Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.advisorÁvila Caica, Olga Lucía
dc.contributor.authorDucuara Perdomo, Juan Andrés
dc.contributor.authorFraile Blanco, Johanna Andrea
dc.contributor.authorSánchez Morales, Claudia Esperanza
dc.date.accessioned2015-11-25T15:06:40Z
dc.date.available2015-11-25T15:06:40Z
dc.date.created2015
dc.date.issued2015-11-25
dc.identifier.citationAlcaldía Mayor de Bogotá.Integración escolar de sordos, usuarios de la Lengua de Señas Colombiana LSC en colegios Distritales. (Cuadernos de Trabajo). Bogotá/Colombia: Secretaria de Educación del Distrito.
dc.identifier.citationAnderson, D., & Reilly, J. (2002). The MacArthur communicative development inventory: normative data for American Sign Language. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 83-106.
dc.identifier.citationAnderson, L., &Krathwohl, D. (2001).A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching and Assessing: a revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy. New York, NY/USA: Longman.
dc.identifier.citationAvila, O. (2010). Using EFL Internet resources as a support on the development of a blended English course designed for deaf university students (Master thesis, Universidad de la Sabana, Chia/Colombia). Retrieved from http://intellectum.unisabana.edu.co/bitstream/handle/10818/3196/129945.pdf?sequence= 1
dc.identifier.citationBaker, S., &Easterbrooks. (2002). Language learning in children who are deaf and hard of hearing. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon
dc.identifier.citationBerent, G. P. (2001).English for deaf students: Assessing and addressing learners' grammar development.In D. Janáková (Ed.),Proceedings of the International Seminar on Teaching English to Deaf and Hard-of-Hearing Students at Secondary and Tertiary Levels of Education(pp. 124-134). http://www.pen.ntid.rit.edu/newdownloads/workshop/cr/2004/2- Berent/Berent%20Prague%202001%20Paper.pdf
dc.identifier.citationBerent, G., & Clymer, E. (2007). English for International Deaf Students: Technologies for teacher training and classroom instruction. PEN-international.
dc.identifier.citationBindarti,W, Ratnawati, N., &Rofiq, A. (2012).The effect of using crossword puzzle on vocabulary achievement of the eight year students at SMP Negeri 5 Jember, 2(2)
dc.identifier.citationBochner, J. H., & Walter, G. G. (2005). Evaluating deaf students' readiness to meet the English language and literacy demands of postsecondary educational programs. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 10(3), 232-243.
dc.identifier.citationBoone, R., & Higgins, K. (2007). The role of instructional design in assistive technology research and development. Reading Research Quaterly, 42, 135-140.
dc.identifier.citationBouvet, D. (1990). The path to language. Bilingual education for deaf children. Available from http://en.bookfi.org/book/1270036
dc.identifier.citationBowe, F. (1998). Language development in deaf children. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 3(1), 73-77.
dc.identifier.citationBrown, D. (2000). Principles of language learning and teaching. New York, NY/USA: Pearson.
dc.identifier.citationBrown, D. (2001). Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy. New York, NY/USA: Longman.
dc.identifier.citationBrown, G. T. (2006). Conceptions of curriculum: A framework for understanding New Zealand’s Curriculum Framework and teachers’ opinions. Curriculum Matters, 2, 164-181.
dc.identifier.citationBrown, H. D. (2007). Principles of language learning and teaching. White Plains, NY: Pearson Longman
dc.identifier.citationBurns, A. (1999). Collaborative action research for English language teachers. Cambridge/United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
dc.identifier.citationBurns, A. (2010). Doing Action research in English language teaching. A guide for practitioners. New York, NY/USA: Routledge.
dc.identifier.citationBusch, S. (2012). Students who are deaf/hard of hearing with learning challenges: Strategies for classroom instruction (Master thesis). Washington.
dc.identifier.citationCanning-Wilson, C.(2000). Research in visuals.Video Special Interest Group at the International TESOL.Arabia 2000 Conference.Arabia
dc.identifier.citationCall, M. (2006). ASL/Spanish/English Trilingualism of Hispanic/Latino Deaf Children in the United States. Retrieved from http://www.lifeprint.com/asl101/topics/trilingualism.pdf
dc.identifier.citationChapelle, C., & Jamieson, J. (2008). Tips for teaching with CALL.Practical approaches to computer-Assisted Language Learning. New York, NY/USA: Pearson-Longman.
