Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorAnderson, Carl Edlund
dc.contributor.authorMora Gonzalez, Carlos Andres
dc.date.accessioned2014-11-12T15:55:08Z
dc.date.available2014-11-12T15:55:08Z
dc.date.created2014
dc.date.issued2014-11-12
dc.identifier.citationAdam, J. (1992). Les textes: types et prototypes - Récit, description, argumentation et dialogue [Texts: types and prototypes - Narration, description, argumentation and dialogue]. Paris, France: Nathan.
dc.identifier.citationAdcock, A. (2000). Effects of cognitive load on processing and performance. Unpublished manuscript, Instructional Media Lab, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN.
dc.identifier.citationAlamargot, D., & Chanquoy, L. (2001). Through the models of writing: With commentaries by Ronald T. Kellogg & John R. Hayes (Vol. 9). New York, NY: Springer.
dc.identifier.citationAlvermann, D. E., & Boothby, P. R. (1986). Children's transfer of graphic organizer instruction. Reading Psychology: An International Quarterly, 7(2), 87-100.
dc.identifier.citationAnderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R., Airasian, P. W., Cruikshank, K. A., Mayer, R. E., Pintrich, P., & Wittrock, M. (2000). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
dc.identifier.citationAntaki, C., & Leudar, I. (1990). Claim-backing and other explanatory genres in talk. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 9(4), 279-292.
dc.identifier.citationApotheloz, D., & Mieville, P. (1989). Cohérence et discours argumenté [Coherence and the argumentative discourse]. In M. Charolles (Ed.), The resolution of discourse (pp. 68-87). Hamburg, Germany: Buske Verlag.
dc.identifier.citationApothéloz, D. (1990). The development of cohesion in writing: Preliminary research on anaphoric procedures and thematic planning in texts by children. In M. Spoelders (Ed.) Literacy acquisition (pp. 53-70). Lier, Belgium: J. Van In.
dc.identifier.citationApplebee, A., Langer, J., Mullis, I., Latham, A., & Gentile, C. (1994). National Assessment of Educational Progress 1992: Writing Report Card. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office
dc.identifier.citationBabbie, E. (2010). The practice of social research. (12 ed). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
dc.identifier.citationBamberg, B. (1984). Assessing coherence: A reanalysis of essays written for the National Assessment of Educational Progress, 1969-1979. Research in the Teaching of English, 18(3), 305-319
dc.identifier.citationBarrows, H. S. (1985). How to design a problem-based curriculum for the preclinical years. New York, NY: Springer.
dc.identifier.citationBaxendell, B. W. (2003). Consistent, coherent, creative. Teaching Exceptional Children, 35(3), 46-53.
dc.identifier.citationBelland, B. R. (2010). Portraits of middle school students constructing evidence-based arguments during problem-based learning: The impact of computer-based scaffolds. Educational Technology Research and Development, 58(3), 285-309.
dc.identifier.citationBereiter, C. (1980). Development in writing. In L. W. Gregg & E. R. Steinberg (Eds.), Cognitive processes in writing, (pp. 73-93). Hillsdale, HJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
dc.identifier.citationBerg, B. (1989). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon
dc.identifier.citationBillmeyer, R., & Barton, M. L. (1998). Teaching reading in the content areas: If not me, then who? (2nd ed.). Aurora, CO: Mid-continent Regional Educational Laboratory.
dc.identifier.citationBloom, B. S., Engelhart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H., & Krathwohl, D. R. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals, Handbook I: Cognitive Domain. London, England: Longmans, Green and Co.
dc.identifier.citationBoscolo, P. (1995). The cognitive approach to writing and writing instruction: A contribution to a critical appraisal. Cahiers de psychologie cognitive, 14(4), 343-366
dc.identifier.citationBrooks, J. G., & Brooks, M. G. (1993). In search of understanding: The case for the constructivist classroom. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
dc.identifier.citationBrovero, M. D., (2004). For a clearer view. Book Links, 13(5), 45-46
dc.identifier.citationBromley, K. D. A., Irwin-DeVitis, L., & Modlo, M. (1995). Graphic organizers: Visual strategies for active learning. New York, NY: Scholastic Professional Books.
dc.identifier.citationBronckart, J.P., Bain, D., Schneuwly, B., Davaud, C., & Pasquier, A. (1985). Le fonctionnement du discours. [The functioning of discourse]. Neuchâtel, France: Delachaux et Niestlé.
