Apresentar o registro simples

dc.contributor.authorSarmiento I
dc.contributor.authorCockcroft A
dc.contributor.authorDion A
dc.contributor.authorBelaid L
dc.contributor.authorSilver H
dc.contributor.authorPizarro K
dc.contributor.authorPimentel J
dc.contributor.authorTratt E
dc.contributor.authorSkerritt L
dc.contributor.authorGhadirian M.Z
dc.contributor.authorGagnon-Dufresne M.-C
dc.contributor.authorAndersson N.
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-07T21:38:50Z
dc.date.available2024-10-07T21:38:50Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.identifier.issn7787367
dc.identifier.otherhttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85193801354&doi=10.1186%2fs13690-024-01303-7&partnerID=40&md5=e0f420a7ed9a216e70ec5a004d5369fb
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10818/61867
dc.description.abstractBackground: Fuzzy cognitive mapping (FCM) is a graphic technique to describe causal understanding in a wide range of applications. This practice review summarises the experience of a group of participatory research specialists and trainees who used FCM to include stakeholder views in addressing health challenges. From a meeting of the research group, this practice review reports 25 experiences with FCM in nine countries between 2016 and 2023. Results: The methods, challenges and adjustments focus on participatory research practice. FCM portrayed multiple sources of knowledge: stakeholder knowledge, systematic reviews of literature, and survey data. Methodological advances included techniques to contrast and combine maps from different sources using Bayesian procedures, protocols to enhance the quality of data collection, and tools to facilitate analysis. Summary graphs communicating FCM findings sacrificed detail but facilitated stakeholder discussion of the most important relationships. We used maps not as predictive models but to surface and share perspectives of how change could happen and to inform dialogue. Analysis included simple manual techniques and sophisticated computer-based solutions. A wide range of experience in initiating, drawing, analysing, and communicating the maps illustrates FCM flexibility for different contexts and skill bases. Conclusions: A strong core procedure can contribute to more robust applications of the technique while adapting FCM for different research settings. Decision-making often involves choices between plausible interventions in a context of uncertainty and multiple possible answers to the same question. FCM offers systematic and traceable ways to document, contrast and sometimes to combine perspectives, incorporating stakeholder experience and causal models to inform decision-making. Different depths of FCM analysis open opportunities for applying the technique in skill-limited settings. © The Author(s) 2024.en
dc.formatapplication/pdfes_CO
dc.language.isoenges_CO
dc.publisherArchives of Public Healthes_CO
dc.relation.ispartofseriesArchives of Public Health Vol. 82 N° 1 art. 76
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.sourceUniversidad de La Sabanaes_CO
dc.sourceIntellectum Repositorio Universidad de La Sabanaes_CO
dc.subject.otherFuzzy cognitive mappingen
dc.subject.otherFuzzy logicen
dc.subject.otherGlobal healthen
dc.subject.otherParticipatory modellingen
dc.subject.otherPublic healthen
dc.subject.otherStakeholder engagementen
dc.subject.otherWeight of evidenceen
dc.titleFuzzy cognitive mapping in participatory research and decision making: a practice reviewen
dc.typejournal articlees_CO
dc.type.hasVersionpublishedVersiones_CO
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccesses_CO
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s13690-024-01303-7


Arquivos deste item

ArquivosTamanhoFormatoVisualização

Não existem arquivos associados a este item.

Este item aparece na(s) seguinte(s) coleção(s)

Apresentar o registro simples

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 InternationalExceto quando indicado o contrário, a licença deste item é descrito como Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International