dc.identifier.citationCliff, A. (2008). Beyond bullet points. Using Microsoft Power Point 2007 to create presentations that inform, motivate and inspire. Washington, WA/USA:Microsoft Press.
dc.identifier.citationCline, T., & Frederickson, N. (2009). Special Educational Needs, Inclusion and Diversity. New York, NY/USA: Open University Press.
dc.identifier.citationCohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education. New York, NY/USA: Routledge.
dc.identifier.citationCongreso de Colombia. (8 de febrero de 1994) Artículo 73 [Titulo IV]. Ley General de Educación. [Ley 115 de 1194]. DO: 41.214.
dc.identifier.citationCongreso de Colombia. (2 de agosto de 2005). Ley 982. DO: 45995.
dc.identifier.citationConstitución política de Colombia [Const.] (1991) Artículos 5, 13, 67. 7 [Titulo I, II]. 2da Ed. Legis.
dc.identifier.citationCorbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sag
dc.identifier.citationCronin, M., & Myers, S. (1997). The effects of visuals versus no visuals on learning outcomes from Interactive multimedia instruction. Journal of Computing in Higher Education Spring,8(2), 46-71.
dc.identifier.citationCummins, J. (1981). The role of primary language development in promoting educational success for language minority students: A theoretical framework.Sacramento,CA/USA: California State Department of Education
dc.identifier.citationCummins, J. (2000). Language, power, and pedagogy: Bilingual children in the crossfire (Vol. 23). Multilingual Matters
dc.identifier.citationDimling, L. M. (2010). Conceptually Based Vocabulary Intervention: Second Graders' Development of Vocabulary Words. American annals of the deaf,155(4), 425-448
dc.identifier.citationDooly, M. (2008). Constructing knowledge together. Telecollaborative Language Learning.A Guidebook to Moderating Intercultural Collaboration Online, 21-45. Retrieved from http://pagines.uab.cat/melindadooly/sites/pagines.uab.cat.melindadooly/files/Chpt1.pdf
dc.identifier.citationEnns, C. (2007). Process and product: Creating stories with deaf students. TESL Canada Journal, 25(1), 1-22.
dc.identifier.citationFlorian, L. (2008). Special or inclusive education: future trends. British Journal of Special Education, 35(4), 202-208.
dc.identifier.citationForehand, M. (2010). Bloom’s taxonomy. Emerging perspectives on learning, teaching, and technology, 41-47.
dc.identifier.citationFoster, S., Long, G., & Snell, K. (1999). Inclusive instruction and learning for deaf students in postsecondary education. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 4(3), 225-235.
dc.identifier.citationFreeman, D. (1998).Doing teacher research: From inquiry to understanding. Pacific Grove, CA/USA: Heinle and Heinle Publishers.
dc.identifier.citationGage, N., & Berliner, D. (1991). Educational psychology (6th ed.). Boston, MA/USA: Houghton Mifflin
dc.identifier.citationGallagner, J. (1964). Current and Historical Thinking on education for gifted and talented students. Washington, D.C.
dc.identifier.citationGarrison, W., Long, G., &Dowaliby, F. (1997). Working memory capacity and comprehension processes in deaf readers. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 2(2), 78-94
dc.identifier.citationGardner, R. C. (1985). Social psychology and second language learning: The role of attitudes and motivation.Paper presented at the Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, Los Angeles, CA/USA. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED262624.pdf
dc.identifier.citationGiven, L. M. (Ed.). (2008). The Sage encyclopedia of qualitative research methods. California, CA/USA: Sage Publications.
dc.identifier.citationGlasser, B., & Strauss, A. (1968). The discovery of the Grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson
dc.identifier.citationGouldin, C. (2002). Grounded Theory. A practical guide for Management, Business and Market researchers. Sage Publications Ltd.
dc.identifier.citationGrbich, C. (2013). Qualitative data analysis.An introduction (2nd ed.).London:Sage Publications
dc.identifier.citationGrosjean, F. (2001). The right of the deaf child to grow up bilingual. Sign Language Studies, 1(2), 110–114
dc.identifier.citationGrundy, S. (1987). Curriculum: Product or praxis. London: Falmer Press.