dc.identifier.citationBrown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32-42.
dc.identifier.citationBurns, A. (2003). Collaborative action research for English language teachers. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press
dc.identifier.citationBurns, A. (2010). Doing action research in English language teaching: A guide for practitioners. New York, NY: Routledge.
dc.identifier.citationByrnes, J. (1998). The nature and development of decision making. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
dc.identifier.citationCameron,J.(2005).Focussingon the focus group.In I,Hay(Ed), Qualitative Research Methods in Human Geography (pp. 83-101). NewYork,NY:OxfordUniversityPress
dc.identifier.citationCapretz, K., Ricker, B., & Sasak, A. (2003). Improving organizational skills through the use of graphic organizers (Unpublished Master’s thesis). Saint Xavier University, Chicago, IL. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED473056.pdf
dc.identifier.citationCaviglioli, O. (2002). Thinking skills & eye Q. London, England: Bloomsbury Academic.
dc.identifier.citationCaviglioli, O., & Harris, I. (2003). Thinking visually: Step-by-step exercises that promote visual, auditory and kinesthetic learning. Markham, Canada: Pembroke Publishers.
dc.identifier.citationChanquoy, L. (1996). Connectives and argumentative text: A developmental study. Paper presented at the First International Workshop on Argumentative Text Processing, Barcelona, Spain.
dc.identifier.citationCochrane, V. (2010). Top level structure: Why use graphic organizers to scaffold developing writers. Practically Primary, 15(3), 34-37.
dc.identifier.citationCohen, L. Manion, l. & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education. New York, NY: Routledge.
dc.identifier.citationCoirier, P., & Golder, C. (1993). Writing argumentative text: A developmental study of the acquisition of supporting structures. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 8(2), 169-181.
dc.identifier.citationCoirier, P., Andriessen, J., & Chanquoy, L. (1999). From planning to translating: The specificity of argumentative writing. In P. Coirier & J. Andriessen (Eds.), Foundations of argumentative text processing (pp.1-28). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Amsterdam University Press.
dc.identifier.citationCorbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
dc.identifier.citationConnor, U., & Lauer, J. (1988). Cross-cultural variation in persuasive student writing. In A. C. Purves (Ed.), Writing across languages and cultures: Issues in contrastive rhetoric (pp. 138-159). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
dc.identifier.citationCouncil of Europe (2011). Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, and assessment. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press
dc.identifier.citationCraig, D. V. (2009). Action research essentials (Vol. 11). San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons.
dc.identifier.citationCreswell, J. W. (2013). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
dc.identifier.citationCrowhurst, M. (1990). The development of persuasive/argumentative writing. In R. Beach & S. Hynds (Eds.), Developing discourse practices in adolescence and adulthood (pp. 200- 223). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
dc.identifier.citationDe Bernardi, B. (1996). Interestingness and argumentative text production. Paper presented at the First International Workshop on Argumentative Texts. University of Barcelona, Spain
dc.identifier.citationDe Bernardi, B., & Antolini, E. (2007). Fostering students’ willingness and interest in argumentative writing: an intervention study. In P. Boscolo & S. Hidi (Eds.), Studies in Writing: Writing and motivation (Vol. 19, pp. 183-201). Oxford, England: Elsevier.
dc.identifier.citationDelrose, L. N. (2011). Investigating the use of graphic organizers for writing (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, Baton Rouge, LA. Retrieved from http://etd.lsu.edu/docs/available/etd04122011-182849/unrestricted/THESIS.pdf
dc.identifier.citationDent-Young, J. (1993). Write away: For use of English. Hong, Kong, China: Longman.
dc.identifier.citationDenzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2003). Strategies of qualitative inquiry. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
dc.identifier.citationDornyei, Z. (2003). Questionnaires in second language research: Construction, administration and processing. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
dc.identifier.citationDowell, J., Tscholl, M., Gladisch, T., & Asgari-Targhi, M. (2009). Argumentation scheme and shared online diagramming in case-based collaborative learning. In O’Malley, C., Suthers, D., Reimann, P., & Dimitracopoulou, A. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 9th international conference on computer supported collaborative learning (Vol.1, pp. 567- 575). Chicago, IL: International Society of the Learning Sciences
dc.identifier.citationDuch, B. (1996). Problems: A key factor in PBL. About teaching, 50, 78.
