Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Educación y reumatología en el pregrado: ¿enseñamos suficiente?

dc.contributor.authorMora Karam C.
dc.contributor.authorBeltrán A.
dc.contributor.authorRestrepo J.
dc.contributor.authorSierra R.
dc.contributor.authorGuerrero Y.A.
dc.contributor.authorMartínez D.C.
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-20T19:13:25Z
dc.date.available2024-05-20T19:13:25Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.citationMora Karam, C., Beltrán, A., Restrepo, J., Sierra, R., Guerrero, Y.A., Martínez, D.C. Teaching Rheumatology in the undergraduate: It is enough? [Article@Educación y reumatología en el pregrado: ¿enseñamos suficiente?] (2022) Revista Colombiana de Reumatologia, 29 (1), pp. 38-43es_CO
dc.identifier.issn1218123
dc.identifier.otherhttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85104619960&doi=10.1016%2fj.rcreu.2020.11.006&partnerID=40&md5=1b7a6ff200656b268573988851b1a68f
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10818/60080
dc.description12 páginases_CO
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Musculoskeletal disorders (MSD) are the second leading cause of disability worldwide. There are difficulties in the early diagnosis and therapeutic approach to these pathologies, with a negative impact on their outcomes. Access to rheumatology is limited, with a low supply in the face of growing demand, which makes the general practitioner the first contact for care. Objectives: Describe the perception and confidence that general practitioners have regarding the training in rheumatology received at undergraduate level. Materials and methods: Observational cross-sectional study, with a Likert-type survey tool being used. The study included general practitioners graduated from the Colombian Medicine program between 2009 and 2019. The variables studied were those related to the curriculum, acquired knowledge or skills, and proficiency in content in rheumatology compared to practice. Subjects who attended a specialist or who had an employment relationship with a specialist rheumatology centre were excluded. Results and conclusions: A total of 102 physicians were surveyed, and 86 completed questionnaires were included in the final analysis. Of these, 83.4% were graduates of private universities. Over two-thirds (37%9) had a formal subject in rheumatology, 16% received training with specific strategies, 54% expressed security when performing the ME physical examination, and 47% were safe in the diagnostic approach, and prescription of disease-modifying drugs. In order to strengthen the training in rheumatology required by the undergraduate, a joint effort is required with the medical schools in defining the competencies and skills of the primary care physician, together with the health needs and available educational strategies. © 2021 Asociación Colombiana de Reumatologíaen
dc.formatapplication/pdfes_CO
dc.language.isoenges_CO
dc.publisherRevista Colombiana de Reumatologiaes_CO
dc.relation.ispartofseriesRevista Colombiana de Reumatologia Vol. 29 N° 1 p. 38-43
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.sourceUniversidad de La Sabanaes_CO
dc.sourceIntellectum Repositorio Universidad de La Sabanaes_CO
dc.subject.otherEducation Medicalen
dc.subject.otherGeneral Practitionersen
dc.subject.otherRheumatologyen
dc.titleTeaching Rheumatology in the undergraduate: It is enough?en
dc.titleEducación y reumatología en el pregrado: ¿enseñamos suficiente?es_CO
dc.typejournal articlees_CO
dc.type.hasVersionpublishedVersiones_CO
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccesses_CO
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.rcreu.2020.11.006


Ficheros en el ítem

FicherosTamañoFormatoVer

No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem.

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 InternationalExcepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International