dc.identifier.citationGuardino, C. A., & Fullerton, E. (2010). Changing behaviors by changing the classroom environment. Teaching Exceptional Children, 42(6), 8-13.
dc.identifier.citationHarmer, J. (2001). The practice of English language teaching.England: Longman.
dc.identifier.citationHesier, J, Lonn, S., & Mayer, R. (2001). Cognitive constraints on Multimedia Learning. When presenting more material results in less understanding. Journal of educational psychology, 93(1), 187-198. doi: 10.1037//0022-0663.93.1.187
dc.identifier.citationHollingshead, A. K. (2013). Broadening the definition of engagement for students with severe disabilities: A phenomenological study of the experts in the field (Order No. 3601373). Available from: ProQuest Dissertations & Theses A&I. (1466304634).Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/1466304634?accountid=45375.
dc.identifier.citationHuitt, W. (2009). Humanism and open education. Educational Psychology Interactive. Retrieved from http://www.edpsycinteractive.org/topics/affect/humd.html
dc.identifier.citationJanáková, D. (2001). Teaching English to deaf and hard of hearing students “Proceedings 2000: International seminar on teaching English of Deaf and hard of hearing students at secondary and tertiar levels of education.Prague, Czech Republic: Charles University.
dc.identifier.citationJanáková, D., &Berent, G. (2005). Proceedings 2004: The Second Prague International Seminar on Teaching English to the Deaf and Hard-of-Hearing Students. Prague, Czech Republic: The Karolinum Press.
dc.identifier.citationJohnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Smith, K. A. (1989). Cooperative learning. Minnesota, MN/USA: Interaction Book Company
dc.identifier.citationJones, A. (2003). The use and abuse of PowerPoint in teaching and learning in the life sciences. A personal overview. Essay. Life science teaching Unit, Old medical school, University of Dundee. DD1 AHN. UK.
dc.identifier.citationKaçauni, D. (2014). International conference.New Perspectives in science education.Using visual materials in teaching vocabulary in English as a foreign language classroom with young learners.(3rd ed.). Lifelong learning program.University of Albania
dc.identifier.citationKoelle, W. H., & Convey, J. (1982). The prediction of the achievement of deaf adolescents from self-concept and locus of control measures. American Annals of the Deaf, 127, 769–778
dc.identifier.citationLane, H., Hoffmeister, P. J., & Bahan, B.(1996). A journey into the deaf world. San Diego, CA/USA: Dwan Sign Press
dc.identifier.citationLongman Dictionary of Contemporary English. (2001). (3rded.). Harlow, England: Longman. Available in: http://www.ldoceonline.com/dictionary/visual-aid
dc.identifier.citationLuckner, J., Bowen, S., & Carter, K. (2001). Visual teaching strategies.Teaching Exceptional Children, 33(3), 38.
dc.identifier.citationLuckner, J. L., & Cooke, C. (2010). A summary of the vocabulary research with students who are deaf or hard of hearing. American Annals of the Deaf, 155(1), 38-67.
dc.identifier.citationMacurová, A. (2005). An introduction to principles of language learning Lecture in The Second Prague International on Teaching English to deaf and hard-of-hearing students at secondary and tertiary levels.
dc.identifier.citationMacGregor, D., &Winki, P. (2001). Review of Hot Potatoes. Language, learning & technology, 5(2).
dc.identifier.citationMaual de Convivencia IED San Carlos. (2012-2015)
dc.identifier.citationMarschark, M. (2005). Classroom interpreting and visual information processing in mainstream education for deaf students: Live or memorex? American Educational Research Journal, 42, 727-776.
dc.identifier.citationMayer, R. (2001). Multimedia Learning. Cambridge University Press.
dc.identifier.citationMeadow, S., & Mayberry, R. (2001). How do profoundly deaf children learn to read? Journal Learning disabilities research & practice, 16(4).
dc.identifier.citationMeyer, C., & Wells, G. (1996). Can the linguistic interdependence Theory support a BilingualBicultural model of literacy Education to deaf students?.Journal of deaf studies and deaf Education, (2),93-107
dc.identifier.citationMinisterio de EducacionNacional. (11 de Enero de 1980). [Decreto 34].DO:35449.
dc.identifier.citationMinisterio de Educacion Nacional. (18 de noviembre de 1996). [Decreto 2082].DO:41.214.
dc.identifier.citationMinisterio de Educacion Nacional. (2006). Fundamentación conceptual para la atención en el servicio educativo a estudiantes con Necesidades Educativas Especiales-NEE. Guia N° 12
dc.identifier.citationMinisterio de Educacion Nacional. (9 de Febrero de 2009). [Decreto 366]. DO: 47258.
dc.identifier.citationMoats, L. C. (2005). How spelling supports reading. American Educator, 6(12–22), 42-43.
dc.identifier.citationMolina, C. (2009). Nivel I de Inglés para sordos. Unpublished manuscript. Department of Modern languages. National University. Bogotá, Colombia.
dc.identifier.citationMontaño, J., & Vera, E. (2012). Inclusive English classrooms: requirements, implications and limitations. A qualitative case study. Folios, (36), 77-95
dc.identifier.citationMorávková, V. (2011). Deaf Students and their Motivation to Learn English. Masaryk University Brno. Faculty of Education. Brno, Czech Republic.
dc.identifier.citationNational Reading Panel (US), National Institute of Child Health, & Human Development (US). (2000). Report of the national reading panel: Teaching children to read: An evidencebased assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction: Reports of the subgroups. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health
dc.identifier.citationNemati, A. (2009). Memory vocabulary learning strategies and long-term retention. International journal of vocational and technical Education, 1(2). October 2009. Available online at http://www.academicjournals.org/ijvte
dc.identifier.citationNikolaraizi, M., Vekiri, I., & Easterbrooks, S. (2013). Investigating deaf students’ use of visual multimedia resources in reading comprehension. American annals of the deaf, 157(5), 458-473.
dc.identifier.citationNova, D. (2010). The advantages and disadvantages of using games in teaching vocabulary to the third graders of top school elementary school. Final Project report, Thesis. SebelasMaret University, Indonesia. Available in: http://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/12345382.pdf
dc.identifier.citationNover, S. M., & Andrews, J. F.(1998). Critical pedagogy in deaf education: Bilingual methodology and staff development. SantaFe, NM/USA:New Mexico School for Deaf.
dc.identifier.citationOdlin, T. (1989). Language transfer: Cross-linguistic influence in language learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
dc.identifier.citationOrtiz, J. (1997). La integración escolar del excepcional: complejidades y posibilidades. RevistaPedagogía y Saberes, (9), 19-28.
dc.identifier.citationPEN International. (2007). English for international deaf students: Technologies for teacher training and classroom instruction. Rochester, NY: Clymer, WE.,&Berent, GP.
dc.identifier.citationPerfetti, C. A. (1992). The representation problem in reading acquisition.
dc.identifier.citationReeves, J. B., Wollenhaupt, P., & Caccamise, F. (1995). Deaf Student as Visual Learners: Power for Improving Literacy and Communication. Education of the Deaf , 1-10
dc.identifier.citationReynolds, H., & Rosen, R. (1973). The effectiveness of text-book, individualized and pictorial instructional formats for hearing-impaired college students. ERIC Document Reproduction Service. No, ED. 075-968. Washington, D.C. USA
dc.identifier.citationRiester-Wood, T. (2010). Inclusive schools network. Supporting inclusive education worldwide. USA
dc.identifier.citationRogers, C., & Freiberg, H. J. (1994). Freedom to learn (3rd ed.). New York, NY/USA: Macmillan/Merrill.
dc.identifier.citationRyan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions.Contemporary educational psychology, 25(1), 54-67.
dc.identifier.citationSagor, R. (1992). How to conduct collaborative action research.Association for supervision and curriculum development, Alexandria, Virginia. USA.
dc.identifier.citationSamway, K. (1994). But it’s hard to keep field notes while also teaching. TESOL Journal, 4(1), 47-48
dc.identifier.citationSchrimer, B. (2000). Language and literacy development in children who are deaf. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon
dc.identifier.citationScrivener, J (2003). Teaching grammar. New York, NY/USA: Oxford University Press.
dc.identifier.citationSmith, C. R. (2003). Learning disabilities: The interaction of students and their environments. Allyn & Bacon.
dc.identifier.citationTheunissen, S. C., Rieffe, C., Netten, A. P., Briaire, J. J., Soede, W., Kouwenberg, M., &Frijns, J. H. (2014). Self-esteem in hearing-impaired children: The influence of communication, education, and audiological characteristics. PloS one, 9(4), e94521.
dc.identifier.citationThornley, M. (2013). Manipulate visual language: A complete classroom approach for visual learners. Georgetown University Washington, D.C. Master Thesis. Retrieved from: https://repository.library.georgetown.edu/bitstream/handle/10822/559501/Thornley_geor getown_0076M_12347.pdf?sequence=1
dc.identifier.citationTomlinson, B. (1998). Materials development in language teaching.Cambridge University Press.U.K.
dc.identifier.citationTrussell, R. P. (2008). Classroom universals to prevent problem behaviors. Intervention in School and Clinic, 43, 179–185. doi:10.1177/1053451207311678.
dc.identifier.citationUnited Nations. (2006). Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities [A/RES/61/106].
dc.identifier.citationUr, P. (1991). A course in language teaching. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press
dc.identifier.citationWalqui, A. (2006). Scaffolding instruction for English language learners: A conceptual framework. The International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 9(2),159- 180.
dc.identifier.citationWillingham, D., & Price, D. (2009). Theory to practice vocabulary instruction in community college developmental education reading classes: What the research tells us. Journal of College Reading and Learning, 40(1), 91-105.
dc.identifier.citationWorld Health Organization. (March, 2006). Fact sheet 300 retrieved from http://whqlibdoc.who.int/fact_sheet/2006/FS_300.pdf.
dc.identifier.citationYoung, R. D. (1991). Risk-Taking in Learning, K-3.NEA Early Childhood Education Series. National Education Association Professional Library, PO Box 509, West Haven, CT 06516.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10818/20260
dc.description102 páginas incluye diagramas
dc.description.abstractEste estudio de investigación acción colaborativa analizó el grado en que el uso de actividades mediadas por ayudas visuales pudo promover el aprendizaje de vocabulario básico en Inglés en la población sorda. Este proyecto surge a partir de la necesidad de brindar a los estudiantes con discapacidad auditiva la oportunidad de estar en contacto con el Inglés como lengua extranjera en el marco de una educación inclusiva. Los participantes fueron veinte estudiantes con barreras auditivas de los grados sexto, séptimo, octavo y noveno, con edades entre los 12 y 17 años, pertenecientes al colegio público San Carlos ubicado en el sur de Bogotá, Colombia. Los instrumentos usados para recolectar la información fueron: una entrevista grabada en vídeo hecha a los estudiantes con barreras auditivas, un examen escrito a mitad y al final del proceso, pruebas de conocimiento, la mayoría de ellas diseñadas con algunas de las aplicaciones de software Hot Potatoes y notas de campo. Durante la fase de intervención pedagógica, implementada durante nueve semanas, los estudiantes participaron en doce sesiones presenciales. Cada una de las lecciones fue apoyada por el uso de herramientas tecnologicas tales como projector , computadores entre otros.Por medio del análisis de los datos recolectados fue posible determinar que las ayudas visuales y las herramientas tecnológicas contribuyen al aprendizaje de vocabulario básico en Inglés. Adicionalmente, el uso de dichos recursos promovió la motivación intrínseca, aspecto esencial en el aprendizaje de una lengua. Este estudio proporciona elementos metodológicos que ayudan a la conceptualización de los enfoques de enseñanza-aprendizaje del Inglés como idioma extranjero, en el marco de las acciones que propenden por una educación inclusiva en nuestro país.es_CO
dc.language.isoenges_CO
dc.publisherUniversidad de La Sabana
dc.sourceUniversidad de La Sabana
dc.sourceIntellectum Repositorio Universidad de La Sabana
dc.subjectInglés básico -- Colombia
dc.subjectSordos -- Educación -- Colombia
dc.subjectEducación inclusiva -- Colombia
dc.titleAn inclusive english classroom proposal for students with hearing impairmentses_CO
dc.typemasterThesis
dc.publisher.programMaestría en Didáctica del Inglés con Énfasis en Ambientes de Aprendizaje Autónomo
dc.publisher.departmentDepartamento de Lenguas y Culturas Extranjeras
dc.identifier.local176432
dc.identifier.localTE07913
dc.type.localTesis de maestría
dc.type.hasVersionpublishedVersion
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccesses_CO
dc.creator.degreeMagíster en Didáctica del Inglés con Énfasis en Ambientes de Aprendizaje Autónomo


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem