Show simple item record

Diseño universal para el aprendizaje en la evaluación: apoyo a los ELL con dificultades de aprendizaje;
Design universal para a aprendizagem na avaliação: apoio aos ELLs com dificuldades de aprendizagem

dc.contributor.authorDelaney, Thomas A.
dc.contributor.authorHata, Maiko
dc.date.accessioned11/12/2020 8:15
dc.date.available11/12/2020 8:15
dc.date.issued2020-08-28
dc.identifier.citationDelaney, T. A., & Hata, M. (2020). Universal design for learning in assessment: Supporting ELLs with learning disabilities. Latin American Journal of Content & Language Integrated Learning, 13(1), 79-91. https://doi.org/10.5294/laclil.2020.13.1.5es_CO
dc.identifier.issn2011-6721
dc.identifier.otherhttps://laclil.unisabana.edu.co/index.php/LACLIL/article/view/12245
dc.identifier.otherhttps://laclil.unisabana.edu.co/index.php/LACLIL/article/view/12245/pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10818/44196
dc.description13 páginases_CO
dc.description.abstractStudying English is challenging and, for many learners, undiagnosed learning disabilities can present a serious threat to their success. Recent studies indicate that up to 10% of the world population has a non-apparent disability, such as autism or dyslexia. At the same time, few English language learner (ELL) instructors in higher education have training in learning disabilities, and they are often unsure of how to support learners who seem to have extra challenges. This is especially true when it comes to assessment, as instructors often rely on traditional tools that could negatively affect the validity of the assessment outcomes. In this brief reflection, the authors share how instructors can apply the principles of Universal Design for Learning (UDL) to their assessment practices to support students with disabilities, regardless of diagnostic status. First, disabilities that affect language learning will be briefly discussed, followed by the explanation of how English to speakers of other languages (ESOL) assessments present specific challenges for students with disabilities. Then, the authors will provide an overview of UDL theory, which proposes that learners with disabilities are often best served by accommodations in representation, expression and engagement that can benefit the entire class. Most of the paper will focus on specific, practical strategies for implementing UDL within assessment in higher education. Such strategies include building executive function, implementing multi-channel assessment, and learning about students through an “evaluation loop.”en
dc.description.abstractEstudiar inglés es un desafío y, para muchos estudiantes, las discapacidades de aprendizaje no diagnosticadas pueden representar una seria amenaza para su éxito. Los más recientes estudios indican que, hasta un 10 % de la población mundial tiene una discapacidad no aparente, como el autismo o la dislexia. Al mismo tiempo, pocos profesores de aprendices de inglés (ELL) en educación superior han recibido entrenamiento en discapacidades de aprendizaje y, a menudo, no están seguros de cómo apoyar a los alumnos que parecen tener otros desafíos. Esto es particularmente cierto en lo que respecta a la evaluación, ya que los instructores a menudo se basan en herramientas tradicionales que podrían afectar negativamente la validez de los resultados de la evaluación. En esta breve reflexión, los autores comparten cómo los instructores pueden aplicar los principios del Diseño Universal para el Aprendizaje (DUA) a sus prácticas de evaluación para apoyar a los estudiantes con discapacidades, independientemente del estado de diagnóstico. Luego, los autores proporcionarán una descripción general de la teoría DUA, que propone que los estudiantes con discapacidades a menudo se benefician más con adaptaciones en representación, expresión y participación que pueden beneficiar a toda la clase. La mayor parte del artículo se centrará en estrategias prácticas específicas para implementar la DUA dentro de la evaluación en la educación superior. Dichas estrategias incluyen desarrollar la función ejecutiva, implementar evaluaciones multicanal y aprender sobre los estudiantes a través de un “ciclo de evaluación”.es_CO
dc.formatapplication/pdfes_CO
dc.language.isoenges_CO
dc.relation.ispartofseriesLatin American Journal of Content & Language Integrated Learning, 13(1), 79-91
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.sourceinstname:Universidad de La Sabanaes_CO
dc.sourcereponame:Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de La Sabanaes_CO
dc.subject.otherLearning disabilitieseng
dc.subject.otherUniversal designeng
dc.subject.otherUniversal design for learningeng
dc.subject.otherUDLeng
dc.subject.otherAssessmenteng
dc.subject.otherEvaluationeng
dc.subject.otherHigher educationeng
dc.titleUniversal Design for Learning in Assessment: Supporting ELLs with Learning Disabilitiesen
dc.titleDiseño universal para el aprendizaje en la evaluación: apoyo a los ELL con dificultades de aprendizajees_CO
dc.titleDesign universal para a aprendizagem na avaliação: apoio aos ELLs com dificuldades de aprendizagemes_CO
dc.typejournal articlees_CO
dc.publisher.departmentDirección de Publicacioneses_CO
dc.type.hasVersionpublishedVersiones_CO
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccess
dc.identifier.doi10.5294/laclil.2020.13.1.5
dcterms.referencesAmerican Psychiatric Association. (2019a). What is ADHD? https://www.psychiatry.org/patients-families/adhd/what-is-adhdeng
dcterms.referencesAmerican Psychiatric Association. (2019b). What is autism spectrum disorder? https://www.psychiatry.org/patients-families/autism/what-is-autism-spectrum-disordereng
dcterms.referencesBrookhart, S. M. (2009). The many meanings of “multiple measures.” Educational Leadership, 67(3), 6–12. http://www.ascd.org/publications/educational-leadership/nov09/vol67/num03/The-Many-Meanings-of-%C2%A3Multiple-Measures%C2%A3.aspxeng
dcterms.referencesButterworth, B., & Kovas, Y. (2013). Understanding neurocognitive developmental disorders can improve education for all. Science, 340(6130), 300–305. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1231022eng
dcterms.referencesCenter for Applied Special Technology. (2014). Universal design for learning guidelines version 2.1 [graphic organizer]. http://udlguidelines.cast.org/?utm_medium=web&utm_campaign=none&utm_source=cast-about-udleng
dcterms.referencesCenter for Applied Special Technology. (2019). About Universal Design of Learning. http://www.cast.org/our-work/about-udl.html#.XyHq1vhKjfZeng
dcterms.referencesHughes, A. (2003). Testing for language teachers. Cambridge University Press. Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 of 2004.eng
dcterms.referencesJapan Student Services Organization. (2015). 平成26年度(2014年度)障害のある学生の修学支援に関する実態調査. https://www.jasso.go.jp/gakusei/tokubetsu_shien/chosa_kenkyu/chosa/2014.htmleng
dcterms.referencesLarson, K., Russ, S. A., Kahn, R. S., & Halfon, N. (2011). Patterns of comorbidity, functioning, and service use for US children with ADHD, 2007. Pediatrics, 127(3), 462–470. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2010-0165eng
dcterms.referencesNakayama W. T., & Butterworth, B. (1999). A case study of an English-Japanese bilingual with monolingual dyslexia. Cognition, 70, 273–305.eng
dcterms.referencesNational Center for Education Statistics. (2019). Table 6. MAIN TYPE OF CONDITION: Among undergraduates reporting disabilities, percentage distribution of main type of condition or impairment, by selected demographic and enrollment characteristics: 2011–12. https://nces.ed.gov/Datalab/TablesLibrary/TableDetails/11798?rst=trueeng
dcterms.referencesNational Center for Learning Disabilities (NCLD). (2014). The state of learning disabilities: Facts, trends and indicators. NCLD.eng
dcterms.referencesSireci, S. G., Scarpati, S. E., & Li, S. (2005). Test accommodations for students with disabilities: An analysis of the interaction hypothesis. Review of Educational Research, 75(4), 457–490. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543075004457eng
dcterms.referencesSnyder, T. D., Brey, C. d., & Dillow, S. A. (2019). Digest of education statistics, 2017. https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2018/2018070.pdfeng
dcterms.referencesThe International Dyslexia Association. (2019). Definition of dyslexia. https://dyslexiaida.org/definition-of-dyslexia/eng
dcterms.referencesWesche, M. B. (1983). Communicative testing in a second language. The Modern Language Journal, 67(1), 41–55. https://doi.org/10.2307/326692eng
dc.identifier.eissn2322-9721


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 InternationalExcept where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International