dc.identifier.citationEllis, E. S., & Rock, M. L. (2001). Makes sense strategies: Connecting teaching, learning, and assessment. Tuscaloosa, AL: Masterminds
dc.identifier.citationEllis, E. (2004). Q&A: What’s the big deal with graphic organizers? Retrieved from http://www.graphicorganizers.com/Sara/ArticlesAbout/Q&A%20Graphic%20Organizers. pdf
dc.identifier.citationEllis, E. S. (2005). Makes sense strategies (Version 4.0) [Computer software].Tuscaloosa, AL: Masterminds Publishing
dc.identifier.citationEllis, E., & Howard, P. (2007). Graphic organizers: Power tools for teaching students with learning disabilities. Current Practice Alerts, 13, 1-4.
dc.identifier.citationEmerson, K. & Maxwell T.W. (2011). Graphic organisers and writing performance: Improving undergraduate competence using action research in a workplace internship, Work based Learning E-Journal, 2(1), 5-23.
dc.identifier.citationFayol, M., & Schneuwly, B. (1987). La mise en texte et ses problèmes [Textual formulation and its problems]. In J.L. Chiss, J.P. Laurent, J.C. Meyer, H. Romian & B. Schneuwly (Eds.), Apprendre/enseigner à produire des textes écrits (pp. 223-240). Brussels, Belgium: De Boeck
dc.identifier.citationFlynn, P., Mesibov, D., Vermette, P.J. & Smith, M. (2004). Applying standards based on constructivism: A two-step guide for motivating middle and high school students. Larchmont, NY: Eye-on-Education.
dc.identifier.citationFlower, L., & Hayes, J. R. (1981). A cognitive process theory of writing. College Composition and Communication, 32(4), 365-387
dc.identifier.citationFoote, C. J., Vermette, P. J., & Battaglia, C. (2001). Constructivist strategies: Meeting standards and engaging adolescent minds. Larchmont, NY: Eye on Education.
dc.identifier.citationForman, E. A., Minick, N. E., & Stone, C. (1993). Contexts for learning: Sociocultural dynamics in children's development. New York, NY: Oxford University Press
dc.identifier.citationFreedman, A., & Pringle, I. (1984). Why students can't write arguments. English in Education, 18(2), 73-84.
dc.identifier.citationGallagher, S. A., Stepien, W. J., & Rosenthal, H. (1992). The effects of problem-based learning on problem solving. Gifted Child Quarterly, 36(4), 195-200.
dc.identifier.citationGibbons, D. (2013). Graphic organizers & technology [online image]. Retrieved February 13, 2013 from http://esinedgibbons.blogspot.com/
dc.identifier.citationGlover, J. A., Bullock, R. G., & Dietzer, M. L. (1990). Advance organizers: Delay hypotheses. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(2), 291.
dc.identifier.citationGolder, C., & Coirier, P. (1994). Argumentative text writing: Developmental trends. Discourse Processes, 18(2), 187-210
dc.identifier.citationGrabe, W. & Jiang, X. (2007). Graphic organizers in reading instruction: Research findings and issues. Reading in a Foreign Language, 19(1), 34-55.
dc.identifier.citationGraff, G. (2004). Clueless in academe: How schooling obscures the life of the mind. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
dc.identifier.citationGrize, J. B. (1982). De la logique à l'argumentation. Geneva, Switzerland: Librairie Droz.
dc.identifier.citationHalliday, M.A.K. & Hassan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. London, England: Longman.
dc.identifier.citationHarland, D. (2003). Using asTTle persuasive writing: A case study of teaching argument writing (asTTle Technical Report 29). Auckland, Australia: University of Auckland/Ministry of Education.
dc.identifier.citationHalpern, D. (1998). Teaching critical thinking for transfer across domains. American Psychologist, 53(4), 449-455.
dc.identifier.citationHawkins, L. (2011). The use of graphic organizers in supporting primary aged students in genre specific writing tasks (Unpublished Master’s thesis). State University of New York College at Brockport, Brockport, NY. Retrieved from: http://digitalcommons.brockport.edu/ehd_theses
dc.identifier.citationHayes, J.R., & Flower, L.S. (1980). Identifying the organization of writing processes. In L.W. Gregg & E.R. Steinberg (Eds.), Cognitive process in writing (pp. 3-30). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
dc.identifier.citationHayes, J.R., & Nash, J.G. (1996). On the nature of planning in writing. In C.M. Levy & S. Ransdell (Eds.), The Science of writing (pp. 29-55). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum
dc.identifier.citationHmelo-Silver, C. E. (2004). Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn? Educational Psychology Review, 16(3), 235-266.
