Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Cooperative learning projects as a strategy to foster oral interaction in EFL learners

dc.contributor.advisorJiménez, Sonia Stella
dc.contributor.authorEspinel Molano, Nancy
dc.date.accessioned2017-11-14T19:37:10Z
dc.date.available2017-11-14T19:37:10Z
dc.date.created2017
dc.date.issued2017-11-14
dc.identifier.citationAlegría, A., & García, M. del P. (2009). Oral interaction in task-based EFL learning?: The use of the L1 as a cognitive tool. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 47 (3-4)(August), 325–345. http://doi.org/10.1515/iral.2009.014
dc.identifier.citationAndújar, A., & Cruz, M. (2017). Mobile instant messaging: Whatsapp and its potential to develop oral skills. Comunicar, 25(50), 43–52. http://doi.org/10.3916/C50-2017-04
dc.identifier.citationAziz, Z., & Hossain, M. A. (2010). A comparison of cooperative learning and conventional teaching on student’s achievement in secondary mathematics. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 9, 53–62. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.12.115
dc.identifier.citationAzizinezhad, M., Hashemi, M., & Darvishi, S. (2013). Application of cooperative learning in EFL classes to enhance the students ’ language learning. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 93, 138–141. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.09.166
dc.identifier.citationAzkarai, A., & del Pilar García Mayo, M. (2015). Task-modality and L1 use in EFL oral interaction. Language Teaching Research, 19(5), 550–571. http://doi.org/10.1177/1362168814541717
dc.identifier.citationBailey, K. M. (2005). Practical English language teaching?: speaking. New York: McGraw-Hill ESL/ELT.
dc.identifier.citationBaumberger-Henry, M. (2005). Cooperative learning and case study: Does the combination improve students’ perception of problem-solving and decision making skills? Nurse Education Today, 25(3), 238–246. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2005.01.010
dc.identifier.citationBayram, E. (2013). Implementing cooperative learning in the language classroom?: opinions of Turkish teachers of English, 70, 1852–1859. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.01.263
dc.identifier.citationBerg, B. L. (2004). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences. BOOK, Boston: Pearson.
dc.identifier.citationBiggam, J. (2008). Succeeding with your master’s dissertation?: a step-by-step handbook. Maidenhead; New York: McGraw Hill/Open University Press.
dc.identifier.citationBlaxter, L., Hughes, C., & Tight, M. (2006). How to research. Berkshire, England; New York, NY: Open University Press.
dc.identifier.citationBrown, H. D. (2008). Principles of language learning and teaching. SOUND, Princeton, N.J.: Recording for the Blind & Dyslexic.
dc.identifier.citationBurns, A. (2003). Collaborative action research for English language teachers. BOOK, Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.
dc.identifier.citationBurns, A. (2010). Doing action research in English language teaching?: a guide for practitioners. New York: Routledge.
dc.identifier.citationBygate, M. (1987). Speaking. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.
dc.identifier.citationCameron, L. (2001). Teaching languages to young learners. Cambridge; New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
dc.identifier.citationCarrero, N. P. (2016). Effects of Tasks on Spoken Interaction and Motivation in. Gist Education and Learning Research Journal, 13(13), 34–55.
dc.identifier.citationCohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education. BOOK, London: Routledge.
dc.identifier.citationCorbin, J. M., & Strauss, A. L. (2015). Basics of qualitative research?: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. BOOK.
dc.identifier.citationCorbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative qesearch: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. BOOK, California (Estatu Batuak): Sage.
dc.identifier.citationCouncil, of E. (2002). Common reference levels. Common European framework of Running head: reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
dc.identifier.citationCowie, H., & Wallace, P. (2006). Peer support in action?: from bystanding to standing by. BOOK, London [u.a.]: SAGE Publ.
dc.identifier.citationCreswell, J. W. (2014). Research design?: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. BOOK, Los Angeles: SAGE Publications.
dc.identifier.citationCunningsworth, A., & Horner, D. (1985). The role of simulations in the development of communication strategies. System, 13(3), 211–218. JOUR. http://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0346-251X(85)90035-1
dc.identifier.citationde Saint Léger, D., & Storch, N. (2009). Learners ’ perceptions and attitudes?: Implications for willingness to communicate in an L2 classroom. System, 37(2), 269–285. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2009.01.001
dc.identifier.citationDenzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2000). Qualitative research. Thousand Oaks ua. Ellis, R., & Widdowson H.G. (2017). Second language acquisition. BOOK, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
dc.identifier.citationFaqeih, H. I. (2015). Learners ’ Attitudes Towards Corrective Feedback. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 192, 664–671. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.101
dc.identifier.citationFelder, R. M., & Brent, R. (2007). Cooperative Learning *. Journal of Education Sciences, 1–13.
dc.identifier.citationForero Rocha, Y. (2005). Promoting Oral Interaction in Large Groups through Task-Based Learning *. PROFILE, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, 6, 73–81.
dc.identifier.citationGagné, N., & Parks, S. (2013). Cooperative learning tasks in a Grade 6 intensive ESL class?: Role of scaffolding. http://doi.org/10.1177/1362168812460818 Gokhale, A. (1995). Collaborative Learning Enhances Critical Thinking. Journal of Technology Education, 7. http://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21061/jte.v7i1.a.2
dc.identifier.citationGokhale, A. (1995). Collaborative Learning Enhances Critical Thinking. Journal of Technology Education, 7. http://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21061/jte.v7i1.a.2
dc.identifier.citationHarmer, J. (1983). The practice of English language teaching. London: Longman.
dc.identifier.citationHarmer, J. (2007). The practice of English language teaching. Harlow, England: Pearson Longman.
dc.identifier.citationHedge, T. (2014). Teaching and learning in the language classroom. BOOK, Oxford: Oxford University Press
dc.identifier.citationHernandez, T. A. (2010). Promoting Speaking Proficiency through Motivation and Interaction: The Study Abroad and Classroom Learning Contexts. Foreign Language Annals, 43(4), 650–670. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.2010.01107.x
dc.identifier.citationHughes, R. (2011). Teaching and researching speaking. ELEC, Harlow ; Munic [u.a.]: Pearson / Longman
dc.identifier.citationJauregi, K., & Canto, S. (2012). Enhancing meaningful oral interaction in Second Life. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 34(0), 111–115. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.02.023
dc.identifier.citationJohnson, D., & Johnson, R. (1999). Making cooperative learning work. Theory into Practice, 5841(January 2012), 37–41. http://doi.org/10.1080/00405849909543834
dc.identifier.citationJohnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Stanne, M. B. (2000). Cooperative Learning Methods : A Meta-Analysis. Methods, 1(January 2000), 1–33. Retrieved from http://www.tablelearning.com/uploads/File/EXHIBIT-B.pdf
dc.identifier.citationJohnson, R. T., & Johnson, D. W. (1986). Action Research: Cooperative Learning in the Science Classroom. Science and Children, 24(2), 31–32. http://doi.org/10.3102/00346543050002315
dc.identifier.citationJolliffe, W. (2007). Cooperative learning in the classroom : putting it into practice. BOOK, Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Paul Chapman Publishing
dc.identifier.citationJonhson, R. (1983). Effects of cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning experiences on social development. Exceptional Children, 49(4), 323–329.
dc.identifier.citationKessler, C. (1992). Cooperative language learning : a teacher’s resource book. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall Regents.
dc.identifier.citationLantolf, J. P. (2000). Introducing sociocultural theory. Sociocultural Theory and Second Language Learning, 1, 1–26.
dc.identifier.citationLavasani, M., Afzali, L., Borhanzadeh, S., Afzali, F., & Davoodi, M. (2011). The effect of cooperative learning on the social skills of first grade elementary school girls. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 1802–1805. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.04.006
dc.identifier.citationLee, G. (2009). Speaking up : Six Korean students ’ oral participation in class discussions in US graduate seminars. English for Specific Purposes, 28(3), 142–156. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2009.01.007
dc.identifier.citationLindsay, C., & Knight, P. (2006). Learning and teaching English : a course for teachers. Oxford: Oxford University Press
dc.identifier.citationMackey, A., & Silver, R. E. (2005). Interactional tasks and English L2 learning by immigrant children in Singapore. System, 33(2), 239–260. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2005.01.005
dc.identifier.citationMaolida, E. H. (2013). A Descriptive Study of Teacher’s Oral Feedback In an ESL Young Learner Classroom in Indonesia. K@Ta, 15(2), 117–123. http://doi.org/10.9744/kata.15.2.117-124
dc.identifier.citationMelchor-Couto, S. (2017). Foreign language anxiety levels in second life oral interaction. ReCall, 29(1), 99–119. http://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344016000185
dc.identifier.citationMeng, J. (2010). Cooperative Learning Method in the Practice of English Reading and
dc.identifier.citationSpeaking. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 1(5), 701–703. http://doi.org/10.4304/jltr.1.5.701-703
dc.identifier.citationMolberg, H.-K. K. (2010). The consequence of motivation and linguistic self-confidence in relation to pupil’s oral interaction. Universitetet i Tromsø
dc.identifier.citationNaughton, D. (2006). Cooperative Strategy Training and Oral Interaction: Enhancing Small Group Communication in the Language Classroom. Language, 90(2), 169–184.
dc.identifier.citationNekuruh, L. (2015). Who do learners prefer to be corrected by ? Teachers or classmates ? Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 199, 381–386. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.522
dc.identifier.citationNichols, J. D., & Miller, R. B. (1994). Cooperative Learning and Student Motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology. http://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1994.1015
dc.identifier.citationNóbrega, D. (2008). Oral interaction and its implication in the learning and teaching process in EFL. Revista Letra Magna, 8, 1–7.
dc.identifier.citationNunan, D. (1999). Second language teaching & learning. BOOK, Boston, Mass.: Heinle & Heinle Publishers.
dc.identifier.citationNunan, D., & Carter, R. (2001). The Cambridge guide to teaching English to speakers of other languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
dc.identifier.citationOrsmond, P., & Centre for Bioscience, H. E. A. (2004). Self- and peer-assessment : guidance on practice in the biosciences. BOOK, Leeds: Centre for Bioscience, Higher Education Academy
dc.identifier.citationOxford, R. L., & Dean, E. (1997). Cooperative Learning , Collaborative Learning , and Interaction : Three Communicative Strands in the Language Classroom. The Modern Language Journal, 81(4), 443–456. http://doi.org/10.2307/328888
dc.identifier.citationPutnam, J. W., Rynders, J. E., Johnson, R. T., & Johnson, D. W. (1989). Collaborative Skill Instruction for Promoting Positive Interactions Between Mentally Handicapped and Nonhandicapped Children. Exceptional Children, 55(6), 550–557. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/001440298905500609
dc.identifier.citationRichards, J. C. (2011). The language teaching matrix. BOOK, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
dc.identifier.citationRichards, J. C., & Lockhart, C. (1994). Reflective teaching in second language classrooms. Cambridge [England]; New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press.
dc.identifier.citationRichards, J. C., & Renandya, W. A. (2011). Methodology in language teaching : an anthology of current practice. BOOK, New York: Cambridge University Press
dc.identifier.citationRichards, J. C., & Schmidt, R. W. (2014). Longman dictionary of language teaching and applied linguistics. BOOK
dc.identifier.citationRivera, D. H. (2010). Authentic Oral Interaction in the EFL Class : What It Means , What It Does not. October, 12(1), 47–61.
dc.identifier.citationRosas, M. (2016). Communication strategies used by different level L2 English learners in oral interaction. Revista Signos, 49(90), 71–93. http://doi.org/10.4067/S0718- 09342016000100004
dc.identifier.citationSagor, R. (2010). Collaborative action research for professional learning communities. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree Press.
dc.identifier.citationSaldaña, J. (2011). Fundamentals of qualitative research. New York: Oxford University Press.
dc.identifier.citationSavignon, S. J. (2017). Communicative Competence. The TESOL Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching, 1–7. http://doi.org/10.1002/9781118784235.eelt0047
dc.identifier.citationScrivener, J. (1994). Learning teaching : a guidebook for English language teachers. Oxford: Heinemann Publishers (Oxford) Ltd.
dc.identifier.citationSlavin, R. E. (1983). When does cooperative learning increase student achievement? Psychological Bulletin, 94(3), 429–445. http://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.94.3.429
dc.identifier.citationTarim, K. (2009). The effects of cooperative learning on preschoolers’ mathematics problem-solving ability. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 72(3), 325–340.
dc.identifier.citationTashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (2003). Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research. BOOK, London: SAGE Publications.
dc.identifier.citationThornbury, S. (2005). How to teach speaking. BOOK, Harlow: Longman.
dc.identifier.citationTudor, I. (2001). The dynamics of the language classroom. BOOK, Cambridge; New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press
dc.identifier.citationUr, P. (1996). A course in language teaching : practice and theory. BOOK, Cambridge [England]; New York: Cambridge University Press.
dc.identifier.citationWalqui, A. (2006). Scaffolding Instruction for English Language Learners: A Conceptual Framework. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 9(2), 159–180. http://doi.org/10.1080/13670050608668639
dc.identifier.citationZhang, Y., Zhang, L., & Ma, L. (2010). A Brief Analysis of Corrective Feedback in Oral Interaction. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 1(3), 306–308. http://doi.org/10.4304/jltr.1.3.306-308
dc.identifier.citationZimmerman, B. (1990). Self-Regulated Learning and Academic Achievement: An Overview. Educational Psychologist, 25, 3–17.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10818/31975
dc.description146 Páginas.es_CO
dc.description.abstractLa interacción oral tiene un papel importante en el aprendizaje de idiomas. Estudios previos han resaltado que los estudiantes deben ser involucrados en actividades más motivantes, significativas y auténticas como forma de promover y mejorar la interacción oral. Sin embargo, poca atención y valor se le ha dado al aprendizaje cooperativo como estrategia para involucrar a los estudiantes en la interacción oral. El presente estudio de investigación-acción educativa empleó registros de audio, diarios del docente y entrevistas grupales para recolectar datos sobre el impacto que los proyectos cooperativos tuvieron sobre el desarrollo de la interacción oral en los estudiantes. Los datos fueron analizados a la luz de la teoría fundamentada y los resultados demostraron que los estudiantes mejoraron significativamente su interacción oral trabajando cooperativamente en proyectos. Esto justifica la noción de que el aprendizaje cooperativo es un enfoque efectivo para mejorar la interacción oral en niños, por lo tanto, este debería ser ampliamente adoptado por la comunidad educativa.es_CO
dc.formatapplication/pdfes_CO
dc.language.isoenges_CO
dc.publisherUniversidad de La Sabanaes_CO
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.sourceUniversidad de La Sabana
dc.sourceIntellectum Repositorio Universidad de La Sabana
dc.subjectAdquisición del lenguaje
dc.subjectPlanificación educativa
dc.subjectMétodos de enseñanza
dc.subjectAprendizaje
dc.subjectInvestigación acción
dc.titleCooperative learning projects as a strategy to foster oral interaction in EFL learnerses_CO
dc.typemasterThesises_CO
dc.publisher.programMaestría en Didáctica del Inglés con Énfasis en Ambientes de Aprendizaje Autónomoes_CO
dc.publisher.departmentDepartamento de Lenguas y Culturas Extranjerases_CO
dc.identifier.local266998
dc.identifier.localTE09370
dc.type.localTesis de maestría
dc.type.hasVersionpublishedVersiones_CO
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccesses_CO
dc.creator.degreeMagíster en Didáctica del Inglés con Énfasis en Ambientes de Aprendizaje Autónomoes_CO


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail
Nombre:
Nancy Espinel Molano (Tesis).pdf
Tamaño:
2.061Mb
Formato:
PDF
Descripción:
Ver documento en PDF
Ver/

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 InternationalExcepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International