Apresentar o registro simples

The inclusion of information and communications technologies in the english language classroom : a systematic literature review

dc.contributor.advisorMcdougald, Jermaine S.
dc.contributor.authorOrtiz, Angela Sofia
dc.coverage.spatialColombiaes_CO
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-24T14:46:51Z
dc.date.available2019-07-24T14:46:51Z
dc.date.issued2019-06-17
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10818/36309
dc.description218 páginases_CO
dc.description.abstractThis study provides a systematic literature review in which 59 research projects were examined. The sample included reports that give account of the use of information and communications technologies (ICTs) in English language learning contexts from 2009 to 2017 in Colombia. At the needs analysis stage, it was evidenced that there is not a solid synthesis of these projects to determine how ICTs have been used over the years in different educational Colombian contexts. Therefore, the main aim of the present study is to understand and identify how pedagogies and technologies have been used by these teachers to support language learning. Data from the 59 theses was collected and scrutinized following systematic literature review and grounded qualitative meta-analysis procedures. Results indicate that affordances provided by ICT tools along with the use of teaching strategies offer varied benefits to learning enhancement (i.e. self-directedness, metacognition, affective factors, and collaboration), as well as to language skills development (i.e. writing, reading, speaking, vocabulary). Key words: ICTs; CALL; 21st century skills; systematic literature review.es_CO
dc.formatapplication/pdfes_CO
dc.language.isospaes_CO
dc.publisherUniversidad de La Sabanaes_CO
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectTecnología educativaes_CO
dc.subjectIngléses_CO
dc.subjectAprendizajees_CO
dc.subjectInnovaciones tecnológicases_CO
dc.titleThe inclusion of information and communications technologies in the english language classroom : a systematic literature reviewes_CO
dc.typemasterThesises_CO
dc.publisher.programMaestría en Didáctica del Inglés con Énfasis en Ambientes de Aprendizaje Autónomoes_CO
dc.publisher.departmentDepartamento de Lenguas y Culturas Extranjerases_CO
dc.type.hasVersionpublishedVersiones_CO
dc.rights.accessRightsrestrictedAccesses_CO
dc.creator.degreeMagíster en Didáctica del Inglés con Énfasis en Ambientes de Aprendizaje Autónomoes_CO
dcterms.referencesAlavi, M. (1994). Computer-mediated learning : An empirical evaluation. MIS Quarterly, 18(2), 159–174. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/249763eng
dcterms.referencesAlghasab, M. (2016). The impact of EFL teachers’ mediation in wiki-mediated collaborative writing activities on student-student collaboration. In S. Papadima-Sophocleous, L. Bradley, & S. Thouësny (Eds.), CALL communities and culture – short papers from EUROCALL 2016 (pp. 1–6). https://doi.org/10.14705/rpnet.2016.EUROCALL2016.9781908416445eng
dcterms.referencesAltun, A. (2010). New text on the block: Problems and issues while navigating to read. In M. J. Luzón, M. N. Ruiz-Madrid, & M. L. Villanueva (Eds.), Digital Genres, New Literacies and Autonomy in Language Learning (pp. 43–61). Cambridge Scholars Publishing.eng
dcterms.referencesAnderson, N. J. (2012). Metacognition: Awareness of Language Learning. In S. Mercer, S. Ryan, & M. Williams (Eds.), Psychology for Language Learning: Insights from Research, Theory and Practice (pp. 169–187). London: Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137032829_12eng
dcterms.referencesAntigoni, P., Panayiotis, Z., Salomi, P.-S., & Andri, I. (2013). Mapping the landscape of computer-assisted language learning: an inventory of research. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 10(4), 252–269. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITSE-02-2013-0004eng
dcterms.referencesBajrami, L. (2015). Teacher’s new role in language learning and in promoting learner autonomy. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 199, 423–427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.528eng
dcterms.referencesBax, S. (2003). CALL—past, present and future. System, 31(1), 13–28. Retrieved from http://www.u.arizona.edu/~jonrein/internettech10/bax_03.pdfeng
dcterms.referencesBeatty, K. (2010). Teaching and Researching Computer-Assisted Language Learning (2nd ed.). Pearson.eng
