Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorPeachey, Nicholas
dc.contributor.authorHerrera Ramirez, Yeison Edgardo
dc.date.accessioned2015-06-10T21:00:38Z
dc.date.available2015-06-10T21:00:38Z
dc.date.created2012
dc.date.created2012
dc.date.issued2015-06-10
dc.identifier.citationAguirre, A. (2010). Writing hyperstories Collaboratively for an Authentic Audience. Universidad Distrital. Bogotá Colombia.
dc.identifier.citationAuerbach, C. F., & Silverstein, L. B. (2003). Qualitative data: An introduction to coding and analysis. New York: New York University Press.
dc.identifier.citationAvery, S. (2011, September 5). Storybird a Collaborative Storytelling Tool. Retrieved from: http://techtutorials.edublogs.org/2011/09/05/storybird/
dc.identifier.citationBeatty, K. (2003). Computer Assisted language learning. Pearson Education Limited. England.
dc.identifier.citationBeltrán, A. (2010). EFL University Learners Working Collaboratively with Digital Storyboards. Universidad Distrital. Bogotá Colombia.
dc.identifier.citationBeltrán, J. (2009). Using the Online Software Hot Potatoes to Help First Graders Develop beginning Writting. Universidad de la Sabana. Chía Colombia.
dc.identifier.citationBenson, P. (1996) Concepts of autonomy in language learning. In R. Pemberton et al. (eds) Taking Control: Autonomy in Language Learning (pp. 27-34). Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
dc.identifier.citationBenson, P. (2002). Rethinking the relationship of self-access and autonomy. Newsletter of the Hong Kong Association for Self-Access Learning and Development, 5, 4-10. Retrieved from: http://lc.ust.hk/HASALD/newsletter/newsletterSept02.pdf
dc.identifier.citationBonk, C. J. (2009). The world is open: How Web technology is revolutionizing education. San Francisco, Calif: Jossey-Bass.
dc.identifier.citationBrown, H. D. (1994). Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy. Englewood Cliffs, N.J: Prentice Hall Regents.
dc.identifier.citationBrown, H. D. (2004). Language assessment: Principles and classroom practices. New York: Pearson/Longman.
dc.identifier.citationBurns, A. (2010). Doing action research in English language teaching: A guide for practitioners. New York: Routledge
dc.identifier.citationCastells, M., (2003). La Galaxia Internet: Reflexiones sobre internet, empresa y sociedad. Ed. Areté. Barcelona, 2001.
dc.identifier.citationChapelle, C. (2001). Computer Applications in Second Language Acquisition: Foundations for Teaching, Testing and research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
dc.identifier.citationChapelle, C. (2003). English language learning and technology: Lectures on applied linguistics in the age of information and communication technology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Pub
dc.identifier.citationConnors, R., (2002). Introduction to D. Gordon Rohman’s “Pre-Writing: The Stage of Discovery in the Writing Process.” In McDonald, C. R., & McDonald, R. L. (Eds.), Teaching Writing: Landmarks and horizons (pp. 3-6). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
dc.identifier.citationCorbin, J. M., Strauss, A. L., & Strauss, A. L. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Los Angeles, Calif: Sage Publications.
dc.identifier.citationDabbs, L. (2011, July 19). New teacher Boot Camp Week 3-Using Storybird. Retrieved from: http://www.edutopia.org/blog/storybird-new-teacher-boot-camp-lisa-dabbs
dc.identifier.citationDavies G. Walker R., Rendall H. & Hewer S. (2010) Introduction to Computer Assisted Language Learning (CALL). Module 1.4 in Davies G. (ed.) Information and Communications Technology for Language Teachers (ICT4LT), Slough, Thames Valley University [Online].Retrieved from: http://www.ict4lt.org/en/en_mod1-4.htm [Accessed 29 11 2010]
dc.identifier.citationDey, I. (1993). Qualitative data analysis: A user-friendly guide for social scientists. London: New York, NY
dc.identifier.citationDick, B. (1993). You want to do an action research thesis? Retrieved from http://www.scu.edu.au/schools/gcm/ar/art/arthesis.html.
dc.identifier.citationDing, A. (2003). Theoretical and Practical Issues in the Promotion of Collaborative Learner Autonomy in a Virtual Self-access Centre. In Holmberg, B., Shelley, M., & White, C. (Eds). Distance education and languages: Evolution and change (2005). Clevedon, Hants, England: Multilingual Matters.
