Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.advisorMorales Pulido, Virginia
dc.contributor.authorParra Suarez, Fredy Guillermo
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-21T16:35:23Z
dc.date.available2018-11-21T16:35:23Z
dc.date.issued2018-10-12
dc.identifier.citationAndrade, H., & Du, Y. (2007). Student responses to criteria-referenced self-assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 32(2), 159-181.
dc.identifier.citationAndrade, H. G. (2000). Using rubrics to promote thinking and learning. Educational Leadership, 57(5), 13-19
dc.identifier.citationAriza, A., & Suarez, M. (2013). Effectiveness of the integration of ICT tools and activities to foster awareness as the first stage to reach learning autonomy. Gist Education and learning Research Journal, 7, 154-172.
dc.identifier.citationBailey, K. M. (1998). Learning about language assessment: dilemmas, decisions, and directions. US: Heinle & Heinle
dc.identifier.citationBandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W. H. Freeman and Company.
dc.identifier.citationBandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action. Englewood. Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
dc.identifier.citationBeatty, K. (2010). Teaching and researching: Computer-assisted language learning (2nd ed.). Harlow: Longman/Pearson.
dc.identifier.citationBenson, P. (2013). Teaching and researching: Autonomy in language learning. New York, NY: Routledge.
dc.identifier.citationBoisvert, P., & Rao, K. (2014). Video self-modeling for English Language Learners. TESOL Journal, VI(I).
dc.identifier.citationBoud, D. (1995). Enhancing learning through self-assessment. London: Kogan Page.
dc.identifier.citationBoud, D. (2000). Sustainable assessment: Rethinking assessment for the learning society. Studies in Continuing Education, 22(2), 151-167.
dc.identifier.citationBrand, C., & Götz, S. (2011). Fluency versus accuracy in advanced spoken learner language: A multi-method approach. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 16(2), 255-275. doi: 10.1075/ijcl.16.2.05bra
dc.identifier.citationBrown, G. (1983). Teaching the spoken language: An approach based on the analysis of conversational English. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
dc.identifier.citationBrown, H. D. (1994). Principles of language learning and teaching. (3rd ed.). NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc
dc.identifier.citationBrown, H. D. (2007). Principles of language learning and teaching. NY: Pearson Education.
dc.identifier.citationBrown, J. D. (2003). Promoting fluency in EFL classrooms. In Proceedings of the 2nd annual JALT Pan-SIG conference (pp.1-12). Kyoto institute of Technology Kyoto, Japan.
dc.identifier.citationBrumfit, C. J. (1984). Communicative Methodology in Language Teaching: The Roles of Fluency and Accuracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
dc.identifier.citationBryant, S. M. & Hunton, J. E. (2000). The use of technology in the delivery of instruction: Implications for accounting educators and education researchers. Issues in Accounting Education, 15(1), 129-163.
dc.identifier.citationBurham, A. (2009). Second language teaching and linguistics. Palembag: Grafika Telindo Press.
dc.identifier.citationBurns, A. (1999). Collaborative action research for English language teachers. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press
dc.identifier.citationBurns, A. (2010). Doing action research in English language teaching: A guide for practitioners. New York, NY: Routledge
dc.identifier.citationBurns, A., & Joyce, H. (1997). Focus on speaking. Sydney: National Center for English Language Teaching and Research.
dc.identifier.citationBush, M., & Crotty, W. (1991). Interactive videodisc in language teaching. In W. F. Smith (Ed.), Modern technology in foreign language education: applications and projects. Lincolnwood, IL: National Textbook.
dc.identifier.citationButler, Y. G., & Lee, J. (2010). The effects of self- assessment among young learners of English. Language Testing, (1), 5-31. doi: 10.1177/0265532209346370
dc.identifier.citationBygate, M. (1987). Speaking. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
dc.identifier.citationByrne, D. (1986). Teaching oral English. Harlow: Longman.
dc.identifier.citationCaicedo, O. (2016). The effects of peer-correction and peer-assessment on students’ spoken fluency. (Master thesis, Universidad de la Sabana, Chia, CO). Retrieved from http://intellectum.unisabana.edu.co/handle/10818/25057
dc.identifier.citationCakir, I. (2006). The use of video as an audio-visual material in foreign language teaching classroom. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 5(4).
dc.identifier.citationCampillo, M. (2006). Acquisition and transfer of a writing revision strategy: A self-regulatory analysis. Dissertation Abstracts International, The Humanities and Social Sciences. 67,03.