dcterms.referencesBeatty, K., & Nunan, D. (2004). Computer-mediated collaborative learning. System, 32(2), 165– 183. Retrieved from http://explore.bl.uk/primo_library/libweb/action/display.do?tabs=detailsTab&gathStatTab=t rue&ct=display&fn=search&doc=ETOCRN148319995&indx=1&recIds=ETOCRN148319 995eng
dcterms.referencesBenson, P. (2007). Autonomy in language teaching and learning. Language Teaching, 40(01), 21–40. Retrieved from http://www4.pucsp.br/inpla/benson_artigo.pdfeng
dcterms.referencesBenson, P. (2013). Learner autonomy. TESOL Quarterly, 47(4), 839–843. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.134eng
dcterms.referencesBlurton, C. (1999). New Directions of ICT-Use in Education. UNESCO’s World Communication and Information Report. Retrieved from http://www.unesco.org/education/educprog/lwf/dl/edict.pdfeng
dcterms.referencesCarpenter, S. K., & Olson, K. M. (2012). Are pictures good for learning new vocabulary in a foreign language? only if you think they are not. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 38(1), 92–101. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024828eng
dcterms.referencesChamot, A. U. A. (2005). Language learning strategy instruction: Current issues and research. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 25, 112–130. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190505000061eng
dcterms.referencesChang, M.-M. (2010). Effects of self-Monitoring on web-based language learner ’ s performance and motivation. CALICO Journal, 27(2), 298–310.eng
dcterms.referencesChapelle, C. A. (2016). Call in the Year 2000: a Look Back From 2016. Language Learning & Technology, 20(2), 159–161. Retrieved from http://llt.msu.edu/issues/june2016/chapelle.pdfeng
dcterms.referencesChen, P.-J. (2016). Learners’ metalinguistic and affective performance in blogging to write. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(4), 790–814. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eric&AN=EJ1099287&site=edsliveeng
dcterms.referencesChoudhury, N. (2014). World wide web and Its journey from web 1.0 to web 4.0. International Journal of Computer Science and Information Technologies, 5(6), 8096–8100. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-9-82eng
dcterms.referencesChun, D., Smith, B., & Kern, R. (2016). Technology in language use, language teaching, and language learning. The Modern Language Journal, 100(1), 64–80. Retrieved from https://search-ebscohostcom.ez.unisabana.edu.co/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip&db=eric&AN=EJ1092042 &lang=es&site=eds-live&scope=siteeng
dcterms.referencesClarke, C. C. (1918). The phonograph in modern language teaching. The Modern Language Journal, 3(3), 116–122. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1918.tb03384.xeng
dcterms.referencesClaro, M., Preiss, D. D., San Martín, E., Jara, I., Hinostroza, J. E., Valenzuela, S., … Nussbaum, M. (2012). Assessment of 21st century ICT skills in Chile: Test design and results from high school level students. Computers and Education, 59(3), 1042–1053. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.04.004eng
dcterms.referencesCohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education. Professional Development in Education (6th ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2011.643130eng
dcterms.referencesConole, G., & Alevizou, P. (2010). A literature review of the use of Web 2.0 tools in Higher Education. Commissioned by the Higher Education Academy (Vol. 17). Retrieved from http://www.jisctechdis.ac.uk/assets/EvidenceNet/Conole_Alevizou_2010.pdf%5Cnhttp://or o.open.ac.uk/23154/eng
dcterms.referencesCorbin, J. M., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of Qualitative Research : techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory / Juliet Corbin, Anselm Strauss. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=cat06493a&AN=sab.000129814&s ite=eds-liveeng
dcterms.referencesCote Parra, G. E. (2015). Engaging foreign language learners in a web 2.0-mediated collaborative learning process. PROFILE Issues in Teachers’ Professional Development, 17(2), 137–146. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.15446/profile.v17n2.47510.eng
dcterms.referencesCutrim Schmid, E. (2008). Potential pedagogical benefits and drawbacks of multimedia use in the English language classroom equipped with interactive whiteboard technology. Computers and Education, 51(4), 1553–1568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.02.005eng
dcterms.referencesDavies, G. (2012). Introduction to multimedia CALL. Retrieved December 11, 2017, from http://www.ict4lt.org/en/en_mod2-2.htmeng
dcterms.referencesDevedzic, V. (2004). Education and the semantic web. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 14, 39–65.eng
dcterms.referencesDörnyei, Z. (2014). Motivation in second language learning. In M. Celce-Murcia, M. Brinton, & M. Snow (Eds.), Teaching English as a second or foreing language (4th ed., pp. 518–131).eng
dcterms.referencesDoulgeri, M., & Antoniou, L. (2018). The effectiveness of a parallel syllabus that uses WebQuests to enhance the new literacies of 6th grade primary school EFL learners. Research Papers in Language Teaching & Learning, 9(1), 56–76. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edb&AN=128811896&site=edsliveeng
dcterms.referencesDurriyah, T. L., & Zuhdi, M. (2018). Digital literacy with EFL student teachers : Exploring Indonesian student teachers ’ initial perception about integrating digital technologies into a teaching unit. International Journal of Education & Literacy Studies., 6(3), 53–60. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijels.v.6n.3p.53eng
dcterms.referencesEkahitanond, V. (2018). The impact of feedback in Facebook on students’ language proficiency. TEM Journal, 7(3), 686–692. https://doi.org/10.18421/TEM73-28eng
dcterms.referencesFelix, U. (2008). The unreasonable effectivness of CALL: What have we learned in two decades of research? ReCALL, 20(2), 141–161. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344008000323eng
dcterms.referencesGokhale, A. A. (1995). Collaborative learning enhances critical thinking. Journal of Technology Education, 7(1). Retrieved from http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/ejournals/JTE/v7n1/gokhale.jtev7n1.htmleng
dcterms.referencesGolonka, E. M., Bowles, A. R., Frank, V. M., Richardson, D. L., & Freynik, S. (2014). Technologies for foreign language learning: A review of technology types and their effectiveness. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 27(1), 70–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2012.700315eng
dcterms.referencesGough, D., Oliver, S., & Thomas, J. (2012). An Introduction to Systematic reviews. Sage Publications, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1109/METRIC.2004.1357885eng
dcterms.referencesGrover, K., Miller, M., Swearingen, B., & Wood, N. (2014). An examination of the self-directed learning practices of ESL adult language learners. Journal of Adult Education, 43(2), 12– 19.eng
dcterms.referencesHammond, M. (2009). What is an affordance and can it help us understand the use of ICT in education? Education and Information Technologies, 15(3), 205–217. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-009-9106-zeng
dcterms.referencesHaryati Ibrahim, A., & Mat Daud, N. (2013). Public speaking anxiety in podcast aided language classes. World Applied Sciences Journal, 21(SPECIAL ISSUE4), 12–18. https://doi.org/10.5829/idosi.wasj.2013.21.sltl.2132eng
dcterms.referencesHealey, D. (2016). Language learning and technology: Past, present and future. In F. Farr & L. Murray (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Language Learning and Technology. (pp. 9– 23). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315657899eng
dcterms.referencesHitosugi, C. I. (2016). Creating a sense of a collaborative learning community with google+. Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 3–10. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2016.10eng
dcterms.referencesHossler, D., & Scalese-love, P. (1989). Grounded meta-analysis : A guide for research synthesis. The Review of Higher Education, 13(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.1989.0000eng
dcterms.referencesHsu, H.-C., & Lo, Y.-F. (2018). Using wiki-mediated collaboration to foster L2 writing performance. Language Learning & Technology, 22(3), 103–123. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eric&AN=EJ1192898&site=edsliveeng
dcterms.referencesHubbard, P. (1988). An integrated framework for CALL courseware evaluation. CALICO Journal, 6(2), 51–72. https://doi.org/10.11139/cj.6.2.51-72eng
dcterms.referencesHutchby, I. (2001). Technologies, texts and affordances. Sociology, 35(2), 441–456.eng
dcterms.referencesIksan, H., & Halim, H. A. (2018). The effect of e-feedback via wikis on ESL students’ L2 writing anxiety level. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 6(3), 30–48. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=EJ1185810eng
dcterms.referencesJara, C. A., Candelas, F. A., Torres, F., Dormido, S., Esquembre, F., & Reinoso, O. (2008). Realtime collaboration of virtual laboratories through the Internet. Computers and Education, 52(1), 126–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.07.007eng
dcterms.referencesJewitt, C. (2013). Multimodality and digital technologies in the language classroom. In I. de Saint-Georges & J. J. Weber (Eds.), Multilingualism and Multimodality : Current Challenges for Educational Studies (pp. 141–152). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers. Retrieved from https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip&db=nlebk&AN=63950 3&lang=es&site=eds-live&scope=siteeng
dcterms.referencesKennewell, S. (2001). Using affordances and constraints to evaluate the use of information and communications technology in teaching and learning. Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education, 10(1–2), 101–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/14759390100200105eng
dcterms.referencesKessler, G., & Bikowski, D. (2010). Developing collaborative autonomous learning abilities in computer mediated language learning: Attention to meaning among students in wiki space. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 23(1), 41–58. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588220903467335eng
dcterms.referencesKhalil, H., & Ebner, M. (2017). Using electronic communication tools in online group activities to develop collaborative learning skills. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 5(4), 529–536. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2017.050401eng
dcterms.referencesKukulska-Hulme, A., & Shield, L. (2008). An overview of mobile assisted language learning: From content delivery to supported collaboration and interaction. ReCALL, 20(03), 271– 289. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344008000335eng
dcterms.referencesLai, C. (2015). Modeling teachers’ influence on learners’ self-directed use of technology for language learning outside the classroom. Computers and Education, 82, 74–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.11.005eng
dcterms.referencesLee, L. (2010). Exploring wiki-mediated collaborative writing : A case study in an elementary Spanish course. CALICO Journal, 27(2), 260–276.eng
dcterms.referencesLevy, M. (2000). Scope, goals and methods in CALL research: Questions of coherence and autonomy. ReCALL. Retrieved from http://explore.bl.uk/primo_library/libweb/action/display.do?tabs=detailsTab&gathStatTab=true&ct=display&fn=search&doc=ETOCRN089624824&indx=1&recIds=ETOCRN089624 824eng
dcterms.referencesLin, M. H. (2015). Learner-centered blogging : A preliminary investigation of EFL student writers ’ experience. Educational Technology & Society, 18(4), 446–458.eng
dcterms.referencesLitzler, M. F., & García Laborda, J. (2017). English for business: Student responses to language learning through social networking tools. ESP Today, 5(1), 91–107. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.18485/esptoday.2017.5.1.5eng
dcterms.referencesLiu, M., Moore, Z., Graham, L., & Lee, S. (2003). A look at the research on computerbased technology use in second language learning: A review of the literature from 1990-2000. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 34(3), 250–273. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2002.10782348eng
dcterms.referencesLuzón, M. J., Ruiz-Madrid, M. N., & Villanueva, M. L. (2010). Learner autonomy in digital environments: Conceptual framework. In M. J. Luzón, M. N. Ruiz-Madrid, & M. L. Villanueva (Eds.), Digital Genres, New Literacies and Autonomy in Language Learning (pp. 1–22). Cambridge Scholars Publishing.eng
dcterms.referencesMarczak, M. (2013). Information and communication technology in computer assisted language learning. In Communication and Information Technology in (Intercultural) Language Teaching (pp. 111–135). Cambridge Scholars Publishing.eng
dcterms.referencesMcDougald, J. S. (2013). The use of new technologies among in-service Colombian ELT teachers. Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal, 15(2), 247–264.eng
dcterms.referencesMellati, M., Khademi, M., & Abolhassani, M. (2018). Creative interaction in social networks : Multi-synchronous language learning environments. Education and Information Technologies, 23(5), 2053–2071. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9703-9eng
dcterms.referencesMishan, F. (2003). Designing authenticity into language learning materials. Bristol: Intellect. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=e000xww&AN=108331&site=edsliveeng
dcterms.referencesMohammadyari, S., & Singh, H. (2015). Understanding the effect of e-learning on individual performance: The role of digital literacy. Computers & Education, 82, 11–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.10.025eng
