Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.advisorCruz Corzo, Carolina
dc.contributor.authorContreras Gutiérrez, Katía
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-15T16:25:19Z
dc.date.available2014-05-15T16:25:19Z
dc.date.created2013
dc.date.issued2014-05-15
dc.identifier.citationBinder, C. Haughton, G. and Bateman, B. (2002).“Fluency: Achieving True Mastery in the Learning Process”.Retrieved:http://www.fluency.org/Binder_Haughton_Bateman.pdf
dc.identifier.citationBordonaro, K. (2006).Self directed language learning of ESL students in an American College library. Journal of Language and Learning, 5(1), 29-49 retrieved http://www.jllonline.co.uk/journal/jllearn/4_1/3_bordonaro.pdf
dc.identifier.citationBrown, J. D. (2004). Promoting fluency in EFL classroom. In T. Newfield (Ed.), Conversational fluency: Ideology or reality: Proceedings of the JALT Pan-SIG Conference, Kyoto, Japan, 2003. Tokyo: Japan Association for Language Teaching. Also retrieved from: http://www.jalt.org/pansig/2003/HTML/Brown.htm
dc.identifier.citationBrumfit, C.J. (1984). Communicative Methodology in Language Teaching: The Roles of Fluency and Accuracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
dc.identifier.citationBurns, A. (2010). Doing Action Research in English Language Teaching.New York: Routledge.
dc.identifier.citationStrauss, A. Corbin, J. (1990) Basics of Qualitative Research. Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. (2nd Ed. 1998)
dc.identifier.citationSheerin, S. (1997).An exploration of the relationship between self-access and independent learning. In Autonomy and independence in languagelearning, eds. P. Benson and Voller.London: Longman, pp. 54–65
dc.identifier.citationClark & Wilkes-Gibbs. (1986). Referring as a collaborative process. Cognition. (1-39) Stanford University
dc.identifier.citationCohen, A. (1994). Assessing Language Ability in the Classroom. Boston. Heinle&Heinle.
dc.identifier.citationCollazos, C., Guerrero, L, Pino, J, And Ochoa, S. (2003) Collaborative Scenarios to promote positive interdependence among group members. CRIWG 2003.LNCS 2806, pp.356- 370,2003.
dc.identifier.citationCrystal, D. 1987. The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
dc.identifier.citationDenzin, N.K. (1970). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods. Chicago: Aldine
dc.identifier.citationDillenbourg P. (1999) What do you mean by collaborative learning?. In P. Dillenbourg (Ed) Collaborative-learning: Cognitive and Computational Approaches. (pp.1-19).Oxford: Elsevier
dc.identifier.citationDu, F. (2012). Using study plans to develop self-directed learning skills: implications from a pilot project. College Student Journal, 46, 223-232
dc.identifier.citationEllis, R. (1994). The Study of Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
dc.identifier.citationEllis, R., (2003).Task-based Language Learning and Teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
dc.identifier.citationFreeman, D (1998) Doing teacher research: From inquiry to understanding. Boston: Heinle and Heinle Publishers.
dc.identifier.citationGarcía- Amaya. (2009). New Findings on Fluency Measures across Three Different Learning Contexts.
dc.identifier.citationGarrison, D.R. (1997).“Self-directed learning: Toward a comprehensive model”. In Adult Education Quarterly, Fall 97 v 48 n 1, p18, 16 p.
dc.identifier.citationGolafshani, N. (2003). Understanding reliability and validity in qualitative research. The Qualitative Report, 8(4), 597-606. Retrieved March 5, 2013 from http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QR8-4/golafshani.pdf
dc.identifier.citationHartmann, R. R. K., & Stork, F. C. (1976).Dictionary of language and linguistics. New York: Wiley.
dc.identifier.citationHieke, A.E. (1985). A componential approach to oral fluency evaluation. The Modern Language Journal, 69, 135-142
dc.identifier.citationJones, L.(2007).The Student-Centered Classroom. Cambridge University Press.
dc.identifier.citationJohnson, R. B., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Turner, L. A. (2007). Toward a definition of mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research
dc.identifier.citationKato, H. (1997). Some Thoughts on Oral Examination for Advance Students in Japanese System.5, (3). 181-186. In: Cohen, A. (1994). Assessing Language Ability in the Classroom. Boston. Heinle&Heinle.
dc.identifier.citationKellem, H. (2009) Principles for developing oral fluency in the classroom .JALT Journal 33. 1
dc.identifier.citationKrashen, S.D. (1982). Principles and Practice in Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: Pergamon
dc.identifier.citationKormos, Judit and MariannDénes (2004). Exploring measures and perceptions of fluency in the speech of second language learners. System, 32 (2), 145 - 164
dc.identifier.citationLennon, P. 1990. Investigating fluency in EFL: A quantitative approach. Language Learning,40, 3, 387-417.
dc.identifier.citationMacIntyre, P., Clement, R., Dörnei, Z. & Noels, K. (1998).Conceptualizing willingness to communicate in a L2: A situational model of L2 confidence and affiliation.The Modern Language Journal.
dc.identifier.citationMerriam, S. (2001). Andragogy and Self-Directed Learning: Pillars of Adult Learning Theory. New Directions for Adult & Continuing Education, 88, 3-13
dc.identifier.citationNunan, D. (2004) Task-based Language Teaching.Cambridge University Press.
dc.identifier.citationNunan, D., & Bailey, K.M. (2009) Exploring second language classroom research:A comprehensive guide. Boston: Heinle, C engage Learning.
dc.identifier.citationNunan, D. (1992) Research Methods in Language Learning.Cambridge University Press.
dc.identifier.citationPattanpichet, F. (2011). The effects of using collaborative learning to enhance students‟ English speaking achievement. Journal of College Teaching & Learning 8(11), 1-11. Retrieved from http://journals.cluteonline.com/index.php/TLC/article/view/6502
dc.identifier.citationPrabhu, N. S., (1987 b). Second Language Pedagogy.Oxford: OUP.
dc.identifier.citationRichards, J. C., Platt, J., & Weber, H. (1985).Longman dictionary of applied linguistics. London: Longman.
dc.identifier.citationRichards, J. and T. Rodgers.(1986). Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
dc.identifier.citationRichards, J.C. & Schmidt, R. (2002). Longman dictionary of language teaching & applied Linguistics (3rd Ed.) Harlow: Longman
dc.identifier.citationRichards, J &. Renandya, W. (2002) Teaching: An Anthology ofcurrent practice Ed Methodology in LanguageCambridge: Cambridge University Press
dc.identifier.citationRivers, W.M. (1981). Teaching foreign language skills (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
dc.identifier.citationRoschelle, J. &Teasley S.D. (1995) The construction of shared knowledge in collaborative problem solving. In C.E. O‟Malley (Ed), computer-supported collaborative learning. (pp 69-197) Berlin: Springer-Verlas
dc.identifier.citationSchmidt, R. (1992). Psychological Mechanisms Underlying Second Language Fluency.CambridgeUniversityPress.
dc.identifier.citationThornbury, S. (1999).How to teach grammar.Harlow, Pearson Education.
dc.identifier.citationVan Boxtel, C., Van der Linden, J. L., &Kanselaar, G. (2000). Collaborative learning tasks and the elaboration of conceptual knowledge. Learning and Instruction 10, 311–330. (pp. 1- 20) Oxford: Elsevier science Ltd.
dc.identifier.citationWillis, J. (1996) A framework for Task-Based Learning.Longman.
dc.identifier.citationWillis, D. & Willis, J. (2007).Doing task-based teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press
dc.identifier.citationXiao-Qing, Q. (2002) „An Investigation into the Motivation Theories and the Implications for Foreign Language Learning‟, Foreign Language Research Vol 4
dc.identifier.citationYaruss, S. (1998). Real-Time Analysis of Speech Fluency.Journal of Speech-Language Pathology. Retrieved from http://www.fluencyfriday.org/realtimeanalysis.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10818/10677
dc.description88 Páginas
dc.description.abstractEl objetivo de este proyecto de investigación es analizar el efecto que el diseño y la implementación de actividades de producción oral basadas en el trabajo colaborativo y las estrategias de autodirección tienen en el mejoramiento de la fluidez oral en lengua extranjera. Los estudiantes involucrados en esta investigación son estudiantes universitarios entre 20 y 21 años de edad de la ciudad de Sincelejo Sucre, quienes expresan sentir inseguridad y temor al momento de realizar actividades orales en inglés. Los resultados indican que la implementación de actividades de producción oral basadas en el trabajo colaborativo y las estrategias de autodirección incrementaron el nivel de fluidez en un 152% al final de las intervenciones así como también la motivación de los estudiantes hacia la realización de actividades de producción oral en lengua extranjera . Palabras clave: tareas de autodirección, trabajo colaborativo, actividades de producción oral en lengua extranjera, fluidez.es_CO
dc.language.isospaes_CO
dc.publisherUniversidad de La Sabana
dc.sourceUniversidad de La Sabana
dc.sourceIntellectum Repositorio Universidad de La Sabana
dc.subjectInglés técnico -- Colombiaes_CO
dc.subjectIngles -- Enseñanza -- Colombiaes_CO
dc.subjectInglés -- Oraciones -- Colombiaes_CO
dc.titleEnhancing fluency in speaking through the use of collaborative and self- directed speaking taskses_CO
dc.typemasterThesis
dc.publisher.programMaestría en Didáctica del Inglés con Énfasis en Ambientes de Aprendizaje Autónomo
dc.publisher.departmentDepartamento de Lenguas y Culturas Extranjeras
dc.identifier.local148031
dc.identifier.localTE06489
dc.type.localTesis de maestría
dc.type.hasVersionpublishedVersion
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccess
dc.creator.degreeMagíster en Didáctica del Inglés con Énfasis en Ambientes de Aprendizaje Autónomo


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem