Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Investigación del impacto de la técnica de resumen de matriz de análisis en la mejora de la comprensión de lectura de estudiantes universitarios iraníes

dc.contributor.authorBahrami, Samaneh
dc.contributor.authorRahimy, Ramin
dc.date.accessioned2/2/2021 11:29
dc.date.available2/2/2021 11:29
dc.date.issued2021-01-14
dc.identifier.citationBahrami, S., & Rahimy, R. (2020). Investigating impact of analysis matrix summarization technique on Iranian university students’ reading comprehension enhancement. Latin American Journal of Content & Language Integrated Learning, 13(2), 191–214. https://doi.org/10.5294/laclil.2020.13.2.3es_CO
dc.identifier.issn2011-6721
dc.identifier.otherhttps://laclil.unisabana.edu.co/index.php/LACLIL/article/view/13011
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10818/46637
dc.description24 páginases_CO
dc.description.abstractThe present study was an attempt to investigate the effect of the analysis matrix, a type of graphic organizer, as a language improvement supportive attempt on fostering reading comprehension in an EFL academic context. The main question this study tried to answer was whether using this technique might enhance reading comprehension abilities among Iranian non-English majors. To achieve this goal, 120 nursing and microbiology majors were randomly selected from a population of the non-English majors enrolled for the Academic English course. They were divided into four groups of 30 and were randomly assigned to two experimental groups and two control groups. A pre-test of reading comprehension was administered to all groups. Then, they were taught passages to read for eight sessions with different methods; the experimental groups received a treatment of analysis matrix technique instruction while the control groups were taught with the traditional method, including no summarization instruction. A post-test of reading comprehension was finally administered to all groups. The data were analyzed using one-way analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) to control the effects of the pre-test on the outcomes. The results indicated a statistically significant difference due to pedagogical intervention; the two experimental groups outperformed on the post-test after being treated with analysis matrix technique for eight sessions.en
dc.description.abstractEl presente estudio fue un intento de investigar el efecto de la matriz de análisis, un tipo de organizador gráfico, como un intento de apoyo a la mejora del lenguaje para fomentar la comprensión de lectura en un contexto académico de inglés como lengua extranjera. La pregunta principal que este estudio buscaba responder fue si el uso de esta técnica podría mejorar las habi-lidades de comprensión de lectura entre los estudiantes iraníes que no eran de la Licenciatura en inglés. Para alcanzar este objetivo, se seleccionaron 120 estudiantes de enfermería y microbiología al azar de una población de estudiantes que no hacían parte de la Licenciatura en inglés y que es-taban inscritos en el curso de Inglés Académico. Se dividieron en cuatro grupos de 30 y se asignaron aleatoriamente a dos grupos experimentales y dos grupos de control. A todos los grupos se les ad-ministró una prueba previa de comprensión lectora. A continuación, se les enseñaron pasajes para leer durante ocho sesiones con diferentes métodos; los grupos experimentales recibieron un trata-miento de instrucción de técnica de matriz de análisis mientras que los grupos de control recibieron instrucción con el método tradicional, incluyendo sin instrucción de resumen. Finalmente, se admi-nistró una prueba posterior de comprensión de lectura a todos los grupos. Los datos se analizaron mediante análisis de covarianza unidireccional (ANCOVA) para controlar los efectos de la prueba previa en los resultados. Los resultados indicaron una diferencia estadísticamente significativa debi-do a la intervención pedagógica; los dos grupos experimentales obtuvieron mejores resultados en la prueba posterior después de que se aplicara la técnica de matriz de análisis durante ocho sesiones.en
dc.formatapplication/pdfes_CO
dc.language.isoenges_CO
dc.relation.ispartofseriesLatin American Journal of Content & Language Integrated Learning, 13(2), 191–214
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.sourceinstname:Universidad de La Sabanaes_CO
dc.sourcereponame:Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de La Sabanaes_CO
dc.subject.otherContent-based academic readingeng
dc.subject.otherNon-English majorseng
dc.subject.otherReading habiteng
dc.subject.otherReading promotioneng
dc.titleInvestigating Impact of Analysis Matrix Summarization Technique on Iranian University Students’ Reading Comprehension Enhancementen
dc.titleInvestigación del impacto de la técnica de resumen de matriz de análisis en la mejora de la comprensión de lectura de estudiantes universitarios iraníeses_CO
dc.title.alternativeInvestigação do impacto da técnica de resumo da matriz de análise na melhoria da compreensão da leitura de estudantes universitários iranianospor
dc.typejournal articlees_CO
dc.publisher.departmentDirección de Publicacioneses_CO
dc.type.hasVersionpublishedVersiones_CO
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccess
dc.identifier.doi10.5294/laclil.2020.13.2.3
dcterms.referencesAnderson, N. J. (1999). Exploring second language reading: Issues and strategies. Heinle & Heinle.eng
dcterms.referencesAry, D., Jacobs, L. C., Irvine, C. K. S., & Walker, D. (2013). Introduction to research in education. Cengage Learning.eng
dcterms.referencesBaleghizadeh, S., & Babapur, M. (2011). The effect of summary writing on reading comprehension and recall of EFL students. New England Reading Association Journal, 47(1), 44–57. https://doi.org/10.5296/jse.v3i2.2644eng
dcterms.referencesBiria, R., & Sharifi, M. M. (2013). Graphic organizers and reading comprehension ability: Evidence from Iranian EFL university students. Sino-US English Teaching, 10(5), 358–365. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/259849463_Graphic_Organizers_and_Reading_­Comprehension_Ability_Evidence_from_Iranian_University_­Studentseng
dcterms.referencesChang, K. E., Sung, Y. T., & Chen, I. D. (2002). The effect of concept mapping to enhance text comprehension and summarization. The Journal of Experimental Education, 2002, 71(1), 5–23. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/13372428.pdfeng
dcterms.referencesChaury, P. (2015). The effects of strategy instruction on reading comprehension in English as a Foreign Language. Concordia Working Papers in Applied Linguistics, 6, 2–24. https://doe.concordia.ca/copal/documents/1_Chaury_Patrick.pdfeng
dcterms.referencesChmielewski, T., & Dansereau, D. F. (1998). Enhancing the recall of text: Knowledge mapping training promotes implicit transfer. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 407–413. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.90.3.407eng
dcterms.referencesEllis, E., & Howard, P. (2005). Graphic organizers: Power tools for teaching students with learning disabilities. Graphic Organizers and Learning Disabilities, 1, 1–5. https://s3.amazonaws.com/cmi-teaching-ld/alerts/6/uploaded_files/original_alert13.pdf?0=eng
dcterms.referencesFisher, A. L. (2001). Implementing graphic organizer notebooks: The art and science of content. Reading Teacher, 55(2), 116–120. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20205022eng
dcterms.referencesGrabe, W. (2009). Reading in a second language: Moving from theory to practice. Cambridge University Press.eng
dcterms.referencesGrabe, W., & Stoller, L., F. (2011). Teaching and researching reading. Routledge.eng
dcterms.referencesGrabe, W., & Zhang, C. (2013). Second language reading-writing relations. In A. S. Horning & E. W. Kreamer (Eds.), Reconnecting reading and writing (pp. 108–133). Parlor Press and WAC Clearinghouse.eng
dcterms.referencesGraney, M. J. (1992). A framework for using text graphing. System, 20, 161–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/0346-251X(92)90022-Ueng
dcterms.referencesHarris, T., & Hodges, R. (1995). The literacy dictionary: The vocabulary of reading and writing. International Reading Association.eng
dcterms.referencesHibbard, K. M., & Wagner, E. A. (2003). Assessing and teaching reading comprehension and writing, K-3. Eye on Education.eng
dcterms.referencesHirvela, A. (2016). Connecting reading and writing in second language writing instruction. University of Michigan.eng
dcterms.referencesHodaeian, M. & Biria, R. (2015). The effect of backward design on intermediate EFL learners’ L2 reading comprehension: Focusing on learners’ attitudes. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research, 2(7), 80–93. https://www.jallr.com/index.php/JALLR/article/view/162/0eng
dcterms.referencesJiang, X., & Grabe, W. (2007). Graphic organizers in reading instruction: Research findings and issues. Reading in a Foreign Language, 19, 34–55. http://nflrc.hawaii.edu/rfl/April2007/jiang/jiang.pdfeng
dcterms.referencesKamil, M. L. (2004). Vocabulary and comprehension instruction: Summary and implications of the national reading panel findings. Academic Exchange Quarterly, 12, 113–122.eng
dcterms.referencesKiewra, K. A., Kauffman, D. F., Robinson, D. H., Dubois, N. F., & Stanley, R. K. (1999). Supplementing floundering text with adjunct displays. Instructional Science, 27, 373–401. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003270723360eng
dcterms.referencesLee, Y., Baylor, A. L., & Nelson, D. (2005). Supporting problem solving performance through the construction of knowledge maps. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 16(2), 117–131. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ726309eng
dcterms.referencesLin, H. Y., & Chern, L. C. (2014). The effects of background knowledge and L2 reading proficiency on Taiwanese university students’ summarization performance. Contemporary Educational Research Quarterly, 22(4), 149–186. https://doi.org/10.6151/CERQ.2014.2204.04eng
dcterms.referencesMall Amiri, B., & Sarlak, H. (2010). The comparative effect of summarizing and concept mapping on ESP learners’ reading comprehension of EAP texts. JELS, 1(4), 113–136. http://journals.iau.ir/article_510808_8fbc8fb0aa141d0381014c2326bb8b7a.pdfeng
