Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Development of a1 l2 learners’ literal reading comprehension of short online animated stories through vocabulary pre-reading activities

dc.contributor.advisorParra Pérez, Diana Angélica
dc.contributor.authorBlanco Melo, Julieth Ximena
dc.date.accessioned2016-11-18T16:35:17Z
dc.date.available2016-11-18T16:35:17Z
dc.date.created2016
dc.date.issued2012-11-18
dc.identifier.citationAarnoutse, C., van Leeuwe, J., & Verhoeven, L. (2005). Early literacy from a longitudinal perspective. Educational Research and Evaluation, 11(3), 253-275.
dc.identifier.citationAinley, M. (2006). Connecting with learning: Motivation, affect and cognition in interest processes. Educational Psychology Review, 18(4), 391-405.
dc.identifier.citationAlarcón, O. (2013). Using interactive online educational games to motivate third graders towards improved abilities in writing descriptive paragraphs to foster their autonomous learning process (Master's thesis, Universidad de la Sabana, Chía Colombia). Retrieved from http://intellectum.unisabana.edu.co/handle/10818/7378
dc.identifier.citationAl-Dersi, Z. (2013). The use of short stories for developing vocabulary of EFL learners. International Journal of English Language Translation Studies, 1(1), 72-86.
dc.identifier.citationAlshumaimeri, Y. & Almasri, M. (2012). The effects of using webquests on reading comprehension performance of saudi EFL students. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 11(4), 295-306.
dc.identifier.citationAltas, B. (2014). A case study of multimodal presentation of selected stage play literature in a multimedia environment. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 1726-1734.
dc.identifier.citationAlvermann, D. E. (2002). Adolescents and literacies in a digital world. New York, NY: Peter lang
dc.identifier.citationAnderson, N. (2003). Scrolling, clicking and reading English: Online Reading Strategies in a Second/Foreign Language. The Reading Matrix, 3(3).
dc.identifier.citationAnderson, R. & Nagy, W. (1991). Word meanings. In Barr, R., Kamil, M., Mosenthal, P. & Pearson, P.D.(Eds.), Handbook of reading research, 2,(pp. 690–724). New York, NY: Longman.
dc.identifier.citationAzizifar, A., Roshani, S., Gowhary, H., & Jamalinesari, A. (2015). The effect of pre-reading activities on the reading comprehension performance of ilami high school students. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 192, 188-194.
dc.identifier.citationBaker, S. K., Simmons, D. C., & Kame’enui, E. J. (1998). What reading research tells us about children with diverse learning needs: Bases and Basics. Mahwah, NJ: Routledge.
dc.identifier.citationBeatty, K. (2013). Teaching & researching: Computer-assisted language learning. New York, NY: Routledge.
dc.identifier.citationBeltrán , J. (2013). Using the online software hot potatoes to help first graders develop beginning writing (Master's thesis, Universidad de la Sabana, Chía, Colombia). Retrieved from http://intellectum.unisabana.edu.co/handle/10818/7512
dc.identifier.citationBiemiller, A., & Boote, C. (2006). An effective method for building meaning vocabulary in primary grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(1), 44. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. EJ734337
dc.identifier.citationBloom, , B. S., Engelhart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H., & Krathwohl, D. R. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals, Handbook I: Cognitive domain. New York, NY: Longman Green
dc.identifier.citationBohannon III, J., Warren-Leubecker, A., & Hepler, N. (1984). Word order awareness and early reading. Child Development, 55(4), 1541-1548. doi:10.2307/1130024
dc.identifier.citationBrown, H. D. (2007). Principles of language learning and teaching. NY: Pearson education.
dc.identifier.citationBrown, J. (2001). Using surveys in language programs. NY: Cambridge University Press
dc.identifier.citationBryman, A. (2006). Integrating quantitative and qualitative research: How is it done? Qualitative Research, 6(1), 97-113.
dc.identifier.citationBuchweitz, A., Mason, R., Tomitch, L., & Just, M. A. (2009). Brain activation for reading and listening comprehension: An fMRI study of modality effects and individual differences in language comprehension. Psychology & Neuroscience, 2(2), 111-123.
dc.identifier.citationBurns, A. (1999). Collaborative action research for English language teachers. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press
dc.identifier.citationBurns, A. (2010). Doing action research in English language teaching: A guide for practitioners. New York, NY: Routledge.
dc.identifier.citationCain, K., Oakhill, J., & Bryant, P. (2004). Children's reading comprehension ability: Concurrent prediction by working memory, verbal ability, and component skills. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(1), 31
dc.identifier.citationCameron, L. (2001). Teaching languages to young learners. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
dc.identifier.citationCantrell, S. (1998). Effective teaching and literacy learning: A look inside primary classrooms. The Reading Teacher, 5 (4), 370-378.
dc.identifier.citationCarr, N, Crocco, K, Eyring, J & Gallego,J,. (2008). Perceived benefits of technology enhanced language learning in beginning language classes. IALLT Journal., 41(1), 1-32. Retrieved from http://Www.iallt.org/iallt_journal/perceived_benefits_of_technology_enhanced_language _learning_in_beginning_language_clas
dc.identifier.citationCatts, H., & Weismer, S. (2006). Language deficits in poor comprehenders: A case for the simple view of reading. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 49(2), 278- 293.
dc.identifier.citationChacón, Y., & Zuluaga, I. (2012). Technological mediation in the English classroom for children from 6 to 8 years (Graduate's thesis, Universidad de la Salle, Bogotá, Colombia). Retrieved from repositorio.lasalle.edu.co/handle.net/10185/7903
dc.identifier.citationCharria, A. (2014). Supporting incidental vocabulary learning in young learners by means of strategy training and online resources while reading e-storybooks (Master's thesis, Universidad de la Sabana, Chia, Colombia). Retrieved from http://intellectum.unisabana.edu.co/handle/10818/10782
dc.identifier.citationChen, C., Chen, S., Chen, S. E., & Wey, S. (2013). The effects of extensive reading via E-books on tertiary level EFL students' reading attitude, reading comprehension, and vocabulary. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 12(2), 303-312.
dc.identifier.citationChun, D. M., & Plass, J. L. (1996). Facilitating reading comprehension with multimedia. System, 24(4), 503-519.
dc.identifier.citationClark, F. L., Deshler, D. D., Schumaker, J. B., Alley, G. R., & Warner, M. M. (1984). Visual imagery and self-questioning: Strategies to improve comprehension of written material. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 17(3), 145-149.
dc.identifier.citationCohen, A. (1980). Testing language ability in the classroom. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
dc.identifier.citationCohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2013). Research methods in education. New York, NY: Routledge..
dc.identifier.citationCorbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
dc.identifier.citationCreswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. (2011). Choosing a mixed methods design: Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
dc.identifier.citationCunningham, P. (1999). What should we do about phonics. In Gambrell, L.,Morrow, L., & Pressley, M. (Eds.) Best practices in literacy instruction. (pp.68-89). New York, NY: Guilford Press
dc.identifier.citationDay, Richard & Jeong-suk, Park. (2005). Developing reading comprehension questions. Reading in a Foreign Language, 17(1), 60.
dc.identifier.citationDay, R. R., & Bamford, J. (1998). Extensive reading in the second language classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
dc.identifier.citationDincer, A., Yesilyurt, S., & Takkac, M. (2012). The effects of autonomy-supportive climates on EFL learner's engagement, achievement and competence in english speaking classrooms. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 3890-3894
dc.identifier.citationFarías, M., Obilinovic, K., & Orrego, R. (2010). Modelos de aprendizaje multimodal y enseñanza-aprendizaje de lenguas extranjeras. Universitas Tarraconensis. Revista De Ciències De l’Educació, 1(2), 55-74
dc.identifier.citationFolse, K. S. (2004). Vocabulary myths: Applying second language research to classroom teaching. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
dc.identifier.citationFord, K. (2005). Fostering literacy development in English language learners. Proceedings from: American Federation of Teachers QuEST Conference.
dc.identifier.citationFraser, C. A. (1999). Lexical processing strategy use and vocabulary learning through reading. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21(2), 225-241.
dc.identifier.citationFredricks, J., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59-109.
dc.identifier.citationFry, R. (2012). Improve your reading. Wayne, NJ: Career Press.
dc.identifier.citationFuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Hosp, M. K., & Jenkins, J. R. (2001). Oral reading fluency as an indicator of reading competence: A theoretical, empirical, and historical analysis. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5(3), 239-256.
dc.identifier.citationGarcía, G. E. (1991). Factors influencing the english reading test performance of spanishspeaking hispanic children. Reading Research Quarterly,26(4), 371-392.
dc.identifier.citationGersten, R. & Geva, E. (2003). Teaching reading to early language learners. Educational Leadership, 60(7), 44-49.
dc.identifier.citationGilakjani, A. P., Ismail, H. N., & Ahmadi, S. M. (2011). The effect of multimodal learning models on language teaching and learning. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 1(10), 1321-1327.
dc.identifier.citationGlaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative inquiry. New Brunswick, NJ: Aldine.
dc.identifier.citationGolinkoff, R., & Rosinski, R. (1976). Decoding, semantic processing, and reading comprehension skill. Child Development, 47(1), 252-258.
dc.identifier.citationGolshan, N., & Tafazoli, D. (2014). Technology-enhanced language learning tools in iranian EFL context: Frequencies, attitudes and challenges. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 136(0), 114-118. doi http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.05.299
dc.identifier.citationGonzales, Y. (2015). Digital literacy in early childhood (Master's thesis, Universidad de la Sabana, Chía, Colombia). Retrieved from http://intellectum.unisabana.edu.co/handle/10818/20385
dc.identifier.citationGough, P. B., & Tunmer, W. (1986). Decoding, reading, and reading disability. Remedial and Special Education, 7(1), 6-10.
dc.identifier.citationGraff, H. (1981). Literacy and social development in the west. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
dc.identifier.citationGraves, M. F. (1994). Essentials of classroom teaching: Elementary reading methods. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
dc.identifier.citationGreen, J., & Burgess, J. (2009). YouTube: Online video and participatory culture. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
dc.identifier.citationGuerrero Arroyo, D., & Samper, A. M. (2013). Improving English lexical knowledge in efl fifth graders through the implementation of a blended English course designed in moodle (Master's thesis, Universidad de la Sabana, Chía, Colombia). Retrieved from http://intellectum.unisabana.edu.co/handle/10818/9266
dc.identifier.citationHarmer, J. (2007). How to teach English-new edition. Harlow, England: Pearson Education Limited
dc.identifier.citationHarrington, M., & Sawyer, M. (1992). L2 working memory capacity and L2 reading skill. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 14(01), 25-38.
dc.identifier.citationHiggins, S. J. (2003). Does ICT improve learning and teaching in schools. UK: BERA, British Educational Research Association.
dc.identifier.citationHoover, W., & Gough, P. (1990). The simple view of reading. Reading and Writing, 2(2), 127- 160.
dc.identifier.citationHouse, J. S. (1977). The three faces of social psychology. Sociometry, 40(2), 161-177.
dc.identifier.citationHuckin, T., & Bloch, J. (1993). Strategies for inferring word-meanings in context: A cognitive model. In Huckin, T (Eds.), Second Language Reading and Vocabulary Learning. (pp. 153-178). Norwood: Ablex Publishing Corporation
dc.identifier.citationHull, G. A., & Nelson, M. E. (2005). Locating the semiotic power of multimodality. Written Communication, 22(2), 224-261.
dc.identifier.citationHunt, A., & Beglar, D. (2005). A framework for developing EFL reading vocabulary. Reading in a Foreign Language, 17(1), 23.
dc.identifier.citationInglis, F., & Aers, L. (2008). Key concepts in education. London, UK: Sage Publications.
dc.identifier.citationJewitt, C. (2005). Multimodality,“reading”, and “writing” for the 21st century. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 26(3), 315-331
dc.identifier.citationJewitt, C. (2013). Multimodality and digital technologies in the classroom. In Ingrid de SaintGeorges and Jean-JacquesWeber (Eds.), Multilingualism and Multimodality. (pp. 141- 152). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
dc.identifier.citationJohnson, A. P. (2005). A short guide to action research. Mankato, MN: Pearson.
dc.identifier.citationJohnson, D., & Blair, A. (2003). The importance and use of student self-selected literature to reading engagement in an elementary reading curriculum. Reading Horizons, 43(3), 181- 200
dc.identifier.citationJoshi, R. M., & Aaron, P. (2000). The component model of reading: Simple view of reading made a little more complex. Reading Psychology, 21(2), 85-97
dc.identifier.citationKahu, E. (2014). Increasing the emotional engagement of first year mature-aged distance students: Interest and belonging. The International Journal of the First Year in Higher Education, 5(2), 45.
dc.identifier.citationKaivanpanah, S., & Zandi, H. (2009). The role of depth of vocabulary knowledge in reading comprehension in EFL contexts. Journal of Applied Sciences, 9(4), 698-706.
dc.identifier.citationKamil, M. L. (2004). Vocabulary and comprehension instruction: Summary and implications of the national reading panel findings. In McCardle, P. & Chhabra, V. (Eds.), The voice of evidence in reading research (pp. 213-234). Baltimore, MD: Paul H.Brookes.
dc.identifier.citationKarlin, R. (1980a). Teaching elementary reading: Principles and strategies. San Diego, CA: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
dc.identifier.citationKarlin, R. (1980b). Teaching elementary reading: Principles and strategies. San Diego, CA: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
dc.identifier.citationKemmis, S., & MacTaggart, R. (1988). Cómo planificar la investigación-acción. Barcelona, Spain: Laertes
dc.identifier.citationKirschner, M., Spector-Cohen. E., & Wexler, C. (1996). A teacher education workshop on the construction of efl tests and materials. TESOL Quarterly, 30(1), 85-111.
dc.identifier.citationKorat, O. (2010). Reading electronic books as a support for vocabulary, story comprehension and word reading in kindergarten and first grade. Computers & Education, 55(1), 24-31. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.11.014
dc.identifier.citationKress, G. B., & Kalantzis, M. (2000). Multimodality in B. cope & M. kalantzis (ed) Multiliteracies: Literacy learning and the design of social futures. London, UK: Psychology Press
dc.identifier.citationKropp, P. (1996). Raising a reader: Make your child a reader for life. New York, NY: Broadway Books
dc.identifier.citationLadd, G. W., Buhs, E. S., & Seid, M. (2000). Children's initial sentiments about kindergarten: Is school liking an antecedent of early classroom participation and achievement? MerrillPalmer Quarterly, 46(2), 255-279.
dc.identifier.citationLankshear, C., & Knobel, M. (2003). New literacies: Changing knowledge and classroom practice. Buckingham, UK: Open University.
dc.identifier.citationLaufer, B. (1996). The lexical threshold of second language reading comprehension: What it is and how it relates to L1 reading ability. In K. Sajavaara & C. Fairweather (Eds.), Approaches to Second Language Acquisition.(pp.55-62). Jyväskylä, Finland: University of Jyväskylä.
dc.identifier.citationLeider, C., Proctor, C. P., Silverman, R. D., & Harring, J. R. (2013). Examining the role of vocabulary depth, cross-linguistic transfer, and types of reading measures on the reading comprehension of latino bilinguals in elementary school. Reading and Writing, 26(9), 1459-1485.
dc.identifier.citationLesaux, N. K., Crosson, A. C., Kieffer, M. J., & Pierce, M. (2010). Uneven profiles: Language minority learners' word reading, vocabulary, and reading comprehension skills. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 31(6), 475-483.
dc.identifier.citationLeu, J. D. J. (2002). The new literacies: Research on reading instruction with the internet. What Research has to Say about Reading Instruction, 3, 310-336.
dc.identifier.citationLevy, M. (2012). Technology-enhanced language learning (TELL) in independent schools in Queensland. Queensland, Australia: Independent schools Queensland. espace.library.uq.edu.au.
dc.identifier.citationLewin, C. (1997). Evaluating talking books: Ascertaining the effectiveness of multiple feedback modes and tutoring techniques. Yearbook-National Reading Conference, 46, 360-371.
dc.identifier.citationLynne, C. (2001). Teaching languages to young learners. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
dc.identifier.citationMadaoui, R. (2013). Effects of pre-reading activities on EFL reading comprehension by moroccan college students. Higher Education of Social Science, 4(3), 9-19.
dc.identifier.citationManyak, P. C., & Bauer, E. B. (2009). English vocabulary instruction for English learners. The Reading Teacher, 63(2), 174-176.
dc.identifier.citationMarshall, C., & Rossman, G. (1995). Data collection methods. Designing Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
dc.identifier.citationMartin‐Chang, S. L., & Gould, O. N. (2008). Revisiting print exposure: Exploring differential links to vocabulary, comprehension and reading rate. Journal of Research in Reading, 31(3), 273-284
dc.identifier.citationMarzban, A. (2011). Improvement of reading comprehension through computer-assisted language learning in iranian intermediate EFL students. Procedia Computer Science, 3, 3- 10.
dc.identifier.citationMaxwell, J. (1996). Qualitative research design: An interpretative approach.Thousand Oaks, CA. Sage.
dc.identifier.citationMayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia learning. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
dc.identifier.citationMcCarten, J. (2007). Teaching vocabulary. Lessons from the Corpus, Lessons For the Classroom.Cambridge, England: CUP
dc.identifier.citationMcKenna, M. (1998). Electronic texts and the transformation of beginning reading. Handbook of Literacy and Technology: Transformations in a Post-Typographic World, 1, 45-59
dc.identifier.citationMiller, L., Blackstock, J., & Miller, R. (1994). An exploratory study into the use of CD-ROM storybooks. Computers & Education, 22(1), 187-204
dc.identifier.citationMinisterio de Educacion Nacional. (2006). Cartilla estándares básicos de competencias en lengua extranjera: Ingles. Bogota, Colombia: Imprenta Nacional. doi imprenta Nacional
dc.identifier.citationMoghadam, S. H., Zainal, Z., & Ghaderpour, M. (2012). A review on the important role of vocabulary knowledge in reading comprehension performance. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 66, 555-563.
dc.identifier.citationMohamad, A. (1999). What do we test when we test reading comprehension? The Internet TESL Journal, 5(12).
dc.identifier.citationMontalvo, L (2013). Improving reading comprehension and self directed learning through the use of explicit reading strategies and personal blogs on high school students (Master's thesis, Universidad de la Sabana, Chía, Colombia). Retrieved from http://intellectum.unisabana.edu.co/handle/10818/9424
dc.identifier.citationMorrison, M., Sweeney, A., & Hefferman, T. (2003). Learning styles of on-campus and offcampus marketing students: The challenge for marketing educators, Journal of Marketing Education, 25(3), 208-217
dc.identifier.citationMumtaz, S. (2001). Children's enjoyment and perception of computer use in the home and the school. Computers & Education, 36(4), 347-362.
dc.identifier.citationNation, I. (1990). Teaching and learning vocabulary. New York, NY: Newbury House.
dc.identifier.citationNation, P. (1998). Helping learners take control of their vocabulary learning. Greta, 6(1), 9-18.
dc.identifier.citationNunan, D. (1992). Research methods in language learning. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press
dc.identifier.citationNuttall, C. (1996). Teaching reading skills in a foreign language . Portsmouth, England: Heinemann.
