Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorÁlvarez Ayure, Claudia Patricia
dc.contributor.authorCárdenas Carrillo, Anderson Marcell
dc.date.accessioned2015-11-25T15:00:14Z
dc.date.available2015-11-25T15:00:14Z
dc.date.created2015
dc.date.issued2015-11-25
dc.identifier.citationAlvarez, M. & Muñoz, A. (2007).Students’ objectivity and perception of selfassessment in an EFL classroom. The Journal of Asia TEFL, 4(2), 1-29.
dc.identifier.citationArciniegas, C. (2008). Using journals for learners’ reflection and self-assessment. The Internet TESL Journal, 14 (10).
dc.identifier.citationCamelo, M. (2010). Using metacognitive processes to improve students’ writing quality. In Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal, 12 (1), p.54-69.
dc.identifier.citationCorbin, J. & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research. (3rd Ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
dc.identifier.citationBerk, L. E. & Winsler, A. (1995). Scaffolding children’s learning: Vygotsky and early childhood education. Washington: NAYEC.
dc.identifier.citationBialystok, E. (1986). The factors in the growth of linguistic awareness. Wiley. 57 (2), pp. 498-510.
dc.identifier.citationBrown, H. D. (2007). Principles of language learning and teaching. White Plains, NY: Pearson Education.
dc.identifier.citationBrown, H. D. (2001). Teaching by principles: an interactive approach to language pedagogy (2thed.). White plains, NY: Pearson Education.
dc.identifier.citationBrown, J. D. (1995). The elements of language curriculum. USA: Heinle & Heinle.
dc.identifier.citationBurns, A. (2010). Doing action research in English language teaching: a guide for practitioners. New York, NY: Routledge.
dc.identifier.citationBurns, A. (2003). Collaborative action research for English language teachers. Cambridge: CUP
dc.identifier.citationBurns, A. (1999). Collaborative action research for English language teachers. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
dc.identifier.citationCaicedo, S. (2011). La discordancia entre el complemento indirecto y el pronombre átono le, un fenómeno en aumento. Discordance between the Indirect Object and the Atonic Pronoun le, a Growing Phenomenon. ÌKala, revista de Lenguaje y Cultura. 16 (29), 17-43.
dc.identifier.citationCarless, D. (2004). Issues in Teachers’ Reinterpretation of a Task-Based Innovation in Primary Schools. TESOL Quarterly, 38, (4). 639-662.
dc.identifier.citationChalkia, E. (2012). Self-assessment: an alternative method of assessing speaking skills. Research Papers in Language Teaching and Learning (RPLTL), 3, (1). pp, 225- 239.
dc.identifier.citationChamot, Barnhardt, El-Dinary, & Robbins’s (1999).The learning strategies handbook. Pearson. White Plains, NY.
dc.identifier.citationChang, M. M. (2010). Effects of Self-Monitoring on Web-Based Language Learner’s Performance and Motivation. National Pingtung University of Science and Technology CALICO Journal, 27(2), p-p 298-310.
dc.identifier.citationCentro Colombo Americano. (2009). Curricular framework for evaluation for the Adult English Program. Bogota: Josephine Taylor.
dc.identifier.citationCouncil of Europe. (2001). The common European framework of reference for languages. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
dc.identifier.citationDubin, F. & Olshtain, E. (1997). Course Design: developing programs and materials for language learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
dc.identifier.citationEllis, R., S. Loewen, & R. Erlam. (2006). Implicit and explicit corrective feedback and the acquisition of L2 grammar. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 25(2), 243-272.
dc.identifier.citationEllis, R (2004). The definition and measurement of L2 explicit knowledge. Language learning, 54, 227-275.
dc.identifier.citationEllis, R. (2002). Does form-focused instruction affect the acquisition of implicit knowledge? : A review of the research. SSLA, 24, 223-236.
dc.identifier.citationEllis, R. (1994). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
dc.identifier.citationGanushchak, L. Y. & Schiller, N. O. (2009). Speaking one’s second language under time Pressure: An ERP study on verbal self-monitoring in German-Dutch bilinguals. Leiden, The Netherlands: Society for Psychological Research.
dc.identifier.citationGoto, Y. & Lee, J. (2006). On-Task versus off-task self-assessments among Korean elementary school students studying English.Modern Language Journal, 90 (4), 506-518
dc.identifier.citationHan, Z. and Odlin, T. (2006).Studies of fossilization in second language acquisition. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
dc.identifier.citationHan, Z. and Odlin, T. (2006).Studies of fossilization in second language acquisition.In C. K. Nakuma (Ed.).Researching fossilization and second language (L2) attrition: easy questions, difficult answers. (pp. 21-34). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters
dc.identifier.citationHan, Z-H. (2003). Fossilization: From Simplicity to Complexity. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 6 (2), 95-128.
dc.identifier.citationHatch, J. (2002) Doing qualitative research in education settings. New York, NY: State university of New York press
dc.identifier.citationHendricks, C. (2009). Improving schools through action research. Harrisonburg, VA: Pearson.
dc.identifier.citationHennessey, M. G. (1999).Probing the dimensions of metacognition: Implications for conceptual change teaching-learning. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Boston, MA
dc.identifier.citationHiggs, T. & Clifford, R. (1982).The push toward communication. In T. Higgs (Ed.), Curriculum, competence, and the foreign language teacher. (pp. 57-79). Skokie, IL: National Textbook Company.
dc.identifier.citationHinkel, E. (Ed.), (2011). Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning. New York, NJ. Routledge.
dc.identifier.citationIbberson, H. (2012). An Investigation into learners’ and teachers’ attitudes towards learners’ self-assessment according to CEFR scales. Language at the University of Essex, Proceedings. pp. 13-24.
dc.identifier.citationKemmis, S., & McTaggart, R. (Eds.). (1988). The action research planner. 3rd edition. Geelong: Deakin University Press.
dc.identifier.citationKrashen, S. (1990).Principles and practice in second language acquisition. England: Prentice Hall International.
dc.identifier.citationKrashen, S. (2003).Explorations in Language Acquisition and Use. Alexandria, VA: Heinemann.
dc.identifier.citationKormos, J. (2000). The role of attention in monitoring second language speech production. Language learning, 50 (2), 343-384.
dc.identifier.citationKuhn, D. & Dean, D. (2004). A bridge between cognitive psychology and educational practice. Theory into Practice, 43(4), 268-273.
dc.identifier.citationLeow, R. (2000). A study of the role of awareness in foreign language behavior. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22, 557-584.
dc.identifier.citationLevelt, W.J.M. (1989). Speaking: From Intention to Articulation. Cambridge, MA. MIT Press
dc.identifier.citationLightbown, P. (2000).Classroom SLA research and second language teaching. Applied Linguistics 21 (4), 431 – 462.
dc.identifier.citationLivingston, J. (1997). Metacognition: An overview. Graduate School of Education. The State University of New York at Buffalo. Retrieved from http://gse.buffalo.edu/fas/shuell/cep564/metacog.htm
dc.identifier.citationMartinez, M. E. (2006). What is metacognition? Phi Delta Kappan, 87, 696-699.
dc.identifier.citationMin, H.T. (2007) Training students to become successful peer reviewers. System. 33, 293–308.
dc.identifier.citationNakatani, Y. (2005). The effects of awareness-raising training on oral communication strategy use. Modern Language Journal, 89, 76-91.
dc.identifier.citationNunan, D. (1989). Designing tasks for the communicative classroom. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
dc.identifier.citationNorris, J. and Ortega, L. (2000). Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning, 50 (3), 417-428. doi: 10.1111/0023-8333.00136.
dc.identifier.citationO’Malley, J. M. and Chamot, A. U. (1990). Learning strategies in second language acquisition. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge university press.
dc.identifier.citationOscarson, M. (1989). Self-assessment of language proficiency: Rationale and applications. Language Testing, 6, 1-13.
dc.identifier.citationPiaget J. (1932). The moral judgment of the child. New York: Free Press.
dc.identifier.citationPillai, S. (2006). Self-Monitoring and Self-Repair in Spontaneous Speech. KATA, 8 (2), 114-126
dc.identifier.citationQian, M. & Xiao, Z. (2010). Strategies for Preventing and Resolving Temporary Fossilization in Second Language Acquisition. English Language Teaching, CCSE, 3 (1), 180-183.
dc.identifier.citationRodriguez, E. O. (2007). Self-assessment Practices: an empowering Tool in the teaching and learning EFL Processes. Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal, 9, 229- 246.
dc.identifier.citationRomero, J. (2002). The pragmatic fossilization of discourse markers in non-native speakers of English. Journal of pragmatics, 34, 769-784.
dc.identifier.citationSanchez Lujan, K. (2012). The effects of self-monitoring and self-reflection in A1 adult learners in an English blended learning environment (Unpublished Master’s thesis). Universidad de la Sabana, Chia, Colombia. Retrieved from http://intellectum.unisabana.edu.co/handle/10818/3161
dc.identifier.citationSagor, R. (2000). Guiding school improvement with action research. Alexandria, VA: USA. ASCD.
dc.identifier.citationSaslow, J. & Ascher, A. (2012). Summit 2. White Plains, NY: Pearson.
dc.identifier.citationSpada, N. (1997). Form-focused instruction and second language acquisition: a review of classroom and laboratory research. Language Teaching, 30, 73-87.
dc.identifier.citationSavignon, S. (2005).Communicative Language Teaching: Strategies and goals. In E.
dc.identifier.citationHinkel, E. (Ed.) (2011). Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning. New York, NJ: Routledge.
dc.identifier.citationSchraeder, L. (1996). Empowering ESL students in the mainstream through selfassessment and contracted learning. ERIC. Retrieved from: http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/recordDetail June 2007.
dc.identifier.citationSchraw, G. (2006). Promoting Self-Regulation in Science Education: Metacognition as Part of a Broader Perspective on Learning. Research in Science Education, Springer, 36, 111–139 doi: 10.1007/s11165-005-3917-8.
dc.identifier.citationSelinker, L. (1972). Interlanguage. IRAL, 10 (3), 209-231.
dc.identifier.citationStrauss, A. & Corbin, J. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Los Angeles, CA: Sage publications, Inc.
dc.identifier.citationStrauss, A. & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. London, UK: Sage publications. Inc.
dc.identifier.citationTerrell, T. D. (1991).The role of grammar instruction in a communicative approach. The modern language journal, 75 (1), 52-63.
dc.identifier.citationTamjid, N. H. & Birjandi, P. (2011). Fostering learner autonomy through self- and peerassessment. International Journal of Academic Research, 3 (5), 245-251.
dc.identifier.citationVygotsky, L. (1986) Thought and Language Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
dc.identifier.citationWang, J. (2011) Impacts of Second Language Classroom Instruction on IL Fossilization. Journal of Cambridge studies, 6, (1).
dc.identifier.citationWei, X. (2003). Implication of IL Fossilization in Second Language Acquisition. English Language Teaching, CCSE, 1 (1), 127-131.
dc.identifier.citationWeinfeld, N.S. et al. (1999). The Nature of Individual Differences in Infant-Caregiver Attachment. In Cassidy, J. & Shaver, P. R. (Eds.). Handbook of Attachment: Theory, research and clinical applications. New York: Guilford.
dc.identifier.citationZeng, Y. (2010). On some new models of instruction for overcoming fossilization in English learning. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 1 (2), 148-150. doi:10.4304/jltr.1.2.148-150.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10818/20257
dc.description102 páginas incluye diagramas
dc.description.abstractEste fue un estudio cualitativo de investigación-acción cuyo objetivo fue analizar hasta qué punto las estrategias de auto-monitoreo (O’Malley, 1990) y autoevaluación (O’Malley, 1990) podrían ayudar a estudiantes adultos de nivel intermedio del Centro Colombo Americano a contrarrestar sus errores gramaticales fosilizados en su discurso oral. A través de un estudio de las necesidades de los estudiantes, el investigador descubrió que los participantes habían fosilizado elementos gramaticales en tres áreas: forma de verbos, la falta de un sujeto y la elección de palabras erróneas. Los instrumentos usados para recolectar la información fueron notas de campo del investigador, formatos de autoevaluación y transcripciones hechas en las etapas: previa, durante y después del estudio. Para validar la información recogida, se triangularon las notas de campo junto con las transcripciones hechas por los estudiantes y sus reflexiones auto evaluativas ayudaron al investigador a encontrar patrones comunes. Toda esta información fue de gran ayuda para poder responder a la pregunta principal del estudio. Tres categorías emergieron de los resultados. Primeramente, los participantes al parecer desarrollaron conciencia de sus errores fosilizados, lo cual les permitió identificar los errores que habían estado afectando su producción oral. También, los participantes parecen haber desarrollado un grado de atención hacia dichos errores, lo cual les ayudo a autocorregirse mientras interactuaban con sus compañeros.es_CO
dc.language.isoenges_CO
dc.publisherUniversidad de La Sabana
dc.sourceUniversidad de La Sabana
dc.sourceIntellectum Repositorio Universidad de La Sabana
dc.subjectGramática comparada y general
dc.subjectInglés -- Semántica -- Colombia
dc.subjectEducación secundaria -- Colombia
dc.titleTackling adult intermediate students’ fossilized errors through self-monitoring and self-evaluation strategieses_CO
dc.typemasterThesis
dc.publisher.programMaestría en Didáctica del Inglés con Énfasis en Ambientes de Aprendizaje Autónomo
dc.publisher.departmentDepartamento de Lenguas y Culturas Extranjeras
dc.identifier.local176425
dc.identifier.localTE07912
dc.type.spaTesis de maestría
dc.type.hasVersionpublishedVersion
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccesses_CO
dc.creator.degreeMagíster en Didáctica del Inglés con Énfasis en Ambientes de Aprendizaje Autónomo


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record