Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCantú Quintanilla, Guillermo
dc.contributor.authorVidal Sentíes, Carlos
dc.contributor.authorMarcó Bach, Francisco Javier
dc.contributor.authorCamargo Prieto, Fernando
dc.contributor.authorAguiñaga Chiñas, Nuria
dc.contributor.authorContreras Estrada, Daniela
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-02T14:40:46Z
dc.date.available2021-02-02T14:40:46Z
dc.date.issued2020-11-27
dc.identifier.citationCantú-Quintanilla G, Vidal-Sentíes C, Marcó-Bach FJ, Camargo-Prieto F, Aguiñaga-Chiñas N, Contreras-Estrada D. Estudio comparativo del conocimiento de las técnicas de reproducción asistida en estudiantes de medicina de universidades con diferentes idearios éticos y humanísticos. Pers Bioet. 2020;24(2):166-176. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5294/pebi.2020.24.2.4es_CO
dc.identifier.issn0123-3122
dc.identifier.otherhttps://personaybioetica.unisabana.edu.co/index.php/personaybioetica/article/view/11983
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10818/46628
dc.description11 páginases_CO
dc.description.abstractLa fertilización in vitro (FIV) se sigue presentando como una solución relativamente sencilla para producir un embarazo sin dar a conocer la problemática médica y ética que esta representa. Este proyecto consistió en realizar una encuesta a los estudiantes de tres facultades de Medicina de la Ciudad de México, con diferentes idearios éticos y humanísticos, con el objetivo de evaluar el conocimiento sobre las técnicas de fecundación in vitro y sus implicaciones éticas. Se aplicó una encuesta a 404 alumnos de medicina. Los alumnos de escuelas con ética personalista tuvieron un mayor reconocimiento de los principios bioéticos implicados en el uso de estas técnicas. El conocimiento de la técnica y de las cuestiones éticas implicadas en la reproducción asistida podría mejorar la sensibilidad de los alumnos de medicina ante dilemas éticos que se presenten en su ejercicio profesional.spa
dc.description.abstractIn vitro fertilization (IVF) continues to be presented as a relatively simple solution to produce a pregnancy without exposing the medical and ethical problems that this represents. This project consisted of conducting a survey to medical students from three me-dical schools in Mexico City with different ethical and humanistic ideas with the aim of evaluating knowledge about IVF techniques and their ethical implications.The survey was applied to 404 medical students. Students in schools with personalistic ethics had a greater recognition of the bioethical principles involved in the use of these techniques.Knowledge of the technique and ethical issues involved in assisted reproduction could improve the sensitivity of medical students to ethical dilemmas that arise in their professional practice.eng
dc.description.abstractA fertilização in vitro (FIV) continua sendo apresentada como uma solução relativamente simples para produzir uma gestação sem dar a conhecer a problemática médica e ética que ela representa. Esse projeto consistiu em realizar uma pesquisa com estudantes de três faculdades de Medicina da Cidade do México, com diferentes ideários éticos e humanísticos, com o objetivo de avaliar o con-hecimento sobre as técnicas de fecundação in vitro e suas repercussões éticas. Foi aplicada uma pesquisa a 404 alunos de Medicina. Os alunos de escolas com ética personalista tiveram um maior reconhecimento dos princípios bioéticos implicados no uso dessas técnicas. O conhecimento da técnica e das questões éticas implicadas na reprodução assistida poderia melhorar a sensibilidade dos alunos de Medicina ante dilemas éticos que são apresentados em seu exercício profissional.por
dc.formatapplication/pdfes_CO
dc.language.isospaes_CO
dc.publisherUniversidad de La Sabanaes_CO
dc.relation.ispartofseriesPers Bioet. 2020;24(2):166-176
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.sourceinstname:Universidad de La Sabanaes_CO
dc.sourcereponame:Intellectum Repositorio Universidad de La Sabanaes_CO
dc.subject.otherFertilización in vitrospa
dc.subject.otherBioéticaspa
dc.subject.otherEstudiantes de medicinaspa
dc.subject.otherPersonal de saludspa
dc.subject.otherÉticaspa
dc.titleEstudio comparativo del conocimiento de las técnicas de reproducción asistida en estudiantes de medicina de universidades con diferentes idearios éticos y humanísticoses_CO
dc.title.alternativeComparative study of the knowledge of IVF in medical students of universities with different ethical and humanistic valueses_CO
dc.title.alternativeEstudo comparativo do conhecimento das técnicas de reprodução assistida em estudantes de Medicina de universidades com diferentes ideários éticos e humanísticoses_CO
dc.typearticlees_CO
dc.publisher.departmentDirección de Publicaciones
dc.type.hasVersionpublishedVersiones_CO
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccesses_CO
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.5294/pebi.2020.24.2.4
dcterms.referencesPaulson MD. Pregnancy outcome after assisted reproductive technology. Waltham, MA: UpToDate Inc. Disponible en: https://www.uptodate.com/contents/pregnancy-outcome-after-assisted-reproductive-technologyeng
dcterms.referencesPaulson, MD. In vitro fertilization. UpToDate. Waltham, MA: UpToDate Inc. Disponible en: https://www.uptodate.com/contents/in-vitro-fertilizationeng
dcterms.referencesOmbelet W et al. Infertility and the provision of infertility medical services in developing countries. Hum Reprod Update. 2008;14(6):605-21. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmn042eng