dc.identifier.citationDonaldson, R. P., & Haggstrom, M. A. (2006). Changing language education through CALL. Abingdon [England: Routledge
dc.identifier.citationElbow, P. (2000). Everyone can write: Essays toward a hopeful theory of writing and teaching writing. New York: Oxford University Press.
dc.identifier.citationElola, I. & Oskoz, A. (2010). Collaborative Writing: Fostering Foreign Language and Writing Conventions Development. Language Learning and Technology, 14 (3), 51 – 71.
dc.identifier.citationFirst Certificate in English: FCE Specifications and sample papers for examinations from December 2008. Cambridge: University of Cambridge ESOL Examinations. Retrieved from http://www.britishcouncil.org/macedonia-exams-fce-dec-08.pdf
dc.identifier.citationGlaser, B. G. & Strauss, A. L. (2006). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New Brunswick, N.J: Aldine Transaction (a division of Transaction Publishers.
dc.identifier.citationGlässman, S. (2006). Buddy Up! – Facilitating Online Collaboration in University Language Learning. In Lamb, T., & Reinders, H. (Eds.), Supporting independent language learning: Issues and interventions (pp. 201- 218). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
dc.identifier.citationGolafshani, N. (2003). Understanding reliability and validity in qualitative research. The Qualitative Report, 8(4), 597–607. Retrieved from http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QR8- 4/golafshani.pdf
dc.identifier.citationGraetz, K. (2006). The Psychology of Learning Environments. In Oblinger (eds.), Learning Spaces (Chapter 6). Retrieved From http://www.educause.edu/learningspaces
dc.identifier.citationHalliday, M. A. K. & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. London: Longman.
dc.identifier.citationHarmer, J. (2004). How to teach writing. Harlow: Longman.
dc.identifier.citationHarmer, J. (2007). The practice of English language teaching: DVD. Harlow: Pearson/Longman.
dc.identifier.citationHerbert, M. (1990). Planning a research project: A guide for practitioners and trainees in the helping professions. London: Cassell.
dc.identifier.citationHrastinsky, S. (2008) Asynchronous and Synchronous E-Learning. Educause. Retrieved from http://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/EQM0848.pdf
dc.identifier.citationHubbard, P., & Levy, M. (2006). Teacher education in CALL. Language learning and language teaching, v. 14. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Pub. Co.
dc.identifier.citationHubbard, P. (Ed.) (2009). A General Introduction to Computer Language Asisted Language Learning. Computer Asisted Language Learning: Critical Concepts in inguistics. Volume I. Advance online publication. Retrieved from http://www.stanford.edu/~efs/callcc/callcc-intro.pdf
dc.identifier.citationHyland, K. (2002). Teaching and researching writing. Harlow: Longman.
dc.identifier.citationJimenez, C. (2009). Webquests and the Improvement of Critical Reading Skills in a group of University Students. Universidad de La Sabana. Chia Colombia.
dc.identifier.citationJones, B. (2008). Web 2.0 heroes: Interviews with 20 Web 2.0 influencers. Indianapolis, IN: Wiley Pub
dc.identifier.citationKessler, C. (1992). Cooperative language learning: A teacher's resource book. Englewood Cliffs, N.J: Prentice Hall Regents.
dc.identifier.citationKohonen, V. (1992). Experiential Language Learning: Second Language Learning as Cooperative Learner Education. In Nunan (Ed.), Collaborative language learning and teaching (pp. 14-39). Cambridge language teaching library. Cambridge [England: Cambridge University Press.
dc.identifier.citationLamb, T., & Reinders, H. (2006). Supporting independent language learning: Issues and interventions. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
dc.identifier.citationLaningham, S. (2004). DeveloperWorks Interviews: Tim Berners-Lee. Retrieved from http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/podcast/dwi/cm-int082206txt.html
dc.identifier.citationLevy, M., (2006). Effective Use of CALL Technologies: Finding the Right Balance. In Donaldson & Haggstrom (Ed). Changing language education through CALL (pp. 1-18). Abingdon [England: Routledge.
dc.identifier.citationLinares, A. (2010). Using Visual Literacy in a Sequence of Picture Stories to Write Narratives. Universidad Distrital. Bogotá Colombia.
dc.identifier.citationLittle, D. (2000) Learner autonomy and human interdependence: Some theoretical and practical consequences of a social-interactive view of cognition, learning and language. In B. Sinclair et al. (eds). Learner Autonomy, Teacher Autonomy: Future Directions (pp. 15-23). London: Longman.
dc.identifier.citationMiles, M. B. & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
dc.identifier.citationMorgan, D. L. (1997). Focus groups as qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage Publications.
dc.identifier.citationMüller-Hartmann, A. & Schocker-v, M (2010). Research on the Use of Technology in TaskBased Language Teaching. In Thomas and Reinders (Eds.). Task-Based Language Lerning and Teaching with Technology (pp. 17-40). London: Continuum
dc.identifier.citationMurray, D. (1992). Collaborative Writing as a Literacy Event: implications for ESL Instruction. In Nunan (Eds.), Collaborative language learning and teaching (pp. 100-117). Cambridge language teaching library. Cambridge [England: Cambridge University Press.
dc.identifier.citationNordin, Y. (2010). Web 2.0 and Graduate Research Storybird. Retrieved from: http://edpsychbsustudentwork.pbworks.com/f/3-StoryBirdWeb+2.0+and+Graduate+Research.pdf
dc.identifier.citationNorton, L. (2009). Action research in teaching and learning: A practical guide to conducting pedagogical research in universities. London: Routledge.
dc.identifier.citationNunan, D. (1992). Collaborative language learning and teaching. Cambridge language teaching library. Cambridge [England: Cambridge University Press.
dc.identifier.citationNunan, D. (1992). Research methods in language learning. Cambridge language teaching library. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
dc.identifier.citationNunan, D. (1999). Writing. Newbury House Teacher Development (Ed.), Second language and teaching (pp. 271-299). Boston, Massachusetts: Heinle & Heinle Publishers.
dc.identifier.citationObringer, A. (2001). How E-learning Works. How stuff works. Retrieved from: http://people.howstuffworks.com/elearning.htm
dc.identifier.citationOlsen, W. (2004). Triangulation in social research: Qualitative and quantitative methods can really be mixed. Retrieved from http://www.ccsr.ac.uk/staff/Triangulation.pdf
dc.identifier.citationO’Reilly, T. (2005). What is web 2.0: Design patterns and business models for the next generation of software. Retrieved from http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/oreilly/tim/news/2005/09/30/what-is-web-20.html
dc.identifier.citationOur Storybird Collaboration with Canada. (2011, June 21). Retrieved from: http://openthedoortob4.blogspot.com/2011/06/our-storybird-collaboration-withcanada.html
dc.identifier.citationOxford, R. (1997). Cooperative learning, Collaborative learning, interaction: Three communicative Strands in the Language Classroom. The Modern Language Journal, 81(4), 443-456.
dc.identifier.citationPeachey, N. (2009). Web 2.0 Tools for Teachers. Retrieved from http://www.scribd.com/doc/19576895/Web-20-Tools-for-Teachers. 28 Nov. 2010.
dc.identifier.citationPegrum, M., (2009). Communicative Networking and Linguistic Mashups on web 2.0. In Thomas, M. (Ed.), Handbook of research on Web 2.0 and second language learning (pp. 20-41). Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference
dc.identifier.citationPhillips, P. P., & Stawarski, C. A. (2008). Data collection: Planning for and collecting all types of data. San Francisco: Pfeiffer
dc.identifier.citationPrensky, M. (2010). Teaching digital natives: Partnering for real learning. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Corwin.
dc.identifier.citationRichards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2001). Approaches and methods in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
dc.identifier.citationRoger E., Kagan O. & Kagan S. (1992). About Cooperative Learning. In Kessler (Ed.), Cooperative Language Learning: A Teachers’ Resource Book (pp. 1-30). Englewood Cliffs, N.J: Prentice Hall Regents.
dc.identifier.citationRohman, D., (2002). Pre-writing: The Stage of Discovery in the Writing Process (1965). In McDonald, C. R., & McDonald, R. L. (Eds.), Teaching Writing: Landmarks and horizons (pp. 7-16). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
dc.identifier.citationSagor, R. (2005). The action research guidebook. Thousand Oaks, California. Corwin Press.
dc.identifier.citationSchwartz, D. (1998). The Productive Agency that Drives Collaborative Learning. In Dillenbourg (Eds.), Collaborative Learning: Cognitive and Computational Approaches (pp. 197-218). Amsterdam: Pergamon.
dc.identifier.citationScrivener, J. (2005). Learning and Teaching. A Guidebook for English Language Teachers. Macmillan books for teachers.
