@article{10818/35362,
year = {2019},
url = {http://hdl.handle.net/10818/35362},
abstract = {Objective: To analyze the instruments described in the literature for extended assessment in people with chronic wound. Materials and methods: Study of integrative review of the literature. The search was conducted on databases including PUBMED, Web of Science, SciELO, CINAHL, Science Direct (Elsevier), Scopus, and Biblioteca Virtual da Saúde (BVS). Results: The search found 19,060 articles; after relevance tests, 41 were left. The instrument most used in the studies of this review was the SF-36, which is a tool to assess quality of life (QOL). Conclusion: A diversity of instruments was identified for extended assessment of people with wounds, with those investiga-ting QOL being the most frequent. The repercussions are, mostly, contained in the QOL assessment instruments, but superficially and/or not explicitly, as in the Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36), the means most-frequently identified in the studies of this review. These findings suggest the likelihood of differentiated implications of these instruments according to the etiology of the lesions, psychosocial and psychospiritual needs of the individual, as well as the context to which they are destined, like teaching, clinical practice, or research.},
publisher = {Universidad de La Sabana},
keywords = {Calidad de vida},
keywords = {Heridas y lesiones},
keywords = {Úlcera de la pierna},
keywords = {Evaluación de programas e instrumentos de investigación},
title = {Instruments to Assess the Subjective Repercussions of People with Chronic Wounds: Integrative Review},
doi = {https://doi.org/10.5294/aqui.2019.19.1.8},
author = {Souza Lemes, Joyce and Alvares Amaral, Kelle Vanessa and Barros Nunes, Cynthia Assis and Alves Campos, Ana Clara and Nunes Batista, Alexia and Gomes Malaquias, Suelen},
}