dc.identifier.citationHerrenkohl, L. R., & Guerra, M. R. (1998). Participant structures, scientific discourse, and student engagement in fourth grade. Cognition and Instruction, 16(4), 431-473.
dc.identifier.citationHillocks, G. (2011). Teaching argument writing, grades 6-12: Supporting claims with relevant evidence and clear reasoning. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann
dc.identifier.citationHillocks, G. (2010). "EJ" in focus: Teaching argument for critical thinking and writing: An introduction. English Journal, 99(6), 24-32
dc.identifier.citationJonassen, D. H. (1997). Instructional design models for well-structured and III-structured problem-solving learning outcomes. Educational Technology Research and Development, 45(1), 65-94.
dc.identifier.citationJonassen, D. H. (2000). Toward a design theory of problem solving. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(4), 63-85
dc.identifier.citationJonassen, D. H. (2007). What makes scientific problems difficult? In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Learning to solve complex, scientific problems (pp. 3-23). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
dc.identifier.citationJonassen, D. H., & Hung, W. (2008). All problems are not equal: Implications for problem-based learning. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning, 2(2), 4.
dc.identifier.citationJonassen, D. H., & Kim, B. (2010). Arguing to learn and learning to argue: Design justifications and guidelines. Educational Technology Research and Development, 58(4), 439-457.
dc.identifier.citationKellogg, R. T. (1993). Observations on the psychology of thinking and writing. Composition Studies/Freshman English News, 21(1), 3-41.
dc.identifier.citationKim, A. H., Vaughn, S., Wanzek, J., & Wei, S. (2004). Graphic organizers and their effects on the reading comprehension of students with LD: A synthesis of research. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 37(2), 105-118.
dc.identifier.citationKirschner, P. A., Buckingham-Shum, S. J., & Carr, C. S. (2003). Visualizing argumentation: Software tools for collaborative and educational sense-making. London, England: Springer.
dc.identifier.citationKlaczynski, P. A. (2004). A dual-process model of adolescent development: Implications for decision making, reasoning, and identity. In R. V. Kail (Ed.), Advances in child development and behavior, (Vol. 31, pp. 73-123). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
dc.identifier.citationKuhn, D. (2005). Education for thinking. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
dc.identifier.citationKuhn, D. (1991). The skills of argument. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
dc.identifier.citationLancaster, K. (2013). An examination of using graphic organizers to teach writing: A case study. Research in Action, 2, 1-42. Retrieved from http://www.eiu.edu/researchinaction/pdf/Katie_Lancaster_Paper.pdf
dc.identifier.citationLave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
dc.identifier.citationLee, C.C. & Tan, S. C. (2010). Graphical representations and transfer of ideas between multidraft pre-writing stages. In C.H. Steel, M.J. Keppell, P. Gerbic & S. Housego (Eds.), Curriculum, technology & transformation for an unknown future. Proceedings Ascilite Sydney 2010 (pp. 528-538). Brisbane, Australia: University of Queensland. Retrieved from http://ascilite.org.au/conferences/sydney10/procs/Leechienching-full.pdf
dc.identifier.citationLee, C.C. (2007). Graphic organisers as scaffolding for students’ revision in the pre-writing stage. In Atkinson, RJ., McBeath, C., Soong, S. K. A. & Cheers, C. (Eds.), ICT: Providing choices for learners and learning. Proceedings ascilite Singapore 2007. Singapore, Singapore: Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education. Retrieved from http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/singapore07/procs/lee-cc.pdf
dc.identifier.citationLoertscher, D., Koechlin, C., & Zwaan, S. (2005). Ban Those Bird Units! 15 models for teaching and learning in information-rich and technology-rich environments. Salt Lake City, UT: Hi Willow Research and Publishing.
dc.identifier.citationLui, C. L. (1995). Developing the argumentative writing skills of sixth formers in a Hong Kong Secondary school (Unpublished Master’s thesis), University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong,Hong Kong. Retrieved from http://hub.hku.hk/bitstream/10722/29151/1/FullText.pdf?accept=1
dc.identifier.citationMannes, S. M., & Kintsch, W. (1987). Knowledge organization and text organization. Cognition and Instruction, 4(2), 91-115.
dc.identifier.citationMarzano, R.J., Brandt, R.S., Hughes, C.S., Jones, B.F., Pressiesen, B.Z., Rankin, S.C., & Suhor, C. (1988). Dimensions of thinking: A framework for curriculum and instruction. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
dc.identifier.citationMathews-Aydinli, J. (2006). Problem-based learning and adult English language learners. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics. Retrieved from http://www.cal.org/adultesl/pdfs/problem-based-learning-and-adult-english-languagelearners.pdf
dc.identifier.citationMcKay, J., & Marshall, P. (2001). The dual imperatives of action research. Information Technology & People, 14(1), 46-59.
dc.identifier.citationMeyen, E.L., Vergason, G.A., & Whelan, R.J. (1996). Strategies for teaching exceptional children in inclusive settings. Denver, CO: Love Publishing
dc.identifier.citationMeyer, D. J. (1995). The effects of graphic organizers on the creative writing of third grade students (Unpublished Master’s thesis). Kean College of New Jersey, Union, NJ. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED380803.pdf
dc.identifier.citationMiller, S. A. (2011). Using graphic organizers to increase writing performance (Unpublished Doctoral dissertation). State University of New York at Fredonia, Fredonia, NY. Retrieved from https://dspace.sunyconnect.suny.edu/bitstream/handle/1951/57455/Stephanie_Miller_Mate rs_Project_December2011.pdf?sequence=1
dc.identifier.citationMinisterio de Educación Nacional. (2006). Estándares básicos de competencias en lenguas extranjeras: Inglés. Formar en lenguas extranjeras: ¡El reto! lo que necesitamos saber y saber hacer (Serie Guías N° 22). Bogotá, Colombia: Imprenta Nacional.
dc.identifier.citationMorgan, W., & Beaumont, G. (2003). A dialogic approach to argumentation: Using a chat room to develop early adolescent students' argumentative writing. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 47(2), 146-57
dc.identifier.citationMyrick, J., & Siders, J. (2007). Comparison of the effectiveness of learning styles using graphic organizers versus traditional text-based teaching on vocabulary development. The University of Alabama McNair Journal, 7, 115-128.
dc.identifier.citationNamey, E., Guest, G., Thairu, L., & Johnson, L. (2007). Data reduction techniques for large qualitative data sets. Handbook for team-based qualitative research, Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press
dc.identifier.citationNewell, G. E., Beach, R., Smith, J., & VanDerHeide, J. (2011). Teaching and learning argumentative reading and writing: A review of research. Reading Research Quarterly, 46(3), 273-304
dc.identifier.citationNippold, M. A., Ward-Lonergan, J. M., & Fanning, J. L. (2005). Persuasive writing in children, adolescents, and adults a study of syntactic, semantic, and pragmatic development. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 36 (2), 125-138.
dc.identifier.citationNordquist, R. (2012). Argumentation. About.com. Retrieved from http://grammar.about.com/od/ab/g/argumentationterm.htm.
dc.identifier.citationNovak, J. (1991). Clarify with concept maps. Science Teacher, 58(7), 44-49.
dc.identifier.citationNussbaum, E. M., & Schraw, G. (2007). Promoting argument-counterargument integration in students' writing. The Journal of Experimental Education, 76(1), 59-92.
dc.identifier.citationOblinger, D., Oblinger, J.; & Lippincott, J. (2005). Educating the Net Generation. Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.brockport.edu/bookshelf/272
dc.identifier.citationPatton, M. (2001). Qualitative research and evaluation method (3rd Ed). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
dc.identifier.citationPerelman, C., & Olbrechts-Tyteca, L. (1969). The new rhetoric: A treatise on argumentation. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press
dc.identifier.citationPrensky, M. (2001). Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants. Retrieved December 27, 2006, from http://www.marcprensky.com/writing/Prensky%20%20Digital%20Natives,%20Digital20 Immigrants%20-%20Part1.pdf#search=%22prensky%22digital%20native%22%22
dc.identifier.citationReid, D. K., & Stone, C. A. (1991). Why is cognitive instruction effective? Underlying learning mechanisms. Remedial and Special Education, 12(3), 8-19.
