Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorAnderson, Carl Edlund
dc.contributor.authorAlvira Quiroga, Jesús Roberto
dc.date.accessioned2013-12-13T19:20:30Z
dc.date.available2013-12-13T19:20:30Z
dc.date.created2013
dc.date.issued2013-12-13
dc.identifier.citationAlghazo, K., Abdelrahman, S. & Qbeitah, A. A. (2009). The effect of teachers' error feedback on Al-Hussein Bin Talal University students' self-correction ability. European Journal of Social Sciences, 12(1), 142-156. Retrieved from http://www.eurojournals.com/ejss_12_1.htm
dc.identifier.citationAlm, A. (2006). Call for autonomy, competence and relatedness: Motivating language learning environments in Web 2.0. The JALT CALL Journal, 2(3), 29-38. Retrieved from http://www.jaltcall.org/journal/contents_2_3.html.
dc.identifier.citationBichtener, J., Young, S. & Cameron, D. (2005). The effect of different types of corrective feedback on ESL student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 14, 191- 205.
dc.identifier.citationBichtener, J. (2008). Evidence in support of written corrective feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17, 102–118.
dc.identifier.citationBitchener J. & Knoch, U. (2008). The value of written corrective feedback for migrant and international students. Language Teaching Research. 12, 409 doi:10.1177/1362168808089924
dc.identifier.citationBichtener, J. & Knoch, U. (2010). Raising the linguistic accuracy level of advanced L2 writers with written corrective feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing, 19, 207–217.
dc.identifier.citationChandler, J. (2003). The efficacy of various kinds of error feedback for improvement in the accuracy and fluency of L2 student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12, 267–296.
dc.identifier.citationChen, H., Jiang, R., Klein., Miller, (2005). Communication skills importance and proficiency: perception differences between IS staff and IS users. International Journal of Information Management, 25, 215–227. doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2004.12.002
dc.identifier.citationCleaveland, C., Larkins, E. (2004). Web-based practice and feedback improve tax students’ written communication skills. Journal of Accounting. (22), 211–228. doi:10.1016/j.jaccedu.2004.08.001
dc.identifier.citationCohen, A., & Cavalcanti, M. (1990). Feedback on compositions: Teacher and student verbal reports. In B. Kroll (Ed.), Second language writing: Research insights for the classroom (pp. 155-177). Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
dc.identifier.citationCohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K., (2007/8). Research methods in education. London: Routledge Falmer.
dc.identifier.citationConole, G. & Alevizou, P. (2010). A literature of the use of Web 2.0 tools in Higher Education. A report commissioned by the Higher Education Academy. The Open University Walton Hall, Milton Keynes, UK.
dc.identifier.citationCouncil of Europe (2001). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from http://www.coe.int/t/dg4/linguistic/
dc.identifier.citationCouncil of Europe (2001). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Structured overview of all CEFR scales. Retrieved from http://www.coe.int/t/dg4/linguistic/Cadre1_en.asp
dc.identifier.citationCrandall, J. A. (2006, March). The power of writing: The importance of writing in EFL. Presented at the annual conference of TESOL Arabia: Dubai, UAE.
dc.identifier.citationCreswell, J. W. & Miller, D. L. (2000). Determining validity in qualitative inquiry. Theory into Practice, 39(3), 124-131.
dc.identifier.citationCrystal, D. (2005). Speaking of writing and writing of speaking. Pearson Education.
dc.identifier.citationCumming, A. (2005). Learning to write in a second Language: Two decades of research. International Journal of English Studies. Toronto: Institute for Studies in Education of the University of Toronto.
dc.identifier.citationCumming, A. (2006). Goals for Academic Writing. ESL students and their instructors. Ontario Institute for Studies in Education. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company
dc.identifier.citationCushing, W. (2007). Teaching writing teachers about assessment. Journal of Second Language Writing. Department of Applied Linguistics and ESL, Georgia State University.
dc.identifier.citationDagger, S., & Raciti, M. (2010). Embedding relationship cues in written communication. Journal of Services Marketing, 24(2), 103-111
dc.identifier.citationDavis, A., & McGrail, E. (2009). ‘Proof-revising’ with podcasting: keeping readers in mind as students listen to and rethink their writing. Reading Teacher, 62(6), 522-529.
dc.identifier.citationDenzin, N. K. (1978). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods. New York: McGraw-Hill.
dc.identifier.citationDorn, L & Soffos, C. (2001). Scaffolding young writers. Maine: Stenhouse Publishers Portland.
dc.identifier.citationElbow, P. (1998). Writing without teachers (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
dc.identifier.citationFanselow, J. (1987). Breaking rules: Generating and exploring alternatives in language teaching. New York: Longman.
dc.identifier.citationFathman, A. K. Whalley, E. (1990). Teacher response to student writing: Focus on form versus content. Cambridge, UK: In B. Kroll (Ed.), Second Language Writing, 178-190. Cambridge University Press.
