Apresentar o registro simples

dc.contributor.authorPedraza-Sanabria S
dc.contributor.authorDodd S
dc.contributor.authorGiraldo-Cadavid L.F
dc.contributor.authorWhittingham K
dc.contributor.authorBustos R.-H.
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-01T14:34:20Z
dc.date.available2024-11-01T14:34:20Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.identifier.issn2710749
dc.identifier.otherhttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85191900846&doi=10.1097%2fJCP.0000000000001835&partnerID=40&md5=418dfaa78f2eecb926df33bd964293a2
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10818/62177
dc.description.abstractBackground/Purpose Lithium is an effective psychoactive drug. It has a narrow therapeutic margin, with subtherapeutic levels or intoxication commonly occurring. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of lithium has several barriers. This scoping review aims to describe and analyze existing and emerging technologies for lithium TDM and to describe the lithium quantification parameters (precision, accuracy, detection limit) attributed to each technology. Method PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar were searched. Studies that described lithium quantification and complied with PRISMA-ScR guidelines were included. Articles selection was conducted by 2 researchers. Good precision was defined if its relative standard deviation <3%; acceptable, from 3% to 5%; and low, >5%. Accuracy was considered good if the error <5%; acceptable, 5%1 to 0%; and low if it was >10%. Results Of the 2008 articles found, 22 met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 14 studies concerned laboratory devices, in which precision was found to be low in one third of cases, and half had good precision. Accuracy of one third was good, another third was low, and the remaining third did not report accuracy. The other 8 studies concerned portable devices, in which precision was low in more than 60% of the cases and good in 25% of the studies. Accuracy was low in 50% of the cases, and good in just over a third. Limits of detection included the therapeutic range of lithium in all studies. Conclusions Among emerging technologies for lithium TDM, precision and accuracy remain a challenge, particularly for portable devices. © Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.en
dc.formatapplication/pdfes_CO
dc.language.isoenges_CO
dc.publisherJournal of Clinical Psychopharmacologyes_CO
dc.relation.ispartofseriesJournal of Clinical Psychopharmacology Vol. 44 N° 3
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.sourceUniversidad de La Sabanaes_CO
dc.sourceIntellectum Repositorio Universidad de La Sabanaes_CO
dc.subject.otherLithiumen
dc.subject.otherLithiumen
dc.subject.otherLithium derivativeen
dc.subject.otherTranquilizeren
dc.subject.otherAccuracyen
dc.subject.otherBlood glucose monitoringen
dc.subject.otherCapillary electrophoresisen
dc.subject.otherDrug monitoringen
dc.titleExisting and emerging technologies for therapeutic monitoring of lithium: a scoping reviewen
dc.typejournal articlees_CO
dc.type.hasVersionpublishedVersiones_CO
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccesses_CO
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/JCP.0000000000001835


Arquivos deste item

ArquivosTamanhoFormatoVisualização

Não existem arquivos associados a este item.

Este item aparece na(s) seguinte(s) coleção(s)

Apresentar o registro simples

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 InternationalExceto quando indicado o contrário, a licença deste item é descrito como Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International