dc.identifier.citationCanale, M., & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics, 1, 1-47.
dc.identifier.citationCarter, R., & Nunan, D. (2001). The Cambridge guide to teaching English to speakers of other languages. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press
dc.identifier.citationChang, M. (2010). Effects of self- monitoring on web-based language learner: Performance and motivation. Calico Journal (2), 298-310.
dc.identifier.citationChapelle, C. (2009). The relationship between second language acquisition theory and computerassisted language learning. The Modern Language Journal, 93, 741-753. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4781.2009.00970.x
dc.identifier.citationChappuis, J. (2009). Seven strategies of assessment for learning. England: Pearson Longman.
dc.identifier.citationChen, Y. (2011). The influence of integrating technology in language learning courses (Doctoral dissertation) Retrieved from KU ScholarsWorks.
dc.identifier.citationChomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
dc.identifier.citationCohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education (6th ed.). London: Routledge.
dc.identifier.citationCorbin, J. M. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (3rd ed.). Los Angeles, USA: Sage.
dc.identifier.citationCorbin, J. M. & Strauss, A. (2014). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
dc.identifier.citationCouncil of Europe. (2001). In Cambridge University Press (Ed.), Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge, UK.
dc.identifier.citationCreswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). London: Sage Publications.
dc.identifier.citationCrystal, D. (1987). The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
dc.identifier.citationDann, R, (2002). Promoting assessment as learning: Improving the learning process. London, UK: Routledge
dc.identifier.citationDodd, A. (1995). Engaging students: What I learned along the way. Educational Leadership, 53, 65-68.
dc.identifier.citationDonato, R. (2000). Sociocultural contributions to understanding the foreign and second language classroom. In : J. P. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 27-50). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
dc.identifier.citationDrobot, I. (2014). Teaching communication in the English language: How and why? Scientific Journal of Humanistic Studies, 6(11), 89-91.
dc.identifier.citationEbsworth, M. E. (1998). Accuracy & fluency: Which comes first in ESL instruction?. ESL Magazine, 1(2), 24-26. Retrieved from http://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ584012
dc.identifier.citationEllis, R. (1997). Second language acquisition. New York, USA: Oxford University Press.
dc.identifier.citationFlick, U. (2002). An Introduction to Qualitative Research. London, UK: Sage Publications Inc.
dc.identifier.citationFriesner, T., & Hart, M. (2005). Learning Logs: Assessment or Research Method?. Business and Management, University of Chichester, UK. Retrieved from http://smtp.ancasta.net/pubs/papers/log_assess.pdf
dc.identifier.citationGardner, (1999). Self-assessment for autonomous language learners. Links & Letters, 7, 49-60
dc.identifier.citationGarrett, N. (1991). Technology in the service of language learning: Trends and issues. Modern Language Journal, 75(1), 74-101.
dc.identifier.citationGarrison, C. (2007, August 15). Formative and summative assessment in the classroom. Retrieved from https://www.amle.org/BrowsebyTopic/WhatsNew/WNDet/TabId/270/ArtMID/888/Articl eID/286/Formative-and-Summative-Assessments-in-the-Classroom.aspx
dc.identifier.citationGipps, C. (1994) Beyond testing: Towards a theory of educational assessment. London: Falmer Press
dc.identifier.citationGlasser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
dc.identifier.citationGlaser, B. G., & Holton, J. (2004). Remodeling grounded theory. In Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research (Vol. V).
dc.identifier.citationGómez, D. (2014). The impact of peer and self-assessment on teenage B2 students´ use of present perfect simple, present perfect continuous and past perfect simple in their spontaneous spoken production. (Master thesis, Universidad de la Sabana, Chia, CO). Retrieved from http://intellectum.unisabana.edu.co:8080/jspui/handle/10818/10718
dc.identifier.citationGraddol, D. (2006). English Next [E-reader version]. Retrieved from https://englishagenda.britishcouncil.org/sites/default/files/attachments/books-englishnext.pdf
dc.identifier.citationGraham, C. (2005). Blended learning systems: definitions, current trends and future directions. In C. J. Bonk & C.R. Graham, Handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs (pp. 3-21). San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer
dc.identifier.citationGregory, K., Cameron, C., & Forewor, A. D. (2000). Knowing what counts: Self-Assessment and goal setting. Merville, BC: Connections.
dc.identifier.citationGromik, N. A. (2010). Cell phone video recording feature as a language learning tool: A case study. Computers & Education. LVIII(I), 223-230
dc.identifier.citationGuevara, D., & Ordonez C. (2012). Teaching English to very young learners through authentic communicative performances. Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal. 14(2) Retrieved from https://revistas.udistrital.edu.co/ojs/index.php/calj/article/view/3921/6127
dc.identifier.citationHargreaves, E. (2005). Assessment for learning: Thinking outside the (black) box. Cambridge Journal of Education, 35(2), 213-224. Retrieved from http://eprints.ioe.ac.uk/2518/1/Hargreaves2005Assessment213.pdf
dc.identifier.citationHarlen, W., & James, M. (1997). Assessment and learning: differences and relationships between formative and summative assessment. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 4(3), 365-379. doi: 10.1080/0969594970040304
dc.identifier.citationHarmer, J. (1991). The practice of English language teaching. Essex, UK: Longman.
dc.identifier.citationHarris, M. (1997). Self-assessment of language learning in formal settings. English Language Teaching Journal, 51(1), 12-20.
dc.identifier.citationHarris, M. & McCann, P. (1994). Assessment. London: Heinemann.
dc.identifier.citationHatch, E. (1992). Discourse and language education. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press
dc.identifier.citationHedge, T. (2000). Teaching and Learning in the Language Classroom. Oxford: Oxford University Press
dc.identifier.citationHeng-Tsung, D., & Shao-Ting, A. (2010). Examining the practice of a reading-to-speak test task: Anxiety and experience of EFL students. ERIC, 11(2), 235-242
dc.identifier.citationHillier, Y. (2002). Reflective Teaching in Further and Adult Education. London, UK: Continuum.
dc.identifier.citationHunter, J. (2012). “Small Talk”: Developing fluency, accuracy, and complexity in speaking. ELT Journal, 66(1), 30-41. doi: 10.1093/elt/ccq093
dc.identifier.citationHussain, M. A., Niwaz, A., Zaman, A., Dahar, M., & Akhtar, M. S. (2010). Technology-based learning environment and student achievement in English as a foreign language in Pakistan. Journal of World Academy of Science, Engineering, and Technology, 61, 129- 133.
dc.identifier.citationHymes, D. H. (1972). “On Communicative Competence” In: J. B. Pride and J. Holmes (eds) Sociolinguistics. Selected Readings. Harmondsworth: Penguin, pp. 269-293. (Part 2)
dc.identifier.citationJames, R. (1996). CALL and the Speaking Skill. System, 24(1), 15-21.
dc.identifier.citationJohnson, K. (2013). An Introduction to Foreign Language Learning and Teaching. New York, NY: Routledge.
dc.identifier.citationJohnson, R. K. (1989). The second language curriculum. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
dc.identifier.citationKemmis, S., McTaggart, R., & Nixon, R. (1992). The action research planner: Doing critical participatory action research. London, UK: Springer
dc.identifier.citationKhan, N., & Ali, A. (2010). Improving the speaking ability in English: The students’ perspective. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 3575-3579. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.554
dc.identifier.citationKozma, R. B. (2003). Learning with media. Review of Educational Research, 61(2), 179-211.
dc.identifier.citationKrashen, S. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
dc.identifier.citationKrashen, S. (1995). The natural approach: Language acquisition in the classroom. New York: USA: Phoenix Elt
dc.identifier.citationLantolf, J. P. (1994). Sociocultural theory and second language learning: Introduction to the special issue. The Modern Language Journal, 78(4), 418-420. doi: 10.2307/328580
dc.identifier.citationLaw, B. & Eckes, M. (1995). Assessment and ESL: An alternative approach. New York: Portage & Main Press
dc.identifier.citationLeander, S., Kai. (2012). The role of peer feedback in oral communicative tasks for young adult learners. Thesis. (Master thesis, Universidad de la Sabana, Chia, CO). Retrieved from http://intellectum.unisabana.edu.co:8080/jspui/handle/10818/3347
dc.identifier.citationLee, Y.-j. J., & Liang, J.-C. (2012). Using video technology to diagnose EFL students’ cognitive learning difficulties in public speaking. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 64, 671-680. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.11.079
dc.identifier.citationLemos, N. C. (2013). Cooperative learning-based strategies to faster speaking confidence through the participation in an online radio show. (Master thesis, Universidad de la Sabana, Chia, CO) Retrieved from http://intellectum.unisabana.edu.co:8080/jspui/handle/10818/5188
dc.identifier.citationLevy, M. (1997). Computer-assisted language learning: context and conceptualization. New York, USA: Oxford University Press.
dc.identifier.citationLight, D., Manso, M., & Noguera, T. (2009). An Educational revolution to support change in the classroom: Colombia and the educational challenges of the twenty-first century. Policy Futures in Education, 7(1), 88-101. doi: 10.2304/pfie.2009.7.1.88
dc.identifier.citationLopera, E. F. (2013). Enhancing speaking skills through the application of collaborative learning strategies in a Colombian public school. (Master thesis, Universidad de la Sabana, Chia, CO) Retrieved from http://intellectum.unisabana.edu.co:8080/jspui/handle/10818/9274
dc.identifier.citationMancera, J. M. (2014). Improving pronunciation skills through self-recordings. (Master thesis, Universidad de la Sabana, Chia, CO) Retrieved from http://intellectum.unisabana.edu.co/handle/10818/12397
dc.identifier.citationManurung, K. (2015). Improving the speaking skill using reading contextual internet-based instructional materials in an EFL class in Indonesia. Elsevier, 176(2), 44-51.
dc.identifier.citationNilson, L,. (2003). Improving student peer feedback. College Teaching, 51(1), 34-38
dc.identifier.citationNunan, D. (1989). Designing tasks for the communicative classroom. New York: Cambridge University Press.
dc.identifier.citationNunan, D. (1999). Second language teaching & learning. Australia: Heinle, Cengage Learning.
dc.identifier.citationOdlin, T. (1994). Perspectives on pedagogical grammar. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
dc.identifier.citationOjeda Merchán, J. H. (2012). The use of voice message boards to improve accuracy in the simple past tense through awareness-raising in A2 adult English learners. (Master thesis, Universidad de la Sabana, Chia, CO). Retrieved from http://intellectum.unisabana.edu.co:8080/jspui/handle/10818/1730
dc.identifier.citationOmaggio, A. (1993). Teaching language in context. Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle.
dc.identifier.citationO’Malley, J. & Chamot, A. (1990). Learning strategies in second language acquisition. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
dc.identifier.citationOrozco, D. (2013). Communicative activities as a way to foster the oral use of English and confidence in the oral expression. (Master Thesis). Retrieved from DSpace Digital Dissertations.
dc.identifier.citationParis, S. G. & Paris, A. H. (2001). Classroom applications of research on self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 36(2), 89-101.
dc.identifier.citationPawar, M. S. (2004). Data collecting methods and experiences: A guide for social researchers. Elgin, IL: Dawn Press
dc.identifier.citationPop, A., Tomuletiu, E. A., & David, D. (2011). EFL speaking communication with asynchronous voice tools for adult students. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 1199-1203. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.03.262
dc.identifier.citationPrensky, M. (2010). Teaching Digital Natives. London, UK: Sage Company.
dc.identifier.citationRegan, V., Howard, M., & Lemee, I. (2009). The acquisition of sociolinguistic competence in a study abroad context. Salisbury, UK: Short Run Press
dc.identifier.citationRichards, J. C. (2006). Communicative language teaching today. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
dc.identifier.citationRichards, J. C. (2013). Curriculum Approaches in Language Teaching: Forward, Central, and Backward Design. RELC Journal, 44(1), 5-33
dc.identifier.citationRodriguez, E. (2007). Self-assessment practices: An empowering tool in the teaching and learning EFL processes. Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal, (9), 229-246.
dc.identifier.citationRomaña, Y. (2013). Skype™ conference calls for foreign languages: call me on Skype™ whenever you want to practice your target language. (Master thesis, Universidad de la Sabana, Chia, CO). Retrieved from http://intellectum.unisabana.edu.co:8080/jspui/handle/10818/7464
dc.identifier.citationSadler, D. R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18(2), 119-144. doi: 10.1007/BF00117714
dc.identifier.citationSambell, K., McDowell, L. & Sambell, B. (2006). But it is fair?: An exploratory study of student perceptions of the consequential validity of assessment. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 23(4), 349-371.
dc.identifier.citationSamra S. K. (2013). Technology in the classroom: Target or tool. ScienceDirect, 81(2), 609-612.
dc.identifier.citationSánchez, D. (2012). The effects of self-monitoring and self-reflection in A1 adult learners in an English blended learning environment. (Master thesis, Universidad de la Sabana, Chia, CO). Retrieved from https://intellectum.unisabana.edu.co/bitstream/handle/10818/3161
dc.identifier.citationScrivener, J. (2005). Learning teaching. Oxford: Macmillan.
dc.identifier.citationSeliger, H. W., Shohamy, E., & Shohamy, E. (1989). Second language research methods (Vol. 31). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
dc.identifier.citationSerie Guias No. 22 Estandares Basicos de competencias en Lenguas Extrangeras: Ingles. (2006). Estandares Basicos de competencias en Lenguas Extrangeras: Ingles. Bogota, CO: Ministerio de Educacion Nacional
dc.identifier.citationSimonson, M., Smaildino, S., Albright, M. and Zvacek, S. (2000). Teaching and learning at a distance: Foundations of distance education. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
dc.identifier.citationThomas, M. (2013). Pedagogical Considerations and Opportunities for Teaching and Learning on the Web. Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference.
dc.identifier.citationThornbury, S. (2005). How to teach speaking. Harlow, UK: Pearson education limited.
dc.identifier.citationThornbury, S. (2012). Chapter 21: Speaking instruction. In burns, A. & Richards, J., Pedagogy and Practice in Second Language Teaching (pp 198-207). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
dc.identifier.citationUr, P. (1991). A course in language teaching: Practice and theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
dc.identifier.citationWilches, A. (2014). Learner’s perceptions of the benefits of voice tool-based tasks on their spoken performance. GIST Education and Learning Research Journal, January (VIII), 48-65.
dc.identifier.citationWillis, J., & Willis, D. (1996). Challenge and change in language teaching. Oxford, UK: Heinemann.
dc.identifier.citationWhite, E. M. (2009) Putting Assessment for Learning into practice in a Higher Education EFL Context. Boca Raton, FL: Dissertation.
dc.identifier.citationWhitehead, J., & McNiff, J. (2006). Action Research: Living Theory: London: Sage Publications Ltd
dc.identifier.citationYanJun, W. (2008). Collaborate to learn: A case study of technology-enhanced, collaborative language learning. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1007(1), 189. doi.org/10.1063/1.2937605
dc.identifier.citationZimmerman, B. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(2), 64-70.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10818/34462
dc.description95 Páginases_CO
dc.description.abstractPrevious studies on technological devices in language improvement have indicated that audio and video features can be useful for oral production improvement. However, little attention has been paid to the self-assessment process that students can do through audio recording and its impact on spoken accuracy. The overall aim of this study was to identify the use of selfassessment strategies and two web 2.0 tools in language accuracy in a group of thirty-nine A2 level students at a public school in Bogota. The data collection process involved participant voice recordings, self-assessment checklists and logs and teacher field notes. After the data analysis and triangulation, there was evidence that students were able to self-monitor their language production, producing richer and more complex utterances. Additionally, computerbased tasks provided students with the opportunity to use and improve their speaking skills outside the classroom. The use of self-assessment strategies within the EFL classrooms represents a big chance to change the dynamics of language learning and teaching. Technology (web 2.0 tools) served as the vehicle for language learning. Consequently, this study evidenced a close relationship between self-assessment strategies and spoken accuracy. The pedagogical implication of this study offers teachers and researchers an opportunity to explore the use of technology and self-assessment as a trigger of language development in the EFL classrooms.es_CO
dc.formatapplication/pdfes_CO
dc.language.isoenges_CO
dc.publisherUniversidad de La Sabanaes_CO
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.sourceUniversidad de La Sabana
dc.sourceIntellectum Repositorio Universidad de La Sabana
dc.subjectPlanificación educativaes_CO
dc.subjectAutoevaluaciónes_CO
dc.subjectInnovaciones educativases_CO
dc.subjectInnovaciones tecnológicases_CO
dc.subjectHabilidades comunicativases_CO
dc.titleCreating connections: the impact of self-assessment strategies and technology in speaking accuracyes_CO
dc.typemasterThesises_CO
dc.publisher.programMaestría en Didáctica del Inglés con Énfasis en Ambientes de Aprendizaje Autónomoes_CO
dc.publisher.departmentDepartamento de Lenguas y Culturas Extranjerases_CO
dc.identifier.local270046
dc.identifier.localTE09892
dc.type.hasVersionpublishedVersiones_CO
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccesses_CO
dc.creator.degreeMagíster en Didáctica del Inglés con Énfasis en Ambientes de Aprendizaje Autónomoes_CO


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 InternationalExcepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International