dcterms.referencesMorris, R. D. (2011). Web 3.0: Implications for online learning. TechTrends, 55(1), 42–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-011-0469-9eng
dcterms.referencesMotallebzadeh, K., Ahmadi, F., & Hosseinnia, M. (2018). Relationship between 21st century skills, speaking and writing skills: A structural equation modelling approach. International Journal of Instruction, 11(3), 265–276. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=EJ1183376eng
dcterms.referencesNation, P. (2015). Principles guiding vocabulary learning through extensive reading. Reading in a Foreign Language, 27(1), 136–145. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=EJ1059712eng
dcterms.referencesNg, W. (2012). Can we teach digital natives digital literacy? Computers & Education, 59(3), 1065–1078. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.04.016eng
dcterms.referencesOtto, S. E. K. (2017). Learning, from past to present: A hundred years of technology for L2. In C. A. Chapelle & S. Sauro (Eds.), The Handbook of Technology and Second Language Teaching and Learning. John Wiley & Sons.eng
dcterms.referencesPaiva, V. L. M. de O. e, & Braga, J. de C. F. (2008). The complex nature of autonomy. DELTA: Documentação de Estudos Em Lingüística Teórica e Aplicada, 24(spe), 441–468. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-44502008000300004eng
dcterms.referencesPartnership for 21st Century Skills. (2004). Framework for 21st century learning. Retrieved May 17, 2018, from http://www.battelleforkids.org/networks/p21/frameworks-resourceseng
dcterms.referencesPearson, A., White, H., Bath-Hextall, F., Apostolo, J., Salmond, S., & Kirkpatrick, P. (2014). The Joanna Briggs Institute Reviewers ’ Manual 2014 Methodology for JBI Mixed Methods Systematic Reviews (The Joanna).eng
dcterms.referencesPeng, H., Su, Y., Chou, C., & Tsai, C. (2009). Ubiquitous knowledge construction: Mobile learning re-defined and a conceptual framework. Innovations in Education and Teaching International Vol., 46(2), 171–183. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703290902843828eng
dcterms.referencesPetticrew, M., & Roberts, H. (2006). Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences. Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470754887eng
dcterms.referencesPorat, E., Blau, I., & Barak, A. (2018). Measuring digital literacies: Junior high-school students’ perceived competencies versus actual performance. Computers & Education, 126, 23–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.06.030eng
dcterms.referencesRivera, A. (2018). Motivating English language use by using the benefits of technology. GIST Education and Learning Research Journal, 16(January-June), 117–140.eng
dcterms.referencesRosenthal, R. (1978). How often are our numbers wrong? American Psychologist. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.33.11.1005eng
dcterms.referencesSalaberry, M. R. (2001). The use of technology for second language learning and teaching: A retrospective. The Modern Language Journal, 85(1), 39–56. https://doi.org/10.1111/0026- 7902.00096eng
dcterms.referencesSandelowski, M., & Barroso, J. (2007). Handbook for Synthesizing Qualitative Research. Animal Genetics (Vol. 39). Springer.eng
dcterms.referencesSharndama, E. C. (2013). Application of ICTs in teaching and learning English (ELT) in large classes. Journal of Arts and Humanities, 2(6), 34–39. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.18533/journal.v2i6.148eng
dcterms.referencesSiddiq, F., Gochyyev, P., & Wilson, M. (2017). Learning in digital networks – ICT literacy: A novel assessment of students’ 21st century skills. Computers and Education, 109, 11–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.01.014eng
dcterms.referencesSlaouti, D. (2013). Technology in ELT. In J. McDonough, C. Shaw, & M. Hitomi (Eds.), Materials and Methods in ELT: A Teachers’ Guide (3th ed., pp. 79–105). John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004eng
dcterms.referencesSpall, S. (1998). Peer debriefing in qualitative research: emerging operational models. Qualitative Inquiry, 4(2), 280–292. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsgea&AN=edsgcl.20778155&sit e=eds-liveeng
dcterms.referencesStockwell, G. (2012). Mobile-assited language learning. In M. Thomas, H. Reinders, & M. Warschauer (Eds.), Contemporary Computer-Assisted Language Learning (pp. 201–2016). Bloomsbury Academic. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal0768eng
dcterms.referencesSung, K., & Poole, F. (2017). Investigating the use of a smartphone social networking application on language learning. The JALT CALL Journal, 13(2), 97–115. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1155201.pdfeng
dcterms.referencesTafazoli, D., Parra, E. G., & Abril, C. A. H. (2017). Computer literacy : Sine qua non for digital age of language learning & teaching. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 7(9), 716– 722.eng
dcterms.referencesTrilling, B., & Fadel, C. (2009). 21st Century Skills: Learning for Life in Our Times (1st ed.). San Francisco: John Wiley & Sons.eng
dcterms.referencesTsourapa, A. (2018). Exploring teachers’ attitudes towards the development of 21st century skills in EFL teaching. Research Papers in Language Teaching & Learning, 9(1), 6–31. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edb&AN=128811894&site=edsliveeng
dcterms.referencesvan Laar, E., van Deursen, A. J. A. M., van Dijk, J. A. G. M., & de Haan, J. (2017). The relation between 21st-century skills and digital skills: A systematic literature review. Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 577–588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.03.010eng
dcterms.referencesVoogt, J., Knezek, G., Cox, M., Knezek, D., & Ten Brummelhuis, A. (2011). Under which conditions does ICT have a positive effect on teaching and learning? A Call to Action. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365- 2729.2011.00453.xeng
dcterms.referencesVungthong, S., Djonov, E., & Torr, J. (2017). Images as a resource for supporting vocabulary learning: A multimodal analysis of Thai EFL tablet apps for primary school children. TESOL Quarterly, 51(1), 32–58. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.274eng
dcterms.referencesVurdien, R. (2013). Enhancing writing skills through blogging in an advanced English as a foreign language class in Spain. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 26(2), 126–143. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eric&AN=EJ1005238&site=edsliveeng
dcterms.referencesWalker, A., & White, G. (2013). Technology Enhanced Language Learning: connecting theory and practice - Oxford Handbooks for Language Teachers. Oxford University Press. Retrieved from https://books.google.es/books?id=gu6dBgAAQBAJeng
dcterms.referencesWang, S., & Vásquez, C. (2012). Web 2.0 and second language learning: What does the research tell us? CALICO Journal, 29(3), 412–430. https://doi.org/10.11139/cj.29.3.412-430eng
dcterms.referencesWang, Y. (2014). Using wikis to facilitate interaction and collaboration among EFL learners : A social constructivist approach to language teaching. System, 42(2014), 383–390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2014.01.007eng
dcterms.referencesWarschauer, M., & Healey, D. (1998). State of the art article Computers and language learning : an overview. Language Learning, 31, 57–71. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444800012970eng
dcterms.referencesWilliamson Hawkins, M. (2018). Self-directed learning as related to learning strategies, selfregulation, and autonomy in an English language program: A local application with global implications. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 8(2), 445–469. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2018.8.2.12eng
dcterms.referencesYamada, M., & Akahori, K. (2009). Awareness and performance through self- and partner’s image in videoconferencing. CALICO Journal, 27(1), 1–25.eng
dcterms.referencesYang, Y. T. C., & Wu, W. C. I. (2012). Digital storytelling for enhancing student academic achievement, critical thinking, and learning motivation: A year-long experimental study. Computers and Education. Retrieved from http://explore.bl.uk/primo_library/libweb/action/display.do?tabs=detailsTab&gathStatTab=t rue&ct=display&fn=search&doc=ETOCRN311555120&indx=1&recIds=ETOCRN311555 120eng
dcterms.referencesZataraín, R., Barrón, M., González, F., Oramas, R., & Reyes-García, C. A. (2018). An affective and Web 3.0-based learning environment for a programming language. Telematics and Informatics Journal, 35, 611–628. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2017.03.005eng


Arquivos deste item

Thumbnail
Nome:
Angela Ortiz - Research projec ...
Tamanho:
1.447Mb
Formato:
PDF
Descrição:
Ver documento en PDF
Visualizar/Abrir

Este item aparece na(s) seguinte(s) coleção(s)

Apresentar o registro simples

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 InternationalExceto quando indicado o contrário, a licença deste item é descrito como Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International