dc.identifier.citationFerris, D. (2003). Response to student writing: Implications for second language students. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
dc.identifier.citationFerris, D. (2010). Second language writing research and written corrective feedback in SLA. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32, 181–201
dc.identifier.citationFirkins, A., Forey, G. & Sengupta, S. (2007). Teaching writing to low proficiency EFL students. E LT Journal, 61(4).
dc.identifier.citationFregeau, L. A. (1999). Preparing ESL students for college writing: Two case studies. The Internet TESL Journal [On-line]. 5 (10). Retrieved from http://iteslj.org/Articles/FregeauCollegeWriting.html
dc.identifier.citationFrodesen, J. (2001). Grammar in writing. In M. Celce-Murcia (Ed.), Teaching English as a second or foreign language (3rd. ed., pp. 233-248). Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle.
dc.identifier.citationGedera, D. S. P. (2011). Integration of weblogs in developing language skills of ESL learners. International Journal of Technology in Teaching and Learning, 7(2), 124-135.
dc.identifier.citationGrabe, W., & Kaplan, R. B. (1996). Theory and practice of writing: An applied linguistic perspective. New York: Longman.
dc.identifier.citationGrabe, W. & Stoller, F. L. (2002). Teaching and researching reading. New York: Longman. Harmer, J. (2004). How to teach writing. Pearson Education Limited
dc.identifier.citationHartshorn, K. (2008). The effects of manageable corrective feedback on ESL writing accuracy. Provo, Utah: Brigham Young University
dc.identifier.citationHedgcock, J. & Lefkowitz, N. (1994). Feedback on feedback: Assessing learner receptivity to teacher response in L2 composing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 3(2), 141-163.
dc.identifier.citationHedgcock, J. & Lefkowitz, N. (1996). Some input on input: Two analyses of student response to expert feedback on L2 writing. Modern Language Journal, 80(3), 287-308
dc.identifier.citationHsieh, H. & Shannon, S. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15, 1277–1288
dc.identifier.citationHyland, F. (1998). The impact of teacher-written feedback on individual writers. Journal of Second Language Writing, 7(3), 255-286
dc.identifier.citationHyland, F. (2000). ESL writers and feedback: giving more autonomy to students. Language Teaching Research 4(1), 33–54
dc.identifier.citationIce, P., Curtis, R., Phillips, P. & Wells, J. (2007). Using asynchronous audio feedback to enhance teaching presence and students' sense of community. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 11(2), 3-25
dc.identifier.citationIce, P., Swan, K., Kupczynski, L. & Richardson, J. (2008). The impact of asynchronous audio feedback on teaching and social presence: A survey of current research. Paper presented at the ED-MEDIA 2008 - World Conference on educational multimedia and telecommunications
dc.identifier.citationKelly, J. (2007). The importance of writing: Past, present and future. Retrieved from http://www.rscc.cc.tn.us/owl&writingcenter/OWL/Importance.html.
dc.identifier.citationKemmis, S. and McTaggart, R. (1992) The action research planner (third edition) Geelong, Vic.: Deakin University Press
dc.identifier.citationKroll, B. (2001). Considerations for teaching an ESL/EFL writing course. In M. Celce-Murcia (Ed.), Teaching English as a second or Foreign language (3rd ed., pp.219-232). Boston, MA: Heinle and Heinle
dc.identifier.citationLeki, I. (1990). Coaching from the margins: issues in written response. In Cambridge University Press, Second language writing. Research insights for the classroom. (pp. 57-68). Cambridge
dc.identifier.citationMcGarrell, H., Verbeem, J. (2007). Motivating revision of drafts through formative feedback. E LT Journal. 61(3). Retrieved from www.eltj.oxfordjournals.org.
dc.identifier.citationMelgarejo, D. (2010). Assessing children´s perceptions of writing in EFL based on the process approach. Colombian Applied Linguistics, 12(1), 70-84.
dc.identifier.citationMeriwether, N.W. (1997), Strategies for writing successful essays. NTC Publishing.
dc.identifier.citationMoore, R. (1993). Does writing about science improve learning about science? Journal of College Science Teaching, 12(4), 212–217.
dc.identifier.citationNelson, M. & Schunn, C. (2007). The nature of feedback: Investigating how different Types of feedback affect writing performance. Learning Research and Development Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
dc.identifier.citationNunan, D. (1999). Second language teaching and learning. Boston: Heinle and Heinle.
dc.identifier.citationOlesova, L., Weasenforth, D., Richardson, J., and Meloni, C. (2011). Using asynchronous instructional audio feedback in online environments: A mixed methods study. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 7(1). Retrieved from http://jolt.merlot.org/vol7no1/olesova_0311.pdf
dc.identifier.citationPatton, M. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. (3rd ed.).Thousand Oaks, CA. Sage.
dc.identifier.citationRace, P. Using feedback to help students to learn. University of Reading. Retrieved from http://www.reading.ac.uk/internal/engageinfeedback/Whyisfeedbackimportant/efbWhyIsFeedbackImportant.aspx
dc.identifier.citationRaimes, A. (1983). Techniques in teaching writing. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
dc.identifier.citationReid, J. M. (1993). Teaching ESL writing. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall Regents. Richards, J. C. & Rodgers, T. S. (2001). Approaches and methods in language teaching. 2nd ed., Cambridge: Cambridge university press
dc.identifier.citationRogers, H. (2005). Writing Systems: A linguistic approach. Oxford: Blackwell publishing.