dcterms.referencesManoli, P., & Papadopoulou, M. (2012). Graphic organizers as a reading strategy: Research findings and issues. Creative Education, 3(3), 348–356. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2012.33055eng
dcterms.referencesMcKnight, K. (2010). The teacher’s big book of graphic organizers. Jossey-Bass.eng
dcterms.referencesMohammad Hoseinpur, R. (2015). The impact of teaching summarizing on EFL learners’ microgenetic development of summary writing. The Journal of Teaching Language Skills (JTLS), 7(2), 69–92. https://doi.org/10.22099/jtls.2015.3531eng
dcterms.referencesNaseri, H., Asadi, N., & Zoughi, M. (2013). The effect of teaching systemic-oriented summarization strategies on the reading comprehension of advanced Iranian EFL learners. International Journal of Language Learning and Applied Linguistics word (IJLLALW), 4(4), 74–87.eng
dcterms.referencesNational Reading Panel. (2000). Report of the national reading panel: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health.eng
dcterms.referencesO’Donnell, M. P., & Wood, M. (2004). Becoming a reader: A developmental approach to reading instruction (3rd Ed.). Pearson Education.eng
dcterms.referencesPakzadian, M., & Eslami Rasekh, A. (2012). The effects of using summarization strategies on Iranian EFL learners’ reading comprehension. English Language Research, 1(1), 118–125. https://doi.org/10.5430/elr.v1n1p118eng
dcterms.referencesPalmer, J. C. (2003). Summarizing techniques in the English language classroom: An international perspective. PASAA, 34, 54–63. https://fs.libarts.psu.ac.th/research/conference/proceedings-3/3pdf/004.pdfeng
dcterms.referencesPalmer, J. C. (2003). Summarizing techniques in the English language classroom: An international perspective. PASAA, 34, 54–63. https://fs.libarts.psu.ac.th/research/conference/proceedings-3/3pdf/004.pdfeng
dcterms.referencesPearson, R. S., & Denner, P. R. (1989). Semantic organizers: A study for special needs learners. Aspen.eng
dcterms.referencesPraveen, S. D., & Premalatha, R. (2013). Using graphic organizers to improve reading comprehension skills for the middle school ESL students. English Language Teaching, 6(2), 155–170. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v6n2p155eng
dcterms.referencesRobson, C. (1993). Real world research: A resource for social scientist and Practitioner researcher. Blackwell.eng
dcterms.referencesSalehi, D. A., Jahandar, S., & Khodabandehlou, M. (2013). The impact of concept mapping on EFL students. Indian Journal of Fundamental and Applied Life Sciences, 3(3), 241–280. https://www.cibtech.org/J-LIFE-SCIENCES/PUBLICATIONS/2013/Vol_3_No_3/JLS-32-37...the...comprehension.pdfeng
dcterms.referencesSchwartz, S. H., & Fattaleh, D. L. (1972). Representation in deductive problem solving: The matrix. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 95, 343–348. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0033669eng
dcterms.referencesSotiriou, E. P. (2002). Reading to write: Composition in context. Heinle & Heinle.eng
dcterms.referencesTarshaei, G., & Karbalaei, A. (2015). The effect of three phase approach on Iranian EFL learners’ reading comprehension. European Online Journal of Natural and Social Sciences, 4(2), 362–372. https://european-science.com/eojnss/article/view/2592eng
dcterms.referencesvan Merrienboer, J. J. G. (1990). Strategies for programming instruction in high school: Program completion vs. program generation. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 6, 265–287. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/312990037_Strategies_for_programming_­instruction_in_high_school_Program_completion_vs_Program_­generationeng
dcterms.referencesWallace, R., Pearman, C., Hail, C., & Hurst, B. (2007). Writing for comprehension. Reading Horizons, 48(1), 41–56. https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/reading_horizons/vol48/iss1/5/eng
dcterms.referencesWormeli, R. (2005). Summerization in any subject: 50 techniques to improve student reading. The Association for Supervision and Curriculum Design (ASCD).eng
dcterms.referencesZafarani, P. & Kabgani, S. (2014). Summarization strategy training and reading comprehension of Iranian ESP learners. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 1959–1965. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.629eng
dcterms.referencesZahedi, Z., & Tabatabaei, O. (2015). The effect of blended teaching on reading strategy use by Iranian EFL learners. International Journal of Foreign Language Teaching & Research, 3(11), 25–38. https://jfl.iaun.ac.ir/article_559296.htmleng
dcterms.referencesZhao, R., & Hirvela, A. (2015). Undergraduate ESL students’ engagement in academic reading and writing in learning to write a synthesis paper. Reading in a Foreign Language, 27(2), 219–241. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1078373.pdfeng
dc.identifier.eissn2322-9721


Ficheros en el ítem

FicherosTamañoFormatoVer

No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem.

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 InternationalExcepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International