Instruments to Assess the Subjective Repercussions of People with Chronic Wounds: Integrative Review
Enlaces del Item
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10818/35362Visitar enlace: http://aquichan.unisabana.edu. ...
Visitar enlace: http://aquichan.unisabana.edu. ...
Visitar enlace: http://aquichan.unisabana.edu. ...
ISSN: 1657-5997
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5294/aqui.2 ...
Compartir
Estadísticas
Ver Estadísticas de usoCatalogación bibliográfica
Mostrar el registro completo del ítemAutor/es
Souza Lemes, Joyce; Alvares Amaral, Kelle Vanessa; Barros Nunes, Cynthia Assis; Alves Campos, Ana Clara; Nunes Batista, Alexia; Gomes Malaquias, SuelenFecha
2019Resumen
Objective: To analyze the instruments described in the literature for extended assessment in people with chronic wound. Materials and methods: Study of integrative review of the literature. The search was conducted on databases including PUBMED, Web of Science, SciELO, CINAHL, Science Direct (Elsevier), Scopus, and Biblioteca Virtual da Saúde (BVS). Results: The search found 19,060 articles; after relevance tests, 41 were left. The instrument most used in the studies of this review was the SF-36, which is a tool to assess quality of life (QOL). Conclusion: A diversity of instruments was identified for extended assessment of people with wounds, with those investiga-ting QOL being the most frequent. The repercussions are, mostly, contained in the QOL assessment instruments, but superficially and/or not explicitly, as in the Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36), the means most-frequently identified in the studies of this review. These findings suggest the likelihood of differentiated implications of these instruments according to the etiology of the lesions, psychosocial and psychospiritual needs of the individual, as well as the context to which they are destined, like teaching, clinical practice, or research.
Palabras clave
Ubicación
Aquichan Vol. 19, Núm. 1 (2019) p. e1918