Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRodríguez, Sandra
dc.contributor.authorMuñoz, Andrés
dc.contributor.authorBustos, Rosa Helena
dc.contributor.authorJaimes, Diego
dc.date.accessioned8/1/2021 20:49
dc.date.available2021-08-02T01:49:37Z
dc.date.issued2020-08-23
dc.identifier.citationRodríguez S., Muñoz A., Bustos R.H., Jaimes D. (2020) Pharmacovigilance of Biopharmaceuticals in Rheumatic Diseases, Adverse Events, Evolution, and Perspective: An Overview. Biomedicines, 8, 303. p.p. 1-28. https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9059/8/9/303es_CO
dc.identifier.issn2227-9059
dc.identifier.otherhttps://www.mdpi.com/2227-9059/8/9/303
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10818/48080
dc.description28 páginases_CO
dc.description.abstractSince we have gained an understanding of the immunological pathophysiology of rheumatic diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis and systemic lupus erythematosus, treatment based on biological drugs has become a fundamental axis. These therapies are oriented towards the regulation of cytokines such as tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), interleukin (IL)-6, IL-1, and the modulation of cell-mediated immunity (B cells and T cells) by anti CD20 or anti CTAL-4 agents, and can increase the risk of associated infections or adverse events (AE). In this context, the entry of biotherapeutics represented a challenge for pharmacovigilance, risk management and approval by the main global regulatory agencies regarding biosimilars, where efficacy and safety are based on comparability exercises without being an exact copy in terms of molecular structure. The objective of this review is divided into three fundamental aspects: (i) to illustrate the evolution and focus of pharmacovigilance at the biopharmaceutical level, (ii) to describe the different approved recommendations of biopharmaceuticals (biological and biosimilars) and their use in rheumatic diseases (RDs) such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA), juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), ankylosing spondylitis (AS), systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and other less frequent RD like cryopyrin-associated autoinflammatory syndromes (CAPS), and (iii) to identify the main AE reported in the post-marketing phase of RD biopharmaceuticals.en
dc.formatapplication/pdfes_CO
dc.language.isoenges_CO
dc.publisherBiomedicineses_CO
dc.relation.ispartofseriesBiomedicines 2020, 8(9), 303
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.sourceUniversidad de La Sabanaes_CO
dc.sourceIntellectum Repositorio Universidad de La Sabanaes_CO
dc.subjectBiopharmaceuticalses_CO
dc.subjectBiologicses_CO
dc.subjectMonoclonal antibodieses_CO
dc.subjectPharmacovigilancees_CO
dc.subjectRheumatologic diseaseses_CO
dc.subjectBiosimilarses_CO
dc.titlePharmacovigilance of Biopharmaceuticals in Rheumatic Diseases, Adverse Events, Evolution, and Perspective: An Overviewes_CO
dc.typearticleen
dc.type.hasVersionpublishedVersiones_CO
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccesses_CO
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/biomedicines8090303


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 InternacionalExcept where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional