Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMelo Uribe, Mario Alexander
dc.contributor.authorSanabria Quiroga, Álvaro Enrique
dc.contributor.authorRomero Rojas, Alfredo
dc.contributor.authorPérez, Gabriel
dc.contributor.authorVargas Carreño, Elga Johanna
dc.contributor.authorAbaunza Chagin, María Claudia
dc.contributor.authorGutiérrez, Víctor
dc.date.accessioned11/2/2016 11:30
dc.date.available2016-11-02T16:30:38Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.issn0970-9371
dc.identifier.otherhttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25948937/
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10818/27970
dc.description5 páginases_CO
dc.description.abstractAim: To determine the correlation between the results of thyroid fine-needle aspirations interpreted using the Bethesda system and final histopathological reports for patients at an oncology hospital (OH) and non-oncology hospitals (NOHs). Materials and Methods: A retrospective, cross-sectional, descriptive study was performed to compare the cytology and histopathology results for patients with thyroid nodules in three Colombian hospitals. The final correlation of diagnoses between the two methods is reported. In Colombia, the health system provides the existence of general care hospitals and hospitals specializing in care of patients with cancer. Results: A total of 196 reports were reviewed, of which 53% were from OH and 47% were from NOHs. A greater proportion of category V (37.5%) was diagnosed at the OH, whereas NOHs diagnosed a greater proportion of category II (42.3%). The global correlation between diagnoses made using cytology and histopathology was 93.3% for categories V and VI (based on the final malignant diagnosis) and 86.9% for benign category II. Significant differences between institution types were observed when category IV and V and malignant histopathology were compared (56.3% OH vs. 23.5% NOH; P = 0.05 for category IV, 97.4% OH vs. 82.3% NOH; P = 0.03 for category V), while no significant difference between institution types was observed when category II and final benign diagnosis were compared (P = 0.6). Conclusions: The Bethesda system for thyroid cytology correlates adequately with final histopathological diagnosis in Colombia. Significant differences were identified in the diagnostic correlation for malignant lesions between the OH and NOHs in categories IV and V caused by selection bias of the population.en
dc.formatapplication/pdfes_CO
dc.language.isoenges_CO
dc.publisherJournal of Cytologyes_CO
dc.relation.ispartofseriesJ Cytol. Jan-Mar 2015;32(1):12-6
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.sourceUniversidad de La Sabanaes_CO
dc.sourceIntellectum Repositorio Universidad de La Sabanaes_CO
dc.subject.otherBethesda systemen
dc.subject.otherBiopsyen
dc.subject.otherFine needleen
dc.subject.otherMulticenter studyen
dc.subject.otherPathologyen
dc.subject.otherTerminologyen
dc.subject.otherThyroid cytopathologyen
dc.subject.otherThyroid glanden
dc.subject.otherThyroid neoplasmsen
dc.titleThe Bethesda system for reporting thyroid cytopathology in Colombia: Correlation with histopathological diagnoses in oncology and non-oncology institutions.es_CO
dc.typearticleen
dc.type.hasVersionpublishedVersiones_CO
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccesses_CO
dc.identifier.doi10.4103/0970-9371.155224


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 InternationalExcept where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International