dc.identifier.citationReyes, E. C. (2011). Connecting knowledge for text construction through the use of graphic organizers. Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal, 13(1), 7-19.
dc.identifier.citationRoa Pinzón, M.A. (2012). Making connections: impact of graphic organizers in reading comprehension and summarization (Unpublished Master’s thesis). Universidad de La Sabana, Chía, Colombia. Retrieved from http://intellectum.unisabana.edu.co:8080/jspui/bitstream/10818/3348/1/Mar_a_Alejandra _Roa_Pinz_n.pdf
dc.identifier.citationRobinson, D. H., & Kiewra, K. A. (1995). Visual argument: Graphic organizers are superior to outlines in improving learning from text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87(3), 455- 467.
dc.identifier.citationRuddell, M. R. (2001). Teaching content reading and writing (3rd ed.). New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons
dc.identifier.citationSadler, T. D. (2004). Informal reasoning regarding socio-scientific issues: A critical review of research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(5), 513-536.
dc.identifier.citationSakta, C. G. (1992). The graphic organizer: A blueprint for taking lecture notes. Journal of Reading, 35(6), 482-484
dc.identifier.citationSantangelo, T., & Olinghouse, N. G. (2009). Effective writing instruction for students who have writing difficulties. Focus on Exceptional Children, 42(4), 1-20
dc.identifier.citationSchneuwly, B. (1988). Le langage écrit chez l'enfant. [Children's written language] Neuchâtel, France: Delachaux et Niestlé.
dc.identifier.citationSinatra, R. C., & Pizzo, J. (1992). Mapping the road to reading comprehension.Teaching Pre K8(23), 102-105.
dc.identifier.citationSitko, N. J. (2013). Qualitative methods: Data analysis and validation. Paper presented at Zambia Food Security Research Project in support of the Indaba Agricultural Policy Research Institute, Lusaka, Zambia.
dc.identifier.citationStein, N., & Miller, C.A. (1993a). The development of memory and reasoning skill in argumentative contexts: Evaluating, explaining, and generating evidence. In R. Glaser (Ed.), Advances in instructional psychology, (Vol. 4, pp. 285-235). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
dc.identifier.citationStein, N. L., & Miller, C. A. (1993b). A theory of argumentative understanding: Relationships among position preference, judgments of goodness, memory and reasoning. Argumentation, 7(2), 183-204.
dc.identifier.citationStein, N., & Miller, C.A. (1990). I win... you lose: the development of argumentative thinking. In J.F. Voss, D.N. Perkins & J. Segal (Eds.), Informal reasoning and Instruction (pp. 265- 290). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
dc.identifier.citationStewart, D. W. & Shamdasani, P. N. (1990). Focus groups: Theory and practice. California, CA: Sage Publications.
dc.identifier.citationTobias, S. (1990). They're not dumb, they’re different: A new “tier of talent” for science. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 22(4), 11-30.
dc.identifier.citationToulmin, S.E. (1958). The uses of argument. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
dc.identifier.citationVan Eemeren, F. H., & Grootendorst, R. (1984). Speech acts in argumentative discussions: A theoretical model for the analysis of discussions directed towards solving conflicts of opinion. Cinnaminson, NJ: Foris Publications.
dc.identifier.citationVan Eemeren, F. H., & Grootendorst, R. (1987). Fallacies in pragma-dialectical perspective. Argumentation, 1(3), 283-301
dc.identifier.citationVan Eemeren, F.H., Grootensdorst, R., & Henkemans, F.S. (1996). Fundamentals of argumentation theory: A handbook of historical backgrounds and contemporary developments. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
dc.identifier.citationVan Eemeren, F. H., & Grootendorst, R. (1999). Developments in argumentation theory. In R. Andriessen & P. Coirier (Eds.), Foundations of argumentative text processing (pp. 43- 57). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Amsterdam University Press.
dc.identifier.citationVan Eemeren, F.H., Grootensdorst, R., & Henkemans, F.S. (2002). Argumentation: Analysis, evaluation, and presentation. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
dc.identifier.citationVeerman, A. L., & Treasure-Jones, T. (1999). Software for problem solving through collaborative argumentation. Foundations of argumentative text processing, Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Amsterdam University Press.
dc.identifier.citationWhite, D., & Le Cornu, A. (2011). Visitors and Residents: A new typology for online engagement. First Monday, 16(9). doi:10.5210/fm.v16i9.3171. Retrieved from http://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/3171/3049
dc.identifier.citationVictori, M. (1995). EFL writing knowledge and strategies: An interactive study (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Universitat Autonoma, Barcelona, Spain.
dc.identifier.citationVoss, J. F., & Post, T. A. (1988). On the solving of ill-structured problems. In M. H. Chi, R. Glaser, & M. J. Farr (Eds.), The nature of expertise (pp. 261-285). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associate.
dc.identifier.citationVygotsky, L. S. (1978). Tool and symbol in child development. In M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman (Eds.). Mind in Society: The development of higher psychological processes (pp. 1-294).Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
dc.identifier.citationWashington, V. M. (1988). Report writing: A practical application of semantic mapping. The Teacher Educator, 24(1), 24-30.
dc.identifier.citationWertsch, J. V. (1979). From social interaction to higher psychological processes. A clarification and application of Vygotsky’s theory. Human Development, 22(1), 1-22.
dc.identifier.citationWertsch, J. V. (1985). Vygotsky and the social formation of mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
dc.identifier.citationWillis, D., & Willis, J. (2008). Doing task-based teaching. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
dc.identifier.citationWilson, N., & McClean, S. I. (1994). Questionnaire design: a practical introduction. Newton Abbey, UK: University of Ulster Press
dc.identifier.citationWong, Y. K. (1992). Instruction in argumentative writing in Hong Kong secondary schools: A contrastive study of Chinese-English rhetoric (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Georgetown University, Washington, DC
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10818/12424
dc.description135 Páginas.
dc.description.abstractEn este estudio de investigación cualitativa en pequeña escala, se analizó la influencia del uso de organizadores gráficos para ayudar a los participantes en el proceso de realizar textos escritos basados en resolución de problemas. El estudio se llevó a cabo con estudiantes de grado sexto del nivel básico de Inglés según el Marco Común Europeo para las Lenguas en un colegio del sector privado ubicado en Chía, Colombia. Los participantes demostraron dificultades en varios aspectos lingüísticos y comunicativos (vocabulario, conectores, expresiones para dar un punto de vista, dar argumentos, y conectar ideas). Los datos fueron recolectados usando diversos instrumentos como encuestas, cuestionarios, grupos focales, diario docente, y los artefactos de los participantes (organizadores y los textos escritos) y fueron analizados usando el método de teoría fundamentada. Los resultados revelaron que los organizadores gráficos tuvieron una influencia positiva en las habilidades argumentativas de escritura de los participantes. Específicamente, los organizadores ayudaron a promover el desarrollo estratégico de la planeación de la información y linearización argumentativa durante las étapas de planeación y escritura. Esta influencia se debío al mejoramiento de las habilidades de procesamiento de la información y al fomento de la estructura argumentativa escrita. En conclusión, este estudio fomenta la investigación en la escritura en la lengua inglesa ya que extiende nuestro entendimiento sobre cómo los aprendices más jóvenes desarrollan habilidades argumentativas de escritura, y ofrece lecciones significativas para docentes de idiomas—y contenido—en la lengua materna o idiomas adicionales. Palabras claves: Organizadores gráficos; actividades sobre resolución de problemas; habilidad argumentativa escrita; planeación y linearización estratégica.es_CO
dc.language.isoenges_CO
dc.publisherUniversidad de La Sabana
dc.sourceUniversidad de La Sabana
dc.sourceIntellectum Repositorio Universidad de La Sabana
dc.subjectInglés -- Enseñanza -- Colombia
dc.subjectEscritura -- Inglés -- Colombia
dc.subjectComunicación escrita -- Inglés -- Colombia
dc.titleThe influence of graphic organizers in A1 sixth graders' argumentative writing skill in an EFL contextes_CO
dc.typemasterThesis
dc.publisher.programMaestría en Didáctica del Inglés con Énfasis en Ambientes de Aprendizaje Autónomo
dc.publisher.departmentDepartamento de Lenguas y Culturas Extranjeras
dc.identifier.local259987
dc.identifier.localTE06960
dc.type.spaTesis de maestría
dc.type.hasVersionpublishedVersion
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccess
dc.creator.degreeMagíster en Didáctica del Inglés con Énfasis en Ambientes de Aprendizaje Autónomo


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record