Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Thinking, crafting, and commenting: an approach to improving paragraph structure writing

dc.contributor.advisorAnderson, Carl Edlund
dc.contributor.authorBueno Hernández, Yuly Andrea
dc.date.accessioned2016-05-20T21:44:35Z
dc.date.available2016-05-20T21:44:35Z
dc.date.created2016
dc.date.issued2016-04-25
dc.identifier.citationAdıgüzel, F. M. (1998). The effects of the process approach to teaching writing on Turkish students’ writing skills and overall language proficiency in EFL (Unpublished Master’s thesis). Mersin Üniversitesi: Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Mersin, Turkey. Retrieved from http://tez2.yok.gov.tr/adresindenedinilmiştir
dc.identifier.citationAlan, B., & Stoller, F. (2005). Maximizing the benefits of project work in foreign language classrooms. English Teaching Forum, 43(4), 10-21.
dc.identifier.citationAlvira, J. (2013). The impact of direct, coded, oral and written feedback on the improvement of paragraph writing of B1 level EFL students at university level (Unpublished Master’s thesis). Universidad de La Sabana, Chía, Colombia. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10818/9284
dc.identifier.citationAngus, J. (1862). Handbook of the English tongue: For the use of students and others. London, England: Religious Tract Society.
dc.identifier.citationBain, A. (1877). English composition and rhetoric. London, England: Longmans, Green, and Co.
dc.identifier.citationBakalis, M. (2003). Direct teaching of paragraph cohesion. Teaching History, 110, 18-25.
dc.identifier.citationBayat, N. (2014). The effect of the process writing approach on writing success and anxiety. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 14(3), 1133-1141. doi:10.12738/estp.2014.3.1720
dc.identifier.citationBell, J. (2005). Doing your research project: A guide for first-time researchers in education, health, and social science (4th ed.). New York, NY: Open University.
dc.identifier.citationBecker, C. (1991). Quantity and quality of writing German in early acquisition: A case for associative activities in foreign language courses. Los Angeles, CA: University of Southern California.
dc.identifier.citationBloom, B. S., Engelhart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H., & Krathwohl, D. R. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals, Handbook I: Cognitive domain. London, England: Longman, Green and Co.
dc.identifier.citationBraine, G., & Yorozu, M. (1998). Local area network (LAN) computers in ESL and EFL writing classes: Promises and realities. JALT Journal, 20(2), 47-59.
dc.identifier.citationBreen, M., & Candlin, C. (1980). The essentials of a communicative curriculum in language teaching. Applied Linguistics, 1(2), 89-112.
dc.identifier.citationBorji, H., & Khodabandel, M. (2013). The effect of incidental learning of grammar on Iranian intermediate EFL learners' paragraph writing. Modern Journal of Language Teaching Methods (MJLTM), 3(3), 149-160.
dc.identifier.citationBouissac, P. (2010). Saussure: A guide for the perplexed. London, England: Continuum
dc.identifier.citationBurdick, M. (2011). Teacher negotiation and embedded process: A study of high school writing assigments. Journal of Teaching Writing, 26(2), 21-44.
dc.identifier.citationBurns, A. (1999). Collaborative action research for English language teachers. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
dc.identifier.citationBurns, A. (2010). Doing action research in English language teaching: A guide for practitioners. New York, NY: Routledge
dc.identifier.citationByrne, D. (1988). Teaching writing skills (2nd ed.). London, England: Longman.
dc.identifier.citationCaicedo, P. A. (2016). Using cooperative learning to foster the development of adolescents’ English writing skills. PROFILE Issues in Teachers’ Professional Development, 18(1), 21-38. http://dx.doi.org/10.15446/profile.v18n1.53079
dc.identifier.citationCakir, Ö. (2003). Role in improving the writing skills of the program based on the process approach to writing instruction. Tomer Language Journal, 122, 31-51.
dc.identifier.citationCandlin, C., & Hyland, K. (2014). Writing: Texts, processes, and practices. New York, NY: Routledge
dc.identifier.citationCanale, M., & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 1-47.
dc.identifier.citationCaro, M. (2014). EFL learners’ process writing and the implementation of PRWRITE learning objects when creating short narrative compositions (Unpublished Master’s thesis). Universidad de La Sabana, Chía, Colombia. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10818/10776
dc.identifier.citationChamot, A., & O’Malley, J. (1994). The CALLA handbook: Implementing the cognitive academic language learning approach. New York, NY: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Inc.
dc.identifier.citationChappuis, J. (2012). How Am I Doing?. Educational Leadership, 70(1), 36-40.
dc.identifier.citationCheung, M., & Chan, A. (1994). Teaching writing as a process. Hong Kong, China: Education Department.
dc.identifier.citationCheung, M. (1999). The process of innovation adoption and teacher development. Education and Research in Education, 13(2), 55-75.
dc.identifier.citationChristensen, F. (1967). Counterstatement: “Further comments on the paragraph”. College Composition and Communication, 18(3), 186-188
dc.identifier.citationCohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education. New York, NY: Routledge.
dc.identifier.citationCorbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
dc.identifier.citationCreswell, J. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education
dc.identifier.citationCreswell, J., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc
dc.identifier.citationCulham, R. (2003). 6+1 traits of writing: The complete guide grades 3 and up. New York, NY: Scholastic Inc.
dc.identifier.citationCunningsworth, A. (1995).Choosing your coursebook. Oxford, OX: Heinemann.
dc.identifier.citationCushing, S. (2013). Considerations for teaching second language writing. In M. Celce-Murcia, D. Brinton, & M. Snow (Eds.), Teaching English as a second or foreign language (4th ed., pp. 222-237). Boston, MA: Heinle Cengage Learning.
dc.identifier.citationDenscombe, M. (1998). The good research guide for small-scale social research projects. Buckingham, England: Open University Press
dc.identifier.citationDíaz, N. (2010). Peer editing: A strategic source in EFL students’ writing process. Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal, 12(0123-4641), 85-98.
dc.identifier.citationDörnyei, Z. (2003). Questionnaires in second language research: Construction, administration and processing. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
dc.identifier.citationDuncan, M. (2007). Whatever happened to the paragraph?. National Council of Teachers of English, 69(5), 470-495. doi:10.2307/25472231
dc.identifier.citationEden, R., & Mitchell, R. (1986). Paragraphing for the reader. College Composition and Communication, 37, 416-430.
dc.identifier.citationEllis, R. (1994). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford, OX: Oxford University Press.
dc.identifier.citationFawcett, S. (2013). Evergreen: A guide to writing with readings (10th ed.). Stamford, CT: Cengage Learning.
dc.identifier.citationFerris, D., & Hedgcock, J. (2004). Teaching ESL composition: Purpose, process, and practice (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
dc.identifier.citationFreeman, D. (1998). Doing teacher research: From inquiry to understanding. New York, NY: Heinle & Heinle Publishers.
dc.identifier.citationFreestone, N. (2009). Drafting and acting on feedback supports student learning when writing essay assignments. American Physiological Society, 33, 98-102.
dc.identifier.citationFriedlander, A. (1990). Composing in English: Effects of a first language on writing in English as a second language. In B. Kroll (Ed.), Second language writing: Research insights for the classroom (pp.109-125). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
dc.identifier.citationGarnica, V. Y., & Torres, M. P. (2015). An approximation to writing process through the implementation of a process-genre approach in a blended learning environment (Unpublished Master’s thesis). Universidad de La Sabana, Chía, Colombia. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10818/17456
dc.identifier.citationGeiser, S., & Studley, R. (2001). UC and the SAT: Predictive validity and differential impact of the SAT and SAT II at the University of California. Retrieved from http://www.Informaword. Com/smpp/content~db=all~content=a 784398315.
dc.identifier.citationGoldstein, A., & Carr, P. (1996). Can students benefit from process writing?. NCES Report, 1(3), 96-845.
dc.identifier.citationGomez, O. M. (2013). Peer feedback and out-of-class blogging to develop informal writing skills in an EFL course (Unpublished Master’s thesis). Universidad de La Sabana, Chía, Colombia. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10818/8514
dc.identifier.citationGopen, G. (2004). Expectations: Teaching writing from a reader's perspective. New York, NY: Pearson Longman.
dc.identifier.citationGordon, L. (2008). Writing and good language learners. In C. Griffiths (Ed.), Lessons from good language learners (pp. 244-254). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
dc.identifier.citationGrabe, W., & Kaplan, R. (1996). Theory and practice of writing. New York, NY: AddisonWesley Longman Limited
dc.identifier.citationGower, R., Phillips, D., & Walter, S. (1995). Teaching practice handbook. Oxford, OX: Heinemann.
dc.identifier.citationGuilford, W. (2001). Teaching peer review and the process of scientific writing. Advances in Physiology Education, 25, 167- 175.
dc.identifier.citationGugin, D. (2014). A Paragraph-first approach to the teaching of academic writing. English Teaching Forum, 52(3), 24-37.
dc.identifier.citationHalliday, M. A. (1993). Language as social semiotic. In J. Maybin (Ed.), Language and Literacy (pp. 23-43). Clevedon, England: Open University.
dc.identifier.citationHarmer, J. (2004). How to teach writing. Harlow, England: Pearson Education Limited.
dc.identifier.citationHarmer, J. (2001). The practice of English language teaching (4th ed.). New York, NY: Pearson Longman.
dc.identifier.citationHattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81-112. doi:10.3102/003465430298487
dc.identifier.citationHedge, T. (2003). Teaching and learning in the language classroom. New York, NY: Oxford University Press
dc.identifier.citationHedge, T. (2005). Writing. Oxford, OX: Oxford University Press.
dc.identifier.citationHo, B. (2006). Using the process approach to teach writing in 6 Hong Kong primary classrooms. New Horizons in Education, 53, 22-41
dc.identifier.citationHu, G., & Lam, S. T. E. (2010). Issues of cultural appropriateness and pedagogical efficacy: Exploring peer review in a second language writing class. Instructional Science, 38, 371- 394. doi:10.1007/s11251-008-9086-1
dc.identifier.citationHudson, T., Hinkson-Lee, K., & Collins, B. (2013). Teaching paragraph composition to students with emotional/behavioral disorders using the simultaneous prompting procedure. Journal of Behavioral Education, 22, 139-156. doi: 0.1007/s10864-012-9167-8
dc.identifier.citationHuntley, H. S. (1996). Feedback strategies in intermediate and advanced second language composition. A discussion of the effects of error correction, peer review, and studentteacher conferences on student writing and performance. Retrieved from ERIC database (ED 355809).
dc.identifier.citationHyland, K., & Hyland, F. (2006). Feedback on second language students’ writing. Language Teaching, 39(2), 83-101.
dc.identifier.citationHyland, K. (2003). Second language writing. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
dc.identifier.citationHyland, K. (2009). Teaching and researching writing (2nd ed.). Great Britain, UK: Pearson Education Limited.
dc.identifier.citationHymes, D. (1972). On communicative competence. In J. B. Pride & J. Holmes (Eds.), Sociolinguistics (pp. 269-293). Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin.
dc.identifier.citationJacob, G., & Talshir, P. (1998). Creative writing. English Teachers’ Journal (Israel), 52, 64-65.
dc.identifier.citationJayakaran, L. (2005). Everyone’s guide to effective writing. Chennai, India: 2M Publishing International.
dc.identifier.citationJaved, M., Juan, W., & Nazli, S. (2013). A Study of students’ assessment in writing skills of the English language. International Journal of Instruction, 6(2), 129-144.
dc.identifier.citationJohnson, K. (1996). Language teaching and skill learning. Oxford, OX: Blackwell.
dc.identifier.citationKaratay, H. (2011). Based writing process models: Planned writing and evaluation. In M. Ozbay (Ed.), Writing in education (pp. 21-43). Ankara, Turkey: Pegem Academy
dc.identifier.citationKatijah, S. (2008). Building vocabulary and improving writing while developing a tourist brochure. English Teaching Forum, 46(2), 38-41
dc.identifier.citationKellogg, R. T. (2008). Training writing skills: A cognitive developmental perspective. Journal of writing research, 1(1), 1-26.
dc.identifier.citationKemmis, S., & McTaggart, R. (1988). The action research reader. Geelong, VIC: Deakin University Press
dc.identifier.citationKern, R. (2000). Literacy and language teaching. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
dc.identifier.citationKirszner, L. G., & Mandell, S. R. (2011). Writing first with readings: Practice in context (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Bedford/St. Martin’s
dc.identifier.citationKonrad, M., & Test, D. (2007). Effects of go 4 it . . . now! strategy instruction on the written IEP goal articulation and paragraph-writing skills of middle school students with disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 28(5), 277-291. doi:10.1177/07419325070280050301
dc.identifier.citationLee, Y. J. (2006). The process-oriented ESL writing assessment: Promises and challenges. Journal of Second Language Writing, 15(4), 307-330. doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2006.09.003
dc.identifier.citationLewis, M. (1993). The lexical approach. Hove, UK: Language Teaching Publications
dc.identifier.citationLipson, M.Y., Mosenthal, J., Daniels, P., & Woodside-Jiron, H. (2000). Process writing in the classrooms of eleven fifth-grade teachers with different orientations to teaching and learning. The Elementary School Journals, 101(2), 209-231.
dc.identifier.citationLiu, J., & Hansen, J. G. (2002). Peer response in second language writing classrooms. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
dc.identifier.citationLo, J. (1994). Can a leopard change its spots? A personal account. TESL Reporter, 27(1), 27-33. Retrieved from https://journals.lib.byu.edu/spc/index.php/TESL/article/viewFile/3535/3309
dc.identifier.citationLombana, C. (2002). Some issues for the teaching of writing. PROFILE, 3(1), 44-51.
dc.identifier.citationLundstrom, K., & Baker, W. (2009). To give is better than to receive: The benefits of peer review to the reviewer’s own writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 18(1), 30-43
dc.identifier.citationMcCarthy, M., McCarten, J., & Sandiford, H. (2005). Touchstone 1: Teacher’s edition. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
dc.identifier.citationMcDonough, S. (1999). Learner strategies: State of the art article. Language Teaching, 32(01), 1-18.
dc.identifier.citationMcMillan, J., & Schumacher, S. (2010). Research in education: Evidence-based inquiry. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
dc.identifier.citationMelgarejo, D. (2009). Assessing children’s perceptions of writing in EFL based on the process approach. Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal, 12(1), 70-84
dc.identifier.citationMiao, Y., Badger, R., & Zhen, Y. (2006). A comparative study of peer and teacher feedback in a Chinese EFL writing class. Journal of Second Language Writing, 15, 179-200
dc.identifier.citationMills, G. E. (2007). Action research: A guide for the teacher researcher (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
dc.identifier.citationMorse, J. M. (Ed.). (1991). Qualitative nursing research: A contemporary dialogue. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
dc.identifier.citationMourtaga, K. (2004). Investigating writing problems among Palestinian students. Bloomington, Indiana: Author House.
dc.identifier.citationMourente, M. (2004). Teacher correction versus peer-marking. PROFILE, 5(1), 23-28.
dc.identifier.citationNorton, L.S. (2009). Action research in teaching and learning: A practical guide to conducting pedagogical research in universities. New York, NY: Routledge Education.
dc.identifier.citationNunan, D. (1989). Toward a collaborative approach to curriculum development: A case study. TESOL Quaterly, 23(1), 9-25.
dc.identifier.citationNunan, D. (1997). Designing and adapting materials to encourage learner autonomy. In P. Benson & P. Voller (Eds.), Autonomy and independence in language learning (pp. 192- 203). London, England: Longman.
dc.identifier.citationO’Donnell, T., & Paiva, J. (1993). Independent writing (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle Publishers.
dc.identifier.citationO’Malley, J., & Chamot, A. (1990). Learning strategies in second language acquisition. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
dc.identifier.citationO’Malley, J., & Valdez, L. (1996). Authentic assessment for English language learners: Practical approaches for teachers. Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley publishing company, Inc.
dc.identifier.citationOsma, J. C. (2014). Developing students’ writing and awareness through autobiographical life stories using journals in the EFL classroom (Unpublished Master’s thesis). Universidad de La Sabana, Chía, Colombia. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10818/12467
dc.identifier.citationOxford, R. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. New York, NY: Newbury House.
dc.identifier.citationParsons, L. (2001). Revising and editing: Using models and checklists to promote successful writing experiences. Markham, Canada: Pembroke
dc.identifier.citationPeregoy, S., & Boyle, O. (2008). Reading, writing and learning in ESL: A resource book for teaching K-12 English learners (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
dc.identifier.citationPennington, M., & Cheung, M. (1995). Factors shaping the introduction of process writing in Hong Kong secondary schools. Language,Culture and Curriculum, 8(1), 1-20
dc.identifier.citationPennycook, A. (1997). Cultural alternatives and autonomy. In P. Benson & P. Voller (Eds.), Autonomy and independence in language learning (pp. 35-53). London, England: Longman.
dc.identifier.citationPigg, M. (1996). Teaching writing subskills: A study of the effectiveness of the computer assisted instruction program paragraph builder (Master’s thesis). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 1382311)
dc.identifier.citationRaimes, A. (1938). Techniques in teaching writing. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
dc.identifier.citationRajatanun, K. (1988). A refresher course in writing (2nd ed.). Bangkok, Thailand: Thammasat University Press.
dc.identifier.citationReid, J. (2001). Writing. In R. Carter & D. Nunan (Eds.), The Cambridge guide to teaching English to speakers of other languages (pp. 28-33). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
dc.identifier.citationRichards, J. (1990). The language teaching matrix. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
dc.identifier.citationRincón, S. (2009). The use of the process genre approach and E-portfolio dossier to improve short story writing skills of eleventh graders (Unpublished Master’s thesis). Universidad de La Sabana, Chía, Colombia. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10818/7511
dc.identifier.citationRivera, A. (2011). Improving writing through stages. HOW, 18(1), 11-23.
dc.identifier.citationRoberson, A. (2016, April). “I don’t have to do what he says” versus “I trust her”: Task perception and text ownership in peer feedback. Paper presented at the American Association for Applied Linguistics (AAAL) Conference, Orlando, FL. Abstract retrieved from https://convention2.allacademic.com/one/aaal/aaal16/
dc.identifier.citationRobinson, P. (1991). ESP Today: A practitioner’s guide. Hemel Hempstead, UK: Prentice Hall.
dc.identifier.citationRodgers, P. (1965). Alexander Bain and the rise of the organic paragraph. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 51(4), 339-408. doi:10.1080/00335636509382739
dc.identifier.citationSaad, M., & Ahmed, H. (2015). Improving the persuasive essay writing of students of Arabic as a Foreign Language (AFL): Effects of self-regulated strategy development. ProcediaSocial and Behavioral Sciences, 182, 89-97. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.742
dc.identifier.citationSaberi, E., & Rahimi, R. (2013). Guided writing tasks vs. production writing tasks in teaching writing: The impact on Iranian EFL learners' paragraph writing. Modern Journal of Language Teaching Methods (MJLTM), 3(2), 129-142.
dc.identifier.citationSasaki, M. (2002). Building an empirically-based model of EFL learners’ writing processes. In G. Rijlaarsdam (Series Ed.), S. Ransdell & M. Barbier (Volume Eds.), Studies in writing, volume 11: New directions for research in L2 writing (pp. 49-80). Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
dc.identifier.citationSchell, L. (1970). Paragraph composition: A suggested sequential outline. Peabody Journal of Education, 47(4), 233-237. doi:10.1080/01619567009537722
dc.identifier.citationŞentürk, N. (2009). The effect of planned writing and evaluation models on enhancing 8th grade students’ expository writing skills (Unpublished Master’s thesis). Abant Izzet Baysal University Institute of Social Sciences, Bolu, Turkey. Retrieved from HEC Thesis Center (263521).
dc.identifier.citationSéror, J. (2011). Alternative sources of feedback and second language writing development in university content courses. The Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 14(1), 118-143
dc.identifier.citationScott, V. (1996). Rethinking foreign language writing. Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle Publishers.
dc.identifier.citationShahhoseiny, H. (2015). A study of errors in the paragraph writing of EFL learners: A case study of first year translation students at University of Applied Science and Technology in Bushehr, Iran. Academy Publication, 5(6), 1307-1312. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0506.26
dc.identifier.citationSpies, K. L. (2012). The role of peer feedback in oral communicative tasks for young adult learners (Unpublished Master’s thesis). Universidad de La Sabana, Chía, Colombia. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10818/3347
dc.identifier.citationStrunk, W., & White, E. (1999). The elements of style (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
dc.identifier.citationTapia, M., & Silva, V. (2010). Mejorando la calidad de los escritos: Una experiencia pedagógica universitaria en el ámbito de la escritura en las disciplinas. FOLIOS, 31, 91-104.
dc.identifier.citationTebeaux, E. (2011). Technical writing and the development of the English paragraph. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 41(3), 219-253. doi:10.2190/TW.41.3.b
dc.identifier.citationTian, J., & Nassaji, H. (2016, April). Collaborative writing approaches in practice: Effects of peer review and co-writing on Chinese L2 performance. Paper presented at the American Association for Applied Linguistics (AAAL) Conference, Orlando, FL. Abstract retrieved from https://convention2.allacademic.com/one/aaal/aaal16/
dc.identifier.citationTrela, K. (2008). The effects of I write now strategy on high school students with significant cognitive disabilities’ participation in composing an opinion paragraph (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 3303927)
dc.identifier.citationTribble, C. (1996). Writing. Oxford, OX: OUP Oxford.
dc.identifier.citationTudor, I. (2001). The dynamics of the language classroom. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
dc.identifier.citationTyson, R. (1999, August). Using process writing effectively in Korean university EFL classes. Paper presented at the 12th World Congress of Applied Linguistics (AILA ’99), Waseda University, Tokyo, Japan. Retrieved from http://english.daejin.ac.kr/~rtyson/cv/aila99.html
dc.identifier.citationÜlper, H., & Uzun, L. (2009). The Effect of the writing program prepared in accordance with cognitive process model on student success. Elementary Education Online, 8(3), 651- 665. Retrieved from http://ilkogretim-online.org.tr/
dc.identifier.citationUnivio, D. J., & Perez, A. (2014). Ipsative assessment of essay writing to foster reflection and self-awareness of progress (Unpublished Master’s thesis). Universidad de La Sabana, Chía, Colombia. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10818/12491
dc.identifier.citationUr, P. (1996). A course in language teaching: Practice and theory. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
dc.identifier.citationVan Lier, L. (1988). The classroom and the language learner. London, England: Longman.
dc.identifier.citationVillas, I. (2011). Process writing and the Internet: Blogs and Ning networks in the classroom. English Teaching Forum, 2, 26-33
dc.identifier.citationWallace, G., & Bott, D. (1989). Statement-Pie: A strategy to improve the paragraph writing skills of adolescents with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22(9), 541-553. doi:10.1177/002221948902200904
dc.identifier.citationWang, C. (1992). Paragraph organization in English and Chinese academic prose: A comparative study (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database.
dc.identifier.citationWeissberg, R. (2006). Scaffolded feedback: Tutorial conversations with advanced L2 writers. In K. Hyland & F. Hyland (Eds.), Feedback in second language writing: Contexts and issues (pp. 246-265). New York, NY: Cambridge University.
dc.identifier.citationWhite, R., & Arndt, V. (1997). Process writing. Harlow, England: Addison-Wesley Longman Limited.
dc.identifier.citationWilliams, J. (2005). Teaching writing in second and foreign language classrooms. Boston, MA: McGraw Hill.
dc.identifier.citationWong, H., & Storey, P. (2006). Knowing and doing in the ESL writing class. Language Awareness, 15(4), 283-300. doi:10.2167/la365/0
dc.identifier.citationWoottipong, K. (2013). The development of web-based instruction in English paragraph writing for undergraduate university students. Malaysian Journal of ELT Research, 9(2), 49-81. Retrieved from http://www.melta.org.my/majer/vol9(2)/7Majer%20KWoottipong.pdf
dc.identifier.citationYayli, D. (2009, October). Turkish teachers with a pre-application process of writing services. Paper presented at the 18th National Educational Sciences Congress, Ege University, Izmir, Turkey. Retrieved from http://www.pegem.net/Akademi/kongrebildiri_detay.aspx?id=101335
dc.identifier.citationZhang, S. (1995). Reexamining the affective advantage of peer feedback in the ESL writing class. Journal of Second Language Writing, 4, 209-222.
dc.identifier.citationZúñiga, G., & Macías, D. (2006). Refining students’ academic writing skills in an undergraduate foreign language teaching program. Ikala, Revista De Lenguaje Y Cultura, 11(17), 311- 336.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10818/24231
dc.description1 archivo de lectura en pdf.es_CO
dc.description.abstract​En este estudio de investigación de acción a pequeña escala se analizó el impacto de la implementación del enfoque del proceso de escritura junto con la retroalimentación de pares para mejorar la estructura de la escritura del párrafo. El estudio se llevó a cabo con estudiantes adultos jóvenes principiantes del nivel A2 de inglés en una universidad privada en Bogotá, Colombia. Los participantes demostraron dificultades generando ideas y organizándolas en párrafos claros. En Colombia, pocos estudios investigan el impacto del enfoque del proceso de escritura y la retroalimentación de pares en el mejoramiento de los párrafos de los estudiantes a nivel universitario, pero la mayoría de ellos se centran en la mejora del inglés como consecuencia de la corrección de errores o la retroalimentación del profesor. Los datos fueron recolectados de los cuestionarios (antes y después de la implementación), un diario docente y los artefactos de los participantes (examen diagnóstico y final, listas de verificación de retroalimentación de pares y textos escritos) y se analizaron usando el método de la teoría fundamentada. Los resultados revelaron que el enfoque del proceso de escritura y la retroalimentación de pares tuvieron un impacto positivo en la escritura de la estructura del párrafo en la segunda lengua de los participantes; ayudaron a los estudiantes a crear conciencia sobre la escritura del párrafo, desarrollar hábitos de escritura, facilitar su producción y organización de ideas y construir párrafos mejor estructurados. Este estudio contribuye a la investigación de la escritura de la segunda lengua de dos maneras.es_CO
dc.formatapplication/pdfes_CO
dc.language.isoenges_CO
dc.publisherUniversidad de La Sabanaes_CO
dc.sourceUniversidad de La Sabana
dc.sourceIntellectum Repositorio Universidad de La Sabana
dc.titleThinking, crafting, and commenting: an approach to improving paragraph structure writinges_CO
dc.typemasterThesises_CO
dc.publisher.programMaestría en Didáctica del Inglés con Énfasis en Ambientes de Aprendizaje Autónomoes_CO
dc.publisher.departmentDepartamento de Lenguas y Culturas Extranjerases_CO
dc.identifier.local262085
dc.identifier.localTE08265
dc.type.localTesis de maestría
dc.type.hasVersionpublishedVersiones_CO
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccesses_CO
dc.creator.degreeMagíster en Didáctica del Inglés con Énfasis en Ambientes de Aprendizaje Autónomoes_CO
dc.subject.armarcEscritura -- Inglés
dc.subject.armarcInglés técnico -- Colombia
dc.subject.armarcEscritura -- Enseñanza básica
dc.identifier.repourlhttp://intellectum.unisabana.edu.co/


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail
Nombre:
Yuly Andrea Bueno Hernandez ...
Tamaño:
2.073Mb
Formato:
PDF
Descripción:
Ver documento en PDF
Ver/

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem