1), 23-30.
dc.identifier.citationSambell, K,.& Mcdowel, L. (1997). The Value of Self and Peer Assessment to the Developing Lifelong Learner. ISL Symposium.
dc.identifier.citationSaumell, V. (2011). Guided Discovery for Language Instruction: A Framework for Implementation at all Levels. English in Common. Pearson.
dc.identifier.citationSnow, M. A. (1998). Trends and Issues in Content-Based instruction. Ann Rev Appl Ling Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 18, 243-267.
dc.identifier.citationSpies, K. L. (2012). The Role of Peer feedback in Oral Communicative Tasks for Young Adult Learners (Unpublished Master‘s thesis). Universidad de la Sabana, Chía, Colombia.
dc.identifier.citationStenhouse, L. (1975.) An introduction to curriculum research and development. London, Heinemann
dc.identifier.citationStevens, D. D., & Levi, A. J. (2005). Introduction to rubrics: An assessment tool to save grading time, convey effective feedback, and promote student learning. Sterling, VA: Stylus.
dc.identifier.citationStrauss, A., & Corbin, J. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and Techniques. (3rd ed.).Newbury Park, CA: Sage
dc.identifier.citationSultana, A. (2009). Peer correction in ESL classrooms. BRAC University Journal, 6(1), 11-19.
dc.identifier.citationThornbury, S. (2000). Accuracy, fluency and complexity. English Teaching Professional, 16, 3- 6. Retrieved from http://www.thornburyscott.com/assets/Accuracy%20fluency.pdf
dc.identifier.citationTseng, S. (2012). The Factors Cause Language Anxiety for ESL/EFL Learners in Learning Speaking. WHAMPOA - An Interdisciplinary Journal, 63(2012), 75-90
dc.identifier.citationTuttle, H. G. (2011). Peer formative assessment improves student fluency. In R. Goldberg & W. White (Eds.), People, practices, and programs that inspire. Buffalo, NY: NYSAFLT.
dc.identifier.citationUr, P. (1991). A course in language teaching: Practice and theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
dc.identifier.citationUr, P. (1996). A Course in Language Teaching: Practice and Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
dc.identifier.citationVerloop, N., & Wubbels, T. (2000). Some major developments in teacher education in the Netherlands and their relationship with international trends. In G. M. Willems, J. H. J. Stakenborg, & W. Veugelers (Eds.), Trends in Teacher Education (pp. 19-32). Leuven Apeldoorn: Garant.
dc.identifier.citationWilley, K., & Gardner, A. (2010). Investigating the capacity of self and peer assessment activities to engage students and promote learning. European Journal of Engineering Education, 35(4), 429-443.
dc.identifier.citationWilliams, E. (1992). Student Attitudes Towards Approaches To Learning And Assessment.Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 17(1), 45-58
dc.identifier.citationWitbeck, M. C. (1976). Peer Correction Procedures for Intermediate and Advanced ESL Composition Lessons. TESOL Quarterly, 10(3), 321
dc.identifier.citationWhitehead, J., & McNiff, J. (2006). Action Research Living Theory. London: Sage.
dc.identifier.citationWolf, K. & Stevens, E. (2007). The Role of Rubrics in Advancing and Assessing Student learning. The Journal of Effective Teaching. University of Colorado at Denver and Health Sciences Center. Retrieved from: http://www.uncw.edu/cte/et/articles/vol7_1/wolf.pdf
dc.identifier.citationYang, Y. I. (2014). The development of speaking fluency: The 4/3/2 technique for the EFL learners in China. IJRSLL International Journal of Research Studies in Language Learning, 3(4). DOI: 10.5861/ijrsll.2013.624
dc.identifier.citationYule, G. (2010). The study of language, 4th edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10818/25057
dc.description1 archivo de lectura en pdf.es_CO
dc.description.abstract​Este documento examina el efecto de las estrategias de co-evaluación y corrección por pares en el desarrollo de fluidez oral. Este estudio se llevó a cabo con 22 participantes de nivel A2 en la habilidad de lenguaje quienes experimentaron dificultades con su fluidez al momento de entablar conversaciones orales con interlocutores y quienes deseaban demostrar el mismo nivel de fluidez tanto en lenguaje hablado como escrito para el desarrollo profesional y por razones de crecimiento personal. Este manuscrito sigue en el método cualitativo para analizar la efectividad de la intervención que apuntaba mejorar la fluidez oral de los estudiantes. El estudio fue diseñado para determinar el impacto que estas dos estrategias de auto monitoreo o control tenían sobre la fluidez oral de los participantes desarrollando competencia comunicativa a través de la mitigación de filtros afectivos que privaban a los estudiantes el desarrollo oral de la lengua. Este proceso permitió que la mayoría de los participantes identificaran sus propios errores proporcionando retroalimentación entre compañeros, creando confianza y una percepción positiva ante la implementación reflexionando sobre el valor de las estrategias en contextos donde se enseña inglés como lengua extranjeraes_CO
dc.formatapplication/pdfes_CO
dc.language.isoenges_CO
dc.publisherUniversidad de La Sabanaes_CO
dc.sourceUniversidad de La Sabana
dc.sourceIntellectum Repositorio Universidad de La Sabana
dc.titleThe effects of peer-correction and peer-assessment on students’ spoken fluencyes_CO
dc.typemasterThesises_CO
dc.publisher.programMaestría en Didáctica del Inglés con Énfasis en Ambientes de Aprendizaje Autónomoes_CO
dc.publisher.departmentDepartamento de Lenguas y Culturas Extranjerases_CO
dc.type.localTesis de maestría
dc.type.hasVersionpublishedVersiones_CO
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccesses_CO
dc.creator.degreeMagíster en Didáctica del Inglés con Énfasis en Ambientes de Aprendizaje Autónomoes_CO
dc.subject.armarcComunicación oral
dc.subject.armarcExpresión oral y escrita
dc.subject.armarcInglés básico -- Colombia
dc.identifier.repourlhttp://intellectum.unisabana.edu.co/


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail
Nombre:
Oscar Alfonso Caicedo Alvarez ...
Tamaño:
1.966Mb
Formato:
PDF
Descripción:
Ver documento en PDF
Ver/

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem