Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem
How Effective is the Assessment Component of a Customized CLIL Program?
¿Qué tan efectivo es el componente de evaluación de un programa AICLE personalizado?;
Quão eficaz é o componente de avaliação de um programa CLIL personalizado?
| dc.contributor.author | Işık, Ali | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2/2/2021 11:11 | |
| dc.date.available | 2/2/2021 11:11 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2021-01-14 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Isık, A. (2020). How effective is the assessment component of a customized CLIL program? Latin American Journal of Content & Language Integrated Learning, 13(2), 241-287. https://doi.org/10.5294/laclil.2020.13.2.5 | es_CO |
| dc.identifier.issn | 2011-6721 | |
| dc.identifier.other | https://laclil.unisabana.edu.co/index.php/LACLIL/article/view/13367 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10818/46635 | |
| dc.description | 47 páginas | es_CO |
| dc.description.abstract | Considering the pivotal role of assessment, this study aimed to investigate the attitudes of the students and the teachers towards the assessment component of a customized content and language integrated learning in an English as a foreign language program implemented at the tertiary level in Turkey. It also sought to study its effectiveness as a tool for the integrated assessment of language and content. Data were obtained by a mixed-method research approach from 525 university freshman students and 17 English language teachers via questionnaires and follow-up interviews with the teachers and the students. The results indicated that both the students and the teachers developed positive attitudes towards the assessment component of content and language integrated learning. The assessment component was also found to be an adequate tool for the integrated assessment of content and language. | en |
| dc.description.abstract | Teniendo en cuenta el papel fundamental de la evaluación, el objetivo de este estudio era investigar las actitudes de los estudiantes y los profesores hacia el componente de evaluación de un aprendizaje integrado de contenido y lengua personalizado en un programa de inglés como lengua extranjera implementado en el nivel terciario en Turquía. También buscaba estudiar su efectividad como herramienta para la evaluación integrada del lenguaje y el contenido. Los datos se obtuvieron mediante un enfoque de investigación de método mixto de 525 estudiantes universi-tarios de primer año y 17 profesores de inglés a través de cuestionarios y entrevistas de seguimien-to con los profesores y los estudiantes. Los resultados indicaron que tanto los estudiantes como los profesores desarrollaron actitudes positivas hacia el componente de evaluación del aprendizaje integrado de contenido y lenguaje. El componente de evaluación también resultó ser una herramienta adecuada para la evaluación integrada del contenido y el lenguaje. | es_CO |
| dc.format | application/pdf | es_CO |
| dc.language.iso | eng | es_CO |
| dc.relation.ispartofseries | Latin American Journal of Content & Language Integrated Learning, 13(2), 241-287 | |
| dc.rights | Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International | * |
| dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | * |
| dc.source | instname:Universidad de La Sabana | es_CO |
| dc.source | reponame:Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de La Sabana | es_CO |
| dc.subject.other | Content and language integrated learning | eng |
| dc.subject.other | Assessment | eng |
| dc.subject.other | Learner attitude | eng |
| dc.subject.other | Teacher attitude | eng |
| dc.subject.other | Teacher training | eng |
| dc.title | How Effective is the Assessment Component of a Customized CLIL Program? | en |
| dc.title | ¿Qué tan efectivo es el componente de evaluación de un programa AICLE personalizado? | es_CO |
| dc.title | Quão eficaz é o componente de avaliação de um programa CLIL personalizado? | es_CO |
| dc.type | journal article | es_CO |
| dc.publisher.department | Dirección de Publicaciones | es_CO |
| dc.type.hasVersion | publishedVersion | es_CO |
| dc.rights.accessRights | openAccess | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.5294/laclil.2020.13.2.5 | |
| dcterms.references | AECLIL. (2013). Assessment and evaluation in CLIL. https://aeclil.altervista.org/Sito/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/AECLIL-Assessment-and-evaluation-in-CLIL.pdf | eng |
| dcterms.references | Barbero, T. (2012). Assessment tools and practices in CLIL. In F. Quartapelle (Ed.), Assessment and Evaluation in CLIL (pp. 38–56). European Commission: AECLIL-EACEA. https://aeclil.altervista.org/Sito/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/AECLIL-Assessment-and-evaluation-in-CLIL.pdf | eng |
| dcterms.references | Barrios, E., & Milla-Lara, M. D. (2018). CLIL methodology, materials and resources, and assessment in a monolingual context: An analysis of stakeholders’ perceptions in Andalusia. The Language Learning Journal, 48(1), 60–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2018.1544269 | eng |
| dcterms.references | Coyle, D., Hood, P., & Marsh, D. (2010). CLIL: Content and Language Integrated Learning. Cambridge University Press. | eng |
| dcterms.references | Douglas, D. (2010). Understanding language testing. Hoddler Education. | eng |
| dcterms.references | Inbar-Lourie, O. (2008). Constructing a language assessment knowledge base: A focus on language assessment courses. Language Testing, 25(3), 385–402. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532208090158 | eng |
| dcterms.references | Isik, A. (2003). Is ESP a success in the Turkish EFL context? ITL Review of Applied Linguistics, 141(1), 255–287. https://doi.org/10.2143/ITL.141.0.2003190 | eng |
| dcterms.references | Isik, A. (2008). Linguistic imperialism and foreign language teaching. The Journal of Asia TEFL, 5(1), 123–144. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Ali_Isik6/publication/323958594_Linguistic_Imperialism_and_Foreign_Language_Teaching/links/5ab4afecaca27217100444e1/Linguistic-Imperialism-and-Foreign-Language-Teaching.pdf | eng |
| dcterms.references | Leal, J. P. (2016). Assessment in CLIL: Test development at content and language for teaching natural science in English as a foreign language. Latin American Journal of Content and Language Integrated Learning, 9(2), 293–317. http://dx.doi.org/10.5294/laclil.2016.9.2.3 | eng |
| dcterms.references | LICI. (2009). Language in content instruction. http://lici.utu.fi. | eng |
| dcterms.references | Linfield, K. J., & Posavac, E. J. (2018). Program evaluation: Methods and case studies. Routledge. | eng |
| dcterms.references | Lo, Y. Y., & Fung, D. (2018). Assessments in CLIL: The interplay between cognitive and linguistic demands and their progression in secondary education. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2018.1436519 | eng |
| dcterms.references | Maggi, F. (2012). Evaluation in CLIL. In F. Quartapelle (Ed.), Assessment and Evaluation in CLIL (pp. 57–74). http://aeclil.altervista.org/Sito/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/AECLIL-Assessment-and-evaluation-in-CLIL.pdf | eng |
| dcterms.references | Massler, U. (2010). Assessment in CLIL learning. In S. Ioannou-Georgiou & | eng |
| dcterms.references | P. Pavlou (Eds.), Guidelines for CLIL implementation in primary and pre-primary education (pp. 114–136). Cyprus Pedagogical Institute. | eng |
| dcterms.references | Massler, U., Stotz, D., & Queisser, C. (2014). Assessment instruments for primary CLIL: The conceptualisation and evaluation of test tasks. The Language Learning Journal, 42(2), 137–150. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2014.891371 | eng |
| dcterms.references | Morgan, C. (2006). Appropriate language assessment in content and language integrated learning. Language Learning Journal, 33(1), 59–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571730685200121 | eng |
| dcterms.references | O’Dwyer, F., & De Boer, M. (2015). Approaches to assessment in CLIL classrooms: Two case studies. Language Learning in Higher Education, 5(2), 397–421. https://doi.org/10.1515/cercles-2015-0019 | eng |
| dcterms.references | Otto, A. (2017). Assessment issues in CLIL: What you’ve been wondering but were afraid to ask. Revista de Investigación, (1), 1–13. https://app.rdim.es/archivos/publicacion/303dce018b15282742f1b7545667f026.pdf | eng |
| dcterms.references | Otto, A. (2018). Assessing language in CLIL: A review of the literature towards a functional model. LACLIL, 11(2), 308–325. http://dx.doi.org/10.5294/laclil.2018.11.2.6 | eng |
| dcterms.references | Peña, I. P. (2017). Assessment for learning in primary CLIL classrooms and its co-construction in classroom discourse (Doctoral dissertation). Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/c0b9/660532606c95161d635d2163b22824eb2ea4.pdf | eng |
| dcterms.references | Purpura, J. E. (2016). Second and foreign language assessment. The Modern Language Journal, 100, 191–208. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12308 | eng |
| dcterms.references | Reierstam, H. (2015). Assessing language or content? A comparative study of the assessment practices in three Swedish upper secondary CLIL schools (Licentiate thesis). University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden. https://gupea.ub.gu.se/bitstream/2077/40701/4/gupea_2077_40701_4.pdf | eng |
| dcterms.references | Serragiotto, G. (2007). Assessment and evaluation in CLIL. In D. Marsh & D. Wolff (Eds). Diverse contexts – Converging goals. CLIL in Europe (pp. 271–283). Peter Lang | eng |
| dcterms.references | Short, D. J. (1993). Assessing integrated language and content instruction. TESOL Quarterly, 27(4), 627–656. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587399 | eng |
| dcterms.references | Tedick, D., & Cammarata, L. (2006). Integrated performance assessment: Adapting the model for CBI. Minneapolis: Center for Advanced Research on Language Acquisition (CARLA). https://www.carla.umn.edu/cobaltt/modules/assessment/ipa/index.html | eng |
| dcterms.references | Tsagari, D. (Ed.). (2016). Classroom-based Assessment in L2 Contexts. Cambridge Scholars Publishing. | eng |
| dcterms.references | Tsagari, D., & Vogt, K. (2017). Assessment literacy of foreign language teachers around Europe: Research, challenges and future prospects. Papers in Language Testing and Assessment, 6(1), 41–63. https://arts.unimelb.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0010/2349928/6_1_SI3TsagariVogt.pdf | eng |
| dcterms.references | Vogt, K., & Tsagari, D. (2014). Assessment literacy of foreign language teachers: Findings of a European study. Language Assessment Quarterly, 11(4), 374–402. https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2014.960046 | eng |
| dcterms.references | Wewer, T. (2014). Assessment of young learners’ English proficiency in bilingual content instruction CLIL (Doctoral dissertation). The University of Turku, Turku, Finland. | eng |
| dcterms.references | Xavier, A. (2016). Assessment for learning in EBE/CLIL: A learning-oriented approach to assessing English language skills and curriculum content at early primary level (Doctoral dissertation). Nova University Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal. https://run.unl.pt/bitstream/10362/17973/1/ProjectWork_ELT_AX_OE_FINAL_28_10_2015.pdf | eng |
| dcterms.references | Zafiri, M., & Zouganeli, K. (2017). Toward an understanding of Content and Language Integrated Learning Assessment (CLILA) in primary school classes: A case study. Research Papers in Language Teaching and Learning, 8(1), 88–109. https://rpltl.eap.gr/images/2017/08-01-088-Zafiri-Zouganeli.pdf | eng |
| dcterms.references | Zhetpisbayeva, B. A., Kitibayeva, A. K, Kazimova, D. A., Akbayeva, G. N., & Zatyneiko, M. A. (2018). Assessment issues in Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL). Journal of Advanced Pharmacy Education & Research, 8(4), 32–38. https://japer.in/storage/models/article/JOBbrVa32ILzNvUY8Vj3Ysq9Op4YlJdySeGkY2nS9B04dAgB6Nxw5kO3QsfQ/assessment-issues-in-content-and-language-integrated-learning-clil.pdf | eng |
| dc.identifier.eissn | 2322-9721 |
Ficheros en el ítem
| Ficheros | Tamaño | Formato | Ver |
|---|---|---|---|
|
No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem. |
|||
Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International