Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.advisorMorales Pulido, Virginia
dc.contributor.authorGómez Patiño, Judith Carolina
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-05T21:33:30Z
dc.date.available2017-05-05T21:33:30Z
dc.date.created2017
dc.date.issued2017-05-05
dc.identifier.citationAfflerbach, P., Pearson, P. D., & Paris, S. G. (2008). Clarifying differences between reading skills and reading strategies. The Reading Teacher, 61(5), 364–373. http://doi.org/10.1598/RT.61.5.1
dc.identifier.citationAl-Mahrooqi, R., & Rahma, R. A. a A.-M. (2014). Focusing on Efl Reading: Theory and Practice. Cambridge Scholars Publisher. Retrieved from https://books.google.com.co/books?id=dqAxBwAAQBAJ
dc.identifier.citationAlderson, J. C. (2000). Assessing Reading. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
dc.identifier.citationAnderson, G. (2006). “ Be sensitive … to both intensive and extensive reading .” Cambridge University Press, 1–3.
dc.identifier.citationAugust, D., Francis, D. J., Hsu, H. A., & Snow, C. E. (2006). Assessing Reading Comprehension in Bilinguals. The Elementary School Journal, 107(2), 221–238. http://doi.org/10.1086/510656
dc.identifier.citationAusubel, D. (1968). Educational Psychology: A Cognitive View. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston
dc.identifier.citationBallou, A. K. (2012). Using Explicit Strategy Instruction to Improve Reading Comprehension Using Explicit Strategy Instruction to Improve Reading Comprehension. St. John Fisher College
dc.identifier.citationBean, T., Baldwin, S., & Readence, J. (2011). Content-area Literacy: Reaching and Teaching the 21st Century Adolescent. Huntington Beach: Shell Education. Retrieved from https://books.google.com.co/books?id=fJqk0sjicQUC
dc.identifier.citationBellanca, J. (2007). Graphic organizers: tools for lifelong thinking and learning. In A guide to graphic organizers: helping students organize and process content for deeper learning (p. 196). California: Corwin Press.
dc.identifier.citationBentley, K. (2010). The TKT Course: CLIL Module. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press;
dc.identifier.citationBernhardt, B. (2010). Using Graphic Organizers to Enhance Reading Comprehension. University of California.
dc.identifier.citationBin, A., & Amin, M. (2004). ITE TEACHERS ’ CONFERENCE 2004 USING GRAPHIC ORGANIZERS Paper Presented by, 1–16.
dc.identifier.citationBogoya, A. P. (2011). Fostering Fifth Graders’ Reading Comprehension through the use of Intensive Reading in Physical Science. Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal, 13(1), 39– 57. Retrieved from http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0123- 46412011000100004&lng=en&tlng=en.
dc.identifier.citationBrod, M., Tesler, L. E., & Christensen, T. L. (2009). Qualitative Research and Content Validity: Developing Best Practices Based on Science and Experience. Quality of Life Research, 18(9), 1263–1278. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/40539893
dc.identifier.citationBromley, K. (2008). From drawing to digital creations: graphic organizers in the classroom. In Research on Teaching Literacy through the Communicative and Visual Arts. New York: Routledge
dc.identifier.citationBromley, K., Irwin-De Vitis, L., & Modlo, M. (1995). Graphic Organizers. New York: Scholastic Professional Books
dc.identifier.citationBrown, H. D. (2007). Principles of Language Learning and Teaching (4th ed.). White Plains: Pearson Longman. Retrieved from https://books.google.com.co/books?id=jUF0QgAACAAJ
dc.identifier.citationBurns, A. (1999). Collaborative Action Research for English Language Teachers. Cambrridge: Cambridge Universtiy Press.
dc.identifier.citationBurns, A. (2010). Doing Action Research in English Language Teaching. New York: Rouledge.
dc.identifier.citationBustamante, T. (2014). The Use of Graphic Organizers to Improve Reading Comprehension in a Pre-Intermediate EFL Class at Sagrados Corazones High School.
dc.identifier.citationCarrell, P., & Eisterhold, J. (1983). Schema Theory and ESL Reading Pedagogy. Tesol. http://doi.org/10.2307/3586613
dc.identifier.citationCasas, M. (2010). Enhancing Student Learning in Middle School. Enhancing Student Learning in Middle School. http://doi.org/10.4324/9780203847107
dc.identifier.citationCendoya, A., & Adibin, V. (2010). A CLIL experience based on the use of tasks and different genre types. Latin American Journal of Content and Language Integrated Learning, 3(1), 11–17. Retrieved from http://revistas.unisabana.edu.co/index.php/LACLIL/article/download/2643/2779
dc.identifier.citationCharmaz, K. (2015). Grounded Theory. In J. A. Smith (Ed.), Qualitative Psychology: A Practical Guide to Research Methods (3rd ed.). London: SAGE Publications
dc.identifier.citationColombo, M., & Furbush, D. (2009). Teaching English Language Learners Content and Language in Middle and Secondary Mainstream Classrooms. Thousand Oaks, CA.: SAGE Publications.
dc.identifier.citationCooper, J. D., Robinson, M. D., Slansky, J. A., & Kiger, N. D. (2016). Literacy: Helping Students Construct Meaning (Tenth edit). Boston: Cengage Learning. Retrieved from https://books.google.com.co/books?id=Unw7DQAAQBAJ
dc.identifier.citationCorbin, J. M., & Strauss, A. L. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA.: Sage Publications, Inc. Retrieved from https://books.google.com.co/books?id=OZwSAQAAIAAJ
dc.identifier.citationCouncil of Europe. (2001). The Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
dc.identifier.citationCoyle, D., Hood, P., & Marsh, D. (2010). CLIL: Content and language integrated learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
dc.identifier.citationCreswell, J. W. (2009). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Approaches (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA.: SAGE Publications. http://doi.org/10.2307/1523157
dc.identifier.citationCreswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed., Vol. 4). Boston: Pearson Education. http://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
dc.identifier.citationCreswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Applied Linguistics (6th ed., Vol. 2). Los Angeles: SAGE Publications. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1753-6405.2007.00096.x
dc.identifier.citationCulbert, E., Flood, M., & Winder, R. (1998). Qualitative Investigation of the Use of Graphic Organizers.
dc.identifier.citationDalton-Puffer, C. (2007). Discourse in Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) Classrooms. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins
dc.identifier.citationDalton-Puffer, C., Nikula, T., & Smith, U. (2010). Language Use and Language Learning in CLIL Classrooms. (C. Dalton-Puffer, T. Nikula, & U. Smith, Eds.). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
dc.identifier.citationDarmawan, F. (2010). Optimizing Graphic Organizers To Improve Students’ Reading Comprehension. Sebelas Maret University
dc.identifier.citationDelrose, L. (2011). Investigating the Use of Graphic Organizers for Writing. Louisiana State University.
dc.identifier.citationDrapeau, P. (1998). Great teaching with graphic organizers: Lessons and fun-shaped templates that motivate kids of all learning styles. New York: Scholastic Professional Books
dc.identifier.citationEducation, M. of, & Council, B. (2006). Basic Skills Standards for Foreign Languages : English. Retrieved from http://www.colombiaaprende.edu.co/html/micrositios/1752/articles315518_recurso_3.pdf
dc.identifier.citationEllis, E. (2004). Q & A : What ’ s the Big Deal with Graphic Organizers ?, (251), 1–7. Retrieved from https://mcsold1.monet.k12.ca.us/Academics/el712/Graphic Organizers/Q and A about G O.pdf
dc.identifier.citationFeuerstein, R., Feuerstein, R. S., Falik, L. H., & Rand, Y. (2002). The dynamic assessment of cognitive modifiability: The Learning Propensity Assessment Device: Theory, instruments, and techniques. Jerusalem: ICELP Press
dc.identifier.citationFowler, F. (2014). Survey research methods. 2014 (Vol. 5th). Boston: SAGE Publications.
dc.identifier.citationGoss, P. (2009). The Influence of Graphic Organizers on Students’ ability to Summarize and Comprehend Science Content regarding the Earth’s Changing Surface. B.S. Florida International University.
dc.identifier.citationHahn, C. (2008). Doing qualitative research using your computer; A practical guide. Doing Qualitative Research Using Your Computer; A Practical Guide. London: Sage Publications Ltd
dc.identifier.citationHall, T., & Strangman, N. (2004). Graphic Organizers. National Center on Accessing the General Curriculum, 40(1), 1–16. http://doi.org/10.4135/9781452230528.n26
dc.identifier.citationHalvorson, C. (2010). The Effects of Using Graphic Organizers with 6th Grade.
dc.identifier.citationHamilton, G. (2005). Content-Area Graphic Organizers for Science. Portland: Weston Walch.
dc.identifier.citationHarris, T. L., Hodges, R. E., & Association, I. R. (1995). The literacy dictionary : the vocabulary of reading and writing. Vocabulary of reading and writing.
dc.identifier.citationHedge, T. (2000). Teaching and Learning in the Language Classroom: A guide to current ideas about the theory and practice of English language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Retrieved from https://books.google.com.co/books?id=VG8NuoGgKJYC
dc.identifier.citationJiang, X. (2012). Effects of Discourse Structure Graphic Organizers on EFL Reading Comprehension. Reading in a Foreign Language, 24(1), 84–105
dc.identifier.citationJiang, X., & Grabe, W. (2007). · Graphic organizers in reading instruction: Research findings and issues.
dc.identifier.citationLlinares, A., Morton, T., & Whittaker, R. (2012). The roles of language in CLIL. Cambridge language teaching library (Vol. 50). New York: Cambridge University Press. http://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2013.809911
dc.identifier.citationLlumiquinga, M. (2011). The Use of Graphic Organizers to Improve Reading Comprehension Skills with Students Of I-II Intensive Courses.
dc.identifier.citationMahecha, R., Urrego, S., & Lozano, E. (2009). Improving Eleventh Graders’ Reading Comprehension Through Text Coding and Double Entry Organizer Reading Strategies.
dc.identifier.citationMarzano, R. J., Pickering, D., & Pollock, J. E. (2001). Classroom instruction that works: Research-based strategies for increasing student achievement. Representations (Vol. 80014). Retrieved from http://www.amazon.com/Classroom-Instruction-That-WorksResearch-Based/dp/0871205041
dc.identifier.citationMcDougald, J. S. (2009). The state of language and content instruction in Colombia. Latin American Journal of Content and Language Integrated Learning, 2(2), 44–48. http://doi.org/10.5294/laclil.2009.2.2.15
dc.identifier.citationMcKernan, J. (1996). Curriculum Action Research - a Handbook of Methods and Resources for the Reflective Practitioner (Second Edi). London: Kogan Page Limited
dc.identifier.citationMcKown, B., & Barnett, C. (2007). Improving Reading Comprehension through Higher-Order Thinking Skills.
dc.identifier.citationMcMillan, J. H., & Schumacher, S. (2001). Qualitative Data Analysis and Narrative Structure. In Research in education: a conceptual introduction (p. 684). New Jersey: Pearson.
dc.identifier.citationMillet, C. (2000). The Effects of Graphic Organizers on Reading Comprehension Achievement of Second Grade Students.
dc.identifier.citationMohan, B., & van Naerssen, M. (1997). Understanding cause-effect. Learning through language. English Teaching Forum.
dc.identifier.citationMora, C. (2014). The Influence of Graphic Organizers in A1 Sixth Graders’ Argumentative Writing Skill in an EFL Context. Universidad de la Sabana.
dc.identifier.citationMorse, J. M., Barrett, M., Mayan, M., Olson, K., & Spiers, J. (2008). Verification Strategies for Establishing Reliability and Validity in Qualitative Research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 1(2), 13–22. http://doi.org/10.1063/1.2011328
dc.identifier.citationNagy, W. (1988). Teaching vocabulary to improve reading comprehension (National C). Urbana, lll. http://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
dc.identifier.citationNguyen, S. (2009). The Effects of Graphic Organizers on Third Grade Students’ Narrative Writing.
dc.identifier.citationNovak, J. (2010). Learning, Creating, and Using Knowledge: Concept Mapas as Facilitative Tools in Schools and Corporations (Vol. 2nd). New York: Routledge.
dc.identifier.citationNunan, D. (1991). Language Teaching Methodology: A Textbook for Teachers. New York: Prentice-Hall.
dc.identifier.citationNuttal, C. (1996). Teaching Reading Skills in a Foreign Language. Oxford: Heinemann English Language Teaching.
dc.identifier.citationOgle, D., & Blachowicz, C. L. Z. (2002). Beyond literature circles: Helping students comprehend informational texts. Comprehension Instruction: Research-Based Best Practices, 259–274
dc.identifier.citationOkanlawon, A. (2011). Using Appropriate Strategies to Improve Students ’ Comprehension of Chemistry Texts : A Guide for Chemistry Teachers. International Multidisciplinary Journal, Ethiopia, 5(21), 214–230.
dc.identifier.citationÖztürk, Ö. (2012). The Effects of Graphic Organizers on Reading Comprehension Achievement of EFL Learners.
dc.identifier.citationPinkley, D. (1994). Children Learning English as a Foreign Language CLIL : Content and Language Integrated Learning CLIL : A Definition CLIL : Dimensions and Focus
dc.identifier.citationPraveen, S., & Premalatha, R. (2013). Using graphic organizers to improve reading comprehension skills for the middle school ESL students. English Language Teaching, 6(2), 155–170. http://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v6n2p155
dc.identifier.citationReina, M. (2013). Impact of the Application of Reading Strategies on the Development of Intensive Reading Comprehension in a Content-based Science Class
dc.identifier.citationRichards, J. C., & Renandya, W. A. (2002). Methodology in Language Teaching: An Anthology of Current Practice. Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from https://books.google.com.co/books?id=VxnGXusQlI8C
dc.identifier.citationRoa Pinzón, M. A. (2011). Making connections: Impact of Graphic Organizers in Reading Comprehension and Summarization.
dc.identifier.citationSalkind, N. J. (2005). Encyclopedia of Human Development. Retrieved from https://books.google.com.pe/books?id=bPxyAwAAQBAJ
dc.identifier.citationServati, K. (2012). Prewriting Strategies and their Effect on Student Writing.
dc.identifier.citationSkogen, M. (2013). Reading in CLIL and in Regular EFL Classes: to What Extent Do They Differ in Reading Proficiency and Strategy Use?
dc.identifier.citationSousa, D. A. (2005). How the brain learns to read. California: Corwin press.
dc.identifier.citationStrauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of Qualitative Research. Basics Of. Qualitatice Research 2nd Edition. Thousand Oaks, CA.: SAGE Publications. http://doi.org/10.4135/9781452230153
dc.identifier.citationStringer, E. T. (2013). Action Research. Thousand Oaks, CA.: SAGE Publications. Retrieved from https://books.google.com.co/books?id=nasgAQAAQBAJ
dc.identifier.citationTayib, A. (2013). The Effect of Using Graphic Organizers on Writing (A Case Study of Preparatory College Students at Umm-Al-Qura University).
dc.identifier.citationThornbury, S. (2002). How to teach vocabulary. Edinburgh: Pearson Education.
dc.identifier.citationvan Kraayenoord, C. (2010). The Role of Metacognition in Reading Comprehension. In H.-P. Trolldenier, W. Lenhard, & P. Marx (Eds.), Focal points of the research and development of pedagogically-psychological perspectives (pp. 277–302). Gottingen, Germany: Hogrefe
dc.identifier.citationVasilecas, O., Caplinskas, A., Wojtkowski, G., Wojtkowski, W., Zupancic, J., & Wrycza, S. (2006). Information Systems Development: Advances in Theory, Practice, and Education. Budapest: Springer US. Retrieved from https://books.google.com.co/books?id=3e4qEFwQb0C
dc.identifier.citationWallace, C. (1992). Reading. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
dc.identifier.citationWallace, M. (2004). Study skills in English: a course in reading skills for academic purposes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
dc.identifier.citationWallace, M. J. (1998). Action research for language teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
dc.identifier.citationWang, V. (2016). Handbook of Research on Learning Outcomes and Opportunities in the Digital Age. Hershey: IGI Global. Retrieved from https://books.google.com.co/books?id=w4VACwAAQBAJ
dc.identifier.citationWills, S., & Ellis, E. (2005). The Theoretical and Empirical Basis for Graphic Organizer Instruction, (1991), 1–21.
dc.identifier.citationWills, S., & Ellis, E. (2005). The Theoretical and Empirical Basis for Graphic Organizer Instruction, (1991), 1–21.
dc.identifier.citationYou, Y. (2011). Factors in Vocabulary Acquisition through Reading. Itj, 8(1), 43–57.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10818/30303
dc.description100 Páginas.es_CO
dc.description.abstract​El objetivo principal de este estudio de investigación fue determinar cómo la aplicación de los organizadores gráficos afecta el desarrollo de las habilidades de lectura de los estudiantes en el aprendizaje integrado de contenido y lengua extranjera. Esta investigación siguió un enfoque de investigación acción y se llevó a cabo en una institución educativa estatal con 36 estudiantes de READING COMPREHENSION IN CLIL ii noveno grado. De acuerdo con los datos recogidos en el análisis de necesidades hay una escasa comprensión de lectura, así como estrategias adecuadas para leer. La estrategia para abordar el problema fue el uso de organizadores gráficos y la integración de contenidos de otras asignaturas. Los instrumentos para la recolección de datos usados son: pruebas de lectura, cuestionarios y el diario de campo de la docente. Después de la implementación y el análisis de los datos se encontró que los organizadores gráficos promueven la comprensión de lectura, desarrollan estrategias de lectura, y mejoran el aprendizaje integrado de contenidos y lengua extranjera. Estas herramientas permiten a los estudiantes analizar los textos, seleccionar información importante y organizar el contenido desarrollando habilidades de pensamiento de orden inferior y superior para construir conocimiento. La organización de la información leída usando gráficos permite a los estudiantes retener el contenido del texto ya que los organizadores gráficos promueven el aprendizaje significativo, los organizadores son herramientas valiosas que permiten conectar la información previa y la nueva que el lector tiene de un texto. Aunque los textos contenían una cantidad considerable de vocabulario desconocido y los estudiantes nunca habían recibido instrucción en el aprendizaje de contenidos de otras asignaturas en inglés superaron estas dificultades usando los organizadores y los glosarios.es_CO
dc.formatapplication/pdfes_CO
dc.language.isoenges_CO
dc.publisherUniversidad de La Sabanaes_CO
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.sourceUniversidad de La Sabana
dc.sourceIntellectum Repositorio Universidad de La Sabana
dc.subjectTecnología educativa
dc.subjectComprensión de lectura
dc.subjectInglés -- Materiales de enseñanza
dc.subjectOrganizadores gráficos
dc.titleDeveloping reading comprehension through graphic organizers in CLILes_CO
dc.typemasterThesises_CO
dc.publisher.programMaestría en Didáctica del Inglés con Énfasis en Ambientes de Aprendizaje Autónomoes_CO
dc.publisher.departmentDepartamento de Lenguas y Culturas Extranjerases_CO
dc.identifier.local264394
dc.identifier.localTE09075
dc.type.localTesis de maestría
dc.type.hasVersionpublishedVersiones_CO
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccesses_CO
dc.creator.degreeMagíster en Didáctica del Inglés con Énfasis en Ambientes de Aprendizaje Autónomoes_CO


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 InternationalExcepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International