dcterms.referencesBrecina PR, Zhao Y. The ethical, legal and social issues impacted by modern assisted reproductive technologies. Obstet Gynecol Int. 2012:686253. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/686253eng
dcterms.referencesMarcó J. Dilemas pediátricos de la reproducción asistida. En Véliz Pintos RA, editor. Bioética y humanismo para pediatría. México: Graphimedic; 2018. p. 515-25.spa
dcterms.referencesMitsiakos K et al. A case of Adams-Oliver Syndrome following in vitro fertilization. Human Reprod. 2009;24:1529-30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dep096eng
dcterms.referencesHansen M et al. Assisted reproductive technology and birth defects: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2013;19(4):330-53. http://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmt006eng
dcterms.referencesLu Y, Wang N and Jin F. Long-term follow-up of children conceived through assisted reproductive technology. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 2013;14(5):359-371. DOI : http://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.B1200348eng
dcterms.referencesQin J et al. Pregnancy-related complications and adverse pregnancy outcomes in multiple pregnancies resulting from assisted reproductive technology: A meta-analysis of cohort studies. Fertil Steril. 2015;103(6):1492-508. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.03.018eng
dcterms.referencesFortunato A, Tosti E. The impact of in vitro fertilization on health of the children: An update. Eur J Obstet Gynecol. Reprod Biol. 2011;154:125-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2010.10.012eng
dcterms.referencesOdom LN, Segars J. Imprinting disorders and assisted reproductive technology. Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes. 2010;17:517-22. https://doi.org/10.1097/MED.0b013e32834040a3eng
dcterms.referencesGoisis A et al. Medically assisted reproduction and birth outcomes: A within-family analysis using finnish population registers. Lancet. 2019;393(10177):1225-32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31863-4eng
dcterms.referencesNastri CO et al. Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: Pathophysiology, staging, prediction and prevention. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015;45(4):377-93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.14684eng
dcterms.referencesPandey S et al. Obstetric and perinatal outcomes in singleton pregnancies resulting from IVF/ICSI: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2012;18(5):485-503. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dms018eng
dcterms.referencesChen M, Heilbronn LK. The health outcomes of human offspring conceived by assisted reproductive technologies (ART). J Dev Orig Health Dis. 2017;8(4):388-402. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1017/S2040174417000228eng
dcterms.referencesKawwass JF, Badell ML. Maternal and fetal risk associated with assisted reproductive technology. Obstet Gynecol. 2018;132(3):763-72. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000002786eng
dcterms.referencesQin J et al. Assisted reproductive technology and the risk of pregnancy-related complications and adverse pregnancy outcomes in singleton pregnancies: A meta-analysis of cohort studies. Fertil Steril. 2016;105(1):73-85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.09.007eng
dcterms.referencesDyer S et al. International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technologies world report: Assisted Reproductive Technology 2008, 2009 and 2010. Hum Reprod. 2016; 31(7):1588-609. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dew082eng
dcterms.referencesSpar DL. The baby business: How money, science and politics drive the commerce of conception. Boston: Harvard Business School; 2006. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1172/JCI29554eng
dcterms.referencesDavies MJ et al. Reproductive technologies and the risk of birth defects. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(19):1803-13. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMc1206859eng
dcterms.referencesLópez Moratalla N, Huera Zepeda A, Bueno López D. Riesgos para la salud de los nacidos por las técnicas de fecundación asistida. La punta de un iceberg. Rev Cuad Bioét. 2012;XXIII(78). Disponible en: http://aebioetica.org/revistas/2012/23/78/467.pdfspa
dcterms.referencesPérez-Tamayo, R. La ley, la ética médica y los trasplantes. Rev Invest Clin. 2005;57(2):170-6. Disponible en: https://www.medigraphic.com/pdfs/revinvcli/nn-2005/nn052j.pdfspa
dcterms.referencesGarcía JJ. Bioética personalista y bioética principialista. Perspectivas. Cuad Bioét. 2013;24(1):67-76. Disponible en: http://aebioetica.org/revistas/2013/24/80/67.pdfspa
dcterms.referencesGarcía-Sánchez E. ¿Es un acto de amor humano la fecundación in vitro? Una propuesta de análisis ético. Cuad Bioét. 2014;XXV(83):169-83. Disponible en: https://www.bioeticaweb.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/amoryfivet.pdfspa
dcterms.referencesSánchez Ramírez N, Carrillo Bermúdez L, Sanabria Arias AM, & Olivella Mejía L. Reducción embrionaria en embarazo gemelar. Rev Cubana Obstet Gineco. 2019; 45(2). Disponible en: http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0138-600X2019000200015spa


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 InternationalExcept where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International