dc.identifier.citationSagor, R. (2005). The action research guidebook. Corvin Press, California,
dc.identifier.citationSantoso, A. (2008). The art of scaffolding an EFL writing class in a hybrid environment: A practical experience. International Journal of the Computer, the Internet and Management. 16(SP3). Retrieved from http://www.gse.au.edu/index.php?option=com_content&view=section&layout=blog&id= 5&Itemid=55
dc.identifier.citationSimpson, A. (2009). A process Approach to Writing. Retrieved from http://developingteachers.com/articles_tchtraining/pwpf_adam.htm
dc.identifier.citationStrauss, A. & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research. Sage Publications. New York.
dc.identifier.citationSuddaby, R. (2006). From the editors: What grounded theory is not. University of Alberta, Academy of Management Journal, 49(4), 633–642.
dc.identifier.citationTribble, C. (1997). Writing. Oxford University Press.SIL International, (1999). [Review of the book Lingual Links Library]. Retrieved from http://www.sil.org/lingualinks/literacy/referencematerials/glossaryofliteracyterms/whatarewriting skills.htm
dc.identifier.citationTruscott, J. (1996). The case against grammar correction in L2 writing classes. Language Learning. 46, 327-369
dc.identifier.citationUniversity of Cambridge. ESOL Examinations. CEFR Level B2. Retrieved from https://www.teachers.cambridgeesol.org/ts/exams/CEFR/B2
dc.identifier.citationUniversity of Cambridge. International Examinations. IGCSE English first language (0500). 2012 Syllabus. Retrieved from http://www.cie.org.uk/qualifications/academic/middlesec/igcse/subject?assdef_id=852
dc.identifier.citationVan Der Stuyf, R. (2002). Scaffolding as a teaching strategy in adolescent learning and development section. Retrieved from http://www.learnnc.org/lp/pages/5074.
dc.identifier.citationVygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge MA. Harvard University Press.
dc.identifier.citationWilliams, J.G. (2003). Providing feedback on ESL Students' written assignments, The Internet TESL Journal, 9(10). Retrieved from http://iteslj.org/Techniques/WilliamsFeedback.html
dc.identifier.citationWong, R. Glendinning, E. & Mantell, H. (1987), Becoming a writer. Longman.
dc.identifier.citationZen, D. (2005). Teaching ESL/EFL writing beyond language skills. Paper presented at the 3rd International Annual LATEFL China Conference, Tonghua, China.
dc.identifier.citation
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10818/9284
dc.description113 Páginas.
dc.description.abstractA pesar del énfasis que se ha venido dando en lo últimos años en Colombia a la enseñanza de la redacción tanto en español como e inglés, son mayores las dificultades que tienen los estudiantes al término del bachillerato por la baja calidad de su redacción, en ambas lenguas. Este nuevo énfasis está relacionado con las demandas de los empleadores para que sus empleados tengan niveles aceptables de redacción para escribir diferentes tipos de reportes y hacer presentaciones ante diferentes tipos de audiencias. El bajo nivel de escritura de muchos profesores y la baja capacitación recibida para enseñar redacción y para dar retroalimentación a los estudiantes. El presente estudio se centra en la retroalimentación en los trabajos de escritura en inglés a estudiantes universitarios con nivel intermedio de lengua. El estudio propone una metodología específica de retroalimentar y cuenta como instrumento para hacerlo con una herramienta web 2.0 llamada ‘screencast’ o imágenes en pantalla. Los hallazgos nos permiten decir que el uso de la metodología propuesta gozó de aceptación por parte de los estudiantes y arrojó resultados positivos en la mejora de la capacidad de los estudiantes para escribir diferentes tipos de párrafos con la corrección exigida por el programa.es_CO
dc.language.isoenges_CO
dc.publisherUniversidad de La Sabana
dc.sourceUniversidad de La Sabana
dc.sourceIntellectum Repositorio Universidad de La Sabana
dc.subjectIngles -- Eseñanza
dc.subjectEnseñanza del inglés -- Método bilingue
dc.subjectIngles básico
dc.titleThe impact of direct, coded, oral and written feedback on the improvement of paragraph writing of B1 level EFL students at universityes_CO
dc.typemasterThesis
dc.publisher.programMaestría en Didáctica del Inglés con Énfasis en Ambientes de Aprendizaje Autónomo
dc.publisher.departmentDepartamento de Lenguas y Culturas Extranjeras
dc.identifier.local255584
dc.identifier.localTE05998
dc.type.localTesis de maestría
dc.type.hasVersionpublishedVersion
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccess
dc.creator.degreeMagíster en Didáctica del Inglés con Énfasis en Ambientes de Aprendizaje Autónomo


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record