Show simple item record

Promoting three reading strategies (scanning, skimming and making predictions) to foster autonomy

dc.contributor.advisorJiménez, Sonia Stella
dc.contributor.authorIzquierdo Castillo, Alexander
dc.date.accessioned2013-12-13T15:10:40Z
dc.date.available2013-12-13T15:10:40Z
dc.date.created2013
dc.date.issued2013-12-13
dc.identifier.citationAguirre, J., & Ramos, B. (2009). Guidance in reading strategies: A first step --towards autonomy learning in a semi-distance education program. PROFILE 11. Bogotá, Colombia.
dc.identifier.citationAlmasi, J. F. (2003). Teaching strategic reading processes. New York: Guilford Press.
dc.identifier.citationAlderson, J. (2000). Assessing Reading. United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
dc.identifier.citationAnderson, N.J (1999). Exploring Second Language Reading: Issues and Strategies. Toronto: Heinle & Heinle Publisher.
dc.identifier.citationArhar, J. M., Holly, M. L., & Kasten, W. C. (2001). Action research for teachers: Traveling the yellow brick road. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Prentice Hall.
dc.identifier.citationBarnhardt, S., Chamot, A., El-Dinary, P, and Robbins, J. (1999). The learning Strategies Handbook. New York: Longman.
dc.identifier.citationBrantmeier, C (2002). Second Language Reading Strategy Research at the Secondary and University Levels: Variations, Dispartities and Generalizability. The Reading Matrix (3), pp 1 – 14. Retrieved June 10th, 2011 from the World Wide Web at http://www.readingmatrix.com/articles/braintmeier/article.pdf.
dc.identifier.citationBenson, P. and Voller, P. (eds) (1997) Autonomy and Independence in Language Learning. Hong Kong: Longman Group.
dc.identifier.citationBenson, P. (2001). Teaching and researching autonomy in language learning. Harlow, England: Pearson Education Limited
dc.identifier.citationBoud, D. (1988). Developing Student Autonomy in Learning. London: Kogan Page.
dc.identifier.citationBrown (1990). Strategies for Developing Reading Skills. Retrieved March 25th, 2011 from the World Wide Web at: http://www.nclrc.org/essentials/reading/stratread.htm
dc.identifier.citationBurns, A. (1999). Collaborative Action Research for English Language Teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
dc.identifier.citationBurns, A. (2010). Doing Action Research. A Guide for Practitioners. New York: USA, Routledge.
dc.identifier.citationBruner, J. (1973) Beyond the information given; studies in the psychology of knowing. New York. Norton
dc.identifier.citationCarrell, P. L. (1998). Can reading strategies be successfully taught? ARAL, 21(1), 1-20
dc.identifier.citationCohen, L. Manion, I. & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education. (6th ed.) London: Routledge Falmer.
dc.identifier.citationCorbin, J., & Strauss, A. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
dc.identifier.citationCorbin, J., & Strauss A. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory. Procedures and techniques. London: Sage publications.
dc.identifier.citationCorbin , J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research (3rd ed.).Thousand Oaks: Publications.
dc.identifier.citationCorreales, R., Mendivelso, O & Santacruz F. (2000): Reading Comprehension: A Viable Challenge for Public School Students. PROFILE, Issues in Teachers' Professional Development, 1, 38-41.
dc.identifier.citationCortes, M., Sanchez, L. (2005). Profiles of Autonomy in the Field of Foreign Languages. Profile (online). n.6, pp. 133-140. ISSN 1657-0790
dc.identifier.citationCotterall, S. (1995). Developing a course strategy for learner autonomy. ELT Journal, 49, 3, 219-227.
dc.identifier.citationCotterall, S. & Crabbe, D. (1999). Learner Autonomy in Language Learning: Defining the Field and Effecting Change. Frankfurt and Main: Peter Lang GmbH.
dc.identifier.citationDay, R. R., & Bamford, J. (1998). Extensive reading in the second language classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
dc.identifier.citationDeci, E. L. and Ryan, R. M. (1985) Intrinsic Motivation and Self Determination in Human Behaviour. New York, NY: Plenum Press.
dc.identifier.citationDickinson, L. (1992). Learner autonomy 2: Learner training for language learning. Dublin: Authentik Language Resources, Ltd.
dc.identifier.citationDickinson, L. (1995). ‘Autonomy and motivation: A literature review.’ System 23/2: 165- 74.
dc.identifier.citationGaona. G. E.; Suárez L. I; González H. C (2001) Becoming an Efficient Reader: A Proposal for a School Curriculum. Profile Issues in Teachers’ Professional Development, Vol 2, No 1.
dc.identifier.citationGardner, R. (1983). Learning another language: A true social psychology experiment. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 2, 219-240.
dc.identifier.citationGarner, R. (1987). Metacognition and reading comprehension. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
dc.identifier.citationGhuma, Masouda, Moh (2011) The Transferability of Reading Strategies between L1 (Arabic) and L2 (English). Doctoral thesis, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/924/
dc.identifier.citationGrabe, W., Stoller, F. (2002).Teaching and Researching Reading. Malaysia: Longman Pearson Education.
dc.identifier.citationGreenall, S. and Swan, M. (1986). Effective Reading: Reading Skills for Advanced Students. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
dc.identifier.citationGrellet, F. (1996). Developing Reading Skills: A practical guide to reading comprehension exercises. Cambridge University Press.
dc.identifier.citationGreenwood, J. (1998). Class Readers. Hongkong: Oxford University Press.
dc.identifier.citationGuilloteaux, M. & Dörnyei, Z. (2008). Motivating language learners: A Classroom-Oriented Investigation of the Effects of Motivational Strategies on Student Motivation. TESOL Quarterly, 42, 1. 55-77.
dc.identifier.citationGustafson, K. (1996). Instructional Design Models. In T. Plomp & D. P. Ely (Eds.), International Encyclopedia of Educational Technology, Second Edition. New York: Elsevier
dc.identifier.citationGuthrie, J., Wigfield, A., Metsala, J. and Cox, K. (1999). Motivational and cognitive predictors of text comprehension and reading amount. Scientific Studies of Reading, 3: 231-56.
dc.identifier.citationHedge, T. (2003). Teaching and Learning in the Language. Classroom, New York: Oxford University Press
dc.identifier.citationHolec, H., (1981): Autonomy and foreign language learning. Oxford: Pergamon. (First published 1979, Strasbourg: Council of Europe.)
dc.identifier.citationJiménez, P. (2000).Teaching Reading Strategies. Colombia: Universidad Externado de Colombia.
dc.identifier.citationKerr, (2009). Skimming, scanning and inferring in reading. LCPJ.
dc.identifier.citationKomiyama, K. (2009). Car: A means for motivating students to read. English Teaching Forum Number 3.
dc.identifier.citationLegutke, M. and H. Thomas. (1991) Process and Experience in the Language Classroom. Clevedon, Avon: Multilingual Matters.
dc.identifier.citationLessard C, M (1997). Language Learning Strategies: An Overview for L2 Teachers. The Internet TESL Journal 3 (3), pp 34 – 37.
dc.identifier.citationLittle, D. (1991) Autonomy: Definitions, Issues and Problems. Dublin: Authentik.
dc.identifier.citationLoughran, J. (2002) Teacher as researcher: The PAVOT Project. Crows Nest, NSW
dc.identifier.citationLü c K, K. (2008). Web-based Foreign Language Reading: Affective and Productive Outcomes. University of California, Davis.
dc.identifier.citationLuna, M., & Sánchez, D. (2005). Profiles of Autonomy in the Field of Foreign Languages. Profile 6, 133-140: Universidad Nacional de Colombia.
dc.identifier.citationMatsubara, J., & Lehtinen (2007). Promoting autonomy in a reading classroom. Kanda University of International Studies, China Japan
dc.identifier.citationMiles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (2004). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
dc.identifier.citationMokhtari, K., & Sheorey, R. (2002). Measuring ESL students’ awareness of reading strategies. Journal of Developmental Education, 25 (3), 2-10.
dc.identifier.citationNolen, A.L. & Vander Putten, J. (2007). Action Research in Education: Addressing Gaps in Ethical Principles and Practices, Educational Researcher, 36(7):401-407.
dc.identifier.citationNunan, D. (1992). Research Methods in Language Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
dc.identifier.citationNunan, D. (1999). Second Language Teaching and Learning. Boston: Heinle, Cengage Learning.
dc.identifier.citationNuttall, C. (1982). Teaching Reading Skills in a Foreign Language. London: Heinemann
dc.identifier.citationNuttall, C. (1996).Teaching Reading Skills in a Foreign Language. Oxford: Heinemann.
dc.identifier.citationO’Brian, R. (1998). An Overview of the Methodological Approach of Action Research. Faculty of Information Studies, University of Toronto. Available: Retrieved November 13, 2011 from http://www.web.ca/~robrien/papers/arfinal.htm
dc.identifier.citationOxford, R.L. and Nyikos, M. 1989: Variables affecting choice of language learning strategies by university students. The Modern Language Journal 73, 291- 300.
dc.identifier.citationOxford, R.L (1990). Language Learning Strategies: What Every teacher should know. New York: Newbury House.
dc.identifier.citationOzek, Y., & Civelek, Muharrem (2006). A Study on the Use of Cognitive Reading Strategies by ELT Students. Dicle University, Turkey
dc.identifier.citationPennycook, A. (1997) ‘Cultural Alternatives and Autonomy’ in: P. Benson and Voller (eds.) Autonomy and Independence in Language Learning P. 35- 53 Harlow: Longman.
dc.identifier.citationPerdomo, C. M. (2001). An Approach to Making Students Autonomous Readers of the English Language. PROFILE Issues in Teachers' Professional Development. Universidad Nacional de Colombia.
dc.identifier.citationPressley, M., Beard El-Dinary, P., & Brown, R. (1992). Skilled and not-soskilled reading: Good information processing and not-so-good information processing. In M. Pressley, K.
dc.identifier.citationRios, S., & Valcárcel, A. (2005) Reading: A Meaningful Way to Promote Learning English in High School. Profile 6, 59- 72: Universidad Nacional de Colombia.
dc.identifier.citationSau. C., M (n.d). Teaching Students to Read More Effectively. Action research in teaching. Hong Kong
dc.identifier.citationShahidullah, M. 1995-96. “Product and Process View of Reading and Their Pedagogical Implications”. Rajshahi University Studies. Part-A. Vol. 23-24. pp. 209-230
dc.identifier.citationStrauss, A. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
dc.identifier.citationStrauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1994). Grounded theory methodology: An overview. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 273-285). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
dc.identifier.citationStern P. and Porr, C. (2010).Essentials of Accessible Grounded Theory. Walnut Creek, California: Left Coast Press.
dc.identifier.citationSugirin, (1999). Exploring the comprehension strategies of EFL readers: A multi-method study. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. Ed 428- 548)
dc.identifier.citationTakase, A. (2007). Japanese high school students’ motivation for extensive L2 reading. Kansai University.
dc.identifier.citationUrquhart, S. and Weir, C. 1998. Reading in a Second Language: Process, Product and practice. London: Longman
dc.identifier.citationWallace. M. J. (2002). Action Research for Language Teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
dc.identifier.citationWang, J. H. Y., & Guthrie, J. T. (2004). Modeling the eプects of intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation, amount of reading, and past reading achievement on text comprehension between U.S. and Chinese students. Reading Research Quarterly, 39, 162- 186
dc.identifier.citationWilliams, E. (1996). Reading in the Language Classroom. Malaysia: Modern English Publications.
dc.identifier.citationXiaoxia, Q. (2005). Helping EFL learners become autonomous readers: Self-access through metacognition. CELEA Journal. Zhejian Gongshang University
dc.identifier.citationZhang, L. (2001). Awareness in reading: EFL students´ metacognitive knowledge of reading strategies in an acquisition-poor environment. Language Awareness, 10(4), 268-288.
dc.identifier.citationZimmerman, B. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In M. Boeckaerts, et al. (Eds.), Handbook on self-regulation. Directions and challenges for future research (pp. 13-39). San Diego: Academic Press.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10818/9259
dc.description163 Páginas.
dc.description.abstractEn este artículo se reportan los resultados de un proyecto de investigación-acción llevado a cabo en un colegio público rural en Gachetá, Cundinamarca, Colombia, con estudiantes de noveno grado. El propósito de este estudio fue determinar el impacto de tres estrategias de lectura en inglés (scanning, skimming and making predictions) para promover la autonomía y la compresión lectora. La primera estrategia se refiere a saber hallar información específica en un texto, la segunda hace referencia a identificar la idea principal de un texto, y la tercera a la capacidad de predecir el posible contenido de un texto. La recolección de datos incluyó el uso de una lista de verificación inicial para el estudiante, un cuestionario para cada estrategia vista, un reporte de auto evaluación para el docente, y una lista de verificación al finalizar el proyecto para los estudiantes, con el objetivo de analizar si los estudiantes mejoraron su autonomía y comprensión lectora. Adicionalmente, se administró un test a los estudiantes con el fin de constatar si hubo avances en la comprensión de lectura. Los resultados evidenciaron que los estudiantes adquirieron algunos rasgos de autonomía tales como tomar decisiones para aprender y hacer sus tareas asignadas, ser más conscientes de su proceso de lectura, y estar más motivados para el aprendizaje. Asimismo, la capacitación referente a las estrategias de lectura les permitió a los estudiantes mejorar su comprensión lectora. Se puede concluir que estas estrategias de lectura son herramientas que le sirven al estudiante para su formación en autonomía.es_CO
dc.language.isospaes_CO
dc.publisherUniversidad de la Sabana
dc.sourceUniversidad de La Sabana
dc.sourceIntellectum Repositorio Universidad de La Sabana
dc.subjectIngles -- Enseñanza -- Colombia
dc.subjectEnseñanza del ingles -- Método bilingue -- Colombia
dc.subjectIngles -- Métodos de enseñanza -- Colombia
dc.titlePromoting three reading strategies (scanning, skimming and making predictions) to foster autonomyes_CO
dc.typemasterThesis
dc.publisher.programMaestría en Didáctica del Inglés con Énfasis en Ambientes de Aprendizaje Autónomo
dc.publisher.departmentDepartamento de Lenguas y Culturas Extranjeras
dc.identifier.local255684
dc.identifier.localTE06055
dc.type.localTesis de maestría
dc.type.hasVersionpublishedVersion
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccess
dc.creator.degreeMagíster en Didáctica del Inglés con Énfasis en Ambientes de Aprendizaje Autónomo


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Alexander Izquierdo Castillo ...
Size:
1.262Mb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Ver documento en PDF
View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record