dc.identifier.citationOjo, O.I. (2003). Narrative descriptive, argumentative, conversational and dilaogic speech types. In Alabi, A.O. (Ed.). New perspectives in English language skills. Oyo: Immaculate City Publisher.Olson, R. & Wise, B. (1992). Reading on the computer with orthographic and speech feedback. Reading and Writing, 4(2), 107-144.
dc.identifier.citationOuellette, G. P. (2006). What's meaning got to do with it: The role of vocabulary in word reading and reading comprehension. Journal of educational psychology, 98(3),554. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.98.3.554
dc.identifier.citationPaivio, A. (1979). Imagery and verbal processes. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
dc.identifier.citationParibakht, T. S., & Wesche, M. (1999). Reading and “incidental” L2 vocabulary acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21(02), 195-224.
dc.identifier.citationPatton, M. (2001). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
dc.identifier.citationPearson, P. D., & Johnson, D. D. (1978). Teaching reading comprehension. San Diego, CA: Harcourt School
dc.identifier.citationPerfetti, C. A. (1985). Reading ability. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
dc.identifier.citationPerfetti, C. A., Landi, N., & Oakhill, J. (2005). The acquisition of reading comprehension skill. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing
dc.identifier.citationPettit, N. T., & Cockriel, I. W. (1974). A factor study of the literal reading comprehension test and the inferential reading comprehension test. Journal of Literacy Research, 6(1), 63-75.
dc.identifier.citationPlass, J. L., & Jones, L. (2005). Multimedia learning in second language acquisition. In Mayer, R (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 467-488). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
dc.identifier.citationPollock, E., Chandler, P., & Sweller J. (2002). Assimilating complex information. Learning and Instruction, 12, 61-86.
dc.identifier.citationPotter, C. J., Lohr, N. J., Klein, J., & Sorensen, R. J. (2000). Information & technology literacy standards matrix. Milwaukee, WI: Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction
dc.identifier.citationPretorius, E. & Naudé, H. (2002). A culture in transition: Poor reading and writing ability among children in south african townships. Early Child Development and Care, 172(5), 439-449.
dc.identifier.citationPrince, P. (1996). Second language vocabulary learning: The role of context versus translations as a function of proficiency. The modern Language Journal, 80(4), 478-493.
dc.identifier.citationPringprom, P., & Obchuae, B. (2011). Relationship between vocabulary size and reading comprehension. Proceeding of the 2nd International Conference on Foreign Language Learning and Teaching, 1(1). Bangkok: Language Institute, Thammasat University. ISSN 2286-8836
dc.identifier.citationRashidi, N., & Khosravi, N. (2010). Assessing the role of depth and breadth of vocabulary knowledge in reading comprehension of Iranian EFL learners. Journal of Pan-Pacific Association of Applied Linguistics, 14(1), 81-108.
dc.identifier.citationRátiva, M., Pedreros, A., & Núñez, M. (2012). Using web-based activities to promote reading: An exploratory study with teenagers. Profile Issues in Teachers Professional Development, 14(2), 11-27.
dc.identifier.citationReddy, M. J. (1979). The conduit metaphor: A case of frame conflict in our language about language. Metaphor and Thought, 2, 164-201.
dc.identifier.citationReitsma, P. (1988). Reading practice for beginners: Effects of guided reading, reading-whilelistening, and independent reading with computer-based speech feedback. Reading Research Quarterly, 23(2), 219-235.
dc.identifier.citationichards, J. C. (2013). Curriculum approaches in language teaching: Forward, central, and backward design. RELC Journal, 44(1), 5-33.
dc.identifier.citationRichek, M. A. (2005). Words are wonderful: Interactive, Time‐Efficient strategies to teach meaning vocabulary. The Reading Teacher, 58(5), 414-423.
dc.identifier.citationRoe, B., Smith, S., & Burns, P. (2011). Teaching reading in today's elementary school. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning
dc.identifier.citationRyan, E. B., & Ledger, G. W. (1979). Grammaticality judgments, sentence repetitions, and sentence corrections of children learning to read. International Journal of Psycholinguistics, 6 (4), 23-40.
dc.identifier.citationSainsbury, M., & Benton, T. (2011). Designing a formative e‐assessment: Latent class analysis of early reading skills. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(3), 500-514
dc.identifier.citationScaife, M., & Rogers, Y. (1996). External cognition: how do graphical representations work? International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 45, 185-213
dc.identifier.citationSeabiscuit. (2011, seabiscuit's blog). I can teach ICT and you? Retrieved from http://www.teachingenglish.org.uk/blogs/seabiscuit/i-can-teach-ict-you
dc.identifier.citationSedig, K., Rowhani, S., Morey, J., & Liang, H. N. (2003). Application of information visualization techniques to the design of a mathematical mindtool: A usability study. Information Visualization, 2(3), 142-159.
dc.identifier.citationSeliger, H. W., & Shohamy, E., & Shohamy, E. (1989). Second language research methods. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press
dc.identifier.citationShohamy, E. G. (2001). The power of tests: A critical perspective on the uses of language tests. Harlow, UK: Pearson Education
dc.identifier.citationSilva, R. (2002). The effects of hypermedia annotations on incidental vocabulary learning. Trabajo presentado en el congreso de la asociación chilena de estudios norteamericanos, Valparaiso, Chile: Universidad de playa ancha.
dc.identifier.citationSilvia, P. J. (2006). Exploring the psychology of interest. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
dc.identifier.citationSkinner, E. A., & Belmont, M. J. (1993). Motivation in the classroom: Reciprocal effects of teacher behavior and student engagement across the school year. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(4), 571.
dc.identifier.citationStahl, S. A. (2005). Four problems with teaching word meanings. In Hiebert, E. & Kamil, L.(Eds.), Teaching and Learning Vocabulary: Bringing Research to Practice, (pp.95- 114). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
dc.identifier.citationSweet, A, & Snow, C. (2003). Rethinking reading comprehension. New York, NY: Guilford Publications.
dc.identifier.citationThe British Council. (2012). Short Stories. Contributed by © Cambridge English Online.
dc.identifier.citationTorgerson, C., Zhu, D., Andrews, R., Beverton, S., Burn, A., Leach, J., Shakespeare, E. (2004). A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effectiveness of ICT on literacy learning in English. The Impact of ICT on Literacy Education, 5-16.
dc.identifier.citationTorgesen, J., Houston, D., Rissman, L., & Kosanovich, M. (2007). Teaching all students to read in elementary school: A guide for principals. Portsmouth, NH: RMC Research Corporation, Center on Instruction.
dc.identifier.citationTrim, J. L., Bailly, S., & de l'Europe, C. (2001). Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment: A guide for users. Strasbourg, France: Council of Europe Publications.
dc.identifier.citationTrucano, M. (2005). Knowledge Maps: ICT in Education.Washington, DC: Infodev/World Bank. Retrieved from http:// www.infodev.org/en/ Publication.8. html
dc.identifier.citationTruscott, C. & Case, D. (1999). Issues in technology: The lure of bells and whistles choosing the best software to support reading instruction. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 15(4), 361- 369.
dc.identifier.citationU.S Department of Education, Literacy Information and Communication System.(2009). Assessment strategies and reading profiles. Washington D.C. Retrieved from http:/lincs.ed.gov/reading profiles/MC_Word_Recognition.htm
dc.identifier.citationVerhoeven, L., & Van Leeuwe, J. (2012). The simple view of second language reading throughout the primary grades. Reading and Writing, 25(8), 1805-1818.
dc.identifier.citationWadsworth, B. J. (1996). Piaget's theory of cognitive and affective development: Foundations of constructivism.(5th ed.). White Plains, NY: Longman Publishing
dc.identifier.citationWalsh, M. (2010). Multimodal literacy: What does it mean for classroom practice?. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 33(3), 211-239.
dc.identifier.citationWiersma, W. (1995). Research methods in education: An introduction. Boston, MA: Allyn bacon
dc.identifier.citationYbarra, R., & Green, T. (2003). Using technology to help ESL/EFL students develop language skills. The Internet TESL Journal, 9(3).
dc.identifier.citationYeeding, S. (2007). Using pre-reading activities to increase learners’ motivation in reading comprehension: A case of 2nd year vocational students enrolled in the electrical and electronic certificate program at industrial technology college King Mongkut. King Mongkut.Pranakorn.
dc.identifier.citationZhang, L. J., & Anual, S. B. (2008). The role of vocabulary in reading comprehension the case of secondary school students learning english in singapore. RELC Journal, 39(1), 51-76.
dc.identifier.citationZoghi, M., Mustapha, R., & Maasum, T., Nor Rizan Tg Mohd. (2010). Looking into EFL reading comprehension. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 7, 439-445.
dc.identifier.citationZohrabi, M. (2013). Mixed method research: Instruments, validity, reliability and reporting findings. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 3(2), 254-262.
dc.identifier.citationZúñiga, G. (2003). A framework to build readers and writers in the second language classroom. Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal, (5), 158-175.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10818/28545
dc.description109 Páginas.es_CO
dc.description.abstract​​Las habilidades de comprensión lectora juegan un papel importante en el proceso de aprendizaje de una lengua extranjera, tanto para aprendices jóvenes o adultos; es bien sabido que los buenos lectores tienen éxito en el desarrollo de otras habilidades de aprendizaje de la lengua. Sin embargo, no ha habido suficiente investigación en relación al uso de estrategias tradicionales como la enseñanza del vocabulario combinada con el uso de tecnologías multimodales para promover el desarrollo de comprensión lectora. El presente estudio se baso en el desarrollo de actividades de aprendizaje de vocabulario con el fin de lograr la comprensión lectora de historias animadas. Los niveles de comprensión de lectura fueron evaluados a través de tests de comprensión con formato de verdadero/ falso y seleccion multiple basados en el contenido de las historias. Una vez terminada la implementación, se aplicaron entrevistas a estudiantes y un cuestionario a los padres de familia para conocer sus percepciones sobre las actividades desarrolladas y el uso de tecnología. Luego de analizar los datos con la teoría fundamentada en datos, se encontró que las actividades realizadas con el vocabulario y los recursos multimodales contribuyeron al mejoramiento de su comprensión de lectura literal y además, generaron emociones positivas en los estudiantes. Estos resultados muestran que el uso de estrategias tradicionales como la pre-enseñanza de vocabulario en conjunto con la implementación de tecnologías multimodales deben ser mayormente consideradas por los actores de la enseñanza de Inglés como lengua extranjera en la educación básica primaria en Colombia. ​es_CO
dc.formatapplication/pdfes_CO
dc.language.isoenges_CO
dc.publisherUniversidad de La Sabanaes_CO
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.sourceUniversidad de La Sabana
dc.sourceIntellectum Repositorio Universidad de La Sabana
dc.titleDevelopment of a1 l2 learners’ literal reading comprehension of short online animated stories through vocabulary pre-reading activitieses_CO
dc.typemasterThesises_CO
dc.publisher.programMaestría en Didáctica del Inglés con Énfasis en Ambientes de Aprendizaje Autónomoes_CO
dc.publisher.departmentDepartamento de Lenguas y Culturas Extranjerases_CO
dc.identifier.local262931
dc.identifier.localTE08744
dc.type.localTesis de maestría
dc.type.hasVersionpublishedVersiones_CO
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccesses_CO
dc.creator.degreeMagíster en Didáctica del Inglés con Énfasis en Ambientes de Aprendizaje Autónomoes_CO


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail
Nombre:
Julieth Ximena Blanco Melo ...
Tamaño:
2.663Mb
Formato:
PDF
Descripción:
Ver documento en PDF
Ver/

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 InternationalExcepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International