Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorBernal Pulido, Carlos
dc.date.accessioned2019-12-03T15:33:24Z
dc.date.available2019-12-03T15:33:24Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.citationCarlos Bernal-Pulido, “Fundamentos bíblicos de la separación de poderes y función catalizadora del juez”, en Dikaion 28, 2 (2019), 222-246. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5294/dika.2019.28.2.1es_CO
dc.identifier.issn0120-8942
dc.identifier.otherhttps://dikaion.unisabana.edu.co/index.php/dikaion/article/view/11569
dc.identifier.otherhttps://dikaion.unisabana.edu.co/index.php/dikaion/article/view/11569/5383
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10818/38597
dc.description25 páginases_CO
dc.description.abstractEste artículo sostiene que la Biblia fundamenta el principio de separación de poderes. En efecto, a partir de una reconstrucción conceptual de dicha noción, este trabajo defiende la tesis de que las Escrituras atribuyen a los jueces la función de incentivar a las autoridades políticas a comportarse de forma virtuosa para proteger los derechos e intereses de las personas. Las conclusiones que proporciona este artículo resultan de suma relevancia para sostener una concepción que incentive a los jueces a ejercer una función catalizadora para que las autoridades políticas efectivamente protejan los derechos e intereses de las personas mediante la creación de derecho y la formulación de políticas públicas.es_CO
dc.formatapplication/pdfes_CO
dc.language.isospaes_CO
dc.publisherUniversidad de La Sabanaes_CO
dc.relation.ispartofseriesDikaion 28, 2 (2019), 222-246
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.sourceUniversidad de La Sabanaes_CO
dc.sourceRepositorio Institucional de la Universidad de La Sabanaes_CO
dc.subjectDivisión de podereses_CO
dc.subjectConstitucionalismoes_CO
dc.subjectSupremacía judiciales_CO
dc.subjectFunción judiciales_CO
dc.subjectFundamentos cristianos de la separación de podereses_CO
dc.titleFundamentos bíblicos de la separación de poderes y función catalizadora del juezes_CO
dc.title.alternativeBiblical Foundations for the Separation of Powers and the Catalysing Function of Judgeses_CO
dc.title.alternativeFundamentos bíblicos da separação de poderes e a função catalisadora do juizes_CO
dc.typearticlees_CO
dc.publisher.departmentDirección de Publicaciones
dc.type.hasVersionpublishedVersiones_CO
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccesses_CO
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.5294/dika.2019.28.2.1
dcterms.referencesAlbert, Richard, “Amendment and revision in the unmaking of constitutions”, en David Landau y Hanna Lerner (eds.), Handbook on Comparative Constitution-Making, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar (en prensa), en https://papers. ssrn.com/sol3/papers2.cfm?abstract_id=2841110, fecha de consulta: 12 de marzo de 2018.eng
dcterms.referencesAlbert, Richard, “Constitutional amendment and dismemberment”, Yale Journal of International Law 43 (2018), en https://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/ viewcontent.cgi?article=1685&context=yjileng
dcterms.referencesAlbert, Richard, “Constitutional amendment by constitutional desuetude”, American Journal of Comparative Law 62 (2014), p. 641, en https://lawdigitalcommons.bc.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=https://www.google.com/&httpsre dir=1&article=1757&context=lsfpeng
dcterms.referencesAlexy, Robert, A Theory of Constitutional Rights, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2002.eng
dcterms.referencesArato, Julián, “Treaty interpretation and constitutional transformation: Informal change in international organizations”, Yale Journal of International Law 38 (2013), p. 304, en https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_ id=2142083eng
dcterms.referencesAristóteles, Política, Libro IV, Capítulo 14, en http://classics.mit.edu/Aristotle/ politics.4.four.html, fecha de consulta: 2 de agosto de 2019spa
dcterms.referencesBarak, Aharon, “Unconstitutional constitutional amendments”, Israeli Law Review 44 (2011), pp. 321-341. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021223700018082eng
dcterms.referencesBernal, Carlos, “Informal constitutional change”, American Journal of Comparative Law 62 (2014), p. 495. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5131/AJCL.2014.0017eng
dcterms.referencesBernal, Carlos, “Unconstitutional constitutional amendments in the case study of Colombia: An analysis of the justification and meaning of the constitutional replacement doctrine”, International Journal of Constitutional Law 11 (2) (2013), pp. 339-357. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/mot007eng
dcterms.referencesBilchitz, David y David Landau, “Introduction: The evolution of the separation of powers in the Global South and Global North”, en David Bilchitz y David Landau (eds.), The Evolution of the Separation of Powers. Between the Global North and the Global South, Cheltenham, Elgar, 2018.eng
dcterms.referencesBilchitz, David, Poverty and Fundamental Rights: The Justification and Enforcement of Socio-Economic Rights, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2007.eng
dcterms.referencesCrisafulli, Vezio, “Disposizione (e norma)”, XIII Enciclopedia del Diritto 165 y 203 (1964).ita
dcterms.referencesDixon, Rosalind y David Landau, “Constraining constitutional change”, Wake Forest Law Review 50 (2015), pp. 859-890, en https://ssrn.com/abstract=2624842eng
dcterms.referencesFerraz, Octavio, “Health inequalities, rights and courts: The social impact of the ‘judicialization of health’ in Brazil”, en Alicia E. Yamin y Siri Gloppen (eds.), Litigating Health Rights: Can Courts Bring More Justice to Health?, Cambridge Mass., Harvard University Press, 2011.eng
dcterms.referencesGaroupa, Nuno, “Comparing Judicial Activism – Can we Say that the US Supreme Court is more Activist than the German Constitutional Court”, Revista portuguesa de filosofía 72 (4) (2016), pp. 1089-1105, en https://ssrn.com/ abstract=2887650eng
dcterms.referencesJung, Courtney, Ran Hirschl y Evan Rosevear, “Economic and social rights in national constitutions”, American Journal of Comparative Law 62 (4) (2014), en https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2349680eng
dcterms.referencesKhosla, Madhav, “Constitutional amendment”, en Sujit Choudhry, Madhav Khosla y Pratap Bhanu Mehta, The Oxford Handbook of the Indian Constitution, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2016eng
dcterms.referencesKramer, Larry, The People Themselves: Popular Constitutionalism and Judicial Review, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2004.eng
dcterms.referencesKrishnaswamy, Sudhir, Democracy and Constitutionalism in India: A Study of the Basic Structure Doctrine, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2011eng
dcterms.referencesLandau, David, “Abusive constitutionalism”, University of California Davis Law Review 47 (2013), pp. 189-200, en https://lawreview.law.ucdavis.edu/issues/47/1/articles/47-1_Landau.pdfeng
dcterms.referencesLandau, David, “The importance of constitution-making”, Denver University Law Review 89 (3) (2011-2012), pp. 611-633, en https://ssrn.com/abstract=1950405eng
dcterms.referencesLandau, David, “The reality of social rights enforcement”, Harvard International Law Journal 53 (1) (2012), en https://harvardilj.org/2012/01/issue_53-1_landau/eng
dcterms.referencesLocke, John, Two Treatises of Government, en P. Laslett (ed.), Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1988eng
dcterms.referencesLutz, Donald S., “Toward a theory of constitutional amendment”, American Political Science Review 88 (2) (1994), p. 356. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2944709eng
dcterms.referencesMadison, James, “The Federalist No. XLIII”, en Alexander Hamilton, John Jay y James Madison, Federalist, on the New Constitution, New York, B. Warner, 1817.eng
dcterms.referencesMontesquieu, El espíritu de las leyes, Libro XI, en https://oll.libertyfund.org/titles/montesquieu-complete-works-vol-1-the-spirit-of-laws, fecha de consulta: 2 de agosto de 2019spa
dcterms.referencesNolan, Aoife, “Ireland: The separation of powers doctrine vs. socio-economic rights”, en Malcolm Langford (ed.), Social Rights Jurisprudence: Emerging Trends in International and Comparative Law, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2009.eng
dcterms.referencesPillay, Anashri, “Economic and social rights adjudication: Developing principles of judicial restraint in South African and the United Kingdom”, Public Law 3, (2013).eng
dcterms.referencesRoznai, Yaniv, Unconstitutional Constitutional Amendments. The Limits of Amendment Powers, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2017.eng
dcterms.referencesSchlafty, Phyllis M., The Supremacist: The Tyranny of Judges and Hot to Stop it, Dallas, Spence, 2004.eng
dcterms.referencesSteinberg, Carol, “Can reasonableness protect the poor? A review of South Africa’s socio-economic rights jurisprudence”, South African Law Journal 123 (2006), en https://journals.co.za/content/ju_salj/123/2/EJC53695
dcterms.referencesTushnet, Mark, Weak Courts Strong Rights: Judicial Review and Social Welfare Rights in Comparative Constitutional Law, Princeton, Princeton University Press, 2009, pp. x-xi.eng
dcterms.referencesVersteeg, Mila y Emily Zackin, “Constitutions unentrenched: Towards an alternative theory of constitutional design”, American Political Science Review 110 (2016), p. 657.eng
dcterms.referencesWaldron, Jeremy, “The core of the case against judicial review”, The Yale Law Journal 115 (2006), en https://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/ylj/vol115/iss6/3/eng
dcterms.referencesWaluchow, Wil, “Constitutionalism”, en Edward N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2018, en https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2018/ entries/constitutionalism/, fecha de consulta: 25 de enero de 2019.eng
dcterms.referencesWenzel, James P., Shaun Bowler y David J. Lanoue, “Legislating from the state bench: A comparative analysis of judicial activism”, American Politics Quarterly 25 (1997), pp. 363-379. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X9702500306eng
dcterms.referencesYoung, Katharine, “A typology of economic and social rights adjudication: Exploring the catalytic function of judicial review”, International Journal of Constitutional Law 8 (3) (2010). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/moq029eng
dcterms.referencesYoung, Katharine, Constituting Economic and Social Rights, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2012.eng


Ficheros en el ítem

FicherosTamañoFormatoVer

No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem.

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 InternationalExcepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International