Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Medios de comunicación y eutanasia en Colombia. Análisis de contenido y categorización argumentativa

dc.contributor.authorSarmiento Medina P.J.
dc.contributor.authorGarcía Medina D.P.
dc.contributor.authorGarzón González C.J.
dc.contributor.authorCastillo Merchán L.J.
dc.contributor.authorCorreal Neira K.
dc.contributor.authorCelis Pedraza D.A.
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-17T15:15:45Z
dc.date.available2024-04-17T15:15:45Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.citationSarmiento-Medina, P.J., García-Medina, D.P., Garzón-González, C.J., Castillo-Merchán, L.J., Correal-Neira, K., Celis-Pedraza, D.A. Mass media and euthanasia in colombia. Content analysis and argumentative categorization [Article@Medios de comunicación y eutanasia en Colombia. Análisis de contenido y categorización argumentativa] (2019) Revista Facultad de Medicina, 67 (2), pp. 209-215es_CO
dc.identifier.otherhttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85073292583&doi=10.15446%2frevfacmed.v67n2.68645&partnerID=40&md5=5173cc7e1ed337eea0071b7222d20517
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10818/59757
dc.description6 páginas
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Euthanasia was decriminalized in Colombia by means of Sentence C-239/97 and regulated through Resolution 1216 of 2015 of the Ministry of Health and Social Protection. Some Colombian media were consulted to identify whether their position was in favor, neutral or against euthanasia and their reasons during the period 1997-2015. Objectives: To establish the position of some media regarding euthanasia during 1997-2015 and analyze their reasoning. Materials and methods: After conducting a search in the digital and printed versions of El Tiempo, El Espectador and Revista Semana, a classification and content analysis of the articles on euthanasia was carried out using the software ATLAS.ti, version 8. Results: From 257 articles retrieved, 190 included the term euthanasia in the context of health and end of life. 45% of the articles were neutral and informative and 78.9% did not mention palliative care. Favorable opinions were related to contents about dignity, suffering and regulation. Conclusions: The articles presented contrasting positions with content mistakes and superficial discussions on the issue. The prevailing position was neutral followed by favorable. There was little involvement of the medical community and almost no mention of palliative care. © 2019, Universidad Nacional de Colombia. All rights reserved.en
dc.language.isoenges_CO
dc.publisherRevista Facultad de Medicinaes_CO
dc.relation.ispartofseriesRevista Facultad de Medicina 67 (2), 209-215
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.sourceUniversidad de La Sabanaes_CO
dc.sourceIntellectum Repositorio Universidad de La Sabanaes_CO
dc.subject.otherColombiaen
dc.subject.otherEuthanasiaen
dc.subject.otherMass Mediaen
dc.subject.otherPalliative Care (MeSH)en
dc.titleMass media and euthanasia in colombia. Content analysis and argumentative categorizationen
dc.titleMedios de comunicación y eutanasia en Colombia. Análisis de contenido y categorización argumentativaes_CO
dc.typejournal articlees_CO
dc.type.hasVersionpublishedVersiones_CO
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccesses_CO
dc.identifier.doi10.15446/revfacmed.v67n2.68645


Ficheros en el ítem

FicherosTamañoFormatoVer

No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem.

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 InternationalExcepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International