dc.identifier.citationSharma, P., & Barrett, B. (2007). Blended learning: Using technology in and beyond the language classroom. Macmillan books for teachers. Oxford: Macmillan.
dc.identifier.citationShurville, S., & Fernstrom, K. (2007). Readings in technology in education: Selected papers from the international conference on information and communications technology in education 2006. Bradford: Emerald Group Press.
dc.identifier.citationSommers, N., (2002). Responding to Student Writing (1982). In McDonald, C. R., & McDonald, R. L. (Eds.), Teaching Writing: Landmarks and horizons (pp. 3-6). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
dc.identifier.citationSpeck, B. W. (1999). Collaborative writing: An annotated bibliography. Bibliographies and indexes in education, no. 19. Westport, Conn: Greenwood Press.
dc.identifier.citationStrauss, A & Corbin, J. (1990) Basics of Qualitative research. Grounded theory applications and techniques. London. Seige Publications.
dc.identifier.citationStorybird, (n.d.). Retrieved April 4, 2012 from http://educ5553.wikispaces.com/file/view/Storybird.pdf
dc.identifier.citationTapscott, D. (2009). Grown up digital: How the net generation is changing your world. New York: McGraw-Hill.
dc.identifier.citationTeeler, D., & Gray, P. (2000). How to use the Internet in ELT. Harlow: Longman. Tribble, C. (1996). Writing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
dc.identifier.citationThomas, M., & Reinders, H. (2010). Task-based language learning and teaching with technology. London: Continuum.
dc.identifier.citationTotten, S., Sills, T., Digby, A., & Russ, P. (1991). Cooperative learning: A guide to research. New York: Garland.
dc.identifier.citationUrquhart, V., & McIver, M. (2005). Teaching writing in the content areas. Alexandria, Va: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
dc.identifier.citationUry, M. (n.d.). Storybird. Retrieved April 4, 2012 from: http://storybird.com/
dc.identifier.citationUsma, J,. (2009). Education and Language Policy in Colombia: Exploring Processes of Inclusion, Exclusion and Stratification in Times if Global Reform. Profile 11. ISSN 1657-0790. 123- 141.
dc.identifier.citationVallance M., Vallance K. & Masahiro M., (2009). Criteria for the Implementation of Learning Technologies. In Thomas, M. (Ed.), Handbook of research on Web 2.0 and second language learning (pp. 1-19). Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference.
dc.identifier.citationWallace, M. J. (1998). Action research for language teachers. Cambridge teacher training and development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
dc.identifier.citationWhithaus, C. (2005). Teaching and evaluating writing in the age of computers and high-stakes testing. Mahwah, N.J: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10818/16526
dc.description116 páginas incluye diagramases_CO
dc.description.abstractEsta investigación demuestra como el uso de la escritura colaborativa a través de Storybird, una herramienta web que promueve la creación de historias, ayuda a los estudiantes mejorar su habilidad para escribir. Este estudio se realizó con dos grupos de estudiantes de nivel intermedio alto en el Instituto de Lenguas de la Universidad Distrital (ILUD) a lo largo de dos ciclos. Los resultados revelaron que la escritura colaborativa promueve la corrección a pares y la auto evaluación. Además, los estudiantes se sintieron más animados al escribir textos narrativos y su actitud positiva hacia la producción de historias aumentó; su conciencia metacognitiva hacía el proceso de escritura, sus compañeros y la auto-regulación dio como resultado a la aparición de conductas autónomas.es_CO
dc.language.isoenges_CO
dc.publisherUniversidad de La Sabana-
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.sourceUniversidad de La Sabana
dc.sourceIntellectum Repositorio Universidad de La Sabana
dc.subjectInglés básico -- Enseñanza
dc.subjectComunicación oral -- Inglés básico -- Colombia
dc.subjectEducación -- Inglés básico -- Colombia
dc.titleMetacognitive awareness and enhanced autonomy through the use of collaborative writing and "storybird"es_CO
dc.typemasterThesises_CO
dc.publisher.programMaestría en Didáctica del Inglés con Énfasis en Ambientes de Aprendizaje Autónomoes_CO
dc.publisher.departmentDepartamento de Lenguas y Culturas Extranjeras-es_CO
dc.identifier.local260693
dc.identifier.localTE07437
dc.type.spaTesis de maestría
dc.type.hasVersionpublishedVersion
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccesses_CO
dc.creator.degreeMagíster en Didáctica del Inglés con Énfasis en Ambientes de Aprendizaje Autónomo


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 InternationalExcept where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International